Veiled Justice: Secularism And The Hijab Across Democracies,
2026
Seattle University School of Law
Veiled Justice: Secularism And The Hijab Across Democracies, Mohamed ‘Arafa
Seattle University Law Review
For much of 2022, Iran was gripped by widespread protests led by women who openly challenged the regime’s authority, particularly its compulsory veiling laws, following the death of Mahsa Amini in police custody. Women around the globe came around and showed solidarity with the women in Iran. However, in non-Islamic countries and societies, one can still make out many prejudices and stereotyping connected to the question of whether and to what extent veiling is mandatory for women according to Shārīe’ā law. Is wearing the hijab a choice, or rather, an essential religious practice that religious Muslim women need to obey? …
Rewriting The Playbook: The X’S And O’S Of The House Settlement And The Future Of Student-Athletes’ Voice In Their Compensation,
2026
Seattle University School of Law
Rewriting The Playbook: The X’S And O’S Of The House Settlement And The Future Of Student-Athletes’ Voice In Their Compensation, Matthew K.V. Glazer
Seattle University Law Review
Since the formation of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) in the 1900s, collegiate athletes (student-athletes) have been prohibited from using their own name, image and likeness (NIL) for profit. But on July 1, 2021, the NCAA changed course and began allowing student-athletes to profit from their own NIL. In the past few years, U.S. college athletics have undergone significant changes, most notably introducing monetary compensation for student-athletes’ NIL. While these changes were long overdue and ultimately beneficial, they have significantly disrupted the landscape of college sports, giving rise to numerous challenges that some experts have compared to the “Wild …
Mr. Trump Goes To Washington Part Ii: A Review Of Richard Delgado's 2025,
2026
Seattle University School of Law
Mr. Trump Goes To Washington Part Ii: A Review Of Richard Delgado's 2025, Kevin Johnson
Seattle University Law Review
Richard Delgado’s The Rodrigo Chronicles have captivated a generation of law students and legal scholars. Mapping the terrain of race, racism, and Critical Race Theory (CRT), the skillful, and long-running narrative series stands as a testament to Delgado’s dedication to justice for all.
The Rodrigo Chronicles are simply one of Delgado’s many intellectual contributions and part of an unparalleled scholarly legacy. As one of the founders of CRT, he produced a landmark body of scholarship –authoring the field's primary text, making the argument for the regulation of hate speech, forcefully challenging the Black/white binary of civil rights that long dominated …
Comment On Opm’S Confidential Government Information Nondisclosure Agreement,
2026
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Comment On Opm’S Confidential Government Information Nondisclosure Agreement, Rachel Arnow-Richman, Mark Fenster, Jonathan F. Harris, Margaret B. Kwoka, Orly Lobel
UF Law Faculty Publications
This comment critically responds to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management's (OPM) May 2026 proposal to implement a government-wide nondisclosure agreement (NDA) for federal workers. Drawing from our scholarship on workplace governance, employee mobility, whistleblowing, and information controls, we argue that the OPM’s proposal is inconsistent with growing recognition of the risks associated with broad workplace secrecy agreements. Recent federal and state reforms limiting the use of NDAs recognize that such agreements can deter reporting, suppress information of public concern, and impede litigants and government actors from prosecuting wrongdoing. TThese concerns are especially salient in the context of public employment, …
Christian Lawyers In The Public Interest And Outside The Political Right,
2026
Brigham Young University Law School
Christian Lawyers In The Public Interest And Outside The Political Right, Jennifer Lee Koh
BYU Law Review
This Article provides an empirically based portrait of a population that is typically hidden from the public eye and has received scant attention in legal scholarship: Christian lawyers who engage in public interest work that falls outside the political right. Throughout the legal profession, lawyers who treat their Christian faith as a component of their professional identity and who actively endorse a politically conservative worldview are visible and active. With such lawyers’ increased prominence, growing political polarization, and reports of shifting levels of religiosity in the United States, the prospect of Christianity being perceived as synonymous with political conservatism seems …
Line Warming: Improperly Influencing Voters Or Mitigating The Effects Of Voter Suppression?,
2026
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Line Warming: Improperly Influencing Voters Or Mitigating The Effects Of Voter Suppression?, Elizabeth Ellen Gordon
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Administrative Law Of Mccarthyism,
2026
Texas A&M University School of Law
The Administrative Law Of Mccarthyism, Nicholas Handler
Faculty Scholarship
This Article recovers the largely overlooked legal and administrative history of the federal loyalty-security program, and argues that it played a formative role in the development of modern civil service protections and administrative law. During the McCarthy era, the United States Civil Service Commission (CSC), under pressure from Congress, implemented a sweeping loyalty program aimed at rooting out purportedly disloyal federal employees. Though often remembered as a moment of political overreach and civil liberties violations, this Article shows that the loyalty program simultaneously catalyzed a surprising expansion in procedural rights for government workers—both through internal reforms initiated by the CSC …
Closing Time?,
2026
University of Chicago Law School
Closing Time?, Aziz Z. Huq
Michigan Law Review
A review of No Democracy Lasts Forever: How the Constitution Threatens the United States. By Erwin Chemerinsky.
What Personhood Means,
2026
University of Houston Law Center
What Personhood Means, Laura Portuondo
Michigan Law Review
A review of Personhood: The New Civil War over Reproduction. By Mary Ziegler.
Reflections And Revisionism: Rethinking The U.S. Response To Covid-19,
2026
Northeastern University School of Law
Reflections And Revisionism: Rethinking The U.S. Response To Covid-19, Wendy E. Parmet
Michigan Law Review
A review of In Covid’s Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us. By Stephen Macedo and Frances Lee.
Symposium Introduction,
2026
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Threats And Political Violence,
2026
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Threats And Political Violence, J. Richard Broughton
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Of, By, And For,
2026
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Owning Geothermal Energy,
2026
Texas A&M University School of Law
Owning Geothermal Energy, Gabriel Eckstein
Faculty Scholarship
Geothermal energy holds vast potential for decarbonizing the U.S. energy system, yet the sector remains significantly underdeveloped, supplying only 0.4% of the nation's electricity. A principal barrier to growth is the fragmented and ambiguous legal landscape currently governing ownership of geothermal resources: thirty-three states lack any clear statutory or common-law framework identifying who owns subsurface thermal energy. This Article examines the physical characteristics of geothermal energy, recent developments in the U.S. geothermal sector, and the principal doctrinal approaches that might govern ownership of subsurface heat, including the ad coelum doctrine, common-pool and open-access frameworks, the rule of capture, and public …
President Or King? What The United States Can Learn From Brazil’S Conviction Of Former President Jair Bolsonaro,
2026
Brooklyn Law School
President Or King? What The United States Can Learn From Brazil’S Conviction Of Former President Jair Bolsonaro, Emma Al-Angurli Peltzer
Journal of Law and Policy
In the United States, January 6, 2021, became a defining moment. President Donald Trump’s conduct and the lack of consequences have been indelibly etched into the nation’s political memory. In Brazil, January 8, 2023, marked a similar political rupture, but one that sealed former President Jair Bolsonaro’s fate in a very different legal order. Through a comparison of the Unites States Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. United States and Brazil’s criminal conviction of former President Bolsonaro, this Note demonstrates how two presidential democracies took sharply different paths when confronted with attacks on their constitutional order. Brazil’s 1988 Constitution, shaped …
The Martha Wright-Reed Act: How The Fcc Took One Step Forward For Communication Equality For Deaf Individuals In Correctional Facilities And How It Could Be Expanded,
2026
Seattle University School of Law
The Martha Wright-Reed Act: How The Fcc Took One Step Forward For Communication Equality For Deaf Individuals In Correctional Facilities And How It Could Be Expanded, Ashley Seebold
Seattle University Law Review
For decades, phone companies preyed on incarcerated individuals and their loved ones due to the lack of regulation of jail phone calls.2 In 2021, the average cost of a fifteen-minute jail phone call was about $3.3 In 2022, the average cost rose to $5.74, while some individuals faced an extreme charge of $24.82 for the same amount of time.4 In the early 2000s, consumer advocate and concerned grandmother Martha Wright-Reed called upon the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to fix the imbalance so she could speak to her incarcerated grandson.5 Eventually, in 2023, the FCC answered her call to action and …
Aggregation And The “Universal” Injunction,
2026
Texas A&M University School of Law
Aggregation And The “Universal” Injunction, Portia Pedro, Adam N. Steinman
Faculty Scholarship
In this Essay, we begin with a brief summary of the CASA decision’s holding regarding the availability of “universal” injunctions. Part II discusses the relationship between remedies and judicial review and the important role that such injunctions play in that regard. Part III explores how class actions could serve as an alternative path for federal courts, after engaging in judicial review, to make their decisions meaningful by requiring officials to comply with the law and to cease illegal actions or policies. We also respond to several objections to the use of class actions in this context. The final Part addresses …
The Supreme Court Under Threat: Early Lessons In Judicial Self-Protection,
2026
Duke Law School
The Supreme Court Under Threat: Early Lessons In Judicial Self-Protection, Curtis A. Bradley, Neil S. Siegel
Faculty Scholarship
This Essay explores how the U.S. Supreme Court, despite being vulnerable to defiance of its decisions and political retaliation, has developed tools of judicial self-protection to preserve its institutional authority and thus its capacity to sustain the Constitution and the rule of law. Arguing that the Court performs not only a legal role that requires interpretation of the law but also a political one that demands institutional preservation, the Essay examines how the Court has historically navigated political threats by using a range of tools—including avoidance, delay, narrow rulings, strategic dicta, and rhetorical appeals. The Essay focuses on three nineteenth-century …
Communicative Administration: The Administrative State Beyond Legal Administration,
2026
Texas A&M University School of Law
Communicative Administration: The Administrative State Beyond Legal Administration, Daniel E. Walters
Faculty Scholarship
On many dimensions, the administrative state is at the nadir of its power. The Supreme Court has tightened administrative law controls on agency power, and the Trump Administration has stormed the bureaucracy in an unprecedented blitz designed to kneecap agency capacity and independence. For better or worse, many agencies and their civil servants are being sidelined as meaningful actors in the administration of government. Yet this familiar account doesn’t tell the entire story. At the same time that agencies are being stripped of the power to implement law—what this Article calls “legal administration”— they are steadily accumulating extensive and largely …
Making The Party Presentation Principle Safe For Originalism,
2026
Texas A&M University School of Law
Making The Party Presentation Principle Safe For Originalism, Randy E. Barnett, Lawrence B. Solum
Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court sometimes adheres to what it calls the “party presentation principle”—terminology that dates back to 2008. Although judicial articulations of the principle have been inconsistent and imprecise, the gist is the familiar notion that courts should resolve cases on the basis of the issues and reasons presented by the parties to the dispute. Conversely, questions not properly raised by the parties should be avoided by the Court. Thus, the Court has on several occasions declined to address arguments outside the scope of the questions raised by the parties in their petition for certiorari.
For originalists, the importance of …
