Value: A Menu Of Questions,
2011
Columbia Law School
Value: A Menu Of Questions, Joseph Raz
Faculty Scholarship
The paper considers some questions arising out of reflection on Finnis's writings about value, exemplifying them by consideration of the putative value of knowledge. They include the role of harmony, and of self-evidence, in identifying or constituting values, and the ways in which values can provide reasons.
Tangled Up In Law: The Jurisprudence Of Bob Dylan,
2011
New York Law School
Tangled Up In Law: The Jurisprudence Of Bob Dylan, Michael L. Perlin
Articles & Chapters
A a careful examination of Bob Dylan’s lyrics reveals a writer - a scholar - with a well-developed jurisprudence, ranging over a broad array of topics that relate to civil and criminal law, public and private law. His lyrics reflect the work of a thinker who takes “the law” seriously in multiple iterations - the role of lawyers, the role of judges, the disparities between the ways the law treats the rich and the poor, the inequality of the criminal and civil justice systems, the corruption of government, the police, and the judiciary, and more. In this paper, I seek …
The Limited Case For Permitting Sme Procurement Preferences In The Wto Agreement On Government Procurement,
2011
Touro Law Center
The Limited Case For Permitting Sme Procurement Preferences In The Wto Agreement On Government Procurement, John Linarelli
Scholarly Works
This is a chapter in the book, Sue Arrowsmith & Robert D. Anderson, The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform (Cambridge University Press, 2011). The chapter puts under scrutiny public procurement policies designed to benefit SMEs per se, as small or medium sized enterprises, and to evaluate whether the GPA (and hence possibly other trade agreements liberalizing procurement markets) should be more accommodating to these policies, even though these policies might restrict international trade. The chapter also evaluates whether the GPA should be more accommodating to policies designed to benefit firms controlled by individuals who belong to historically …
Attachments And Associated Reasons,
2011
Columbia Law School
Attachments And Associated Reasons, Joseph Raz
Faculty Scholarship
The paper will unfold in 5 parts dealing with five questions: first, does the partiality of attachments present an obstacle to their being or giving practical reasons? Second, given a value-based approach to practical reasons, can universal values generate reasons that are specific to their subjects, reasons – say – towards my friends that only I have? Third, do attachments affect what we do independently of any reasons that they provide? Fourth, in what ways do attachments constitute or provide normative reasons, and briefly, how do attachment-related reasons relate to other practical reasons? Finally, I turn to the question of …
On Equality: The Anti-Interference Principle,
2011
Chapman University School of Law
On Equality: The Anti-Interference Principle, Donald J. Kochan
University of Richmond Law Review
This essay seeks to summarize the general equality concept and proposes that equality requires that the government engage in anti-interference with individual choices and activities, so long as these things create no negative externalities for others. If we are serious about respecting equality, such interference actions should be avoided. Adopting an "anti-interference principle" is a necessary foundation for achieving the goal of true equality. The primary point is that equality matters. The purpose of this essay is not to survey the vast political, jurisprudential, and academic debate on equality, but instead, to take a broad look at the philosophical concept …
Modal Retributivism: A Theory Of Sanctions For Attempts And Other Criminal Wrongs,
2011
Wayne State University Law School
Modal Retributivism: A Theory Of Sanctions For Attempts And Other Criminal Wrongs, Anthony M. Dillof
University of Richmond Law Review
Rather than building the case for modal retributivism from the ground up, this article takes the existing components of retributive thought and reassembles them into a sounder structure. The cogency of the argument against harm-based retributivism andthe appeal of modal retributivism will likely be strongest forthose who allow reason, as opposed to intuition, a leading role in resolving moral issues.
Beyond Formalist Sovereignty: Who Can Represent "We The People Of The United States" Today?,
2011
New York Law School
Beyond Formalist Sovereignty: Who Can Represent "We The People Of The United States" Today?, David Chang
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reasonable Pluralism And International Law,
2011
Touro Law Center
Reasonable Pluralism And International Law, John Linarelli
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
December 30, 2010: What Does “One Nation Under God” In The Pledge Of Allegiance Mean?,
2010
Duquesne University
December 30, 2010: What Does “One Nation Under God” In The Pledge Of Allegiance Mean?, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “What Does “one Nation under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance Mean?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
December 28, 2010: Natural Goodness,
2010
Duquesne University
December 28, 2010: Natural Goodness, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Natural Goodness“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
December 24, 2010: Merry Christmas Season,
2010
Duquesne University
December 24, 2010: Merry Christmas Season, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Merry Christmas Season“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
December 23, 2010: The Repeal Of Don’T Ask Don’T Tell,
2010
Duquesne University
December 23, 2010: The Repeal Of Don’T Ask Don’T Tell, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “The Repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
December 19, 2010: Why Does The Government Celebrate Christmas?,
2010
Duquesne University
December 19, 2010: Why Does The Government Celebrate Christmas?, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Why Does the Government Celebrate Christmas?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
December 14, 2010: A Fundamental Rights Decision Masquerading As A Commerce Decision,
2010
Duquesne University
December 14, 2010: A Fundamental Rights Decision Masquerading As A Commerce Decision, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “A Fundamental Rights Decision Masquerading as a Commerce Decision“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
December 11, 2010: Hallowed Secularism And The Tea Party,
2010
Duquesne University
December 11, 2010: Hallowed Secularism And The Tea Party, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Hallowed Secularism and the Tea Party“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
December 8, 2010: Uphold Proposition 8,
2010
Duquesne University
December 8, 2010: Uphold Proposition 8, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Uphold Proposition 8“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
December 5, 2010: Seeking Common Ground: A Secular Statement,
2010
Duquesne University
December 5, 2010: Seeking Common Ground: A Secular Statement, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Seeking Common Ground: A Secular Statement“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
Separation Of Law And State,
2010
Tel Aviv University Law School
Separation Of Law And State, Talia Fisher
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
In the framework of the jurisprudential literature, the law-state bond is assumed as a given. Points of dispute emerge only at more advanced stages of the discussion, with respect to such questions as the duty to obey state law or the appropriate extent of state intervention in social relations. This Article will be devoted to a reconsideration of the presupposition of the law-state link and to challenging the state's status vis-à-vis the law-both in its role as the producer of legal norms and its capacity as the arbiter of disputes.
The Article opens with a comparative elucidation of the Hobbesian …
November 30,2010: There Is No G-O-D In America,
2010
Duquesne University
November 30,2010: There Is No G-O-D In America, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “There is no G-o-d in America“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
November 25, 2010: Happy Thanksgiving,
2010
Duquesne University
November 25, 2010: Happy Thanksgiving, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Happy Thanksgiving“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
