Neither Sad Nor Strange: Recovering The Logic Of Anticruelty Organizations In Gilded Age America,
2013
University of Michigan Law School
Neither Sad Nor Strange: Recovering The Logic Of Anticruelty Organizations In Gilded Age America, Bryn Resser Pallesen
Michigan Law Review
In 1877, the American Humane Association ("AHA") incorporated as one of the first national organizations dedicated to the protection of animals. Nine years later, it amended its constitution to include the protection of children in its chartered mission. By 1908, there were 354 anticruelty organizations in the United States, 185 of which were, like the AHA, humane societies invested in the welfare of both animals and children (pp. 2-3). As primary source documents reveal, Gilded Age humanitarians viewed the joint pursuit of child and animal protection as entirely sensible (p. 5). One of the Illinois Humane Society's founding directors, for …
2013 Massachusetts Family Impact Seminar: Youth At Risk, Part 2,
2013
Clark University
2013 Massachusetts Family Impact Seminar: Youth At Risk, Part 2, Denise A. Hines, Fern L. Johnson, Donna Haig Friedman, Deborah A. Frank
Mosakowski Institute for Public Enterprise
The youth of Massachusetts are of primary concern to legislators and citizens. This briefing report features three essays by experts — Fern Johnson, Deborah Frank, and Donna Haig Friedman — who focus on three aspects of children in need: children in foster care who need adoption, children who are hungry, and children who are homeless. Each report has further and more detailed suggestions for helping these children in need; below is a summary of the problems we face.
Protecting Children? The Evolution Of The First Amendment: A Historical Timeline Of Children And Their Access To Pornography And Violence,
2013
Pace University School of Law
Protecting Children? The Evolution Of The First Amendment: A Historical Timeline Of Children And Their Access To Pornography And Violence, Nicole Digiose
Pace Law Review
This paper will explore the evolving relationship between children and their access to potentially harmful materials. The timeline will start at Part II.A with the landmark decision of Prince v. Massachusetts, a 1940’s case, wherein children were afforded the most constitutional protection. In Part II.B, this paper will evaluate another landmark decision: Ginsberg v. New York. In this 1968 case, the Supreme Court declared that children shall not have access to harmful, pornographic materials. By the 1990s, there appeared to be a notable shift in how the Supreme Court decided cases pertaining to children and their access to …
To Prevent And To Protect: The Reporting Of Child Abuse By Educators,
2013
Brigham Young University Law School
To Prevent And To Protect: The Reporting Of Child Abuse By Educators, Jon M. Hogelin
Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Pulling Back The Curtains: Undetected Child Abuse And The Need For Increased Regulation Of Home Schools In Missouri,
2013
Brigham Young University Law School
Pulling Back The Curtains: Undetected Child Abuse And The Need For Increased Regulation Of Home Schools In Missouri, Tyler Barnett
Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Dismantling The United Front In Child Abuse Cases: Reevaluating Delaware’S Serious Injury Statute After Fifteen Years Of Asfa,
2013
Washington and Lee University School of Law
Dismantling The United Front In Child Abuse Cases: Reevaluating Delaware’S Serious Injury Statute After Fifteen Years Of Asfa, Eliza M. Hirst, Harper S. Seldin
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Symposium: Child Witness In Sexual Abuse Cases,
2013
Roger Williams University
Symposium: Child Witness In Sexual Abuse Cases, Roger Williams University School Of Law
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.
Beyond Kent And Gault: Consensual Searches And Juveniles,
2013
Pepperdine University
Beyond Kent And Gault: Consensual Searches And Juveniles, Larry T. Pleiss
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
So You're Going To Represent A Juvenile!,
2013
Pepperdine University
So You're Going To Represent A Juvenile!, John R. Heilman
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sex Differences In Delinquency: An Analysis Of Juvenile Court Statistics, 1970-76,
2013
Pepperdine University
Sex Differences In Delinquency: An Analysis Of Juvenile Court Statistics, 1970-76, Darrell J. Steffensmeier, John H. Kramer
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Standard Should Be Used To Determine A Valid Juvenile Waiver?,
2013
Pepperdine University
What Standard Should Be Used To Determine A Valid Juvenile Waiver?, Martin Levy, Stephen Skacevic
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recidivism And Juvenile Offenders: The Role Of The Counselor,
2013
Pepperdine University
Recidivism And Juvenile Offenders: The Role Of The Counselor, William C. Gordon
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Juvenile Justice And The Equal Protection Clause: First Class, Tourist, Or Luxury Coach,
2013
Pepperdine University
Juvenile Justice And The Equal Protection Clause: First Class, Tourist, Or Luxury Coach, James M. Mcgoldrick
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Take My Child, Please - A Plea For Radical Nonintervention,
2013
Pepperdine University
Take My Child, Please - A Plea For Radical Nonintervention, William M. Marticorena
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The California Youth Authority: Planning For A Better Tomorrow,
2013
Pepperdine University
The California Youth Authority: Planning For A Better Tomorrow, Pearl S. West
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Statement Of William S. White,
2013
Pepperdine University
Statement Of William S. White, William S. White
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Compendium Of Major California Juvenile Law Decisions With Brief Analyses, 1979,
2013
Pepperdine University
A Compendium Of Major California Juvenile Law Decisions With Brief Analyses, 1979, Michael T. Lubinski, Robert M. Triplett
Pepperdine Law Review
Society has been plagued with the problem of whether the police, the courts and the correction agencies are to administer juveniles for their protection and treatment, or for their punishment. To facilitate a better understanding of juvenile administration the authors have analyzed the California juvenile law cases for the year 1979. The article consists of six major area of interest; parent-child custody, sentencing, procedure, jurisdiction, evidentiary and constitutional which will be used to highlight some of the more significant decisions in the past year, thus enabling the reader to assess changes occurring in the juvenile system.
Where For Art Thou Danforth: Bellotti V. Baird ,
2013
Pepperdine University
Where For Art Thou Danforth: Bellotti V. Baird , David C. Boatwright
Pepperdine Law Review
The author's focus is upon a Supreme Court opinion dealing with the constitutional parameters of a minor's right to make an independent decision with respect to abortion. The majority, in an attempt to balance the often conflicting interests of the minor, the minor's parents, and the state, sets forth the minimum requirements with which parental consent statutes must comply. The author emphasizes the significance of the high court's plurality split regarding this issue, and cautions the practitioner as to the possibility of inconsistent rulings on such statutes in the future.
Fare V. Michael C.: Juveniles And In Custodial Interrogations ,
2013
Pepperdine University
Fare V. Michael C.: Juveniles And In Custodial Interrogations , Gregory S. Chudacoff
Pepperdine Law Review
In the principal case, Fare v. Michael C., the United States Supreme Court rejects the position of the Supreme Court of California that a juvenile's request for the presence of his probation officer constitutes an invocation of the juvenile's right to remain silent within the meaning of the Miranda decision. The author examines the rationale applied by each court enroute to this split of opinion, and suggests a middle ground which would accommodate the concerns of both courts with respect to the protection of an accused juvenile at the custodial interrogation stage.
Status Offenders Should Be Removed From The Juvenile Court ,
2013
Pepperdine University
Status Offenders Should Be Removed From The Juvenile Court , Luke Quinn, Peter M. Hutchison
Pepperdine Law Review
Inadequate financial resources and overcrowded juvenile placement facilities have frequently been cited as grounds for the abrogation of the juvenile court's practice of retaining jurisdiction over status offenders. In this article, Judge Quinn suggests the existence of even more compelling reasons which support diversion of status offenders to programs better suited to their particular needs. The author contends that the juvenile court's jurisdiction should be confined to matters of fact-finding and adjudication, rather than intruding into areas within the domain of the parents, and into areas in which the court lacks the necessary expertise. It is argued that diversion of …
