Sentenced To Child Welfare: How States Seeking Placement And Services For Justice-Involved Youth Fail To Protect The Rights Of Parents And Create "Reverse" Crossover Youth,
2020
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Sentenced To Child Welfare: How States Seeking Placement And Services For Justice-Involved Youth Fail To Protect The Rights Of Parents And Create "Reverse" Crossover Youth, Christina Cullen
Children's Legal Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Increasingly Covert And Invasive Surveillance Of Students And Its Visible Role In The Student-To-Prison Pipeline,
2020
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
The Increasingly Covert And Invasive Surveillance Of Students And Its Visible Role In The Student-To-Prison Pipeline, Andy Froelich
Children's Legal Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
A Child's Right To A Name: An Emphasis On The Iranian Legal System,
2020
University of Tehran
A Child's Right To A Name: An Emphasis On The Iranian Legal System, Abbas Mirshekari, Alireza Fattahi Ketilate
Children's Legal Rights Journal
This article provides an interpretation of the Iranian legal system in which individuals are free to choose their own name, unless the choice of a particular name is prohibited by law, depending on a concrete and reasonable justification. Accordingly, both the right of children to have a name and the right of parents to freely choose a name for their children will be explored. A parent's right to name can also be framed as an example of parental rights to their children; albeit a parent's right to name is constitutionally restricted by a principle prohibiting abuse of the right. In …
Early State And Federal Responses To Coronavirus-Related School Closures,
2020
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Early State And Federal Responses To Coronavirus-Related School Closures, Jim Alrutz
Children's Legal Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Broken Promises On Education And Illinois' Formula For Rectifying The Issue,
2020
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Broken Promises On Education And Illinois' Formula For Rectifying The Issue, Diana Arroyo
Children's Legal Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
A Constitutional Right To An Education: Revisited,
2020
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
A Constitutional Right To An Education: Revisited, Andy Froelich
Children's Legal Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Twice Exceptional Students Need Twice The Programming,
2020
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Twice Exceptional Students Need Twice The Programming, Rebecca Jacobs
Children's Legal Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Marriage Story: Ensuring The Interests Of The Child Are Represented In Domestic Relations Cases,
2020
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Marriage Story: Ensuring The Interests Of The Child Are Represented In Domestic Relations Cases, Meghan Kasner
Children's Legal Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Child Labor Laws In India And The Need For Change,
2020
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Child Labor Laws In India And The Need For Change, Alexandra Spognardi
Children's Legal Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Duquesne University
How Long Is Too Long? - Why A Method Proposed By A Panel Of The United States Court Of Appeals For The Third Circuit For Determining The Constitutionality Of De Facto Life Without Parole Imposed Upon Juvenile Offenders Was Grounded In Logic But Missed The Mark, Dominic A. Carrola
Duquesne Law Review
No abstract provided.
Resentencing Juveniles: States’ Implementation Of Miller And Montgomery Through Resentencing Hearings, 53 Uic J. Marshall L. Rev. 311 (2020),
2020
UIC School of Law
Resentencing Juveniles: States’ Implementation Of Miller And Montgomery Through Resentencing Hearings, 53 Uic J. Marshall L. Rev. 311 (2020), Emily Komp
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Internet Never Forgets: A Federal Solution To The Dissemination Of Nonconsensual Pornography,
2020
Seattle University School of Law
The Internet Never Forgets: A Federal Solution To The Dissemination Of Nonconsensual Pornography, Alexis Santiago
Seattle University Law Review
As technology evolves, new outlets for interpersonal conflict and crime evolve with it. The law is notorious for its inability to keep pace with this evolution. This Comment focuses on one area that the law urgently needs to regulate—the dissemination of “revenge porn,” otherwise known as nonconsensual pornography. Currently, no federal law exists in the U.S. that criminalizes the dissemination of nonconsensual pornography. Most U.S. states have criminalized the offense, but with vastly different degrees of severity, resulting in legal inconsistencies and jurisdictional conflicts. This Comment proposes a federal solution to the dissemination of nonconsensual pornography that carefully balances the …
Mandatory, Fast, And Fair: Case Outcomes And Procedural Justice In A Family Drug Court,
2020
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Mandatory, Fast, And Fair: Case Outcomes And Procedural Justice In A Family Drug Court, Melanie Fessinger, Katherine Hazen, Jamie Bahm, Jennie Cole-Mossman, Roger Heideman, Eve Brank
Center on Children, Families, and the Law: Faculty Publications
Objectives: Problem-solving courts are traditionally voluntary in nature to promote procedural justice and to advance therapeutic jurisprudence. The Family Treatment Drug Court (FTDC) in Lancaster County, Nebraska, is a mandatory dependency court for families with allegations of child abuse or neglect related to substance use. We conducted a program evaluation examining parents’ case outcomes and perceptions of procedural justice to examine whether a mandatory problem-solving court could replicate the positive outcomes of problem-solving courts. Methods: We employed a quasi-experimental design that compared FTDC parents to traditional dependency court parents (control parents). We examined court records to gather court orders, compliance …
Invisible Article Iii Delinquency: History, Mystery, And Concerns About "Federal Juvenile Courts",
2020
University of the District of Columbia
Invisible Article Iii Delinquency: History, Mystery, And Concerns About "Federal Juvenile Courts", Mae C. Quinn, Levi T. Bradford
Journal Articles
This essay is the second in a two-part series focused on our nation’s invisible juvenile justice system—one that operates under the legal radar as part of the U.S. Constitution’s Article III federal district court system. The first publication, Article III Adultification of Kids: History, Mystery, and Troubling Implications of Federal Youth Transfers, examined the little-known practice of prosecuting children as adults in federal courts. This paper will look at the related phenomenon of juvenile delinquency matters that are filed and pursued in our nation’s federal court system. To date, most scholarship evaluating youth prosecution has focused on our country’s juvenile …
A Class Action Lawsuit For The Right To A Minimum Education In Detroit,
2020
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
A Class Action Lawsuit For The Right To A Minimum Education In Detroit, Carter G. Phillips
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
No abstract provided.
Making A Reasonable Calculation: A Strategic Amendment To The Idea,
2020
University of Michigan Law School
Making A Reasonable Calculation: A Strategic Amendment To The Idea, Hetali M. Lodaya
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) lays out a powerful set of protections and procedural safeguards for students with disabilities in public schools. Nevertheless, there is a persistent debate as to how far schools must go to fulfill their mandate under the IDEA. The Supreme Court recently addressed this question with its decision in Endrew F. v. Douglas Cty. School District Re-1, holding that an educational program for a student with a disability must be “reasonably calculated” to enable a child’s progress in light of their circumstances. Currently, the Act’s statutory language mandates Individual Education Program (IEP) teams …
Eighteen Is Not A Magic Number: Why The Eighth Amendment Requires Protection For Youth Aged Eighteen To Twenty-Five,
2020
University of Michigan Law School
Eighteen Is Not A Magic Number: Why The Eighth Amendment Requires Protection For Youth Aged Eighteen To Twenty-Five, Tirza A. Mullin
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The Eighth Amendment protects a criminal defendant’s right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. This Note argues that any punishment of eighteen- to twenty-five-year-olds is cruel and unusual without considering their youthfulness at every stage of the criminal process, and that it is unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment for these youths to be automatically treated as fully-developed adults. This Note will explore in depth how juveniles differ from adults, both socially and scientifically, and how the criminal justice system fails every youth aged eighteen- to twenty-five by subjecting them to criminal, rather than juvenile, court without considering their …
A Dangerous Inheritance: A Child’S Digital Identity,
2020
Seattle University School of Law
A Dangerous Inheritance: A Child’S Digital Identity, Kate Hamming
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment begins with one family’s story of its experience with social media that many others can relate to in today’s ever-growing world of technology and the Internet. Technology has made it possible for a person’s online presence to grow exponentially through continuous sharing by other Internet users. This ability to communicate and share information amongst family, friends, and strangers all over the world, while beneficial in some regard, comes with its privacy downfalls. The risks to privacy are elevated when children’s information is being revealed, which often stems from a child’s own parents conduct online. Parents all over the …
Table Of Contents,
2020
Seattle University School of Law
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Children’S Equality Rights: Every Child’S Right To Develop To Their Full Capacity,
2020
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Children’S Equality Rights: Every Child’S Right To Develop To Their Full Capacity, Nancy E. Dowd
UF Law Faculty Publications
Children are born equal. Yet as early as eighteen months, hierarchies emerge among children. These hierarchies are not random but fall into patterns by race, gender and class. They are not caused nor voluntarily chosen by children or their parents. The hierarchies grow, persist, and are made worse by systems and policies created by the state, perpetuating the position of the privileged and continuing the disadvantage of the subordinated. Children’s equal right to develop to their capacity is severely undermined by policies and structures that hamper and block the development of some by creating barriers and challenges or failing to …
