Jurisprudence Commons^™

رقابة المحكمة الدستورية العليا الفلسطينية على الأنظمة - دراسة مقارنة

UAEU Law Journal

Abstract

This study aims to identify the role of the Palestinian Supreme Constitutional Court in overseeing the constitutionality of regulations, in accordance with the provisions of the amended Basic Law of 2003, which established it as a guardian of its provisions. The court enjoys several powers, including the observance of the constitutionality of laws and regulations, and it falls outside the hierarchical structure of the regular courts. Despite the issuance of the Court Law No. (3) of 2006, its work was not activated until 2016, and that was done under Presidential Decree No. (57) of 2016, which appointed its members. …

نظام الرجوع عن القرارات والأحكام القضائية في دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة

UAEU Law Journal

Abstract

The legislator in the United Arab Emirates has approved ways to appeal against judicial decisions and rulings, among them some are ordinary ways of appeal, which are represented by the way of appeal in the UAE civil judiciary, through which the principle of two-tier litigation is realized, and some are unusual ways of appeal represented in the petition for reconsideration and cassation. And, by Federal Decree-Law No. 15 of 2021, a system was created for reversing civil judicial decisions and judgments.

The UAE legislator, in the text of Article 187 bis, under which the system of reversal is introduced, …

آثار نزع الملكية للمنفعة العامة على حقّ الملكية الخاصة في النظام السعودي

UAEU Law Journal

Abstract

The decisions of private property expropriation for the public interest, issued by administrative authorities, are among the most important practical applications, that clarify the nature of the relationship between administrative authorities and individuals, as the principle of public benefit is used as a justification for the expropriation of private property against the will of the individual. The aim of this study is to investigate the legality of decisions to expropriate private property for the public interest. Such decisions are closely related to a basic human right (the right of ownership), which necessitates examining the meaning of public interest, and …

مستقبل التدخل القضائي في مرحلة التنفيذ العقابي: رؤية جديدة في ضوء نصوص الدستور المصري الصادر سنة 2014م (دراسة تحليلية استشرافية)

UAEU Law Journal

Abstract

The shift toward reformative goal of punishment has played a prominent role in expanding the circle of judicial intervention during the enforcement phase, to insure that the imposed penalty fulfills its role in reforming the person subjected to it. Before the establishment of this reform objective, there was no room for talking about an influential role of the judiciary in the stage of penal enforcement. The serious discussion of this role did not begin until the reformative goal of punishment was established.

The phase of penal enforcement, was a completely forgotten stage for the Egyptian constitutional legislator, and did …

نظام الرجوع عن القرارات والأحكام الباتّة في دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة دراسة تحليلية

UAEU Law Journal

Abstract

This study examines the conditions for accepting the retraction of irrevocable decisions and judgments issued by the Courts of Cassation in the United Arab Emirates. As a rule, Courts of Cassation represent the final stage of adjudicating a case, and their judgments are considered final, meaning they cannot be annulled, as they are deemed the embodiment of truth, whether issued correctly or erroneously. However, since judges are human and prone to error, the Emirati legislator saw fit to ease the rigidity of the principle of the finality of judgments and to prioritize justice. Thus, a reversal system was introduced …

حدود سلطة رئيس الجمهورية في تعديل الدستور في ظل الدستور السوري لعام 2012م

UAEU Law Journal

Abstract

The Syrian constitution of 2012, like many contemporary constitutions, grants the head of state significant powers in the process of constitutional amendment. In this research, we have attempted to present a viewpoint that explains and demonstrates the limits of the President of the Republic’s authority and the role he can play within the framework of constitutional amendment process, whether in terms of the powers he holds under article 150 of the Constitution which governs the procedures, or in terms of the absolute powers he possesses, under his exceptional and referendum-based authority pursuant to Articles 114 and 116 of the …

Legal Summaries Of Administrative Law Cases, Kimberly M. Papadantonakis

Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary

No abstract provided.

The Opioid Litigation’S Challenge For Tort Theory, Alexander B. Lemann

Brooklyn Law Review

Tort litigation related to the opioid crisis has spanned several decades and led to tens of billions of dollars in liability. While several important opioid cases remain pending in various stages of litigation, it is now possible to sketch a basic outline of the results: individual plaintiffs sued opioid manufacturers on a variety of theories, seeking redress for the harms resulting from their addictions. They all lost. Following a pattern established by the tobacco litigation thirty years earlier, public plaintiffs, including city, county, and tribal governments, then filed their own suits, principally on public nuisance theories. These cases were much …

Children And Chairs, Artifacts And Reality, Adam J. Macleod

Catholic University Law Review

Where do children come from? The source of childhood—either nature or political will—is a matter not merely of chronology but of authority. Whoever makes children gets to define childhood. Legal childhood is one type of legal personhood. Legal personhood matters because legal persons bear legal rights and duties. Rights and duties direct how we act toward each other. Thus, our ideas about how persons come to be, who counts as a person, and how persons are defined in law determine in large part how we act toward persons, both other persons and ourselves.

A legal person is an artifact of …

The Real Impact Of General Deterrence: Empirical Insights From The Robbery Data Of Three American Cities, Andrew W. Eichner

Catholic University Law Review

General deterrence theory relies on the critical assumption that prospective offenders will be deterred from committing crimes when they are aware of the apprehension and punishment of others. This idea has been reiterated across thousands of years of Western political thought and has significant implications in modern American criminal sentencing, though it has not been historically subjected to rigorous testing. The recent availability of voluminous crime data permits a deeper examination of the real impact of sentencings on crime trends and allows the opportunity for previously impossible analyses regarding the efficacy of general deterrence.

To examine whether there is evidence …

Pragmatics And Textualism, Lawrence B. Solum

Journal of Law and Policy

In theoretical linguistics the word “pragmatics” refers to the roles of context and communicative intentions in the production of meaning. Those roles include contextual disambiguation and the communication of implicit content via what is called “pragmatic enrichment.” Textualism is sometimes characterized as the view that the meaning of statutory texts should not take context into account, but that characterization is incorrect. Not only do self-identified textualists explicitly maintain that context should be considered when interpreting statutes—all good textualists must do so. Absent consideration of context, the meaning of statutory texts would be pervasively ambiguous, sparse, and incomplete. Good textualism requires …

The Deterrence Dilemma: Is It Time For Canada To Abandon General Deterrence As A Sentencing Objective?, Caitlin Salvino

Dalhousie Law Journal

When Canada first codified its sentencing framework in the Criminal Code, Parliament included deterrence as a sentencing objective. The sentencing objective of deterrence encompasses two aspects: specific deterrence for the individual offender and general deterrence for other potential offenders. I engage with the concept of general deterrence and its incorporation into Canadian sentencing law throughout this article. I argue that Parliament should abandon general deterrence as a sentencing objective under the Criminal Code. After reviewing the jurisprudence on general deterrence and conducting a systematic review of its current application in Ontario sentencing decisions, I argue that general deterrence should be …

Maine's Judicial Machinery At The Crossroads, Armand A. Dufresne Jr.

Maine Law Review

There is really no such thing as "a court"; in modem society, at least, there is only something which may be called a court system. Even that designation, however, may be a misnomer; a court system is really no more than a group of people, judges, clerks, lawyers, bailiffs, and so forth, tied together by certain functional arrangements. Even the finest institutional organization for a court system will produce delay and injustice if it is not staffed by competent people. Conversely, the most competent and dedicated people cannot produce satisfactory results from an institutional arrangement which does not permit them …

Washington State Bar Licensure Task Force Subcommittee On Ethics/Character Fitness Report And Recommendations, Brent Williams-Ruth

Seattle University Law Review Online

The Washington State Bar Licensure Task Force’s Subcommittee on Ethics/Character and Fitness (the Subcommittee) was created at the behest of Brent Williams-Ruth, the representative selected by the President of the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA or the Bar) to represent the Board of Governors on the Bar Licensure Task Force. His interest in modifying the Character and Fitness process took root after meeting Tarra Simmons during her experience with the Character and Fitness Board. After the WSBA Character and Fitness Board recommended that Simmons’s application to sit for the bar exam be denied, the Washington Supreme Court reversed that recommendation …

No Lawyer, No Jail: A Critical Case Study Of Pragmatism And The Flaws Of “Purposeful” Decision Making In Argersinger V. Hamlin, Alisa Smith, Sarah K. Stice

Seattle University Law Review

By releasing conference notes and internal communications, Supreme Court Justices provide insight into the otherwise private decisionmaking process, shedding light on how case outcomes and legal reasoning are framed and negotiated. The watershed case of Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972) extended the constitutional right to counsel to some, but not all, misdemeanor defendants. The case was argued twice, and the Court relied on empirical and authoritative sources to answer complex and practical questions about requiring counsel. This case study employs critical discourse analysis to uncover what influenced the Justices’ decisions and how they framed, shaped, and constructed social realities to foreground …

When You’Re Arrested For A Felony In Seattle, You’Ll Meet Me., Austin Field

Seattle University Law Review

In this Essay, Austin Field, a practicing public defender, uses a first-person perspective to describe what it is like to meet a criminal defendant for the first time. He explains the process from start to finish, detailing everything from the way he introduces himself to how bail works.

"I’ll ask you for your name. Most of the time, you tell me. I check your name against my list. On any given day I’m supposed to interview between five and fifteen people. I have a lot of questions for you. We only have about ten minutes."

Modern Day Colonialism Through HawaiʻI’S Quiet Title And Partition Laws, Cheyann Fujii

Seattle University Law Review

This Note will attempt to highlight important aspects of Hawaiian history to provide readers with a clear picture on how Native Hawaiians are still impacted by colonialism, specifically when plaintiffs bring a quiet title or partition action against Native Hawaiian owners of kuleana lands. Before colonization, the concept of private land ownership did not exist in Hawai‘i, and Native Hawaiians adopted a feudal system by dividing land into geographical areas. Missionaries and businessmen brought Western ideas to Hawai‘i and influenced legislation such as the Great Māhele and the Kuleana Land Act of 1850, which solidified the concept of private property. …

Data Advantage And Merger Review: Can Entrenchment Theory Reform Antitrust Enforcement?, Shin-Ru Cheng

Seattle University Law Review

A merger involving giant digital companies is likely to dampen competition, as it allows those companies to combine and control data access, enabling them to entrench their dominant positions in relevant markets and extend those positions into related markets. While competition law in many jurisdictions aims to prohibit mergers that may substantially lessen competition or create a monopoly, arguably the review of digital mergers is failing because antitrust agencies lack an effective approach to identify data-generated anticompetitive harms. This Article demonstrates that entrenchment theory, recently reintroduced in the 2023 U.S. Merger Guidelines, would help reform the process of antitrust enforcement. …

Defining Deference: Impacts Of Abandoning Chevron On Emerging Technology Governance And Administrative Law, R. Aubrey Davis Iii

Seattle University Law Review

Emerging technologies, particularly Artificial Intelligence (AI), often lead to unforeseen legal outcomes. Notable abuses in areas such as facial recognition, employment bias, and housing discrimination are well known. However, legislative responses to these issues either have been largely reactive or there has been no legislative response at all. In lieu of legislation, agencies have sought to fill the gap. For example, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently proposed a rule mandating voter notification for all AI-generated political phone calls citing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) of 1991 as authority. However, the TCPA was originally passed to curtail telemarketing, not …

Intellectual Property Or Modern Folklore? The Problem With Open Gaming Licenses In Tabletop Gaming, Rosie Midget

Seattle University Law Review

This Note addresses how courts and legislatures should address “Open Gaming Licenses” commonly attached to tabletop roleplaying games (TTRPGs), which game publishers use to promote a false image of accessibility—misleading consumers and building goodwill from the misunderstanding. Part I discusses what TTRPGs are, including the defining features of the hobby and culture surrounding it, as well as the unique interplay between publishers and players. Part II explores the question of which elements in a TTRPG system may be subject to copyright protection. Part III examines these elements in practice using Wizards of the Coast’s Dungeons and Dragons TTRPG as a …