Constitutional Uopianism: An Exercise In Law And Literature,
2016
University of the Pacific
Constitutional Uopianism: An Exercise In Law And Literature, Susan N. Herman
University of the Pacific Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rules, Standards, Sentencing, And The Nature Of Law,
2016
Georgia State University College of Law
Rules, Standards, Sentencing, And The Nature Of Law, Russell D. Covey
Faculty Publications By Year
Sentencing law and practice in the United States can be characterized as an argument about rules and standards. Whereas in the decades prior to the 1980s when sentencing was largely a discretionary activity governed only by broad sentencing standards, a sentencing reform movement in the 1980s transformed sentencing practice through the advent of sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum provisions. As a result, sentencing became far less standard-like and far more rule-like. Although reform proponents believed that this "rulification" of sentencing would reduce unwarranted sentencing disparities and enhance justice, it is far from clear that these goals were achieved. Indeed, the …
Poverty In The Human Rights Jurisprudence Of The Nigerian Appellate Courts (1999-2011),
2016
Osgoode Hall Law School of York University
Poverty In The Human Rights Jurisprudence Of The Nigerian Appellate Courts (1999-2011), Obiora C. Okafor, Basil E. Ugochukwu
Articles & Book Chapters
The major objective of this article is to examine the extent to which the human rights jurisprudence of the Nigerian appellate courts has been sensitive and/or receptive to the socio-economic and political claims of Nigeria’s large population of the poor and marginalized. In particular, the article considers: the extent to which Nigerian human rights jurisprudence has either facilitated or hindered the efforts of the poor to ameliorate their own poverty; the kinds of conceptual apparatuses and analyses utilized by the Nigerian courts in examining the issues brought before it that concerned the specific conditions of the poor; and the key …
A Referee Without A Whistle: Magistrate Judges And Discovery Sanctions In The Seventh Circuit,
2016
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
A Referee Without A Whistle: Magistrate Judges And Discovery Sanctions In The Seventh Circuit, Landyn Wm. Rookard
Indiana Law Journal
This Note ultimately argues that, if the Seventh Circuit is not willing to reverse its holdings in Alpern v. Lieb and Retired Chicago Police Ass'n v. City of Chicago in light of recent developments, Congress should again clarify its intent. In the face of the crushing "costs of discovery [that] threaten to exceed the amount at issue in all but the largest cases," it is the Seventh Circuit's responsibility to employ all just and legal devices to comply with Congress's mandate "to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding."
Justice Scalia, The 2016 Presidential Election, And The Future Of Church-State Relations,
2016
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Justice Scalia, The 2016 Presidential Election, And The Future Of Church-State Relations, Marci A. Hamilton
Articles
No abstract provided.
Causation, Legal History, And Legal Doctrine,
2016
University of Virginia
Causation, Legal History, And Legal Doctrine, Charles Barzun
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
On Absences As Material For Intellectual Historical Study,
2016
University at Buffalo School of Law
On Absences As Material For Intellectual Historical Study, John Henry Schlegel
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Declaration Of Independence And Constitutional Interpretation,
2016
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
The Declaration Of Independence And Constitutional Interpretation, Alexander Tsesis
Faculty Publications & Other Works
This Article argues that the Reconstruction Amendments incorporated the human dignity values of the Declaration of Independence. The original Constitution contained clauses, which protected the institution of slavery, that were irreconcilable with the normative commitments the nation had undertaken at independence. The Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments set the country aright by formally incorporating the Declaration of Independence's principles for representative governance into the Constitution.
The Declaration of Independence provides valuable insights into matters of human dignity, privacy, and self-government. Its statements about human rights, equality, and popular sovereignty establish a foundational rule of interpretation. While the Supreme Court has …
The Declaration Of Independence As Introduction To The Constitution,
2016
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
The Declaration Of Independence As Introduction To The Constitution, Alexander Tsesis
Faculty Publications & Other Works
No abstract provided.
Hearsay Evidence: Legal Discourse, Circumstantiality, And The Woman In White,
2016
Pepperdine University
Hearsay Evidence: Legal Discourse, Circumstantiality, And The Woman In White, Matthew Finley
Global Tides
In Wilkie Collins’s The Woman in White, Walter Hartright begins the narrative by stating that, because “the Law is still … the pre-engaged servant of the long purse,” he has arranged the novel to reveal the truth (5). The author, then, puts the law on trial by engaging the interplay between legal questions of witness credibility and testimonial evidence and their impact on social factors such as class and gender. The law’s emphasis on externality leads the system to privilege the snakelike Fosco over the heroic Walter, Laura, and Marian, signaling the courts' capital offence. Although the novel is …
The Rise Of The Unilateral Executive,
2016
Pepperdine University
The Rise Of The Unilateral Executive, Anna Kitsmarishvili
Global Tides
This paper addresses the impact of executive order issuance on the separation of powers among the executive and legislative branches—particularly in the realm of foreign affairs. It concludes that judicial vagueness and avoidance regarding presidential directives has resulted in increased Executive authority. The aggrandizement of presidential powers in foreign affairs is revealed through examples from both the Bush and the Obama Administrations. By reviewing landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases, such as United States v. Curtiss-Wright Corp. (1936) and Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952), the paper examines the traditional framework of the Court regarding presidential direct action and …
Ethical Limitations On The State's Use Of Arational Persuasion,
2016
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Ethical Limitations On The State's Use Of Arational Persuasion, Nadia N. Sawicki
Faculty Publications & Other Works
Policymakers frequently use arational appeals – such as those relying on emotion, cognitive biases, and subliminal messaging – to persuade citizens to adopt behaviors that support public goals. However, these communication tactics have been widely criticized for relying on arational triggers, rather than reasoned argument. This Article develops a fuller account of the non-consequentialist objections to arational persuasion by state actors, as well as the arguments in favor of such tactics, that have been presented by scholars of rhetoric, political theory, and cognitive science. The Article concludes by proposing ethically justifiable limitations on state communications that should be compelling to …
Just Listening: The Equal Hearing Principle And The Moral Life Of Judges,
2016
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Just Listening: The Equal Hearing Principle And The Moral Life Of Judges, Barry Sullivan
Faculty Publications & Other Works
No abstract provided.
Transgressions Of A Timid Judiciary: Our Highest Court's Refusal To Overturn Abood V. Board Of Education—Harris V. Quinn,
2016
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Transgressions Of A Timid Judiciary: Our Highest Court's Refusal To Overturn Abood V. Board Of Education—Harris V. Quinn, Joe E. Ling
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Rule Of Unanimity's Circuit Splitting Effect: The Problem With Consent—Griffioen V. Cedar Rapids & Iowa City Railway Co.,
2016
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
The Rule Of Unanimity's Circuit Splitting Effect: The Problem With Consent—Griffioen V. Cedar Rapids & Iowa City Railway Co., Aaron P. Meland
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nonmoral Theoretical Disagreement In Law,
2016
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Nonmoral Theoretical Disagreement In Law, Alani Golanski
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Model Or Anti-Model? U.S. Regulatory Takings Doctrine In Foreign Jurisdictions,
2016
Environmental Working Group
Model Or Anti-Model? U.S. Regulatory Takings Doctrine In Foreign Jurisdictions, Melanie Benesh
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
Canada and Australia have taken a different approach to regulatory takings than Peru, despite some similarities among the countries. Like Peru, Canada and Australia both have IIAs with the United States. Like Peru, both have also addressed regulatory takings issues in their domestic jurisprudence since signing those IIAs. And like Peru, both Canada and Australia have looked to U.S. regulatory takings doctrine while developing their own domestic jurisprudence. However, unlike Peru, Canada and Australia have both ultimately decided that the U.S. regulatory takings doctrine would not be viable in their constitutional and political systems. They view U.S. regulatory takings doctrine …
Mr. Peabody's Improbable Legal Intellectual History,
2016
Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Mr. Peabody's Improbable Legal Intellectual History, Mark Fenster
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Writing The Social History Of Legal Doctrine,
2016
University of Virginia
Writing The Social History Of Legal Doctrine, Cynthia Nicoletti
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
James Wilson In The State House Yard: Ratifying The Structures Of Popular Sovereignty,
2016
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
James Wilson In The State House Yard: Ratifying The Structures Of Popular Sovereignty, Ian C. Bartrum
Scholarly Works
There is an excellent (and rapidly growing) literature examining the influence of James Wilson's Scottish philosophical education on his later political ideas. In this Article, Professor Ian Bartrum makes two contributions to that scholarship. First, he reexamines several of the most important Scottish moral sentimentalists with a particular focus on the specific ontological and epistemological accounts that influenced Wilson. Second, he dissolves the seeming contradictions in Wilson's political thought by showing that, while he understood that representative bodies were essential to legitimate government, he nonetheless distrusted these institutions because they work to obscure, or even subvert, their members' individual experience …
