Argument Analysis: On First Day Of New Term, Supreme Court Seems Skeptical Of Texas’ Arguments In Interstate Water Dispute With New Mexico,
2020
University of New Mexico - School of Law
Argument Analysis: On First Day Of New Term, Supreme Court Seems Skeptical Of Texas’ Arguments In Interstate Water Dispute With New Mexico, Reed D. Benson
Faculty Scholarship
Find out more information regarding Texas v. New Mexico at SCOTUSblog.
Read more about Professor Reed Benson's involvement on the UNM Law News Page.
Dirty Johns: Prosecuting Prostituted Women In Pennsylvania And The Need For Reform,
2020
Penn State Dickinson Law
Dirty Johns: Prosecuting Prostituted Women In Pennsylvania And The Need For Reform, Mckay Lewis
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Prostitution is as old as human civilization itself. Throughout history, public attitudes toward prostituted women have varied greatly. But adverse consequences of the practice—usually imposed by men purchasing sexual services—have continuously been present. Prostituted women have regularly been subject to violence, discrimination, and indifference from their clients, the general public, and even law enforcement and judicial officers.
Jurisdictions can choose to adopt one of three general approaches to prostitution regulation: (1) criminalization; (2) legalization/ decriminalization; or (3) a hybrid approach known as the Nordic Model. Criminalization regimes are regularly associated with disparate treatment between prostituted women and their clients, high …
Poland’S Challenge To Eu Directive 2019/790: Standing Up To The Destruction Of European Freedom Of Expression,
2020
Penn State Dickinson Law
Poland’S Challenge To Eu Directive 2019/790: Standing Up To The Destruction Of European Freedom Of Expression, Michaela Cloutier
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
In 2019, the European Parliament and Council passed Directive 2019/790. The Directive’s passage marked the end of a fouryear- long legislative attempt to impose more liability for copyright violations on Online Service Providers, an effort which was controversial from the start. Online Service Providers fear that the 2019 Directive, especially its Article 17, will completely change the structure of liability on the Internet, forcing providers to adopt expensive content filtering systems. Free speech advocates fear that ineffective filtering technology will infringe upon Internet users’ rights to express themselves, and legal scholars have pointed out the Directive’s inconsistency with prior European …
A False Sense Of Security: How Congress And The Sec Are Dropping The Ball On Cryptocurrency,
2020
Penn State Dickinson Law
A False Sense Of Security: How Congress And The Sec Are Dropping The Ball On Cryptocurrency, Tessa E. Shurr
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Today, companies use blockchain technology and digital assets for a variety of purposes. This Comment analyzes the digital token. If the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) views a digital token as a security, then the issuer of the digital token must comply with the registration and extensive disclosure requirements of federal securities laws.
To determine whether a digital asset is a security, the SEC relies on the test that the Supreme Court established in SEC v. W.J. Howey Co. Rather than enforcing a statute or agency rule, the SEC enforces securities laws by applying the Howey test on a fact-intensive …
Antitrust Changeup: How A Single Antitrust Reform Could Be A Home Run For Minor League Baseball Players,
2020
Penn State Dickinson Law
Antitrust Changeup: How A Single Antitrust Reform Could Be A Home Run For Minor League Baseball Players, Jeremy Ulm
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
In 1890, Congress passed the Sherman Antitrust Act to protect competition in the marketplace. Federal antitrust law has developed to prevent businesses from exerting unfair power on their employees and customers. Specifically, the Sherman Act prevents competitors from reaching unreasonable agreements amongst themselves and from monopolizing markets. However, not all industries have these protections.
Historically, federal antitrust law has not governed the “Business of Baseball.” The Supreme Court had the opportunity to apply antitrust law to baseball in Federal Baseball Club, Incorporated v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs; however, the Court held that the Business of Baseball was not …
Case Preview: In Newest Chapter In Long-Running Water Dispute, Court Will Hear First-Ever Challenge To Ruling By Interstate River Master,
2020
University of New Mexico - School of Law
Case Preview: In Newest Chapter In Long-Running Water Dispute, Court Will Hear First-Ever Challenge To Ruling By Interstate River Master, Reed D. Benson
Faculty Scholarship
Find out more information regarding Texas v. New Mexico at SCOTUSblog.
Read more about Professor Reed Benson's involvement on the UNM Law News Page.
Table Of Contents,
2020
Seattle University School of Law
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Class Actions, Jurisdiction, And Principle In Doctrinal Design,
2020
Brigham Young University Law School
Class Actions, Jurisdiction, And Principle In Doctrinal Design, David Marcus, Will Ostrander
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
A State Is A “They,” Not An “It”: Intrastate Conflicts In Multistate Challenges To The Affordable Care Act,
2020
Brigham Young University Law School
A State Is A “They,” Not An “It”: Intrastate Conflicts In Multistate Challenges To The Affordable Care Act, Anthony Johnstone
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The (Surprisingly) Prevalent Role Of States In An Era Of Federalized Class Actions,
2020
Brigham Young University Law School
The (Surprisingly) Prevalent Role Of States In An Era Of Federalized Class Actions, Linda S. Mullenix
BYU Law Review
In enacting the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), Congress intended to expand access to the federal courts for interstate class actions by creating minimal diversity and removal jurisdiction. In Section 2 of the Act, “Findings and Purposes,” Congress stated that class action abuses undermined “the concept of diversity jurisdiction as intended by the Framers of the United States Constitution” in that state courts kept cases of national importance out of federal court and sometimes demonstrated bias against out-of-state defendants. Congress stated that a purpose of CAFA was to “restore the intent of the framers of the United States …
Applying International Law Solutions To The Xinjiang Crisis,
2020
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
Applying International Law Solutions To The Xinjiang Crisis, Preston Jordan Lim
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The California Coastal Commission’S Efforts To Provide Affordable Overnight Accommodations By Preempting Cities’ Constitutional Police Power,
2020
Brigham Young University Law School
The California Coastal Commission’S Efforts To Provide Affordable Overnight Accommodations By Preempting Cities’ Constitutional Police Power, Taylor Smith
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Case For Preempting State Money Transmission Laws For Crypto-Based Businesses,
2020
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
The Case For Preempting State Money Transmission Laws For Crypto-Based Businesses, Carol R. Goforth
Arkansas Law Review
Few industries are evolving as rapidly or as dramatically as those involving payment systems. The recent advent and spread of cryptocurrencies and associated trading platforms and exchanges, as well as ongoing improvements and innovations in FinTech generally, ensure that this is going to continue for the foreseeable future. Along with this rapid change has come a dynamic increase in the number and range of payment startups, a development that has been recognized as likely to redound to the benefit of consumers and the broader economy. The problem is simply that regulation is not keeping up with innovation.
Immunity From Suit For International Organizations: The Judiciary's New Que Of Separating Lawsuit Sheep From Lawsuit Goats,
2020
Penn State Law
Immunity From Suit For International Organizations: The Judiciary's New Que Of Separating Lawsuit Sheep From Lawsuit Goats, Ylli Dautaj
Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies
I. Introduction
II. Immunity from Suit in Public International Law
(A) Sovereign Immunity
(i) Sources of Sovereign Immunity
(ii) Legal Theory on Sovereign Immunity
(iii) Doctrinal Evolution of Sovereign Immunity
(B) Jurisdictional Immunity for International Organizations
(C) Sovereign Immunity and Immunity for International Organizations
Domestically
III. Jam v. Int'l Finance Corporation:
A New Dawn for International Organizations in the United States
(A) Jam v. Int'l Finance Corporation: Majority View
(B) Jam v. Int'l Finance Corporation: Dissenting Opinion by Justice Breyer
IV. The Exception that Proves but does not Swallow the rule on Virtually
Absolute Immunity: Criticism of the Majority in …
Passport To Plastics: Cosmetic Surgery Tourism, Medical Malpractice, And The Automatic Establishment Of Personal Jurisdiction By Way Of The Joint Commission International,
2020
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Passport To Plastics: Cosmetic Surgery Tourism, Medical Malpractice, And The Automatic Establishment Of Personal Jurisdiction By Way Of The Joint Commission International, Elizabeth Astrup
Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies
For centuries, tourists have visited lands near and far in search of experiences unavailable in their home countries. From golfing the best courses in the world, to yoga retreats in remote locations, many tourist activities provide experiential opportunities along with health and wellness benefits. Currently, an increasing number of individuals are opting to cross international borders to receive medical treatments, often at reduced costs. While many scholars use the term health tourism to encompass all health and wellness travel purposes, this note uses the term medical tourism to distinguish tourism for the specific purpose of medical treatments or procedures. Medical …
Redeeming Globalization Through Unfair Competition Law,
2020
Michigan State University College of Law
Redeeming Globalization Through Unfair Competition Law, Sean A. Pager, Eric Priest
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Claim Preclusion And The Problem Of Fictional Consent,
2020
University of Georgia School of Law
Claim Preclusion And The Problem Of Fictional Consent, Lindsey D. Simon
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Regulating Jurisdiction Collisions In International Law: The Case Of The European Court Of Justice's Exclusive Jurisdiction In Law Of The Sea Disputes,
2020
University of Michigan Law School
Regulating Jurisdiction Collisions In International Law: The Case Of The European Court Of Justice's Exclusive Jurisdiction In Law Of The Sea Disputes, Darío Maestro
Michigan Journal of International Law
To maximize their chances of receiving a favorable disposition, claimants often aspire to bring complex disputes to more than one international court. However, doing so may bring their claims under the jurisdiction of more than one branch of international law simultaneously, creating what this note calls a jurisdiction collision. This practice poses a challenge to the cohesion of international adjudication as competing international tribunals, relying on differing precedents, may give differing interpretations to the same rule.
Concentrating on the classical roots of international law and its changing significance over time and within different contexts, this note considers the benefits …
Fight Or Flight: The Ninth Circuit's Advancement Of Textualism During An Era Of Intentionalism In United States V. Lozoya,
2020
Pepperdine University
Fight Or Flight: The Ninth Circuit's Advancement Of Textualism During An Era Of Intentionalism In United States V. Lozoya, Zachary Remijas
Pepperdine Law Review
The modern complexities of global interaction and accessibility have recently forced some federal courts to reconsider standards for determining proper venue for criminal defendants who commit offenses while engaged in transportation, particularly those involving interstate commerce and crimes spanning multiple districts. These courts’ application of two adversarial schools of statutory interpretation—textualism and intentionalism—has driven conflict between textualist jurisdictions adhering to the plain meaning of established constitutional and statutory sources, and intentionalist jurisdictions refraining from the “creeping absurdity” of establishing venue for certain in-transit offenses under the literal meaning of such provisions. This Note endorses the sensibility and superiority of the …
Cybersecurity-Cybercrime-The Legal Environment,
2020
CUNY Hostos Community College
Cybersecurity-Cybercrime-The Legal Environment, Amy J. Ramson
Open Educational Resources
This presentation covers the legal environment of cybercrime to date. It addresses: the challenges of law enforcement; federal government vs. sate jurisdiction of cybercrime; law enforcement department and agencies which handle cybercrime; criminal statutes and privacy statutes.
