Here There Be Dragons: The Likely Interaction Of Judges With The Artificial Intelligence Ecosystem,
2020
William & Mary Law School
Here There Be Dragons: The Likely Interaction Of Judges With The Artificial Intelligence Ecosystem, Fredric I. Lederer
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Better By The Dozen: Bringing Back The Twelve-Person Civil Jury,
2020
University of Oklahoma Norman Campus
Better By The Dozen: Bringing Back The Twelve-Person Civil Jury, Steven Gensler, Lee Rosenthal, Patrick Higginbotham
Other Faculty Publications
A jury of 12 resonates through the centuries. Twelve-person juries were a fixture from at least the 14th century until the 1970s. Over 600 years of history is a powerful endorsement. So too are the many social-science studies consistently showing that a 12-person jury makes for a better deliberative process, with more predictable (and fewer outlier) results, by a more diverse group that is a more representative cross-section of the community. And yet, most federal judges today routinely seat civil juries without the full complement of 12 members. Why? Because in 1973 the United States Supreme Court said it was …
Can The International Criminal Court Succeed? An Analysis Of The Empirical Evidence Of Violence Prevention,
2020
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School
Can The International Criminal Court Succeed? An Analysis Of The Empirical Evidence Of Violence Prevention, Stuart Ford
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review
Despite significant optimism about the future of the International Criminal Court (“ICC”) during its early years, recently there has been growing criticism of it by both scholars and governments. As a result, there appears to be more doubt about the ICC’s ability to succeed now than at any other point in its history. So, are the critics correct? Is the ICC failing? No. This Article argues that, not only can the ICC succeed, there is strong evidence that it is already succeeding. It analyzes several recent empirical articles that have convincingly demonstrated that the ICC prevents serious violations of international …
Experiments With Suppression: The Evolution Of Repressive Legality In Britain In The Revolutionary Period,
2020
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School
Experiments With Suppression: The Evolution Of Repressive Legality In Britain In The Revolutionary Period, Christopher M. Roberts
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review
This article is concerned with the structure of repressive governance, and how it has evolved historically. It examines this theme through an exploration of the manner which repressive laws and institutions evolved in Britain over the course of the late eighteenth century. In particular, it reviews the various measures that British authorities utilized and relied upon in order to confront a growing wave of calls for social and political reforms. These included a policy of aggressive prosecutions of dissidents; the creation of new institutions such as the Home Office designed to enhance the powers of the central authorities; extralegal measures …
Committing To Justice: The Case For Impact Of Race And Culture Assessments In Sentencing African Canadian Offenders,
2020
Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University
Committing To Justice: The Case For Impact Of Race And Culture Assessments In Sentencing African Canadian Offenders, Maria C. Dugas
Dalhousie Law Journal
Canadian judges have made notable, although too limited, strides to recognize the unique conditions of Black Canadians in sentencing processes and decisionmaking. The use of Impact of Race and Culture Assessments in sentencing people of African descent has gradually gained popularity since they were first introduced in R v “X.” These reports provide the court with the necessary information about the effect of systemic anti-Black racism on people of African descent and how the experience of racism has informed the circumstances of the offence, the offender, and how it might inform the offender’s experience of the carceral state. This paper …
Judging Judicial Appointment Procedures,
2020
Vanderbilt University Law School
Judging Judicial Appointment Procedures, S. I. Strong
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Over the last several years, judicial appointment procedures in the United States have become increasingly intractable. Members of both parties are seen to engage in political gamesmanship, calling the legitimacy of the appointment process into question and decreasing public confidence in both the legislature and the judiciary. Questions are even beginning to arise about whether and to what extent the United States is complying with the rule of law.
Although numerous solutions have been proposed, one alternative has not yet been considered: international law. As paradoxical as it may seem, the best and perhaps only feasible solution to quintessentially domestic …
Standing, Still? The Evolution Of The Doctrine Of Standing In The American And Israeli Judiciaries: A Comparative Perspective,
2020
Vanderbilt University Law School
Standing, Still? The Evolution Of The Doctrine Of Standing In The American And Israeli Judiciaries: A Comparative Perspective, Joshua Hoyt
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
The doctrine of standing plays an important role in limiting the classes of cases or controversies that are appropriate for judicial resolution; considered with other justiciability doctrines, judicial standing necessarily reflects the broader role of the court in society. Though the American judiciary had rather generous standing policies in place at the time of the founding, with the rise of the administrative state in the aftermath of the New Deal, progressive justices saw fit to restrict judicial standing as a means of insulating regulatory programs from industry challenge. In contradistinction, the young Israeli society has some of the most accessible …
Table Of Contents,
2020
UC Law SF
Employment Law: Sexual Harassment Law After The Norm Cascade,
2020
UC Law SF
Employment Law: Sexual Harassment Law After The Norm Cascade, Joan C. Williams, Jodi Short
The Judges' Book
No abstract provided.
Notable Faculty Publications In 2019,
2020
UC Law SF
Civil Procedure: Plaintiff Personal Jurisdiction And Venue Transfer,
2020
UC Law SF
Civil Procedure: Plaintiff Personal Jurisdiction And Venue Transfer, Scott Dodson
The Judges' Book
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law: Symmetric Constitutionalism,
2020
UC Law SF
Constitutional Law: Symmetric Constitutionalism, Zachary S. Price
The Judges' Book
No abstract provided.
Copyright Law: Statutory Damages In The Digital Age Of Copyright Law,
2020
UC Law SF
Copyright Law: Statutory Damages In The Digital Age Of Copyright Law, Ben Depoorter
The Judges' Book
No abstract provided.
Foreword,
2020
UC Law SF
Civil Procedure: Beyond Bias In Diversity Jurisdiction,
2020
UC Law SF
Civil Procedure: Beyond Bias In Diversity Jurisdiction, Scott Dodson
The Judges' Book
No abstract provided.
International Law: Immunities Of Foreign Officials From Civil Jurisdiction,
2020
UC Law SF
International Law: Immunities Of Foreign Officials From Civil Jurisdiction, Chimene I. Keitner
The Judges' Book
No abstract provided.
Health Law: Why Anti-Vaccine Claims About Nvicp Cases Are Wrong,
2020
UC Law SF
Health Law: Why Anti-Vaccine Claims About Nvicp Cases Are Wrong, Dorit Reiss
The Judges' Book
No abstract provided.
Tort Law: Liability For Anti-Vaccine Misinformation,
2020
UC Law SF
Tort Law: Liability For Anti-Vaccine Misinformation, Dorit Reiss, John Diamond
The Judges' Book
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law: Should The Power Of Presidential Pardon Be Revised?,
2020
UC Law SF
Constitutional Law: Should The Power Of Presidential Pardon Be Revised?, David L. Levine
The Judges' Book
No abstract provided.
Introduction,
2020
UC Law SF
