Monopoly Or Monopolization––A Reply To Professor Rostow,
2020
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Monopoly Or Monopolization––A Reply To Professor Rostow, Edward R. Johnston, John Paul Stevens
Northwestern University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Screened Out Of Housing: The Impact Of Misleading Tenant Screening Reports And The Potential For Criminal Expungement As A Model For Effectively Sealing Evictions,
2020
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Screened Out Of Housing: The Impact Of Misleading Tenant Screening Reports And The Potential For Criminal Expungement As A Model For Effectively Sealing Evictions, Katelyn Polk
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
Having an eviction record “blacklists” tenants from finding future housing. Even renters with mere eviction filings—not eviction orders—on their records face the harsh collateral consequences of eviction. This Note argues that eviction records should be sealed at filing and only released into the public record if a landlord prevails in court. Juvenile record expungement mechanisms in Illinois serve as a model for one way to protect people with eviction records. Recent updates to the Illinois juvenile expungement process provided for the automatic expungement of certain records and strengthened the confidentiality protections of juvenile records. Illinois protects juvenile records because it …
A Political Effect On Judicial Decision Making: Does Ideology Or Election Effect The Way Judges Decide?,
2020
Bemidji State University
A Political Effect On Judicial Decision Making: Does Ideology Or Election Effect The Way Judges Decide?, Kaylynne Lyons
Political Science Theses and Capstones
Politics have shown to have a strong effect on most things in our country. There has been lots of research on our state judicial systems and their effects on judicial decisions. Judges have been accused of having underlying reasons to their decisions even though they are not supposed to. Past research has suggested that how the judge is retained has a small but relevant effect on judicial decision making. The literature review discusses effects of the state's system of judicial selection. That leads us to question more about political effects on decision making. I analyze how the ideology of a …
Reflections On The Effects Of Federalism On Opioid Policy,
2020
Emory University School of Law
Reflections On The Effects Of Federalism On Opioid Policy, Matthew B. Lawrence
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
No abstract provided.
The Opioid Litigation: The Fda Is Mia,
2020
NYU School of Law
The Opioid Litigation: The Fda Is Mia, Catherine M. Sharkey
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
It is readily agreed that federal preemption of state tort law alters the balance between federal and state power. Federal preemption is a high-profile defense in almost all modern products liability cases. It is thus surprising to see how little attention has been given to federal preemption by courts and commentators in the opioid litigation. Opioid litigation provides a lens through which I explore the role of state and federal courts and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in striking the right balance of power. My purpose here is not to resolve the divide among the few courts that have …
Clark Memorandum: Spring 2020,
2020
Brigham Young University Law School
Clark Memorandum: Spring 2020, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Byu Law School Alumni Association, J. Reuben Clark Law Society
The Clark Memorandum
- Of Rights and Responsibilities: The Social Ecosystem of Religious Freedom
- I am the Woman Who Can
- Flashes of Light: Thoughts on Circumstantial Evidence
- Capital Markets and Human Flourishing
Read on Issuu
Statistical Precedent: Allocating Judicial Attention,
2020
Vanderbilt University Law School
Statistical Precedent: Allocating Judicial Attention, Ryan W. Copus
Vanderbilt Law Review
The U.S. Courts of Appeals were once admired for their wealth of judicial attention and for their generosity in distributing it. At least by legend, almost all cases were afforded what William Richman and William Reynolds have termed the “Learned Hand Treatment.” Guided by Judge Learned Hand’s commandment that “[t]hou shalt not ration justice,” a panel of three judges would read the briefs, hear oral argument, deliberate at length, and prepare multiple drafts of an opinion. Once finished, the judges would publish their opinion, binding themselves and their colleagues in accordance with the common-law tradition. The final opinion would be …
Price-Fixing In The Motion Picture Industry,
2020
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Price-Fixing In The Motion Picture Industry, John Paul Stevens
Northwestern University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law Library Blog (April 2020): Legal Beagle's Blog Archive,
2020
Roger Williams University
Law Library Blog (April 2020): Legal Beagle's Blog Archive, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Law Library Newsletters/Blog
No abstract provided.
The Cradle Of The Countermajoritarian Diffifficulty,
2020
Chapman University
The Cradle Of The Countermajoritarian Diffifficulty, John W. Compton
Political Science Faculty Articles and Research
Part of book review symposium responses to Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present. By Keith E. Whittington (University Press of Kansas, 2019). In
"The Function Of The Independent Lawyer As A Guardian Of Our Freedom": The Great Stevens Dissent In Walters,
2020
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
"The Function Of The Independent Lawyer As A Guardian Of Our Freedom": The Great Stevens Dissent In Walters, Andrew Koppelman
Northwestern University Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Memoriam,
2020
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
A Personal History Of The Law Review,
2020
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
A Personal History Of The Law Review, John Paul Stevens
Northwestern University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Paradox Of Justice John Paul Stevens,
2020
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
The Paradox Of Justice John Paul Stevens, Sonja R. West, Dahlia Lithwick
Northwestern University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sixty-Five Oral Arguments Were Not Enough: A Tribute To Justice Stevens From Across The Bench,
2020
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Sixty-Five Oral Arguments Were Not Enough: A Tribute To Justice Stevens From Across The Bench, Carter G. Phillips
Northwestern University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judging And Baseball,
2020
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Judging And Baseball, Merritt E. Mcalister
Northwestern University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introductory Comment, Seventy-Fifth Volume,
2020
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Introductory Comment, Seventy-Fifth Volume, John Paul Stevens
Northwestern University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is Justice Irrelevant?,
2020
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Is Justice Irrelevant?, John Paul Stevens
Northwestern University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bhopal In The Federal Courts: How Indian Victims Failed To Get Justice,
2020
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Bhopal In The Federal Courts: How Indian Victims Failed To Get Justice, Jayanth K. Krishnan
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Over thirty-five years ago, the city of Bhopal, India, witnessed a horrific gas leak that originated from a facility operated by Union Carbide India Limited (“UCIL”), which had as its parent company the American-based Union Carbide Corporation (“UCC”). Thousands were killed, with many more injured. One hundred forty-five cases were filed throughout various U.S. federal district courts on behalf of the victims asserting that UCIL and UCC were liable. Eventually, these cases were consolidated through the multi-district litigation (“MDL”) process and placed onto the docket of federal Judge John Keenan. In 1986, Judge Keenan issued his famous forum non conveniens …
The Loophole In The Florida Notice Requirement For Foster Caregivers,
2020
Barry University School of Law
The Loophole In The Florida Notice Requirement For Foster Caregivers, Eve Lumsden
Child and Family Law Journal
No abstract provided.
