Diversity, Tenure, And Dissent,
2018
Emory University School of Law
Diversity, Tenure, And Dissent, Joanna Shepherd
Faculty Articles
Although academics have long recognized that institutions such as opinion-assignment procedures and voting order might influence the propensity to dissent, empirical studies have failed to consider the impact of collegiality and personal relationships on dissent rates. Thus, in this short Essay, I empirically test whether some of the judges’ assertions are consistent with the data. I test whether various measures of diversity are associated with dissent rates in state supreme courts. I find that diversity in many areas—gender, race, age, religion, home state, and political affiliation—is associated with higher levels of dissent. In contrast, diversity in the jobs that judges …
Challenges Facing Judges Regarding Expert Evidence In Criminal Cases,
2018
Duke Law School
Challenges Facing Judges Regarding Expert Evidence In Criminal Cases, Paul W. Grimm
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Amicus Curiae Professor Marin K. Levy’S Amicus Brief In Support Of Plaintiff-Appellant Governor Roy A. Cooper, Iii,
2018
Duke Law School
Amicus Curiae Professor Marin K. Levy’S Amicus Brief In Support Of Plaintiff-Appellant Governor Roy A. Cooper, Iii, Marin K. Levy
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Keeping Up With Your Sister Court: Unpublished Memorandums, No-Citation Rules, And The Superior Court Of Pennsylvania,
2018
Dickinson School of Law of the Pennsylvania State University
Keeping Up With Your Sister Court: Unpublished Memorandums, No-Citation Rules, And The Superior Court Of Pennsylvania, Logan Hetherington
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
As Pennsylvania’s intermediate appellate court of general jurisdiction, the Pennsylvania Superior Court decides thousands of cases each year. The vast majority of those cases are disposed of via unpublished memorandums. These unpublished memorandums are designated as non-precedential and may not be cited by parties before the Superior Court. As a result, litigants and their counsel may not even persuasively cite an unpublished memorandum in briefs or other papers submitted to the Court. Thus, if counsel finds an unpublished memorandum deciding the identical issue of the case at hand and counsel is before the Superior Court judge who authored that opinion, …
Forum: What’S The Matter With The Supreme Court?,
2018
New York Law School
Forum: What’S The Matter With The Supreme Court?, Michael Klarman, Nadine Strossen, Eli Noam, Sanford Levinson, Mark Tushnet
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Plata O Plomo: Effect Of Mexican Transnational Criminal Organizations On The American Criminal Justice System,
2018
St. Mary's University School of Law
Plata O Plomo: Effect Of Mexican Transnational Criminal Organizations On The American Criminal Justice System, Mark M. Mcpherson
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming
Law Library Blog (January 2018): Legal Beagle's Blog Archive,
2018
Roger Williams University
Law Library Blog (January 2018): Legal Beagle's Blog Archive, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Law Library Newsletters/Blog
No abstract provided.
Learned Hand On Statutory Interpretation: Theory And Practice,
2018
Columbia Law School
Learned Hand On Statutory Interpretation: Theory And Practice, Thomas W. Merrill
Faculty Scholarship
It is a great honor to take part in the celebration of the Second Circuit’s 125th anniversary and in particular to present the Hands Lecture. The Second Circuit in the 1930s and 1940s came to be called the “Hand Court,” and during those years it established its reputation as the most admired of the U.S. circuit courts of appeals. It was called the Hand Court because two of its judges, who often formed the majority on three-judge panels, bore the surname Hand. They were cousins. Augustus Hand was a few years older than Learned Hand but was appointed to the …
The Imperfect But Necessary Lawsuit: Why Suing State Judges Is Necessary To Ensure That Statutes Creating A Private Cause Of Action Are Constitutional,
2018
University of Richmond School of Law
The Imperfect But Necessary Lawsuit: Why Suing State Judges Is Necessary To Ensure That Statutes Creating A Private Cause Of Action Are Constitutional, Stephen N. Scaife
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Memory Of Roderick Glen Ayers, Jr. (1947–2017), Professor Of Law, St. Mary's University School Of Law,
2018
U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Texas
In Memory Of Roderick Glen Ayers, Jr. (1947–2017), Professor Of Law, St. Mary's University School Of Law, Craig A. Gargotta, William R. "Dick" Davis Jr.
St. Mary's Law Journal
On September 27, 2017, Glen Ayers, a former professor at St. Mary’s School of Law, passed away suddenly and unexpectedly. Two St. Mary's alumni—Bankruptcy Judge Craig A. Gargotta (1989) and William R. “Dick” Davis, Jr. (1983)—have provided this tribute to an icon of San Antonio’s bankruptcy bar.
Cardozo And The Civil Jury,
2018
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Cardozo And The Civil Jury, Michael D. Green, Ashley Dimuzio
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ode To Judge Leon D. Lazer,
2018
Touro Law Center
Cardozo, The Canon And Some Critical Thoughts About Pedagogy,
2018
Touro Law Center
Cardozo, The Canon And Some Critical Thoughts About Pedagogy, Deborah W. Post
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction: Canada's Chief Justice: Beverley Mclachlin's Legacy Of Law And Leadership,
2018
Allard School of Law at the University of British Columbia
Introduction: Canada's Chief Justice: Beverley Mclachlin's Legacy Of Law And Leadership, Marcus Moore
All Faculty Publications
Summarizes the legacy of law and leadership of Beverley McLachlin, the longest-serving Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada (2000-2017), and first female Chief Justice.
Justice As Harmony: The Distinct Resonance Of Chief Justice Beverley Mclachlin's Juridical Genius,
2018
Allard School of Law at the University of British Columbia
Justice As Harmony: The Distinct Resonance Of Chief Justice Beverley Mclachlin's Juridical Genius, Marcus Moore
All Faculty Publications
Chief Justice McLachlin’s juridical work has earned special praise, but what specifically distinguishes it among the work of other leading jurists has proven elusive for lawyers and social scientists to identify. My experience as a law clerk to McLachlin CJC suggested a distinct approach never comprehensively articulated, but intuitively well-known and widely-emulated among those in her sphere of influence. Drawing on the Chief Justice’s public lectures—where she often explained and offered deeper reflection on the McLachlin Court’s defining jurisprudence—I make the case in this article that at the heart of that approach is a quality best described as the pursuit …
Arguing With Friends,
2018
University of Chicago Law School
Arguing With Friends, William Baude, Ryan D. Doerfler
Michigan Law Review
Judges sometimes disagree about the best way to resolve a case. But the conventional wisdom is that they should not be too swayed by such disagreement and should do their best to decide the case by their own lights. An emerging critique questions this view, arguing instead for widespread humility. In the face of disagreement, the argument goes, judges should generally concede ambiguity and uncertainty in almost all contested cases.
Both positions are wrong. Drawing on the philosophical concepts of “peer disagreement” and “epistemic peerhood,” we argue for a different approach: A judge ought to give significant weight to the …
Recovering Wagner V. International Railway Company,
2018
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Recovering Wagner V. International Railway Company, Kenneth S. Abraham, G. Edward White
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Palsgraf V. Long Island R.R.: Its Historical Context,
2018
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Palsgraf V. Long Island R.R.: Its Historical Context, William E. Nelson
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Analyzing Justice Cardozo’S Opinions On The Constitutionality Of The New Deal,
2018
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Analyzing Justice Cardozo’S Opinions On The Constitutionality Of The New Deal, Robert J. Pushaw Jr
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Mediation: From Debates To Renewal,
2018
Université de Sherbrooke
Judicial Mediation: From Debates To Renewal, Jean-François Roberge, Dorcas Quek Anderson
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Judicial mediation involving a judge acting as a mediator in a court dispute has been implemented in many jurisdictions worldwide as a way to overcome access to justice challenges. This innovation has raised many debates on the changing role of the judge built on either its congruence with or divergence from judicial adjudication. Over the years, these debates have become increasingly stagnant. The evolving vision on access to justice brings an opportunity to draw from the earlier debates and forge a different way forward. This paper argues that a coequality approach to understanding judicial mediation is a better way to …
