American Muslim Minorities: The New Human Rights Struggle,
2011
University of Denver
American Muslim Minorities: The New Human Rights Struggle, Ashley Moore
Human Rights & Human Welfare
The ramifications of the attacks of September 11, 2001 are felt throughout the United States. However, no minority community is as deeply affected as the American-Muslim minority. Since the attacks on the World Trade Center, Muslims residing in the United States have experienced violations of economic and political liberties, as well as ongoing social discrimination. Media stereotypes and government legislation continually exacerbate these human rights abuses and entrench institutional, social, and economic discrimination deeper in American society. At the heart of this discrimination are clear misunderstandings about Islam and those who practice the faith. In an effort to combat these …
Combating Discrimination Against The Roma In Europe: Why Current Strategies Aren’T Working And What Can Be Done,
2011
University of Denver
Combating Discrimination Against The Roma In Europe: Why Current Strategies Aren’T Working And What Can Be Done, Erica Rosenfield
Human Rights & Human Welfare
In the summer of 2010, the forced expulsion of many Roma from Western to Eastern Europe captured headlines and world attention, yet this practice simply represented the latest manifestation of anti-Roma sentiment in Europe. Indeed, the Roma—numbering over ten million across Europe, making them the continent’s largest minority—face discrimination in housing, education, healthcare, employment, and law enforcement; widespread prejudice against this group shows no evidence of receding. There is, however, certainly no shortage of national and supranational policies aiming to promote inclusion and equality for the Roma.
January Roundtable: The Haiti Earthquake, One Year Later, Introduction,
2011
University of Denver
January Roundtable: The Haiti Earthquake, One Year Later, Introduction
Human Rights & Human Welfare
An annotation of:
“Haiti's Blame Game” by Poooja Bhatia. Foreign Policy. November 23 2010.
The Scourge Of Occupation,
2011
Organization of American States
The Scourge Of Occupation, Christina Cerna
Human Rights & Human Welfare
“Haiti’s Blame Game” suggests that Haitians are wondering why they should bother voting when it is unclear that their government is running the country. The anger of the Haitians, according to the author, is focused on MINUSTAH, the UN mission that was created in 2004 to stabilize Haiti and to coordinate the work of the different UN agencies active in the country.¹ Some Haitians perceive MINUSTAH to be an occupying force, but is it really, and who is running the country?
Bring Back Aristide,
2011
University of Denver
Bring Back Aristide, Louis Edgar Esparza
Human Rights & Human Welfare
My friend Annie recently had her trip to Haiti postponed because of the political instability surrounding the November elections. Annie totes modest sums of cash, medicine, and clothing collected from sympathetic friends and has a resolute willingness to help. Together with the partner organizations she is working with, she is hiring Haitians to build an orphanage. Another colleague of mine, Tonya, traveled to the country very soon after the earthquake. She described her experience in The Nation, lamenting that the major US airlines, which had agreed to waive baggage fees for relief aid to Haiti, did not do so for …
Civilizing American Civil Justice: International Insights,
2011
University of Baltimore School of Law
Civilizing American Civil Justice: International Insights, James Maxeiner, Gyooho Lee, Armin Weber
All Faculty Scholarship
In 1776, when Americans declared independence from Britain, they also declared their rights. Their declarations of rights count “open courts” as among the best means for constitutional development. Open courts should secure to every man, without regard to wealth, a just remedy for every wrong suffered, according to the law of the land, by fair and speedy procedure.
Since 1776 Americans have invested heavily in creating open courts. They have been disappointed by returns that fall “far short of perfection” (Maurice Rosenberg). They have found reform to be an “unending effort to perfect the imperfect” (Jay Tidmarsh).
That Americans have …
Customary International Law As U.S. Law: A Critique Of The Revisionist And Intermediate Positions And A Defense Of The Modern Position,
2011
Georgetown University Law Center
Customary International Law As U.S. Law: A Critique Of The Revisionist And Intermediate Positions And A Defense Of The Modern Position, Carlos Manuel Vázquez
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In a recent referendum, the citizens of Oklahoma overwhelmingly approved a State constitutional amendment providing that the courts of the State "shall not consider international law or Sharia law" in rendering their decisions. The amendment's exclusion of Sharia law has garnered most of the media attention, but more consequential by far is the measure's directive to the State courts to disregard international law. Similar measures have been proposed in other States, some of them merely barring consideration of Sharia law or foreign law, but others barring consideration of international law as well. These measures are clearly unconstitutional insofar as they …
Criminalized State: The International Criminal Court, The Responsibility To Protect, And Darfur, Republic Of Sudan,
2011
Western New England University School of Law
Criminalized State: The International Criminal Court, The Responsibility To Protect, And Darfur, Republic Of Sudan, Matthew H. Charity
Faculty Scholarship
The international community continues to struggle with the question of what to do when a nation fails to protect its own people from systemic neglect, mistreatment, or even genocide. For many years, this debate pitted proponents of humanitarian intervention by a third-party against those who believe that all others must defer to the sovereign right of the state to control its own affairs and the affairs of its people. In the midst of this debate, the international community has adopted a middle road: insisting that states must acknowledge their responsibility to protect their populations and if the state manifestly fails …
Where Are The Grounds For The Legality Of Abortion? A 13th Amendment Argument,
2011
University of Florida
Where Are The Grounds For The Legality Of Abortion? A 13th Amendment Argument, Laura Sjoberg
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article critiques the legal framework supporting abortion rights, arguing that privacy-based jurisprudence, as established in *Roe v. Wade*, is inadequate due to its roots in a gendered public/private divide that perpetuates inequality. It proposes a new constitutional basis for abortion rights under the Thirteenth Amendment, framing forced pregnancy as a form of involuntary servitude and emphasizing gender subordination rather than privacy or equality.
Defining International Law Librarianship In An Age Of Multiplicity, Knowledge, And Open Access To Law,
2011
Duke Law School
Defining International Law Librarianship In An Age Of Multiplicity, Knowledge, And Open Access To Law, Richard A. Danner
Faculty Scholarship
Many law librarians are experts in international law and legal research. The concept of ‘international law librarianship’, however, encompasses something more than a field of study in which a group of experts practise their profession. In the broader sense, the idea suggests a common calling, similar interests, and goals shared by librarians with a range of specialties beyond international law, working in all types of law libraries. What commonalities create and sustain the concept of international law librarianship? This paper suggests that they can be found in: law librarians’ common need to respond to the ‘multiplicity’ of information sources facing …
The Legal Dilemma Of Guantánamo Detainees From Bush To Obama,
2011
William & Mary Law School
The Legal Dilemma Of Guantánamo Detainees From Bush To Obama, Linda A. Malone
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Withdrawing From International Custom: Terrible Food, Small Portions,
2011
Georgetown University Law Center
Withdrawing From International Custom: Terrible Food, Small Portions, Carlos Manuel Vázquez
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Curtis A. Bradley and Mitu Gulati’s Withdrawing from International Custom brings to mind the old joke recounted by Woody Allen in Annie Hall: “Two elderly women are at a Catskill mountain resort, and one of ’em says, ‘Boy, the food at this place is really terrible.’ The other one says, ‘Yeah, I know; and such small portions.’” Similarly, while Bradley and Gulati attack international law’s current prohibition of unilateral withdrawal from custom, they propose an alternative that differs only modestly from it (small portions). At the same time, the doctrinal change they propose would take customary international law in the …
Law As Asymmetric Information: Theory, Application, And Results In The Context Of Foreign Direct Investment In Real Estate,
2011
Georgetown University Law Center
Law As Asymmetric Information: Theory, Application, And Results In The Context Of Foreign Direct Investment In Real Estate, Patrick J. Glen
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In his seminal 1970 article on lemon markets, George Akerlof posited the possibility of market failure in the presence of asymmetric information regarding a good’s value. In the intervening four decades, the importance of accurate valuation information has grown as transnational trade has boomed. The aim of the instant article is to assess the potential impact on transnational trade of asymmetric information regarding the legal attributes of a given good. Inaccurate or asymmetric information regarding relevant legal attributes may give rise to the same problem of market failure that Akerlof initially posited. If buyers are unsure of the ownership of …
International Law In A Kaleidoscopic World,
2011
Georgetown University Law Center
International Law In A Kaleidoscopic World, Edith Brown Weiss
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
International law is developed and implemented today in a complicated, diverse, and changing context. Globalization and integration, fragmentation and decentralization, and bottom-up empowerment are arising simultaneously among highly diverse peoples and civilizations. Most importantly, this period is characterized by rapid and often unforeseen changes with widespread effects. Advances in information technology make possible ever shifting ad hoc coalitions and informal groups and a myriad of individual initiatives.
Towards An International Dialogue On The Institutional Side Of Antitrust,
2011
University of Colorado Law School
Towards An International Dialogue On The Institutional Side Of Antitrust, Philip J. Weiser
Publications
The antitrust world is now globalized and interconnected, requiring ever-increasing awareness as to how different agencies operate. The need to promote convergence on substantive doctrines has received, and will continue to receive, considerable attention. What is less appreciated is the need to focus on institutional design and practice, particularly as to the promotion of transparency and procedural fairness in the conduct of antitrust investigations. This Essay makes the case for such a focus, explaining how one of the healthy aspects of a multijurisdictional world is that sister agencies can challenge one another and model means of improving our institutional practices. …
Evidence (Routledge Handbook Of International Criminal Law),
2011
William & Mary Law School
Evidence (Routledge Handbook Of International Criminal Law), Nancy Amoury Combs
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
"Fact-Finding Without Facts": A Conversation With Nancy Combs,
2011
William & Mary Law School
"Fact-Finding Without Facts": A Conversation With Nancy Combs, Nancy Amoury Combs
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Twenty Years Of Critical Race Theory: Looking Back To Move Forward,
2011
Columbia Law School
Twenty Years Of Critical Race Theory: Looking Back To Move Forward, Kimberlé W. Crenshaw
Faculty Scholarship
This Article revisits the history of Critical Race Theory (CRT) through a prism that highlights its historical articulation in light of the emergence of postracialism. The Article will explore two central inquiries. This first query attends to the specific contours of law as the site out of which CRT emerged. The Article hypothesizes that legal discourse presented a particularly legible template from which to demystify the role of reason and the rule of law in upholding the racial order. The second objective is to explore the contemporary significance of CRT's trajectory in light of today's "post-racial" milieu. The Article posits …
Medellin And Sanchez-Llamas: Treaties From John Jay To John Roberts,
2011
Columbia Law School
Medellin And Sanchez-Llamas: Treaties From John Jay To John Roberts, Lori Fisler Damrosch
Faculty Scholarship
Medellin v. Texas and Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon were the first opportunities for the U.S. Supreme Court to speak in the voice of Chief Justice John Roberts on several of the biggest questions at the connecting points between the U.S. legal order and the rest of the world. In writing for the majority in these cases, the new Chief Justice sent signals to several different audiences about whether and how the United States will fulfill its international obligations. The messages differ markedly from those sent by the divided Court in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, in which Roberts did not participate. Hamdan was …
Book Review Of Fact Finding Without Facts: The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations Of International Criminal Convictions,
2011
William & Mary Law School
Book Review Of Fact Finding Without Facts: The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations Of International Criminal Convictions, Linda A. Malone
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
