Individual Criminal Liability And State Responsibility For Genocide: Boundaries And Intersections,
2018
Brazilian Foreign Service
Individual Criminal Liability And State Responsibility For Genocide: Boundaries And Intersections, Rafael Leme
American University International Law Review
No abstract provided.
Banks As Human Rights Enforcers? A Comparative Analysis Of Soft Law Instruments,
2018
Oxford University
Banks As Human Rights Enforcers? A Comparative Analysis Of Soft Law Instruments, Rita Mota
American University International Law Review
No abstract provided.
La Agresión Como Punto De Contacto Entre El Derecho Internacional De Los Derechos Humanos Y El Derecho Internacional Humanitario,
2018
American University Washington College of Law
La Agresión Como Punto De Contacto Entre El Derecho Internacional De Los Derechos Humanos Y El Derecho Internacional Humanitario, Luciano Pezzano
American University International Law Review
No abstract provided.
La Proteccion De Los Inmigrantes Irregulares En Los Estados Unidos Y La Libertad De Circulacion En Una 'Union Americana',
2018
University of the District of Columbia David A Clarke School of Law
La Proteccion De Los Inmigrantes Irregulares En Los Estados Unidos Y La Libertad De Circulacion En Una 'Union Americana', Kristina M. Campbell
Journal Articles
Este artículo es una continuación y ampliación de una propuesta que formulé en 2009, y se plantea si —y cómo— los Estados Unidos pueden apartarse de su actual sistema de regulación de la inmigración punitivo, cuasi-penal y de exigencia dura de su cumplimiento. ¿Es posible para los Estados Unidos y sus vecinos acercarse a un sistema de protección de los refugiados y otros migrantes irregulares del resto de las Américas, modelado sobre el concepto de «libertad de circulación» de la Unión Europea? Si es así, ¿a qué debería parecerse dicho sistema? Permitiendo a todos los ciudadanos de una «Unión Americana» …
Targeted Capture,
2018
Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Targeted Capture, Alexander K.A. Greenawalt
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
This Article confronts one of the most difficult and contested questions in the debate about targeted killing that has raged in academic and policy circles over the last decade. Suppose that, in wartime, the target of a military strike may readily be neutralized through nonlethal means such as capture. Do the attacking forces have an obligation to pursue that nonlethal alternative? The Article defends the duty to employ less restrictive means (“LRM”) in wartime, and it advances several novel arguments in defense of that obligation. In contrast to those who look to external restraints--such as those imposed by international human …
Academy On Human Rights And Humanitarian Law Articles And Essays On Emerging Challenges In The Relationship Between International Humanitarian Law And International Human Rights Law: Introduction,
2018
American University Washington College of Law
Academy On Human Rights And Humanitarian Law Articles And Essays On Emerging Challenges In The Relationship Between International Humanitarian Law And International Human Rights Law: Introduction, Claudia Martin, Diego Rodriguez-Pinzon
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
We are delighted to present this year's publication of the Academy on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, which includes the three best essays in English and in Spanish recognized in the 2017 Human Rights Essay Award competition. It is satisfying to think that this competition allowed a number of participants an opportunity to expound their thoughts on so many important topics and areas of the world. We hope these participants are able to use their articles as mechanisms for change.
International Financial Regulatory Standards And Human Rights: Connecting The Dots,
2018
American University Washington College of Law
International Financial Regulatory Standards And Human Rights: Connecting The Dots, Daniel D. Bradlow, Motoko Aizawa, Margaret Wachenfeld
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
This paper’s hypothesis is that the international standard setting bodies (SSBs) could improve the quality of their international standards by incorporating a human rights analysis. It focuses on five SSBs and seven of their international standards and its findings include the following: First, the standards all implicate the right of non-discrimination, and the rights to information, privacy and an effective remedy. Second, they each raises economic, social and cultural rights issues, including the obligation to allocate ‘maximum available resources’ to the progressive realization of economic, social and cultural rights; the human rights responsibilities of private actors exercising delegated regulatory authority, …
Rehabilitation In Article 14 Of The Convention Against Torture And Other Cruel, Inhuman, Or Degrading Treatment Or Punishment,
2018
American
University Washington College of Law
Rehabilitation In Article 14 Of The Convention Against Torture And Other Cruel, Inhuman, Or Degrading Treatment Or Punishment, Claudio Grossman, Nora Sevaass, Felice Gaer
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
Persons exposed to torture have suffered serious attacks on their lives, relationships, health, and sense of dignity. The torture they experienced will remain a part of them even if they manage to move ahead and work through the pain. The destructive power of torture affects life on so many levels: mind and body, values and relationships, and the capacity for work and leisure. Providing opportunities to reconstruct lives after torture should be a priority in the international effort to prevent and prohibit torture. International recognition of the right to redress, including rehabilitation for all victims of torture and other cruel, …
When Death Becomes Murder: A Primer On Extrajudicial Killing,
2018
California Western School of Law
When Death Becomes Murder: A Primer On Extrajudicial Killing, William J. Aceves
Faculty Scholarship
International law prohibits the arbitrary deprivation of life, which includes extrajudicial killing. This norm is codified in every major human rights treaty and has attained jus cogens status as a non-derogable norm in international law. In the United States, the Torture Victim Protection Act ("TVPA") establishes civil liability for extrajudicial killing. As evidenced in the TVPA's text and legislative history, the definition of extrajudicial killing is based on international law. Despite the clear meaning of the TVPA's text and the clarity of international law, the TVPA's definition of extrajudicial killing is still contested in litigation, and some courts express uncertainty …
Taking Ihi, R2p And Legitimate Defense Seriously: North Korea As The Primary Consideration,
2018
Visiting Scholar, Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law
Taking Ihi, R2p And Legitimate Defense Seriously: North Korea As The Primary Consideration, Morse Tan
Cornell International Law Journal
North Korea has the worst human rights crisis in terms of the breadth and extent of its violations, and also presents the most serious security crisis in the world. A trio of doctrines— International Humanitarian Intervention, the Responsibility to Protect, and legitimate defense— provide the foundation for a range of solutions and approaches to resolve this crisis. At the same time, North Korea poses real dangers, the situation is delicate, and the resolutions may prove difficult. Strong determination is necessary to stay the course until the Koreas reunite, ideally in a peaceful manner. The situation has moved rapidly over the …
El Desafío De Interpretar El Derecho Internacional De Los Derechos Humanos Y El Derecho Internacional Humanitario,
2018
Universidad de Chile
El Desafío De Interpretar El Derecho Internacional De Los Derechos Humanos Y El Derecho Internacional Humanitario, Sergio Alejandro Rea Granados
American University International Law Review
No abstract provided.
What If Goliath Killed David? The Coalition To Counter Isis And The Status And Responsibility Of Isis' Child Soldiers,
2018
American University Washington College of Law
What If Goliath Killed David? The Coalition To Counter Isis And The Status And Responsibility Of Isis' Child Soldiers, Samantha Bradley
American University International Law Review
No abstract provided.
Two Is Better Than One: Systemic Integration Of International Humanitarian Law And International Human Rights Law To Boko Haram Conflict,
2018
American University Washington College of Law
Two Is Better Than One: Systemic Integration Of International Humanitarian Law And International Human Rights Law To Boko Haram Conflict, Ogunnaike O. Taiwo
American University International Law Review
No abstract provided.
Targeting The Targeted Killings Case - International Lawmaking In Domestic Contexts,
2018
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Targeting The Targeted Killings Case - International Lawmaking In Domestic Contexts, Yahli Shereshevsky
Michigan Journal of International Law
The targeting of non-state armed groups members is perhaps the most debated legal issue in the law of contemporary armed conflicts between states and non-state actors. The 2006 Targeted Killings case of the Israeli Supreme Court (ISC) is a key reference point in this debate. Recently, without much scholarly or public attention, the government of Israel, in its report on the summer 2014 conflict in Gaza (the 2014 Gaza Conflict Report), dramatically diverged from the Targeted Killings case’s definition of legitimate targets in asymmetric conflicts. The Targeted Killings case held a conduct or functional membership-based approach to targeting. This approach …
Justice Outside Of Criminal Courtrooms And Jailhouses, In Arcs Of Global Justice: Essays In Honour Of William A. Schabas (Margaret M. Deguzman & Diane Marie Amann Eds., 2018),
2018
Washington and Lee University School of Law
Justice Outside Of Criminal Courtrooms And Jailhouses, In Arcs Of Global Justice: Essays In Honour Of William A. Schabas (Margaret M. Deguzman & Diane Marie Amann Eds., 2018), Mark A. Drumbl
Books and Chapters
This chapter examines alternate forms of transitional justice, notably, customary forms of dispute resolution, restitution, reparations, amnesties, and civil sanctions. It suggests that the international community’s preference for criminal trials as accountability mechanisms in the aftermath of genocide results in the ‘othering’ of these alternate forms of justice. Such ‘othering’ narrows legal pluralism to questions of the location of criminal process and the imposition of custodial punishment (who prosecutes, who sentences?), rather than a richer examination of how deployment of a conceptual diversity of overlapping mechanisms could promote shared objectives of accountability, justice, and transition.
Dreamers Deferred: The Broken Promise Of Immigration Reform In The Obama Years,
2018
University of the District of Columbia David A Clarke School of Law
Dreamers Deferred: The Broken Promise Of Immigration Reform In The Obama Years, Kristina M. Campbell
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
Sanctuary, Temporary Protected Status, And Catholic Social Teaching,
2018
University of the District of Columbia David A Clarke School of Law
Sanctuary, Temporary Protected Status, And Catholic Social Teaching, Kristina M. Campbell
Journal Articles
The concept of sanctuary has deep roots in many religious traditions, including the Roman Catholic Church. Indeed, during the Sanctuary Movement of the 1980s, many Roman Catholic congregations in the United States provided physical sanctuary to Central American refugees fleeing the brutal wars in their countries. In more recent times, Roman Catholic Churches have participated in the “New Sanctuary Movement,” providing not only physical sanctuary to undocumented immigrants and refugees facing detention and removal by federal immigration authorities, but engaging in advocacy and activism on some of the larger questions surrounding immigration policy in the 21st century. Since initiating his …
The Meaning Of Gravity At The International Criminal Court: A Survey Of Attitudes About The Seriousness Of Mass Atrocities, 24 U.C. Davis J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 209 (2018),
2018
John Marshall Law School
The Meaning Of Gravity At The International Criminal Court: A Survey Of Attitudes About The Seriousness Of Mass Atrocities, 24 U.C. Davis J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 209 (2018), Stuart Ford
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
Gravity is an enormously important concept at the International Criminal Court (ICC). The word appears nine times in the Rome Statute and is crucial at every stage of the proceedings. It is an important factor in decisions about which situations to investigate, which individuals the court will try, and what sentences to impose on those convicted of violating international criminal law.
Gravity may also be important for the long-term success of the court. The Rome Statute states that the ICC will exercise jurisdiction over “the most serious crimes” that “deeply shock the conscience of humanity.” It also claims that the …
Escaping The Logic Of Anarchy: A New Model Of Collective Security,
2018
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Escaping The Logic Of Anarchy: A New Model Of Collective Security, Bryan H. Druzin
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Past attempts to create collective security, such as the League of Nations and the United Nations, have failed. This article argues that this is because the anarchic structure of the international system does not permit a top-down approach to the problem. It is argued that the solution is to create a collective security model that is bottom-up rather than top-down.
This article proposes a model of collective security that uses positive feedback generated by network effects to trigger the bottom-up emergence of a global collective security organization. Driven by fear and self-interest, weak states join this fledgling organization, increasing its …
A Hierarchy Of The Goals Of International Criminal Courts, 27 Minn. J. Int'l L. 179 (2018),
2018
John Marshall Law School
A Hierarchy Of The Goals Of International Criminal Courts, 27 Minn. J. Int'l L. 179 (2018), Stuart K. Ford
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
This Article represents the first attempt to systematically assess and compare the goals of international criminal courts to one another. To compare them, it focuses on their expected value. This is the value of the benefit that would occur if the goal were to be achieved, multiplied by the likelihood that it will be achieved. This approach allows for goals of differing value and likelihood of achievement to be compared to one another. The goal with the highest expected value is the goal that is most important and that international criminal courts should prioritize.
This Article demonstrates that it is …
