Antisocial Innovation,
2024
Duke University School of Law
Antisocial Innovation, Christopher Buccafusco, Samuel N. Weinstein
Articles
Innovation is a form of civic religion in the United States. In the popular imagination, innovators are heroic figures. Thomas Edison, Steve Jobs, and (for a while) Elizabeth Holmes were lauded for their vision and drive, and seen to embody the American spirit of invention and improvement. For their part, politicians rarely miss a chance to trumpet their vision for boosting innovative activity. Popular and political culture alike treat innovation as an unalloyed good. And the law is deeply committed to fostering innovation, spending billions of dollars a year to make sure society has enough of it. But this sunny …
Individualized Ideological Enclosures: The Generative Ai Crisis And How Consumers Can Reclaim Their Feeds,
2024
SMU Dedman School of Law
Individualized Ideological Enclosures: The Generative Ai Crisis And How Consumers Can Reclaim Their Feeds, Sydney Rose
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
No abstract provided.
Communication Decency Act And The Intellectual Property Exception,
2024
American University Washington College of Law
Communication Decency Act And The Intellectual Property Exception, Casey Windsor
American University Business Law Review
As the internet proliferated in the 1990s, Congress became concerned with courts impeding the advancement of the internet and the distribution of obscene materials. Congress passed Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act (CDA), which was part of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Section 230(c), known as the “Good Samaritan” provision, gave broad immunity to interactive computer services providers (ISPs) who monitor third-party content posted to their website.3 Section 230 created the regulatory foundation for modern day ISPs, including social media websites like Facebook.
Unveiling The Dark Side Of Innovation: Sustainability, Cobalt Mining, And Modern-Day Slavery,
2024
Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of Law
Unveiling The Dark Side Of Innovation: Sustainability, Cobalt Mining, And Modern-Day Slavery, Kaitlin Schleich
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
As the need and demand for sustainability come to the forefront of innovative efforts by technology companies, the use of rechargeable batteries has only become more prominent. A critical mineral in the manufacture of such batteries is cobalt. Looking deeper into how manufacturers get their hands on cobalt exposes the troubling cobalt-mining practices largely taking place within the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). This article dives into the underbelly of the cobalt-mining industry, revealing the egregious human-rights abuses occurring in the DRC and examining the current legal and ethical landscape surrounding cobalt mining around the world. In both small-scale artisanal …
A Tale Of Two Sams: Effective Altruism’S Threat To The Security Of Emerging Technology,
2024
Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of Law
A Tale Of Two Sams: Effective Altruism’S Threat To The Security Of Emerging Technology, Mackenzie Young
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
Since the onset of scientific innovation, the character and charisma of the inventors and scientists behind emerging technologies have been a centerpiece of focus. However, in light of the driving forces behind innovation—especially the global need to “get ahead” of competitors—few are willing to inquire into the sincerity of held belief. From the ouster of Sam Altman as CEO of OpenAI to the criminal conviction of cryptocurrency mogul Sam Bankman-Fried, the philosophy of “effective altruism” has taken over the minds, hearts, and pocketbooks of Silicon Valley.
This Comment evaluates the origins of the Effective Altruism movement and argues that its …
Foreword: Artificially Intelligent Innovation And Justice,
2024
Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of Law
Foreword: Artificially Intelligent Innovation And Justice, Carla L. Reyes
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
No abstract provided.
Copyright Infringement In The Use Of Copyrighted Material By Generative Artificial Intelligence Programs,
2024
University of Central Florida
Copyright Infringement In The Use Of Copyrighted Material By Generative Artificial Intelligence Programs, Kristin Lee
Honors Undergraduate Theses
The importance of protecting artistic works and promoting the creation of new works has been well established since the inception of United States Constitution. Copyright protections were created by Congress to grant authors exclusive rights over how their works are used and any violation of these rights is copyright infringement. This paper outlines why the use of copyrighted material to train generative artificial intelligence (A.I.) systems is an infringement upon the rights of the author and not an exception under fair use. While no court decisions have been rendered on this legal issue, this paper utilizes previous court decisions in …
Antitrust Regulation Of Copyright Markets,
2024
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Antitrust Regulation Of Copyright Markets, Jacob Noti-Victor, Xiyin Tang
Articles
Late last year, a federal court sided with the Department of Justice and blocked the planned merger of book publishers Simon & Schuster and Penguin Random House. The decision was a rare collision between antitrust law and the deeply consolidated copyright content industries. Over the course of the past decade, acquisitions and mergers in the recording, music publishing, and audiovisual space have left just a handful of juggernaut content producers in their wake. Moreover, new technology companies that have entered the content-creation and distribution markets have begun to leverage their scale to further their own industry consolidation.
This Article examines …
International Source Code Secrecy And The Characterization Of Intellectual Property As National Security,
2024
Dalhousie University Schulich School of Law
International Source Code Secrecy And The Characterization Of Intellectual Property As National Security, Anthony D. Rosborough
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
This chapter explores the emergence of source code secrecy rules in Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and their implications for the future of intellectual property (IP). Rooted in geopolitical rivalry, these rules are framed as safeguards for national security and cybersecurity but carry significant potential social, economic, and environmental costs.
It traces the historical and geopolitical contexts that have shaped the rise of source code secrecy. Given that software-dependent technologies are now the dominant modality of innovation, the chapter highlights the impact of source code secrecy on domestic regulatory oversight, innovation, the right to repair, and equitable technology transfer to least-developed …
Anti-Patents,
2024
Duke Law School
Anti-Patents, Roy Baharad, Stuart Minor Benjamin, Ehud Gutte
Faculty Scholarship
Conventional wisdom has long perceived the patent and tort systems as separate legal entities, each tasked with a starkly different mission. Patent law rewards novel ideas; tort law deters harmful conduct. Against this backdrop, this Essay uncovers the opposing effects of patent and tort law on innovation, introducing the "injurer-innovator problem." Patent law incentivizes injurers --often uniquely positioned to make technological breakthroughs--by allowing them to profit from licensing their inventions to competitors. Yet tort law, by imposing liability for failures to invest in care, forces injurers to incur the cost of implementing their own innovations. When the cost of self-implementation …
Competition And Congestion In Trademark Law,
2024
Duke Law School
Competition And Congestion In Trademark Law, Christopher Buccafusco, Jonathan S. Masur, Mark P. Mckenna
Faculty Scholarship
Trademark law exists to promote competition. If consumers know which companies make which products, they can more easily find the products they actually want to purchase. Trademark law has long treated “source significance”—the fact that a particular trademark is identified with a particular producer—as both necessary and sufficient for establishing a valid trademark. That is, trademark law has traditionally viewed source significance as the only necessary precondition for a trademark being pro-competitive. In this Article, we argue that this equation of source significance and pro-competitiveness is misguided. Some marks use words that are so closely connected with the product being …
Introducing Biosimilar Competition For Cell And Gene Therapy Products,
2024
Duke Law School
Introducing Biosimilar Competition For Cell And Gene Therapy Products, Brian Canter, Sabine Sussman, Stephen Colvill, Nitzan Arad, Elizabeth Staton, Arti Rai
Faculty Scholarship
This article provides an early analysis of the potential for creating future biosimilar competition for cell and gene therapies (CGTs) to lower prices and improve patient access, building on a unique set of interviews with relevant experts. Our discussion addressed regulatory, manufacturing, intellectual property, and market size challenges. Due to CGTs’ complexity, meeting the regulatory requirement of ‘high similarity with no clinically meaningful differences’ will be difficult. Gene therapies are likely better candidates for biosimilar development than cell therapies. Biosimilarity should be met when gene therapy biosimilars contain the same genetic sequence as a reference product, and the variability in …
A Codified Liability Regime To Stimulate Greater Investment In Subpatentable Innovation,
2024
Duke Law School
A Codified Liability Regime To Stimulate Greater Investment In Subpatentable Innovation, Jerome H. Reichman, Ana Santos Rutschman
Faculty Scholarship
The global intellectual property system rests on a distinction between exclusive property rights and free competition. Exclusive rights vary in strength and intensity, but the opposite of protection is almost always free competition. Distinctions of intensity are drawn in terms of the length of protection given to different subject matters plus variable lists of exceptions and limitations to exclusive rights. But the bottom line is that, when protection is not available under the existing system, free competition prevails, and vice-versa (i.e., where there is exclusivity, free competition is deferred for a specified period of time).
This Article departs from a …
Mickey, Disney, And The Public Domain: A Ninety-Five-Year Love Triangle,
2024
Duke Law School
Mickey, Disney, And The Public Domain: A Ninety-Five-Year Love Triangle, Jennifer Jenkins
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Sharing Pathogen Sequence Data For Global Scientific Research Under The Nagoya Protocol To The Convention On Biological Diversity,
2024
Duke Law School
Sharing Pathogen Sequence Data For Global Scientific Research Under The Nagoya Protocol To The Convention On Biological Diversity, Jerome H. Reichman, Carolina Dos S. Ribeiro, George B. Haringhuizen, Paul F. Uhlir
Faculty Scholarship
The Nagoya Protocol to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has threatened to impede access to genetic resources and related data for cross-border scientific research. In principle, every use of genetic resources would require a set of contracts under the CBD, in a “bilateral” regime. The related transaction costs could overwhelm many transnational research undertakings, affecting even public health responses to outbreaks and epidemics. However, the Nagoya Protocol also offers a unique opportunity to resolve this dilemma, despite struggles to define the meaning and coverage of “digital sequence information.” The coverage of genetic sequence data under the CBD remains controversial …
The Trade Origins Of Privacy Law,
2024
Georgetown University Law Center
The Trade Origins Of Privacy Law, Anupam Chander
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The desire for trade propelled the growth of data privacy law across the world. Countries with strong privacy laws sought to ensure that their citizens’ privacy would not be compromised when their data traveled to other countries. Even before this vaunted Brussels Effect pushed privacy law across the world through the enticement of trade with the European Union, Brussels had to erect privacy law within the Union itself. And as the Union itself expanded, privacy law was a critical condition for accession.
But this coupling of privacy and trade leaves a puzzle: how did the U.S. avoid a comprehensive privacy …
Feminist Use,
2024
Georgetown University Law Center
Feminist Use, Amanda Levendowski
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In 2015, Judge Pierre Leval wrote that copyright isn’t about authors, it’s about the rest of us. “While authors are undoubtedly important intended beneficiaries of copyright,” he explained, “the primary intended beneficiary is the public.” He would know—his scholarship has been transformative for how every jurist from the Supreme Court down approaches key copyright questions. But copyright often falls short of this aspiration by benefiting only a sliver of the public.
Copyright law grants exclusive rights to authors of qualifying works, such as books, which protects those works from unauthorized copying. The first copyright legislation, the Statute of Anne of …
Another Round For Petrella V. Mgm, Laches, And Raging Bull: Resolving The Circuit Split Over Copyright’S Statute Of Limitations,
2024
University of Georgia School of Law
Another Round For Petrella V. Mgm, Laches, And Raging Bull: Resolving The Circuit Split Over Copyright’S Statute Of Limitations, David E. Shipley
Scholarly Works
There is a split between the Second Circuit and the Ninth and Eleventh Circuits over the interpretation and application of the Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations. The disagreement is about whether it bars a copyright infringement plaintiff from recovering for infringing acts occurring outside the statute’s three-year window. The Second Circuit stated in 2020 in Sohm v. Scholastic that the U.S. Supreme Court explicitly delimited damages to the three years prior to the commencement of an infringement action. However, the Ninth Circuit in Starz Entertainment in 2022 and the Eleventh Circuit Nealy v. Warner Chappell Music in 2023 both …
Public Primacy In Corporate Law,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
Public Primacy In Corporate Law, Dorothy S. Lund
Seattle University Law Review
This Article explores the malleability of agency theory by showing that it could be used to justify a “public primacy” standard for corporate law that would direct fiduciaries to promote the value of the corporation for the benefit of the public. Employing agency theory to describe the relationship between corporate management and the broader public sheds light on aspects of firm behavior, as well as the nature of state contracting with corporations. It also provides a lodestar for a possible future evolution of corporate law and governance: minimize the agency costs created by the divergence of interests between management and …
Stakeholder Governance As Governance By Stakeholders,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
Stakeholder Governance As Governance By Stakeholders, Brett Mcdonnell
Seattle University Law Review
Much debate within corporate governance today centers on the proper role of corporate stakeholders, such as employees, customers, creditors, suppliers, and local communities. Scholars and reformers advocate for greater attention to stakeholder interests under a variety of banners, including ESG, sustainability, corporate social responsibility, and stakeholder governance. So far, that advocacy focuses almost entirely on arguing for an expanded understanding of corporate purpose. It argues that corporate governance should be for various stakeholders, not shareholders alone.
This Article examines and approves of that broadened understanding of corporate purpose. However, it argues that we should understand stakeholder governance as extending well …
