Will Twitter Be Following You In The Courtroom: Why Reporters Should Be Allowed To Broadcast During Courtroom Proceedings,
2010
UC Law SF
Will Twitter Be Following You In The Courtroom: Why Reporters Should Be Allowed To Broadcast During Courtroom Proceedings, Adriana C. Cervantes
UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal
Thanks to micro-blogging and social networking tools, we no longer have to pick up a phone to call our friends and ask them what they are doing. Instead we turn to our laptop, BlackBerry, or iPhone to get instant information available to us through the Internet. Twitter is a key player in the Internet information exchange line-up and has made its way into one of the oldest and most archaic forums: the courtroom. The current law does not properly address whether reporters should be allowed to tweet, but this trend is becoming more prevalent. Twitter needs to be addressed with …
Online Auction Sites And Inconsistencies: A Case Study Of France, China, And The United States,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Online Auction Sites And Inconsistencies: A Case Study Of France, China, And The United States, Won Hee Elaine Lee
Intellectual Property Brief
No abstract provided.
Volume 1, Issue 1 ,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Au Intellectual Property Brief
Intellectual Property Brief
No abstract provided.
Virtual Confusion: How The Lanham Act Can Protect Athletes From The Unauthorized Use Of Their Likenesses In Sports Video Games,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Virtual Confusion: How The Lanham Act Can Protect Athletes From The Unauthorized Use Of Their Likenesses In Sports Video Games, Lindsay Coleman
Intellectual Property Brief
No abstract provided.
Settling For Less? An Analysis Of The Possibility Of Positive Legal Precedent On The Internet If The Google Book Search Litigation Had Not Reached A Settlement,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Settling For Less? An Analysis Of The Possibility Of Positive Legal Precedent On The Internet If The Google Book Search Litigation Had Not Reached A Settlement, Brooke Ericson
Intellectual Property Brief
No abstract provided.
South Africa's Movie Piracy Challenges,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
South Africa's Movie Piracy Challenges, Matilda Bilstein
Intellectual Property Brief
No abstract provided.
Regulation Of Medicine Patents By The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement To Broaden Access To Medicine,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Regulation Of Medicine Patents By The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement To Broaden Access To Medicine, Daniel Lee
Intellectual Property Brief
No abstract provided.
Masthead & Table Of Contents ,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Masthead & Table Of Contents , Au Intellectual Property Brief
Intellectual Property Brief
No abstract provided.
King Kirby And The Amazin' Terminatin' Copyrights: Who Will Prevail?!?,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
King Kirby And The Amazin' Terminatin' Copyrights: Who Will Prevail?!?, Jay Goldberg
Intellectual Property Brief
No abstract provided.
Copyrights And The Fashion Industry: A Love-Hate Relationship? ,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Copyrights And The Fashion Industry: A Love-Hate Relationship? , Ashlee Hodge
Intellectual Property Brief
No abstract provided.
Unconstitutional Excess, And Other Recent Copyright Developments,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Unconstitutional Excess, And Other Recent Copyright Developments, Ali Sternburg
Intellectual Property Brief
No abstract provided.
Digital “Library” Htmlcomics Shut Down By Fbi, Doj And Publishers,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Digital “Library” Htmlcomics Shut Down By Fbi, Doj And Publishers, Mark Tratos
Intellectual Property Brief
No abstract provided.
Vol. Vi, Tab 38 - Declaration Of Margret M. Caruso,
2010
Google
Vol. Vi, Tab 38 - Declaration Of Margret M. Caruso, Margret M. Caruso
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Xvii, Tab 54 - Google's Reply Motion In Further Support Of Its Motion For Summary Judgment,
2010
Santa Clara Law
Vol. Xvii, Tab 54 - Google's Reply Motion In Further Support Of Its Motion For Summary Judgment, Google
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Xx, Tab 57 - Ex. 2 - Rosetta Stone's First Request For The Production Of Documents From Google,
2010
Santa Clara Law
Vol. Xx, Tab 57 - Ex. 2 - Rosetta Stone's First Request For The Production Of Documents From Google, Rosetta Stone
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Xviii, Tab 55 - Google's Reply Memorandum Of Law In Further Support Of Its Motion To Exclude The Expert Report And Opinion Of Dr. Kent Van Liere,
2010
Santa Clara Law
Vol. Xviii, Tab 55 - Google's Reply Memorandum Of Law In Further Support Of Its Motion To Exclude The Expert Report And Opinion Of Dr. Kent Van Liere, Google
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
It Is Time: Why The Fda Should Start Disclosing Drug Trial Data,
2010
University of Michigan Law School
It Is Time: Why The Fda Should Start Disclosing Drug Trial Data, Mustafa Ünlü
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
Although [drug] manufacturers bear the cost of research data generation, it is oftentimes a worthwhile investment that also confers significant commercial advantages. Consequently, they have argued that research data should be considered a trade secret and kept confidential. The FDA's longstanding position has been to accept this proposition. Even when Congress appeared to mandate disclosure or weaken the underlying rationale for secrecy, the FDA has continued to treat research data as confidential. A strong argument against a default posture of confidentiality is that research data disclosure would promote broad public interests by eliminating the societal costs brought about by keeping …
Optimal Fines For False Patent Marking,
2010
University of Minnesota Law School
Optimal Fines For False Patent Marking, Thomas F. Cotter
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
This Essay proposes that, in order to avoid imposing arbitrary (and perhaps unnecessarily large) fines for false patent marking, courts should seek guidance in the law of remedies for false advertising and copyright infringement. In particular, courts should attempt to approximate the social harm caused by actionable false marking by taking into account (1) the plaintiff's loss (if any) and the defendant's gain (if any) attributable to the false marking at issue; (2) the plausibility of substantial but less easily quantifiable harms to consumers and to nonparty competitors; and (3) the risks, on the one hand, of underdeterring statutory violations …
Patenting By Entrepreneurs: An Empirical Study,
2010
University of San Diego School of Law
Patenting By Entrepreneurs: An Empirical Study, Ted Sichelman, Stuart J.H. Graham
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
[T]he Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation--an organization that studies and promotes entrepreneurship in the United States--funded an effort at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, to undertake the first comprehensive survey of the relationship between patenting and entrepreneurship in the United States. The authors, along with other investigators, administered the survey in 2008 to approximately 15,000 startup and early-stage companies in the biotechnology, medical device, information technology (IT) hardware, and software and Internet sectors. A portion of the survey examined why entrepreneurs, startups, and early-stage companies do (and do not) seek patents. This Article reports and analyzes results from …
Media-Rich Input Application Liability,
2010
University of Michigan Law School
Media-Rich Input Application Liability, David R. Krohn, Pekarek
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
Until recently, media-rich online interactions were mostly unidirectional: multimedia content was delivered by the service provider to the user. Input from the user came almost exclusively in the form of text. Even when searching the Internet for images or audio, a user typically entered text into a search engine. In addition, search engines indexed multimedia content by analyzing not the content itself but the text surrounding it. This is rapidly changing. With the rise of multimedia-capable smartphones and wireless broadband, applications that allow users to search using non-textual inputs are quickly becoming popular. These applications go much further than simply …
