The Kindle Controversy: An Economic Analysis Of How The Amazon Kindle's Text-To-Speech Feature Violates Copyright Law,
2011
Vanderbilt University Law School
The Kindle Controversy: An Economic Analysis Of How The Amazon Kindle's Text-To-Speech Feature Violates Copyright Law, Jeremy B. Francis
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
In 2009, Amazon released the Kindle 2 with a text-to-speech feature. This feature allows users of the Kindle 2 to download software to the device that will read e-books aloud. Authors and publishers of e-books immediately objected to the feature, arguing that it essentially created an unauthorized audiobook. Amazon maintained the legality of the text-to-speech feature, arguing that it does not copy, perform, or create a derivative work. Amazon decided to avoid a legal battle by allowing rightsholders to decide whether to enable the text-to-speech feature for each individual title. The copyright community, however, responded swiftly and nearly unanimously, siding …
What's Wrong With U.S.?: Why The United States Should Have A Public Performance Right For Sound Recordings,
2011
Vanderbilt University Law School
What's Wrong With U.S.?: Why The United States Should Have A Public Performance Right For Sound Recordings, William Henslee
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
This Article discusses the need for the United States to implement a public performance royalty for sound recordings. Under the current system, song writers are compensated for the use of their musical works, but performers on sound recordings do not receive any compensation. Radio and television stations currently pay the performing rights societies a royalty for playing the sound recordings, but they do not pay a performance royalty to the artists who perform the music and record companies that promote and release the sound recordings. Proposed legislation will add a performance royalty for artists and record companies to the current …
Keep America Exceptional! Against Adopting Japanese And European-Style Criminalization Of Contributory Copyright Infringement,
2011
Vanderbilt University Law School
Keep America Exceptional! Against Adopting Japanese And European-Style Criminalization Of Contributory Copyright Infringement, Salil K. Mehra
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
This brief Article, written in connection with a Symposium hosted by the Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, addresses nascent criminal enforcement against contributory copyright infringement in connection with P2P file sharing. Using Judge Posner's analysis in the Aimster case as a lens, it discusses recent cases in Japan and Sweden. This Article contends that criminalization involves an inherent uncertainty involving an innovator's knowledge of, and intent for, the future uses of the platform by others. Despite the difficulty of this task, since Japan and the E.U. have seen criminal prosecutions brought against contributory infringers, it should not evoke …
Information Wars And The Challenges Of Content Protection In Digital Contexts,
2011
Vanderbilt University Law School
Information Wars And The Challenges Of Content Protection In Digital Contexts, Raymond T. Nimmer
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
We are in the midst of a fundamental conflict in law and policy between those who favor maintaining and expanding copyright and related rights in the digital context ("rights enhancers"), and those who favor letting rights atrophy ("rights restrictors'). This Article argues that strong intellectual property rights are essential. At minimum, they are important to support creativity in contexts where the creation, collection, or distribution of the content requires substantial investment of time and resources. The case for allowing creators' rights to weaken is both untested and structurally suspect. Copyright law must construct a balance that fully supports creative activity …
What's In A Name?: Predictably Regulating Cyberfraud To Protect The Democratic Political Process,
2011
Vanderbilt University Law School
What's In A Name?: Predictably Regulating Cyberfraud To Protect The Democratic Political Process, Whitney C. Boshers
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
In recent elections, political candidates have capitalized on the Internet as a central organizing resource. As a result of the low-cost, high-reward nature of campaign websites, some candidates have begun to register Web addresses--or domains--in opponents' names in order to disrupt the democratic political process. Engaging in a practice known as cyberfraud, these individuals register for domains containing the candidate's name, such as 'firstnamelastname.com." Then, instead of finding themselves on the candidate's official campaign website, voters access a website operated by the candidate's opponent that contains misleading or outright false information. Unfortunately, most political candidates have little recourse for such …
Global Intellectual Property Governance (Under Construction),
2011
Seattle University School of Law
Global Intellectual Property Governance (Under Construction), Margaret Chon
Faculty Articles
Top down as well as bottom-up models of regulation are shifting to a governance paradigm characterized by the greater interaction among public, private and civil society sectors, as well as potential increased flexibility of law. As applied to intellectual property, particularly in the international context, governance literature is emerging but still episodic. This article examines the World Intellectual Property Organization’s Development Agenda, currently being implemented through its Committee on Development and Intellectual Property. WIPOs efforts to address global development goals with intellectual property can be theorized through the more participatory and dynamic legal mechanisms promised by global governance. Among the …
Sticky Knowledge In Copyright,
2011
Seattle University School of Law
Sticky Knowledge In Copyright, Margaret Chon
Faculty Articles
Knowledge is sticky because it adheres to people along social routes, lodged within relational and collective modalities, as well as through copyright's proverbial fixed works that can be transacted more freely. Sticky knowledge may in fact constitute a much larger body of knowledge than we usually acknowledge in intellectual property and may intersect with copyright in unexpected ways. This Article delves into sticky knowledge, which has been referenced often outside of intellectual property and sometimes within the laws of patents and trade secrets but almost not at all within copyright law. Under what circumstances will sticky knowledge encourage robust knowledge …
Journal Of Intellectual Property Law Managing Board, 2011-2012,
2011
University of Georgia School of Law
Journal Of Intellectual Property Law Managing Board, 2011-2012, Journal Of Intellectual Property Law
Materials from All Student Organizations
No abstract provided.
Top Tens In 2010: Patent And Trademark Cases,
2011
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Top Tens In 2010: Patent And Trademark Cases, Stephen Mcjohn
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Top Tens In 2010: Copyright And Trade Secret Cases,
2011
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Top Tens In 2010: Copyright And Trade Secret Cases, Stephen Mcjohn
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
The History Of Intellectual Property Taxation: Promoting Innovations And Other Intellectual Property Goals,
2011
University of Washington School of Law
The History Of Intellectual Property Taxation: Promoting Innovations And Other Intellectual Property Goals, Xuan-Thao Nguyen, Jeffrey A. Maine
Articles
No abstract provided.
Fame Law: Requiring Proof Of National Fame In Trademark Law,
2011
University of Washington School of Law
Fame Law: Requiring Proof Of National Fame In Trademark Law, Xuan-Thao Nguyen
Articles
The public has always been infatuated with fame. Trademark law likewise has a long history of infatuation with fame. Protecting the fame embodied in a trademark against dilutive use by others has not been easy. The difficulty stems from the wording of the statute and judicial failure to understand the “fame” requirement. The fundamental question centers on what level of fame is required for the property-like protection against subsequent uses that dilute the famous trademark. This Article argues for national fame to be the requisite requirement for property-like anti-dilution protection under trademark law. The Article recommends that the proof of …
A Special Rule For Compound Protection For Dna-Sequences Impact Of The Ecj "Monsanto" Decision On Patent Practice,
2011
University of Washington School of Law
A Special Rule For Compound Protection For Dna-Sequences Impact Of The Ecj "Monsanto" Decision On Patent Practice, Jan B. Krauss, Toshiko Takenaka
Articles
This article will analyze the Monsanto decision, and criticize the European Court of Justice's interpretation of Article 9 as being incomplete, in particular for failing to take account of all articles and recitals in the Biotech Directive relating to the scope of protection. It will argue that applying the concept of a function-limited protection is unnecessary if a claim directed to an isolated DNA sequence is properly interpreted. It will also discuss the possible impact not only on the protection scope but also on the patentability of gene patents.
The Aftermath Of Stanford V. Roche: Which Law Of Assignments Governs?,
2011
University of Washington School of Law
The Aftermath Of Stanford V. Roche: Which Law Of Assignments Governs?, Sean M. O'Connor
Articles
The discovery and commercialization of biotechnology innovations often rely on collaborations between universities and for-profit firms. In the United States, the federal government funds much of university life sciences research and, under the Bayh-Dole Act, has some rights to research arising from that funding.
Two important strands of invention ownership issues in this web of collaboration arose under litigation that culminated in the recent United States Supreme Court decision Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. (“Stanford v. Roche” or “Stanford”). The first is the question of whether Bayh-Dole …
Substance, Procedure, And The Divided Patent Power,
2011
University of Georgia School of Law
Substance, Procedure, And The Divided Patent Power, Joseph S. Miller
Scholarly Works
The Patent Office has the power to issue rules that “shall govern the conduct of proceedings in the Office,” 35 U.S.C. § 2(b)(2), but not the power to issue substantive rules. It has been this way since 1870, when Congress first granted the Office this regulatory power, in nearly these same words. Just how broad is this grant? How should a reviewing court determine whether a challenged Patent Office rule is procedural (and thus valid) or substantive (and thus invalid)? It is remarkable that in 2010, 140 years after Congress gave the Patent Office this power, the proper sorting standard …
Making Coasean Property More Coasean,
2011
Columbia Law School
Making Coasean Property More Coasean, Thomas W. Merrill, Henry E. Smith
Faculty Scholarship
In his pioneering work on transaction costs, Ronald Coase presupposed a picture of property as a bundle of government-prescribed use rights. Not only is this picture not essential to Coase’s purpose, but its limitations emerge when we apply Coase’s central insights to analyze the structure of property itself. This leads to the Coase corollary: in a world of zero transaction costs, the nature of property does not matter to allocative efficiency. However, as with the Coase theorem, the real implication is for our world of positive transaction costs: we need to subject the notion of property to a comparative institutional …
Medical Alert: Alarming Challenges Facing Medical Technology Innovation,
2011
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Medical Alert: Alarming Challenges Facing Medical Technology Innovation, Lawrence M. Sung
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
The Geneticists' Approach To Bilski,
2011
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
The Geneticists' Approach To Bilski, Joann A. Boughman, Kyle M. Brown
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
Facilitating Patient Access To Patent-Protected Genetic Testing,
2011
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Facilitating Patient Access To Patent-Protected Genetic Testing, Janice M. Mueller
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
He's So Gay ... Not That There's Anything Wrong With That: Using A Community Standard To Homogenize The Measure Of Reputational Damage In Homosexual Defamation Cases,
2011
Michigan State University College of Law
He's So Gay ... Not That There's Anything Wrong With That: Using A Community Standard To Homogenize The Measure Of Reputational Damage In Homosexual Defamation Cases, Abigail A. Rury
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The note examines the role of the community standard in determining defamation, particularly in cases involving false claims of homosexuality. It argues that the current application of the community standard often lacks clarity and may reflect judicial biases, leading to inconsistent rulings. The note proposes reforms to enhance the accuracy and transparency of defamation analysis by adopting a contemporary community standard, similar to that used in obscenity law, which considers specific geographic and social contexts.
