Acta And The Specter Of Graduated Response ,
2011
American University Washington College of Law
Acta And The Specter Of Graduated Response , Annemarie Bridy
American University International Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Hot Mess: How Hot-News Misappropriation Bypassed Copyright Law In Barclays V. Theflyonthewall.Com And Gave Originators A Propriety Right In Facts,
2011
The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law
A Hot Mess: How Hot-News Misappropriation Bypassed Copyright Law In Barclays V. Theflyonthewall.Com And Gave Originators A Propriety Right In Facts, Julya E. Vekstein
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Patent Settlements, Risk, And Competition,
2011
Fordham University School of Law
Patent Settlements, Risk, And Competition, Mark R. Patterson
Faculty Scholarship
PowerPoint presentation delivered at the session, Patent Settlements: The Issues Beyond the "Reverse Payment" Cases at the ABA 59th Annual Antitrust Spring Meeting, March 30, 2011.
The (Im)Possibility Of "Standard Technical Measures" For Ugc Websites,
2011
Columbia Law School
The (Im)Possibility Of "Standard Technical Measures" For Ugc Websites, Lauren G. Gallo
Kernochan Center for Law, Media, and the Arts
In today’s highly litigious legal landscape, one might doubt that there could ever be an “open, fair, voluntary” agreement between copyright owners and service providers to police infringement. Congress nevertheless envisioned such a consensus when it developed § (i) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA): “Conditions for [Safe Harbor] Eligibility.” An often-overlooked provision of the DMCA, § 512(i) directs right holders and Internet service providers to work together and agree on “standard technical measures” to “identify or protect copyrighted works.” In addition to being the product of consensus, these measures must be “available ... on reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms” …
Audiovisual Works And The Work For Hire Doctrine In The Internet Age,
2011
Columbia Law School
Audiovisual Works And The Work For Hire Doctrine In The Internet Age, John L. Schwab
Kernochan Center for Law, Media, and the Arts
The work for hire doctrine is a legal mechanism by which the creator of an artistic work’s employer is deemed the author of that work. While, historically, such employer ownership schemes were not recognized by courts, today the work for hire doctrine is a firmly embedded part of American copyright law. In particular, work for hire has developed into an essential tool of the audiovisual entertainment industry. As discussed in Part I.B, infra, there are a number of reasons that work for hire is a particularly useful ownership allocation scheme for audiovisual works.
Modern technological developments are, however, rapidly altering …
Patent Claim Obviousness In Jury Trials: Where's The Analysis?,
2011
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Patent Claim Obviousness In Jury Trials: Where's The Analysis?, Wesley A. Demory
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
Patenting Genes And Genetic Methods: What’S At Stake?,
2011
Penn State Law
Patenting Genes And Genetic Methods: What’S At Stake?, Eileen M. Kane
Faculty Scholarship
The emergence of genetic medicine following decades of molecular biology research has been accompanied by the procurement of patent rights to many medically significant genes and methods for their use. The intellectual force of reductionism in the life sciences – to explain biological phenomena with molecular precision – generates direct conflicts with patent law’s exclusion of basic knowledge from patenting: laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas must remain in the public domain. This is a period of renewed attention to the issue of patentable subject matter in the life sciences, with a particular focus on genetic patenting. Patents …
Acta And Its Complex Politics,
2011
Texas A&M University School of Law
Acta And Its Complex Politics, Peter K. Yu
Faculty Scholarship
Written for a special issue on the politics of intellectual property, this article examines the "country club" approach the negotiating parties of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) embraced to establish new and higher international intellectual property enforcement standards. It points out that the agreement is flawed not only because it is a country club agreement but also because it is a bad country club agreement.
The article then situates ACTA in the context of a recent trend of using bilateral, plurilateral and regional trade and investment agreements to circumvent the multilateral norm-setting process. It contends that this disturbing trend could …
Readers' Copyright,
2011
University of Michigan Law School
Readers' Copyright, Jessica D. Litman
Articles
My goal in this project is to reclaim copyright for readers (and listeners, viewers, and other members of the audience). I think, and will try to persuade you, that the gradual and relatively recent disappearance of readers’ interests from the core of copyright’s perceived goals has unbalanced the copyright system. It may have prompted, at least in part, the scholarly critique of copyright that has fueled copyright lawyers’ impression that “so many in academia side with the pirates.” It may also be responsible for much of the deterioration in public support for copyright. I argue here that copyright seems out …
Snooping, Privacy And Precedent In Ontario,
2011
Osgoode Hall Law School of York University
Snooping, Privacy And Precedent In Ontario, David Vaver
Articles & Book Chapters
No abstract provided.
A Patent Misperception,
2011
The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law
A Patent Misperception, Elizabeth I. Winston
Scholarly Articles
Antitrust and intellectual property laws promote innovation and competition. As long as the costs of promotion do not exceed the benefit to society, then the laws act in harmony. Discord arises when patent holders use public and private ordering to restrain competition, restrict downstream trade, prevent the development of competing products and limit output by competitors. Using the Patent Act and the misperception of antitrust immunity to create a parallel and under-regulated legal system allows a small number of patent holders to coordinate their behavior to maximize profits and minimize competition. The Patent Act provides no shield to prosecution for …
The Prehistory Of Fair Use,
2011
Emory University School of Law
The Prehistory Of Fair Use, Matthew Sag
Faculty Articles
This article proceeds as follows: Part I begins with a brief summary of the fêted case Folsom v. Marsh and its place in the development of American copyright law. Folsom v. Marsh has been criticized for expanding copyright protection beyond acts of mere mechanical reproduction to include an abstract concept of the work’s value. Of course, this critique is premised on the belief that the scope of copyright prior to Folsom v. Marsh’s intervention was so narrow that it tolerated almost all secondary works. Part II exposes the frailty of this premise.
Specifically, Part II explores the foundation for the …
Current And Emerging Transportation Technology: Final Nails In The Coffin Of The Dying Right Of Privacy?,
2011
University of Richmond
Current And Emerging Transportation Technology: Final Nails In The Coffin Of The Dying Right Of Privacy?, James D. Phillips, Katharine E. Kohm
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Transportation networks constitute “the circulatory system of our economy.” The distinct modes that constitute the American transportation system—air, rail, transit, highways, and waterways—impact the entire range of our daily activities. Just as the human body depends on its circulatory system for life and well being, the United States’ vitality would grind to a halting stop without a vibrant transportation system.
Will You Go To Jail For Copyright Infringement?,
2011
University of Richmond - School of Law
Will You Go To Jail For Copyright Infringement?, James Gibson
Law Faculty Publications
We’ve all seen it. Stick a movie in the DVD player, and up pops a scary message from law enforcement: if you infringe copyright, the feds will come after you. Indeed, this threat is so ubiquitous that it has worked its way into popular perception; as any copyright expert knows from cocktail party conversations, laypeople seem to view copyright infringement as mostly a criminal matter.
It’s certainly possible to go to jail for violating copyright law, as long as the violation is willful and involves specific kinds or amounts of infringement. And the good news for copyright owners is that …
Strength Of The International Trade Commission As A Patent Venue,
2011
University of Richmond
Strength Of The International Trade Commission As A Patent Venue, Christopher A. Cotropia
Law Faculty Publications
The data suggests that the ITC is here to stay and almost all patent enforcement actions will take place, at least in part, in the ITC. The landscape of patent enforcement has permanently changed, and the ITC is a solid part of it. This Article reaches these conclusions by first, in Part I, describing the unique features of the ITC that make it a favored venue of patentees. Part II describes the Federal Circuit's decision in Kyocera and the various postulates as to its impact. Part III describes the study, the specific data obtained, and the results. Part IV analyzes …
A Penguin's Defense Of The Doctrine Of Equivalents,
2011
University of Richmond
A Penguin's Defense Of The Doctrine Of Equivalents, Kristen Jakobsen Osenga
Law Faculty Publications
There is no dearth of commentary about the doctrine of equivalents in patent law. Many articles proclaim the doctrine's death, often noting its passage with unbridled delight. Some articles provide empirical evidence to support the assertion that the doctrine of equivalents is dead. Others simply yearn for the doctrine to fade from use, pointing out that no court has "articulated a convincing rationale" for the doctrine's continued use. But maybe these scholars have it wrong. It may be true that the instances of doctrine of equivalents analysis in patent cases are on the decline and successful outcomes based on the …
Who’S Afraid Of The Federal Circuit?,
2011
Duke Law School
Who’S Afraid Of The Federal Circuit?, Arti K. Rai
Faculty Scholarship
In this brief Essay, Professor Rai responds to Professor Jonathan Masur's Yale Law Journal article "Patent Inflation." Professor Masur's argument rests on the assumption that U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") behavior is determined almost entirely by a desire to avoid reversal by the Federal Circuit. Although the PTO is certainly a weak agency over which the Federal Circuit has considerable power, Masur overestimates the extent to which high-level PTO administrators are concerned about Federal Circuit reversals and underestimates institutional influences that are likely to operate in a deflationary direction. The PTO is influenced not only by the Federal Circuit …
Golan V. Holder: Copyright In The Image Of The First Amendment,
2011
Duke Law School
Golan V. Holder: Copyright In The Image Of The First Amendment, David L. Lange, Risa J. Weaver, Shiveh Roxana Reed
Faculty Scholarship
Does copyright violate the First Amendment? Professor Melville Nimmer asked this question forty years ago, and then answered it by concluding that copyright itself is affirmatively speech protective. Despite ample reason to doubt Nimmer’s response, the Supreme Court has avoided an independent, thoughtful, plenary review of the question. Copyright has come to enjoy an all-but-categorical immunity to First Amendment constraints. Now, however, the Court faces a new challenge to its back-of-the-hand treatment of this vital conflict. In Golan v. Holder the Tenth Circuit considered legislation (enacted pursuant to the Berne Convention and TRIPS) “restoring” copyright protection to millions of foreign …
Patent Law And The Duty Of Candor: Rethinking The Limits Of Disclosure,
2011
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Patent Law And The Duty Of Candor: Rethinking The Limits Of Disclosure, Jay Erstling
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Open Letter To Director David Kappos Of The United States Patent And Trademark Office,
2011
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Open Letter To Director David Kappos Of The United States Patent And Trademark Office, Kenneth L. Port
Faculty Scholarship
I appreciate the opportunity to respond to the Request for Comments on the extent to which small businesses may be harmed by litigation tactics by corporations‟ attempts to enforce trademark rights beyond a reasonable interpretation of the scope of the rights granted to the trademark owner; the best use of Government services to protect trademarks and prevent counterfeiting; and appropriate policy recommendations.
The PTO should be commended for considering whether the use of trademark litigation as a form of “bullying” is a problem for the U.S. trademark system. While some consider trademark litigation as a justifiable effort to police marks …
