Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

In A Post Graham World: Choreographing Dance Rights In The World Of Media, Technology And Social Networking, Michelle N. Burkhart

Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum

Michelle Burkhart writes an article diagramming the Choreographing Dance Rights in today’s social media world.  Her article highlights the famous Martha Graham case and in detail describes: Works for higher art; and responsiveness within the dance community.  Burkhart provides an interesting take on how technology has drastically changed the world of dance.

Practice Guide: Post-Employment Trade Secrets In New York, Stephanie Soondar

Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum

Stephanie Soondar writes an article based on modern day trade secrets. Her article highlights the importance placed on trade secrets in today’s market. She provides an in depth look at: What trade secrets are; how they are protected; and the causes of action that result in disclosing trade secrets. Her article focuses on New York practice.

“I’M Litigatin’ It”: Infringement, Dilution, And Parody Under The Lanham Act, Patrick Emerson

Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

P2p File-Sharing And The Making Available War, Diana Sterk

Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

Strategies For Trade Secrets Protection In China, J. Benjamin Bai, Guoping Da

Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

The Role Of Dna Patents In Genetic Test Innovation And Access, Andrew S. Robertson

Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

Timing The Choice Of Law By Contract, Dolly Wu

Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

Cardiac Pacemakers V. St. Jude Medical: The Federal Circuit Correctly Reins In The Reach Of U.S. Patent Law, Eric Hamp

Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

Prometheus Laboratories V. Mayo Clinic’S Gift To The Biotech Industry: A Study Of Patent-Eligibility Of Medical Treatment And Diagnostic Methods After Bilski, Dan Hoang

Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.

Copyright And Democratization In Africa, John Mukum Mbaku

Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review

No abstract provided.

Creative Commons. Cc-Plus, And Hybrid Intermediaries: A Stakeholder's Perspective, Guido Russi

Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review

No abstract provided.

A Comparative Perspective On The Patent Eligibility Of Software Inventions, Hung-San Kuo

Maurer Theses and Dissertations

Computer software is considered similar to an algorithm, a mental activity, or an abstract idea, so whether or not it meets patent eligibility is full of controversy. Although computer software products are sold all over the world, each jurisdiction deals with them differently based on individual regulations. If there were an objective and proper way to deal with this subject matter, it would reduce the number of debates and narrow the gap of patent protection among different jurisdictions.

The meaning of "invention" in patent law in each jurisdiction is the most important factor affecting the determination of patent eligibility, which …

Religious Use Of Copyrighted Works After Smith, Rfra, And Eldred, Steven D. Jamar

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Negativing Invention, Jacob S. Sherkow

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Causing Infringement, Mark Bartholomew, Patrick F. Mcardle

Journal Articles

Recent appellate decisions reveal a chaotic contributory infringement doctrine that offers little direction to entrepreneurs trying to balance digital innovation with legal strictures. Aware of the problem, both the Supreme Court and legal scholars urge a modeling of contributory infringement on common law tort rules. But common law tort is an enormous subject. Without further instruction, the subject area is too vast and contradictory to offer a realistic template for reform. Even when the narrower body of tort law for secondary actors is consulted, there is still too much variation in the existing precedent to provide the necessary guidance. Instead …

Open For Trouble: Amending Washington's Open Public Meetings Act To Preserve University Patent Rights, Vladimir Lozan

Washington Law Review

Times have changed. Science is no longer “a perfect working model of democracy,” so transparent that it does not need supervision by outsiders. Instead, science is now regulated at the federal and state level. At the federal level, laws and regulations require peer review meetings for research at state public universities to ensure compliance with federal funding mandates. At the state level, the Washington Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA) requires that peer review meetings at state universities be open to the public. When a scientist presents during one of these peer review meetings, the state university may lose patent rights …

Billy-Bob Teeth Saves Porn Star: Coping With Defective Work-For-Hire Registrations, Thomas G. Field

The University of New Hampshire Law Review

[Excerpt] “This paper begins by briefly reviewing statutory provisions that determine initial copyright ownership, govern title transfers, establish requisites to infringement litigation, and bar untimely suits.

It then examines Billy-Bob Teeth and Jules Jordan Video and explains how, in the latter case, the Ninth Circuit applied rationales adopted by the Seventh Circuit in the former case to overturn a JMOL unfavorable to an "adult film" star.

The third part of the paper reviews use of the copyright statute of limitations to resolve competing ownership claims.

The last part of the paper, flagging important differences between § 201(b) and § 204(a), …

Rules For Patents, Michael J. Burstein

William & Mary Law Review

There is widespread agreement that the patent system in the United States is in need of reform. Most of the proposals for patent reform that have proliferated in recent years share two common assumptions: first, that patent policy is best made through case-bycase adjudication of the validity of individual patents; and, second, that the existing allocation of authority over patent policy, in which the courts are primarily responsible for interpreting and applying the broad language of the Patent Act, ought not to be disturbed. This
Article challenges both assumptions. I approach the problem of patent reform primarily as a problem …

The Landscape Of Collective Management Schemes, Daniel J. Gervais

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

Collective management comes in many shapes and sizes. There is, however, an interesting definition proposed by WIPO: [T]he term “collective management” only refers to those forms of joint exercise of rights where there are truly “collectivized” aspects (such as tariffs, licensing conditions and distribution rules); where there is an organized community behind it; where the management is carried out on behalf of such a community; and where the organization serves collective objectives beyond merely carrying out the tasks of rights management . . . . In contrast, “rights clearance organizations” are those which perform joint exercise of rights without any …

An "Exclusive" Application Of An Abstract Idea: Clarification Of Patent-Eligible Subject Matter After Bilski V. Kappos, Stephen Pulley

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.