Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

A Program To Improve The Efficiency And Quality Of Patent Examination, N. Hylton, Keith, Lynn Richards, Madisyn

Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal

In this article we suggest three novel amendments to U.S. patent law to increase efficiency and decrease costs. We first contend that while the assertion of invalid patents is detrimental because of anticompetitive effects, such competition concerns should place no duty upon applicants to disclose prior art at the outset. Additionally, we argue that to avoid resource waste, the USPTO should outsource prior art searches for certain applications, as in Japan. Finally, we propose a system where patentees have the option to elect to a patent box regime that reduces their taxes on patent profits substantially (e.g., from 21% to …

Recent Changes In Discretionary Denials Of Drug Patent Challenges, S. Sean Tu, Arti K. Rai, Aaron S. Kesselheim

Faculty Scholarship

Recent policy shifts at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) have sharply limited the use of two administrative pathways for patent reviews, inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review (PGR). Congress created these administrative pathways to provide a faster and less costly way to challenge weak patents. Recently, the USPTO has expanded the use of “discretionary denials,” invoking a new “settled expectations” rationale that blocks IPR petitions for patents more than about six years old. From May to September 2025, 60% of 506 requests for discretionary denial were granted, triple historical levels, including one-third involving drug patents. These changes …

The Reliability Response To Patent Law’S Ai Challenges, Arti K. Rai

Faculty Scholarship

Pervasive AI use adds newfound importance to longstanding debates over patent timing and reliability. Patent claims on speculative ideas generated by AI, or even the infusion of speculative AI-generated ideas into the public domain, may defeat patent incentives for more careful research. Although challenges that AI use poses for patent validity requirements like human inventorship and nonobviousness have received more attention, reliability is equally important.

Indeed, as this Article argues, the issues are linked. If requirements for inventorship and nonobviousness were adjusted to emphasize reliability, a human role could be preserved, and AI use would not necessarily threaten patents. Currently, …

From Ambiguity To Overreach: The Ftc's Questionable Authority To Ban Non-Competes, Taylor Ray Pelton

Cybaris®

No abstract provided.

Patching The Cfaa So Researchers No Longer Pay, Joshua Baker

Cybaris®

No abstract provided.

How Theories Of Art Can Inform Debates About Ai, Jessica Silbey

Faculty Scholarship

Debates about artificial intelligence (AI) tend to swing between the optimistic and the apocalyptic. I propose a less binary approach that frames conversations about AI from the perspectives of theories of art and creativity. Whether we agree that AI is artificial or intelligent, whether it should be constrained or liberated, we cannot deny its influence on literary, artistic, and innovative production. AI may be described as simply a new tool to produce art and science, like the camera or the microscope, or it may transform art and science, the way the internet transformed global communication. Either way, these debates about …

When Should Training An Ai Model Prevail Against Copyright Infringement?, Jeffrey Greenbaum

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Fear Of Ideas? Social Media, Foreign Influence, And National Security In A New Era Of Great-Power Competition, Michael Park

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

The recent spate of legal restrictions on the use of TikTok and other foreign-controlled social media applications highlight concerns over personal data collection, but also how fears over the potential foreign influence of ideas from adversarial foreign governments—whether by propaganda, censorship, or disinformation—have re-emerged in the national security debate. Yet there are concerns that this new era of great power competition will be the basis for justifying overreaching speech regulations that hinder access to information and ideas under the aegis of national security. This work attempts to examine the recent enactment of speech restrictions or bans on foreign-controlled applications within …

Reevaluating Force Majeure Clauses In The Aftermath Of The Covid-19 Pandemic And Its Implications On The Entertainment Industry, Esther Animalu

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Protecting What's Yours: Rights, Risks, And Realities In Ip And Entertainment, Fordham Iplj

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Ozempic Paradox: How Much Is Too Much In The Race For Weight Loss And Diabetes Treatment?, Jack Bekos

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Right To (Digital) Identity, Sarah M. Snow

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

Identity verification is a prerequisite for full participation in modern society. Access to financial services, employment, housing, healthcare, education, and civic engagement all hinge on an individual’s ability to prove their identity. Millions of Americans—particularly marginalized groups—struggle with the rigid, bureaucratic, and often discriminatory processes of traditional identity verification systems. Without legally recognized identification, individuals are effectively excluded from economic and civic life. This Note argues that the ability to prove one’s identity is a protected interest. It proposes adoption of a federal Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) as a legal and technological mechanism to guarantee all Americans have access to a …

Name Your Price: How The Rise Of Tiktok Influencers Reveals Weaknesses In The Right Of Publicity’S Protection Of The Commercial Value Of Name And Identity, Melody Garzon

FIU Law Review

After TikTok's immediate success within the social media industry, many users have turned to their large followings on the app as a means of capitalizing on their own name, likeness, and identity. These influencers‚ now face various obstacles when attempting to assert their right of publicity. The right of publicity is entirely state-mandated, creating vast discrepancies in protection across state borders. More stringent regulations are needed regarding how one's right of publicity is legally protected against other TikTok users and third-party companies. TikTok's current Intellectual Property Policy does little to deter violations of a user's right of publicity; on the …

Should All Exercise Routines Be Precluded From Copyright Protection? The Current Scope Of Copyrightable Choreography, Malina Lapenes

FIU Law Review

Choreography as copyrightable subject matter is an underdeveloped topic in copyright law. Few cases discuss the line drawn between routines that can be protected by copyright and those that cannot. In cases where a choreographic routine tells a story, such as a theatrical performance, copyright protection is warranted. This is because the routine's expressive elements can easily be separated from the routine's underlying athletic movements. However, for routines that do not have readily identifiable expressive elements, courts seem to use too narrow a standard for copyright classification. Specifically, in Tracy Anderson, the district court used a narrow approach in classifying …

Generative Ai Is Doomed, Eric Goldman

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

Eric Goldman delivered this talk as the 2024 Nies Lecture at Marquette University School of Law, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The talk compares the recent proliferation of generative AI with the Internet’s proliferation in the mid-1990s. In each case, it was clear that the technology would have revolutionary but uncertain impacts on society. However, the public sentiments toward the two innovations have differed radically. The Internet arrived during a period of widespread techno-optimism, creating a regulatory environment that fostered the Internet’s growth. Generative AI, in contrast, has arrived during widespread techno-pessimism and following decades of conditioning about the dangers of “AI.” …

Beyond The Hype: The Use Of “Artificial Intelligence” In Healthcare And The Legal And Business Risks Associated With This New Technology, Greg Gulick

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None.

What Can Copyright Law Learn From Greek Tragedy?, Mira Moldawer

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None.

My Body, My Voice: Defining Vocal Identity Rights To Combat Ai-Generated Deception, Kamran Moos

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

Kamran Moos emphasizes the growing risk of nonconsensual AI-generated voice misappropriation and suggests a novel legal framework to address the issue. Moos explains how AI models have made voice replication quick and easy, in some cases requiring only a two-second voice clip to produce a convincing audio recording. These AI-generated recordings can be used to carry out identity theft, misinformation, and commercial exploitation. Moos argues that current legal frameworks, such as the right of publicity, misappropriation, and copyright law, are inadequate to protect individuals from AI-generated voice misappropriation. He advocates for a new legal framework rooted in copyright and property …

Tech Addiction: The Legal Limits Of A Growing Concept, Haneen Abu Ghanem

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None.

The Laboratory Of Repair: Testing California’S Right To Repair Law In The Post-Analytical Phase, John Wilson

Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review

None.