Introduction,
2015
University of Colorado Law School
Report Of The Special Rapporteur On The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples On The Situation Of Indigenous Peoples In The Republic Of The Congo,
2015
University of Colorado Law School
Report Of The Special Rapporteur On The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples On The Situation Of Indigenous Peoples In The Republic Of The Congo, S. James Anaya
Publications
No abstract provided.
Report Of The Special Rapporteur On The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples On Extractive Industries And Indigenous Peoples,
2015
University of Colorado Law School
Report Of The Special Rapporteur On The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples On Extractive Industries And Indigenous Peoples, S. James Anaya
Publications
No abstract provided.
Introduction To Big Horn General Stream Adjudication Symposium,
2015
University of Colorado Law School
Introduction To Big Horn General Stream Adjudication Symposium, Charles Wilkinson
Publications
No abstract provided.
The History, Status, And Future Of Tribal Self-Governance Under The Indian Self-Determination And Education Assistance Act,
2015
Hobbs, Straus, Dean & Walker
The History, Status, And Future Of Tribal Self-Governance Under The Indian Self-Determination And Education Assistance Act, Geoffrey D. Strommer, Stephen D. Osborne
American Indian Law Review
This year marks the 40th anniversary of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975 (ISDEAA), a cornerstone of modern federal Indian policy. In 1988, amendments to the ISDEAA created the Tribal Self-Governance Demonstration Project. By providing a statutory basis for the broader movement of tribal self-governance, this legislation recognized and advanced the proposition that Indian tribes can provide better governmental services to their own members than can distant federal bureaucracies. Expanded and refined in subsequent legislation in 1994 and 2000, the Self-Governance Policy has proven so successful that today over 50% of all federal Indian programs are carried …
Constitutionalism, Federal Common Law, And The Inherent Powers Of Indian Tribes,
2015
University of Utah S.J. Quinney of law
Constitutionalism, Federal Common Law, And The Inherent Powers Of Indian Tribes, Alexander T. Skibine
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Making Indigenous Self-Determination Work: What The Nation Building Principles And Three Case Studies From Chile Teach Us About Implementing Indigenous Human Rights,
2015
Project for Indigenous Self-Determination
Making Indigenous Self-Determination Work: What The Nation Building Principles And Three Case Studies From Chile Teach Us About Implementing Indigenous Human Rights, Laura M. Seelau, Ryan Seelau
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
“Touching The Concerns” Of Kiobel: Corporate Liability And Jurisdictional Remedies In Response To Kiobel Vs. Royal Dutch Petroleum,
2015
University of Oklahoma College of Law
“Touching The Concerns” Of Kiobel: Corporate Liability And Jurisdictional Remedies In Response To Kiobel Vs. Royal Dutch Petroleum, Chinyere Kimberly Ikegbunam
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
“Play Or Pay”: Interpreting The Employer Mandate Of The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act As It Relates To Tribal Employers,
2015
University of Oklahoma College of Law
“Play Or Pay”: Interpreting The Employer Mandate Of The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act As It Relates To Tribal Employers, Rachel Sibila
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Tale Of Two Statutes: Zepeda And The Ninth Circuit’S Descent Into Jurisdictional Madness,
2015
University of Oklahoma College of Law
A Tale Of Two Statutes: Zepeda And The Ninth Circuit’S Descent Into Jurisdictional Madness, Luke Emmer Miles
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Falling Off Balance: How The Tenth Circuit’S Stance On The Implementation Of A Balancing Test Undermines Congressional Intent In Regard To Extending Sovereign Immunity To Economic Entities Of A Tribe,
2015
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Falling Off Balance: How The Tenth Circuit’S Stance On The Implementation Of A Balancing Test Undermines Congressional Intent In Regard To Extending Sovereign Immunity To Economic Entities Of A Tribe, Robert Thomas Redwine
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tribal Courts, Non-Indians, And The Right To An Impartial Jury After The 2013 Reauthorization Of Vawa,
2015
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
Tribal Courts, Non-Indians, And The Right To An Impartial Jury After The 2013 Reauthorization Of Vawa, Cynthia Castillo
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tribal Water Rights Settlements And Instream Flow Protection,
2015
University of Montana
Tribal Water Rights Settlements And Instream Flow Protection, Dylan M. Desrosier
Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers
Native American Tribes have been fighting for access, legal recognition, and the control over their water rights for more than a century. Today less than ten percent of the 566 federally recognized Tribes have had their rights legally defined and secured under the law. One particularly complicated and compelling aspect of tribal reserved water rights involves the protection of water instream. Since the McCarran Amendment and state court quantification of Winters reserved rights, Tribes have sought to quantify and protect reserved water rights through negotiated settlement agreements. Although the settlements seek to bring certainty, resolution, and final integration of reserved …
Water Rights, Water Quality, And Regulatory Jurisdiction In Indian Country,
2015
University of Washington School of Law
Water Rights, Water Quality, And Regulatory Jurisdiction In Indian Country, Robert T. Anderson
Articles
In the seminal Indian water rights case, Winters v. United Slates (1908), the Court posed this question: "The Indians had command of the lands and the waters-command of all their beneficial use, whether kept for hunting, 'and grazing roving herds of stock,' or turned to agriculture and the arts of civilization. Did they give up all this?" The Court's answer was no, and since then a large body of law has developed around Indian water rights, although the primary focus has been on the amount of water reserved for various tribal purposes. While Indian nations use property rights theories to …
The Indian Child Welfare Act's Waning Power After Adoptive Couple V. Baby Girl,
2015
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
The Indian Child Welfare Act's Waning Power After Adoptive Couple V. Baby Girl, Kathleena Kruck
Northwestern University Law Review
In the 1970s, state authorities began removing Indian children from their homes by the thousands and placing them into foster care, institutional housing, and with white families. To counteract this forced assimilation, Congress passed the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) in 1978. The ICWA conferred many powers previously held by the states to tribal courts and created a preference for Indian children to be placed with their extended family, other members of their tribe, or other Indian families. Despite congressional efforts, the practice of removing Indian children from their homes still persists. Many states resist the ICWA through judicially created …
Contesting Unmodulated Deprivation: Sauvé V Canada And The Normative Limits Of Punishment,
2015
Allard School of Law at the University of British Columbia
Contesting Unmodulated Deprivation: Sauvé V Canada And The Normative Limits Of Punishment, Efrat Arbel
All Faculty Publications
Despite a pressing need for judicial guidance on the legalities of administrative segregation, Canadian courts have yet to outline clear, comprehensive principles by which to assess its deployment. While some courts have rebuked the Correctional Service of Canada for the improper use of administrative segregation in specific cases, the regulation of the practice more broadly has proven elusive. This article turns to the Supreme Court of Canada’s prisoner voting rights decision in Sauvé v Canada for guidance in this regard. Since its release in 2002, Sauvé has been applied largely in cases involving political rights, and rarely in cases involving …
Political Possibilities Of Reparations,
2015
American University Washington College of Law
Political Possibilities Of Reparations, Ezra Rosser
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
This essay is a brief response to Gregory Alexander's article, published by Law and Social Inquiry, that generally argues against land reparations for past wrongs. This response argues that there are political reasons to leave land reparations on the table, focusing on the claims of Native American tribes.
Revisiting Montana: Indian Treaty Rights And Tribal Authority Over Nonmembers On Trust Lands,
2015
University of Tulsa College of Law
Revisiting Montana: Indian Treaty Rights And Tribal Authority Over Nonmembers On Trust Lands, Judith V. Royster
Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works
In a series of cases beginning with its 1981 decision in Montana v. United States, the US. Supreme Court has diminished the civil authority of Indian tribal governments over nonmembers within the tribes' territories. Initially, the Court confined itself to hobbling tribes' inherent sovereign authority over non-tribal members only on non-Indian ('fee") lands within reservations. In 2001, however, the Court ruled for the first time that a tribe did not possess inherent jurisdiction over a lawsuit against state officers that arose on Indian ("trust') lands. What that decision, Nevada v. Hicks, means for general tribal authority over nonmembers on Indian …
Two Hundred Years On: A Reexamination Of The Acquisition Of Australia,
2014
Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Two Hundred Years On: A Reexamination Of The Acquisition Of Australia, Nii Lante Wallace-Bruce
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
White Mountain Apache Water Rights Quantification Settlement Judgment And Decree,
2014
University of New Mexico
White Mountain Apache Water Rights Quantification Settlement Judgment And Decree, Superior Court Of Apache County, Az.
Native American Water Rights Settlement Project
Post- Settlement Court Decree, White Mountain Apache Water Rights Quantification Settlement Judgment and Decree, Parties: WMAT, White Mountain Apache Tribe, AZ, Arizona, USA, United States of America,, Arizona Water Company, Buckeye Irrigation Company, Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District, CAWDC, Central Arizona Water Conservation District, City of Avalon, City of Chandler, City of Glendale, City of Mesa, City of Peoria, City of Phoenix, City of Show Low, City of Scottsdale, City of Tempe, Town of Gilbert, RWCD, Roosevelt Water Conservation District, SRP, Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Salt River Valley Water Users' Association,
Quantification of WMAT rights …
