The Political Economy Of International Labor Migration Law,
2010
Tufts University
The Political Economy Of International Labor Migration Law, Joel P. Trachtman
Employment Research Newsletter
No abstract provided.
The Meaning Of Marriage: Immigration Rules And Their Implications For Same-Sex Spouses In A World Without Doma,
2010
William & Mary Law School
The Meaning Of Marriage: Immigration Rules And Their Implications For Same-Sex Spouses In A World Without Doma, Scott C. Titshaw
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
An estimated 35,000 U.S. citizens are living in our country with same-sex foreign partners, but these couples have no right to stay here together on the basis of their relationship. Many of these Americans are faced with a choice between their partners and the country they love. This is true even if the couple is legally married in one of the growing number of U.S. states and foreign countries that recognize same-sex marriage. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defines “marriage” for all federal purposes as an exclusively heterosexual institution, stands squarely in their way. Reform options that would …
Unconstitutional And Unnecessary: A Cost/Benefit Analysis Of "Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude" In The Immigration And Nationality Act,
2010
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Unconstitutional And Unnecessary: A Cost/Benefit Analysis Of "Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude" In The Immigration And Nationality Act, Amy Wolper
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Capitation Taxes; Congress, U.S.; Davis, James John; Einstein, Albert; Guggenheim, Meyer; Immigration Act Of 1882; Immigration Act Of 1917; Immigration Lawyers; New York City,
2010
University of Michigan Law School
Capitation Taxes; Congress, U.S.; Davis, James John; Einstein, Albert; Guggenheim, Meyer; Immigration Act Of 1882; Immigration Act Of 1917; Immigration Lawyers; New York City, Howard Bromberg
Book Chapters
Contributions by Howard J. Bromberg to Encyclopedia of American Immigration.
In-State Tuition And Illegal Immigrants: An Analysis Of Martinez V. Regents Of The University Of California,
2010
Brigham Young University Law School
In-State Tuition And Illegal Immigrants: An Analysis Of Martinez V. Regents Of The University Of California, Kyle William Colvin
Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Profiles Of Asian American Subgroups In Massachusetts: Korean Americans In Massachusetts,
2010
University of Massachusetts Boston
Profiles Of Asian American Subgroups In Massachusetts: Korean Americans In Massachusetts, Nathan James Bae Kupel
Institute for Asian American Studies Publications
This report looks at Korean Americans in Massachusetts with a focus on the Metro Boston area. Using the 2000 U.S. Census and the American Community Survey 2005–2007 Three-Year Estimates in combination with interviews and secondary research, this profile looks at Korean American demographics and community perspectives.
Rhetoric To Reality:
Citizenship Delays And U.S. International
Obligations In The Post-9/11 Landscape,
2010
Washington and Lee University School of Law
Rhetoric To Reality: Citizenship Delays And U.S. International Obligations In The Post-9/11 Landscape, Clifford Ashcroft-Smith
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
The Future Of Discriminatory Local
Ordinances Aimed At Regulating Illegal
Immigration,
2010
Washington and Lee University School of Law
The Future Of Discriminatory Local Ordinances Aimed At Regulating Illegal Immigration, John Ryan Syllaios
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Lopez-Rodriguez V. Mukasey: The Ninth Circuit’S
Expansion Of The Exclusionary Rule In Immigration
Hearings Contradicts The Supreme Court’S Lopezmendoza Decision,
2010
Brigham Young University Law School
Lopez-Rodriguez V. Mukasey: The Ninth Circuit’S Expansion Of The Exclusionary Rule In Immigration Hearings Contradicts The Supreme Court’S Lopezmendoza Decision, Eric W. Clarke
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Chevron’S Ambiguity Hurdle: Delgado V. Holder And
The Proper Interpretation Of The Particularly Serious
Crime Exception To Deportation Relief,
2010
Brigham Young University Law School
Chevron’S Ambiguity Hurdle: Delgado V. Holder And The Proper Interpretation Of The Particularly Serious Crime Exception To Deportation Relief, William M. Hains
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Unsigned United Nations Migrant Worker Rights Convention: An Overlooked Opportunity To Change The Brown Collar Migration Paradigm, Beth Lyon
Working Paper Series
The United Nations Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families (Migrant Worker Convention or Convention) is one of the United Nations' nine core human rights treaties. The United States has neither signed nor ratified the treaty. Despite various reports and articles assessing potential ratification of the Convention by European and other countries, and an even more robust literature examining potential U.S. ratification of other UN core human rights treaties, there has been no examination of the potential for U.S. ratification of this Convention.
The Convention is the most comprehensive global attempt …
Crossing Over: Why Attorneys (And Judges) Should Not Be Able To Cross-Examine Witnesses Regarding Their Immigration Statuses For Impeachment Purposes,
2010
University of South Carolina - Columbia
Crossing Over: Why Attorneys (And Judges) Should Not Be Able To Cross-Examine Witnesses Regarding Their Immigration Statuses For Impeachment Purposes, Colin Miller
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Advising Noncitizen Defendants On The Immigration Consequences Of Criminal Convictions: The Ethical Answer For The Criminal Defense Lawyer, The Court, And The Sixth Amendment,
2010
University of Cincinnati College of Law
Advising Noncitizen Defendants On The Immigration Consequences Of Criminal Convictions: The Ethical Answer For The Criminal Defense Lawyer, The Court, And The Sixth Amendment, Yolanda Vazquez
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
This Article discusses the tension between the Sixth Amendment analysis by courts on the issue of immigration consequences of criminal convictions and the moral and ethical duties that an attorney owes his noncitizen client. Under the majority of jurisdictions, federal circuit and state courts hold that there is no duty to advise on this issue because they are deemed to be “collateral”. However, a growing number of these jurisdictions have begun to find a Sixth Amendment violation for failure to advise. These jurisdictions have created a Sixth Amendment duty only when: 1) the attorney “knew or should have known” the …
Reclaiming The Immigration Constitution Of The Early Republic,
2010
Northwestern University School of Law
Reclaiming The Immigration Constitution Of The Early Republic, James Pfander
Faculty Working Papers
In contrast to the view that national immigration policy began in 1875, this article explores evidence that immigration policy dates from the early republic period. Built around the naturalization clause, which regulates the ability of aliens to own land and shaped their willingness to immigrate to America, this early republic immigration policy included strong norms of prospectivity, uniformity, and transparency. Drawing on these norms, which readily apply in both the naturalization and immigration contexts, the paper argues against the plenary power doctrine, particularly as it purports to authorize Congress to change the rules of immigration midstream and apply them to …
Mexican Families & United States Immigration Reform,
2010
Valparaiso University School of Law
Mexican Families & United States Immigration Reform, Bernard Trujillo
Law Faculty Publications
This essay argues that we should understand U.S. immigration policy as a series of bi-national relationships rather than as a single, user-indifferent interface. Applying this regulatory approach to Mexican labor migration (i) allows a more accurate definition of the migrating person in the context of the family he seeks to support; and (ii) highlights the United States' duty to provide for Mexican families.
Pulling Teeth: The State Of Mandatory Immigration Detention,
2010
Valparaiso University School of Law
Pulling Teeth: The State Of Mandatory Immigration Detention, Geoffrey Heeren
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Fact Or Fiction: The Legal Construction Of Immigration Removal For Crimes,
2010
University of Maryland School of Law
Fact Or Fiction: The Legal Construction Of Immigration Removal For Crimes, Maureen A. Sweeney
Faculty Scholarship
Thousands of long-term legal permanent residents are deported from the United States each year because they have been convicted of criminal offenses, many quite minor. These deportations occur without any of the constitutional safeguards that generally protect criminal defendants. Immigration authorities rely on cases asserting that such deportations are not punishment for the crime, but merely collateral consequences of the conviction. This article challenges that reasoning. It argues that its factual and doctrinal foundation has completely disintegrated over the last 20 years. Far-reaching changes in immigration law and enforcement have rendered deportation for aggravated felonies a “definite, immediate and largely …
A Migrants' Bill Of Rights—Between Restatement And Manifesto,
2010
Georgetown University Law Center
A Migrants' Bill Of Rights—Between Restatement And Manifesto, Gerald Neuman
International Migrants Bill of Rights Symposium
These comments first provide a general perspective on the nature of the proposed International Migrants Bill of Rights (IMBR) and then offer some specific observations on the current draft, in particular its provisions on the subject of equality or nondiscrimination, including but not limited to Article 2.
Avoiding Evasion: Implementing International Migration Policy,
2010
Georgetown University Law Center
Avoiding Evasion: Implementing International Migration Policy, Justin Gest
International Migrants Bill of Rights Symposium
Despite the broadening range of international arbiters of global migration, the state—with its sovereign control of its territory and its subjection to the politics of its society—remains the only arbiter that oversees the actual interactions during which a proposed bill of rights would be followed. “As long as the nation-state is the primary unit for dispensing rights and privileges, it remains the main interlocutor, reference and target of interest groups and political actors, including migrant groups and their supporters.” This suggests that the normative persuasion and mobilization of even the most powerful non-state actors can only be in the ultimate …
The Most-Favoured Nation Principle, Equal Protection, And Migration Policy,
2010
Georgetown University Law Center
The Most-Favoured Nation Principle, Equal Protection, And Migration Policy, Tomer Broude
International Migrants Bill of Rights Symposium
This article discusses the theoretical interaction between the economically grounded most-favoured nation (MFN) treatment principle and the human-rights based concept of equal protection of migrants. In the multilateral law of international trade, MFN is an article of faith that lays a valid claim to having significantly contributed to the success of the trade-liberalizing and welfare-enhancing role of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade /World Trade Organization (GATT/WTO). Above and beyond its trade-related economic roles, when it applies to individuals of different nationalities, the logic of MFN also appears to generally conform to fundamental principles of equal protection of the …
