Human Rights Law Commons^™

Integrating Human Rights In Domestic Practice, Ryan Thoreson, Tamar Ezer, Aya Fujimura-Fanselow, Elizabeth Brundige

Faculty Articles and Other Publications

Given that the human rights framework contains a rich and evolving body of norms and standards, integrating human rights law into clinical teaching provides new avenues to approach problem-solving. A human rights framework offers additional sources to ground moral and legal claims, as well as new strategies and advocacy targets. These alternatives work to foster creativity and lawyering skills, particularly in areas where domestic law is limited or constraining. Moreover, U.S. advocates have much to learn from global human rights struggles and advocacy efforts and can benefit from engaging in human rights discourse and practice. This article introduces readers to …

Colonial Genocide In Intercultural And Interdisciplinary Perspective / Génocide Colonial Dans Une Perspective Interculturelle Et Interdisciplinaire, John Doyle-Raso, Christophe Davis, Veronica Lockyer, Didar Shwan

Reports

Scholars from diverse cultural and disciplinary backgrounds have made recent contributions to debates about colonial genocide, conceptualizing this issue in widely divergent ways. Yet, most research syntheses regarding colonial genocide are over a decade old and therefore exclude influential research such as prominent government reports. This synthesis focuses on two themes: forms of genocide, and accountability mechanisms. Adopting a transnational approach, it incorporates three case studies – Canada, Namibia, and Rwanda – each differing in terms of its temporal relationships with colonial governments, forms of genocide, and accountability mechanisms.

This project compares debates about multiple forms of genocide in the …

The Limits Of A Peace Agreement: An Analysis Of The Havana Agreements, Eduardo Bertoni

Human Rights Brief

In 2016, the government of Colombia and the former Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) signed the “Final Agreement to End the Armed Conflict and Build a Stable and Lasting Peace” in Havana, Cuba. This article provides a close examination of Chapter 5 of the Havana Agreement.

Key Developments At The World Bank Inspection Panel (2013-2024), Dilek Barlas

Perspectives

Through the lens of important cases, this essay reflects on major developments that occurred at the Panel during the tenure of the author as the Executive Secretary of the World Bank Inspection Panel and shows how the Panel has evolved to improve accessibility, has influenced overall development policies, and has become a catalyst for institutional change. The essay observes that the Panel’s success has largely been due to its structural and operational independence, reporting as it does directly to the Bank’s Board of Executive Directors. However, there are challenges facing the Panel on certain issues, including most importantly its independence, …

Kim Scheppele’S Vision For Restoring Democracy - And Why We Must Accept The Challenge, Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

American University International Law Review

Discussant commentary on the Twenty-Fifth Annual Grotius Lecture.

Restoring Democracy Through International Law, Kim Lane Scheppele

American University International Law Review

Grotius Lecturer Professor Kim Lane Scheppele of Princeton University and Distinguished Discussant Former Chief Justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa of the Constitutional Court of Colombia provided the Twenty-Fifth Annual Grotius Lecture on Wednesday, March 29, 2023, at 5:00 p.m.

[Un]Bound? A Critical Assessment Of The Nature Of Interim Measures Requests By The Human Rights Committee, Andrew D. Mitchell, Trina Malone

American University International Law Review

This article critically examines the nature and legal force of interim measures requests (IMRs) issued by the Human Rights Committee (HR Committee) in response to communications received under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR-OP1). Despite the lack of express provisions in the Covenant or the Optional Protocol regarding the power of the HR Committee to issue IMRs or the obligation of States to comply with them, the HR Committee has established its own Rules of Procedure to issue purportedly binding IMRs in certain circumstances. This article is the first thorough examination of whether …

Prologue, Claudio Grossman, Robert K. Goldman

American University International Law Review

Prologue by the Academy Advisory Board Co-Chairs for this special issue of the American University International Law Review featuring the winning papers and honorable mentions from the 2023 Human Rights Essay Award, sponsored by the Academy on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law of American University Washington College of Law.

Henderson And The Objective Observer Standard: The Future Of Race-Conscious Standards Post-Students For Fair Admissions, Gabriela Dionisio

Seattle University Law Review

On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College, which struck down race-conscious admissions policies. Within just a year after its ruling, Students for Fair Admissions has already had a sweeping impact, reaching beyond higher education. Although the Supreme Court did not indicate whether Students for Fair Admissions applies to sectors beyond higher education, law firms, and other employers have already modified their diversity policies and initiatives, erasing race and company diversity considerations. Given those dramatic changes, there is growing fear that Students for Fair Admissions …

Same Crime, Different Time: Sentencing Disparities In The Deep South & A Path Forward Under The Fourteenth Amendment, Hailey M. Donovan

Seattle University Law Review

The United States has the highest incarceration rate of any country in the world. The American obsession with crime and punishment can be tracked over the last half-century, as the nation’s incarceration rate has risen astronomically. Since 1970, the number of incarcerated people in the United States has increased more than sevenfold to over 2.3 million, outpacing both crime and population growth considerably. While the rise itself is undoubtedly bleak, a more troubling truth lies just below the surface. Not all states contribute equally to American mass incarceration. Rather, states have vastly different incarceration rates. Unlike at the federal level, …

Investor-State Dispute Settlement (Isds) Treaty Mechanisms As A Threat To Climate And Sustainable Development Goals, Johanna Leffler

Human Rights Brief

Investor-State Dispute Settlement (“ISDS”) treaty mechanisms threaten the human right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment by crippling states’ abilities to enact meaningful climate change and sustainable development policies, thus hindering their ability to meet obligations under the Paris Agreement.

Where Custom Dictates: A Comparison Of The Integration Of Customary Law In Nigeria And South Africa As Applicable To Custody And Family Law Dispute, Madelyn Cameron

Emory International Law Review

No abstract provided.

Equality And Human Rights: Confronting Racial Discrimination Introduction, Claudia Martin, Diego Rodríguez-Pinzón

American University International Law Review

Introduction of this special issue of the American University International Law Review and the Academy on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law and acknowledgments.

Interrupting Cyclical Trauma: Transitional Justice In The Philippines, Maria Jardeleza

Human Rights Brief

To interrupt the cycles of human rights abuses in the Philippines, the approach to transitional justice must incorporate an understanding of its unique history of abuses. A reliance on both domestic and international justice systems, as well as the promotion of leaders that will build a foundational respect for the rule of law can position the nation to effectuate a more peaceful future.

Cruel And Unusual Punishment: A Human Rights-Based Argument For Extending The Eighth Amendment To Capital Punishment Methods, Brittany Walker

Human Rights Brief

Though Americans generally support capital punishment, there are many issues with how states currently choose to execute individuals, including concern that the different execution methods used by states to carry out capital punishment violates the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, lack of regulation of states and lack of accountability. Further, certain execution methods may violate the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). This article suggests recommendations for state legislatures, the United States Congress, and the Supreme Court for ensuring the humane treatment of individuals during an execution.

Advocating For Equality: Restoring Same-Sex Marriage Recognition In Bermuda, Coleman Watts

Human Rights Brief

In May 2017, Bermuda made significant strides towards marriage equality by legalizing same-sex marriage. Following the general elections in mid-2017, Bermuda’s newly elected PLP (Progressive Labour Party) government enacted legislation in December 2017 to replace same-sex marriage with domestic partnerships. This article suggests arguments that may be used to challenge the revocation of same-sex marriage rights in Bermuda.

The Inter-American Court Of Human Rights Address "Obstetric Violence" In Rodriguez Pacheco Et Al. V. Venezuela, Lily Cantor

Human Rights Brief

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights (“the Court”) decision on reparations and costs in the case of Rodriguez Pacheco et al. v. Venezuela is one of several that the Court analyzed in recent years relating to women’s obstetric health, indicating a rising interest in the area of reproductive rights.

Is Life Imprisonment Without Parole Still Degrading Treatment Under The Echr?, Aykhan Dadashov

Human Rights Brief

After the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) decided Hutchinson v. The United Kingdom in 2017, debates about ECtHR’s position on life sentences without the possibility of parole arose. Some scholars deem the decision a departure from the ECtHR’s principles in Vinter and Others v. The United Kingdom, which held that non-reducible life sentences are a violation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Although the ECtHR came to different conclusions in Hutchinson and Vinter, the ECtHR still considers life imprisonment without parole inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Irreducible life imprisonment is still incompatible …

Truth Or Accountability: The Human Rights Violations Of The Northern Ireland Troubles Legacy And Reconciliation Act Of 2023, Mckenzie Gallagher

Human Rights Brief

On January 17, 2024, the Republic of Ireland lodged an inter-state complaint in the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) against the United Kingdom. The complaint came after the United Kingdom passed the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act of 2023. Among other things, the Legacy Act grants immunity to persons who provide information related to any crimes committed during the Troubles, an intense period of political unrest and violence in Northern Ireland between Catholic Republicans and Protestant Loyalists.

To hold the United Kingdom accountable for human rights violations stemming from the Legacy Act, an ECtHR ruling paired with …

Forced Disappearances In Latin America Are Not Relics Of The Past, Taylor Potenziano

Human Rights Brief

Forced disappearances were endemic to Latin American dictatorships in the late twentieth century. During the Cold War and beyond, more than one hundred thousand Latin Americans were subjected to forced disappearances under authoritarian governments. To date, more than 200,000 people have gone in Brazil alone between 2019 and 2021. Because disappearances are not criminalized in Brazil, Brazilian legislatures do not feel the need to specify the cause of the disappearances.