Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Health Law and Policy Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

14,598 Full-Text Articles 12,020 Authors 10,954,480 Downloads 232 Institutions

All Articles in Health Law and Policy

Faceted Search

14,598 full-text articles. Page 374 of 424.

The Path Between Sebastian's Hospitals: Fostering Reconciliation After A Tragedy, Jonathan R. Cohen 2011 University of Florida Levin College of Law

The Path Between Sebastian's Hospitals: Fostering Reconciliation After A Tragedy, Jonathan R. Cohen

UF Law Faculty Publications

On October 8, 2007, Horst and Luisa Ferrero brought their healthy but short, three-year-old son Sebastian to a university hospital for a “routine” test to determine whether he lacked human growth hormone. Two days later, following a tragic string of errors, Sebastian was pronounced brain dead. Approximately two weeks later, the hospital offered a detailed public apology to the parents for Sebastian’s death. Several months after the apology, the parents began working collaboratively with the hospital to improve patient safety at the hospital and to advocate for a new children’s hospital in their community. This paper is a case study …


The Fda, Preemption, And Public Safety: Antiregulatory Effects And Maddening Inconsistency, Lawrence O. Gostin 2011 Georgetown University Law Center

The Fda, Preemption, And Public Safety: Antiregulatory Effects And Maddening Inconsistency, Lawrence O. Gostin

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

Most people think of preemption as a technical constitutional doctrine, but it is pivotally important to health and safety, while also opening the door to broad judicial discretion. The Rehnquist and Roberts Courts’ pro-business/pro-preemption jurisprudence is distinctly antiregulatory, invalidating major state public health rules, such as in occupational safety, tobacco control, and motor vehicle safety. Apart from the antiregulatory effects, there is maddening inconsistency. Consider three relatively recent Supreme Court cases. In Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc. (2008), the Court held that federal law bars injured consumers from challenging the safety or effectiveness of FDA-approved medical devices. A year later, …


Mandatory Hpv Vaccination And Political Debate, Lawrence O. Gostin 2011 Georgetown University Law Center

Mandatory Hpv Vaccination And Political Debate, Lawrence O. Gostin

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

Vaccinations are among the most cost-effective and widely used public health interventions, but have provoked popular resistance, with compulsion framed as an unwarranted state interference. When the FDA approved a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in 2006, conservative religious groups strongly opposed a mandate, arguing it would condone pre-marital sex, undermine parental rights, and violate bodily integrity. Yet, Governor Rick Perry signed an executive order in 2007 making Texas the first state to enact a mandate — later revoked by the legislature.

Mandatory HPV vaccination reached the heights of presidential politics in a recent Republican debate. Calling the vaccine a "very …


From 'Barbarity' To Regularity: A Case Study Of 'Unnecesarean' Malpractice Claims, Jamie Abrams 2011 American University Washington College of Law

From 'Barbarity' To Regularity: A Case Study Of 'Unnecesarean' Malpractice Claims, Jamie Abrams

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

This paper is a case study from “barbarity” to “regularity” examining comparatively the first ever “unnecesarean” lawsuit arising out of an 1858 cesarean section malpractice case next to a modern forced cesarean section malpractice suit. It positions the modern “unnecessarean” epidemic, in which 30% of births today are by cesarean section, in a historical medical malpractice context. This case study primarily examines a controversial 1858 lawsuit arising out of the first documented cesarean section performed by the revered Dr. Elias Cooper in California. The surgery left Mary Hodges’s bladder, womb, and intestines permanently fused together and left her permanently disfigured. …


Individual And Small-Group Market Health Insurance Rate Review And Disclosure: State And Federal Roles After Ppaca, Kathryn Linehan 2011 George Washington University

Individual And Small-Group Market Health Insurance Rate Review And Disclosure: State And Federal Roles After Ppaca, Kathryn Linehan

National Health Policy Forum

Oversight of private insurance, including health insurance, is primarily a state responsibility. Each state establishes its own laws and regulations regarding insurer activities, including premium increases for the insurance products within its purview. The authority that state regulators have to review and deny requests for premium changes varies from state to state, as do the amount of resources available to state insurance departments for reviewing premium changes. In some markets where insurers have proposed or implemented steep increases, such changes have received considerable attention from the press, state regulators, and policymakers. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) requires …


Aligning Graduate Medical Education With Public Policy, Rob Cunningham 2011 Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library, The George Washington University

Aligning Graduate Medical Education With Public Policy, Rob Cunningham

National Health Policy Forum

In late May–early June 2011, the Forum sponsored a site visit to Denver, Colorado, to observe innovative efforts to improve the health of Coloradans and reduce the cost of health care. The three-day agenda was designed to convey the breadth and interconnectedness of the efforts underway in Denver and to highlight both successes and challenges. The exploration concentrated on how three themes of national interest are unfolding in Denver: building and sustaining a robust and effective safety net in an evolving health care market; improving the health of people and their communities to prevent and reduce the need for health …


When Push Comes To Shove: Mandatory Immunization In Times Of Pandemic-Type Emergencies, Philip P. Houle, Suzanne R. Houle 2011 University at Buffalo School of Law

When Push Comes To Shove: Mandatory Immunization In Times Of Pandemic-Type Emergencies, Philip P. Houle, Suzanne R. Houle

Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Off-Label Promotion Reform: A Legislative Proposal Addressing Vulnerable Patient Drug Access And Limiting Inappropriate Pharmaceutical Marketing, Tim Mackey, Bryan A. Liang 2011 Institute of Health Law Studies, California Western School of Law

Off-Label Promotion Reform: A Legislative Proposal Addressing Vulnerable Patient Drug Access And Limiting Inappropriate Pharmaceutical Marketing, Tim Mackey, Bryan A. Liang

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Off-label promotion occurs when pharmaceutical manufacturers engage in promotion of unapproved or "off-label" uses of their drugs. These off label uses may lack adequate clinical data to substantiate marketing claims, have led to corporate investigations and penalties, and can endanger public health. However there is adequate evidence to suggest that off-label uses are entirely appropriate for some vulnerable patient populations, and that physicians have accepted such uses as standard. Historically, U.S. law has prohibited direct off-label promotion to physicians and patients. However, failed government guidance, industry-based litigation, and the diminished capacity of regulators to police illegal practices have had dire …


Litigating Against An Epidemic: Hiv/Aids And The Promise Of Socioeconomic Rights In South Africa, Nathaniel Bruhn 2011 University of Michigan Law School

Litigating Against An Epidemic: Hiv/Aids And The Promise Of Socioeconomic Rights In South Africa, Nathaniel Bruhn

Michigan Journal of Race and Law

With one of the highest incidence rates in the world, the HIV/AIDS epidemic has taken a large toll on South Africa. Despite medical advances that have made the disease more manageable, many South Africans still do not have access to the medicines needed to control the disease. At the same time, the Constitution of South Africa grants individuals far-reaching socioeconomic rights, including the right to access health care. This Comment explores the intersection of the socioeconomic rights and the HIV/AIDS crisis. Although the Constitutional Court has developed a deferential approach to enforcing socioeconomic rights, substantial room remains to litigate on …


Heterogeneous Rates Of Time Preference And The Decision To Smok, W. Kip Viscusi, Robert L. Scharff 2011 Vanderbilt University Law School

Heterogeneous Rates Of Time Preference And The Decision To Smok, W. Kip Viscusi, Robert L. Scharff

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

Individuals with higher personal rates of time preference will be more likely to smoke. Although previous studies have found no evidence of a relationship between smoking and rates of time preference, analysis of implicit rates of time preference associated with workers' wage fatality risk trade-offs indicates that smokers have higher rates of time preference with respect to years of life. Current smokers have an implied rate of time preference of 13.8% as compared to 8.1% for nonsmokers. Current smokers who are blue-collar workers have rates of time preference with respect to years of life of 16.3% compared to 7.8% for …


Kinder V. Geithner - Commonwealth Of Massachusetts Amicus Brief, Martha Coakley 2011 Attorney General of Massachusetts

Kinder V. Geithner - Commonwealth Of Massachusetts Amicus Brief, Martha Coakley

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.


Kinder V. Geithner - Law Professors Amicus Brief, Barry Friedman, Matthew Adler 2011 New York University School of Law

Kinder V. Geithner - Law Professors Amicus Brief, Barry Friedman, Matthew Adler

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.


Kinder V. Geithner - Seiu And Change To Win Amicus Brief, Service Employees International Union, Change to Win 2011 Santa Clara Law

Kinder V. Geithner - Seiu And Change To Win Amicus Brief, Service Employees International Union, Change To Win

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.


Kinder V. Geithner - Economic Scholars Amicus Brief, David Cutler 2011 Harvard University

Kinder V. Geithner - Economic Scholars Amicus Brief, David Cutler

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.


Kinder V. Geithner - States' Amicus Brief, Kamala D. Harris 2011 Attorney General Office of the State of California

Kinder V. Geithner - States' Amicus Brief, Kamala D. Harris

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.


Kinder V. Geithner - American Association Of People With Disabilities Amicus Brief, American Association of People with Disabilities 2011 Santa Clara Law

Kinder V. Geithner - American Association Of People With Disabilities Amicus Brief, American Association Of People With Disabilities

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.


Kinder V. Geithner - Constitutional Law Professors Amicus Brief, Jack M. Balkin, Gillian E. Metzger, Trevor W. Morrison 2011 Yale Law School

Kinder V. Geithner - Constitutional Law Professors Amicus Brief, Jack M. Balkin, Gillian E. Metzger, Trevor W. Morrison

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.


Kinder V. Geithner - American Nurses Association Amicus Brief, American Nurses Association 2011 Santa Clara Law

Kinder V. Geithner - American Nurses Association Amicus Brief, American Nurses Association

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.


Kinder V. Geithner - Appellees Brief, Timothy Geithner 2011 Secretary of the Treasury

Kinder V. Geithner - Appellees Brief, Timothy Geithner

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.


Florida V. Hhs - Circuit Court Opinion, United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2011 Santa Clara Law

Florida V. Hhs - Circuit Court Opinion, United States Court Of Appeals For The Eleventh Circuit

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Litigation

No abstract provided.


Digital Commons powered by bepress