Property, Privacy And Power: Rethinking The Fourth Amendment In The Wake Of U.S. V. Jones,
2013
University of Washington School of Law
Property, Privacy And Power: Rethinking The Fourth Amendment In The Wake Of U.S. V. Jones, Dana Raigrodski
Articles
This Article seeks to uncover invisible gender, race, and class biases driving modern Fourth Amendment discourse. Unlike traditional theories, which tend to view the Fourth Amendment through the lens of either privacy or property, this Article advances a theory focusing on the real issues of power and control that fuel Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. Specifically, the Article exposes the private/public and home/market dichotomies that are central to the Supreme Court rhetoric as arbitrary and artificial. It finds that current Fourth Amendment discourse protects the interest of white, privileged men and perpetuates male ideology as well as male domination. That focus leaves …
American Bar Association Criminal Justice Standards On Law Enforcement Access To Third Party Records,
2013
University of Oklahoma College of Law
American Bar Association Criminal Justice Standards On Law Enforcement Access To Third Party Records, Stephen E. Henderson
Faculty Books and Book Chapters
Drafted over the past six years and adopted by the American Bar Association (ABA) House of Delegates in February, 2012, these Criminal Justice Standards on Law Enforcement Access to Third Party Records provide much needed guidance to legislatures, courts, and administrative agencies having to decide how to regulate law enforcement access to existing records in the hands of third parties. It is the first framework of its kind, and it can do much to improve the current system of ad hoc protections in both state and federal systems. Decision makers are struggling to determine when to permit law enforcement access …
Five Answers And Three Questions After United States V. Jones (2012), The Fourth Amendment "Gps Case",
2013
Florida Coastal School of Law
Five Answers And Three Questions After United States V. Jones (2012), The Fourth Amendment "Gps Case", Benjamin J. Priester
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
“The Lady Of The House” Vs. A Man With A Gun: Applying Kyllo To Gun-Scanning Technology,
2013
The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law
“The Lady Of The House” Vs. A Man With A Gun: Applying Kyllo To Gun-Scanning Technology, Sean K. Driscoll
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Circuit Confusion: The Growing Divide On Whether Gant Applies To Non-Vehicular Searches Incident To Arrest,
2013
Seton Hall Law
Circuit Confusion: The Growing Divide On Whether Gant Applies To Non-Vehicular Searches Incident To Arrest, Patrick D. Messmer
Student Works
No abstract provided.
Balancing The Scales: Reinstating Home Privacy Without Violence In Indiana,
2013
Indiana University Mauer School of Law
Balancing The Scales: Reinstating Home Privacy Without Violence In Indiana, Tyler Anderson
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
“Oh, It Is You, Is It?”: Closing The Door On Reasonable Resistance To Unlawful Police Entry In Indiana,
2013
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
“Oh, It Is You, Is It?”: Closing The Door On Reasonable Resistance To Unlawful Police Entry In Indiana, Jesse Drum
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Maryland V. King: Terry V. Ohio Redux,
2013
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Maryland V. King: Terry V. Ohio Redux, Tracey Maclin
UF Law Faculty Publications
In Maryland v. King, the Supreme Court addressed whether forensic testing of DNA samples taken from persons arrested for violent felonies violated the Fourth Amendment. The purpose behind DNA testing laws is obvious: collecting and analyzing DNA samples advances the capacity of law enforcement to solve both "cold cases" and future crimes when the government has evidence of the perpetrator's DNA from the crime scene. In a 5-4 decision, the Court, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy, upheld Maryland's DNA testing statute, and presumably the similar laws of twenty-seven other states and the federal government. Although Justice Kennedy's opinion suggests …
Random, Suspicionless Searches Of Students' Belongings: A Legal, Empirical, And Normative Analysis,
2013
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Random, Suspicionless Searches Of Students' Belongings: A Legal, Empirical, And Normative Analysis, Jason P. Nance
UF Law Faculty Publications
This Article provides a legal, empirical, and normative analysis of an intrusive search practice used by schools officials to prevent school crime: random, suspicionless searches of students’ belongings. First, it argues that these searches are not permitted under the Fourth Amendment unless schools have particularized evidence of a weapons or substance problem in their schools. Second, it provides normative considerations against implementing strict security measures in schools, especially when they are applied disproportionately on minority students. Third, drawing on recent restricted data from the U.S. Department of Education’s School Survey on Crime and Safety, it provides empirical findings that raise …
Students, Security, And Race,
2013
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Students, Security, And Race, Jason P. Nance
UF Law Faculty Publications
In the wake of the terrible shootings in Newtown, Connecticut, our nation has turned its attention to school security. For example, several states have passed or are considering passing legislation that will provide new funding to schools for security equipment and law enforcement officers. Strict security measures in schools are certainly not new. In response to prior acts of school violence, many public schools for years have relied on metal detectors, random sweeps, locked gates, surveillance cameras, and law enforcement officers to promote school safety. Before policymakers and school officials invest more money in strict security measures, this Article provides …
Can't Escape From The Memory: Social Media And Public Sector Labor Law,
2013
CUNY Hunter College
Can't Escape From The Memory: Social Media And Public Sector Labor Law, William A. Herbert
Publications and Research
The Web 2.0 communicative revolution is impacting many fields of law, including labor and employment law. This article focuses upon the application and impact of statutory and constitutional doctrines on the use of social media in public employment in the United States. As part of that analysis, it will compare and contrast developments under the National Labor Relations Act, state collective bargaining and tenure laws and the First Amendment concerning social media. Through this comparative analysis, the article will highlight the distinctions and similarities of public sector labor law and their implications for the future.
Pass Parallel Privacy Standards Or Privacy Perishes,
2013
Penn State Law
Pass Parallel Privacy Standards Or Privacy Perishes, Anne T. Mckenna
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
When Autonomous Vehicles Take Over The Road: Rethinking The Expansion Of The Fourth Amendment In A Technology-Driven World,
2013
University of Richmond
When Autonomous Vehicles Take Over The Road: Rethinking The Expansion Of The Fourth Amendment In A Technology-Driven World, Rachael Roseman
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
On a cool summer morning in upstate New York, a man sitting on his couch types in the coordinates to a warehouse in Virginia on his phone and presses “engage.” At that moment, the engine of a vehicle several miles away starts up, and the vehicle slowly backs out of the driveway. Without a driver or any occupants, the vehicle travels several hundred miles from the driveway in New York to the warehouse in Virginia. Meanwhile, the man who engaged the vehicle remains seated on his couch in upstate New York. The man has engaged an autonomous vehicle (AV), capable …
Back To The Future: United States V Jones Resuscitates Property Law Concepts In Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence,
2013
Forster & Johnson, Attorney-at-Law, LLC
Back To The Future: United States V Jones Resuscitates Property Law Concepts In Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence, Nancy Forster
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Passing The Sniff Test: Police Dogs As Surveillance Technology,
2013
University at Buffalo School of Law
Passing The Sniff Test: Police Dogs As Surveillance Technology, Irus Braverman
Journal Articles
In October 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States will review the case of Florida v. Jardines, which revolves around the constitutionality of police canine Franky’s sniff outside a private residence. Essentially, the Court will need to decide whether or not the sniff constitutes a “search” for Fourth Amendment purposes. This Article presents a review of the often-contradictory case law that exists on this question to suggest that underlying the various cases is the Courts’ assumption of a juxtaposed relationship between nature and technology. Where dog sniffs are perceived as a technology, the courts have been inclined to also …
What Alex Kozinski And The Investigation Of Earl Bradley Teach About Searching And Seizing Computers And The Dangers Of Inevitable Discovery,
2013
University of Oklahoma College of Law
What Alex Kozinski And The Investigation Of Earl Bradley Teach About Searching And Seizing Computers And The Dangers Of Inevitable Discovery, Stephen E. Henderson
Faculty Articles
This paper tells two stories. One concerns the investigation of a Delaware physician named Earl B. Bradley that resulted in a conviction and sentence of fourteen consecutive life terms for the sexual abuse of children. The other concerns the computer problems, both judicial and extra-judicial, of Chief Judge Alex Kozinski of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Though in a sense unrelated, they share lessons about the practicalities of computers and their search that are worth telling. As courts continue to struggle with how to cabin the searches of computers in order to minimize privacy intrusion …
Search, Seizure, And Immunity: Second-Order Normative Authority And Rights,
2013
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Search, Seizure, And Immunity: Second-Order Normative Authority And Rights, Stephen E. Henderson, Kelly Sorensen
Faculty Articles
A paradigmatic aspect of a paradigmatic kind of right is that the rights holder is the only one who can alienate it. When individuals waive rights, the normative source of that waiving is normally taken to be the individual herself. This moral feature—immunity—is usually in the background of discussions about rights. We bring it into the foreground here, with specific attention to a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, Kentucky v. King (2011), concerning search and seizure rights. An entailment of the Court’s decision is that, at least in some cases, a right can be removed by the intentional actions of …
Real-Time And Historic Location Surveillance After United States V. Jones: An Administrable, Mildly Mosaic Approach,
2013
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Real-Time And Historic Location Surveillance After United States V. Jones: An Administrable, Mildly Mosaic Approach, Stephen E. Henderson
Faculty Articles
In United States v. Jones, the government took an extreme position: so far as the federal Constitution is concerned, law enforcement can surreptitiously electronically track the movements of any American over the course of an entire month without cause or restraint. According to the government, whether the surveillance be for good reason, invidious reason, or no reason, the Fourth Amendment is not implicated. Fortunately, that position was unanimously rejected by the High Court. The Court did not, however, resolve what restriction or restraint the Fourth Amendment places upon location surveillance, reflecting a proper judicial restraint in this nuanced and difficult …
Maryland V. King: Terry V. Ohio Redux,
2013
Boston Univeristy School of Law
Maryland V. King: Terry V. Ohio Redux, Tracey Maclin
Faculty Scholarship
In Maryland v. King, the Supreme Court addressed whether forensic testing of DNA samples taken from persons arrested for violent felonies violated the Fourth Amendment. The purpose behind DNA testing laws is obvious: collecting and analyzing DNA samples advances the capacity of law enforcement to solve both "cold cases" and future crimes when the government has evidence of the perpetrator's DNA from the crime scene.
In a 5-4 decision, the Court, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy, upheld Maryland's DNA testing statute, and presumably the similar laws of twenty-seven other states and the federal government.
Although Justice Kennedy's opinion suggests …
Ensuring Miranda’S Right To Counsel Abroad,
2013
New York Law School
Ensuring Miranda’S Right To Counsel Abroad, David Henek '12
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
