The Inverse Relationship Between The Constitutionality And Effectiveness Of New York City "Stop And Frisk",
2014
William & Mary Law School
The Inverse Relationship Between The Constitutionality And Effectiveness Of New York City "Stop And Frisk", Jeffrey Bellin
Faculty Publications
New York City sits at the epicenter of an extraordinary criminal justice phenomenon. While employing aggressive policing tactics, such as “stop and frisk,” on an unprecedented scale, the City dramatically reduced both violent crime and incarceration – with the connections between these developments (if any) hotly disputed. Further clouding the picture, in August 2013, a federal district court ruled the City’s heavy reliance on “stop and frisk” unconstitutional. Popular and academic commentary generally highlights isolated pieces of this complex story, constructing an incomplete vision of the lessons to be drawn from the New York experience. This Article brings together all …
Future Of The Fourth Amendment: The Problem With Privacy, Poverty And Policing,
2014
William & Mary Law School
Future Of The Fourth Amendment: The Problem With Privacy, Poverty And Policing, Kami Chavis Simmons
Faculty Publications
For decades, the reasonable expectation of privacy has been the primary standard by which courts have determined whether a "search" has occurred within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. The Supreme Court's recent decision in U.S. v. Jones, however, has reinvigorated the physical trespass doctrine's importance when determining whether there has been a "search" triggering constitutional protection. Recognizing the unpredictability of the reasonable expectation of privacy doctrine and that doctrine's bias against the urban poor, many scholars hope that the Jones opinion may ameliorate the class divide that has developed in Fourth Amendment jurisprudence.
This Article argues that while …
Redefining The Right To Be Let Alone: Privacy Rights And The Constitutionality Of Technical Surveillance Measures In Germany And The United States,
2014
Debevoise & Plimpton
Redefining The Right To Be Let Alone: Privacy Rights And The Constitutionality Of Technical Surveillance Measures In Germany And The United States, Nicole Jacoby
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Fourth Amendment In Schools: An Ambiguous Precedent And The Role Of Gender In Determining Reasonableness,
2014
University at Buffalo School of Law
The Fourth Amendment In Schools: An Ambiguous Precedent And The Role Of Gender In Determining Reasonableness, Maria M. Lewis
Buffalo Journal of Gender, Law & Social Policy
No abstract provided.
Minding Your Meds: Balancing The Needs For Patient Privacy And Law Enforcement In Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs,
2014
West Virginia University School of Law
Minding Your Meds: Balancing The Needs For Patient Privacy And Law Enforcement In Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs, Devon T. Unger
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Framers' Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule: The Mounting Evidence,
2014
Jarvis Christian College
The Framers' Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule: The Mounting Evidence, Roger Roots
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Putting The Brakes On Driver Privacy: Black Boxes, Data Collection, And The Fourth Amendment,
2014
Washington and Lee University School of Law
Putting The Brakes On Driver Privacy: Black Boxes, Data Collection, And The Fourth Amendment, Thayer Case
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Section 6: Criminal,
2014
William & Mary Law School
Section 6: Criminal, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Keep Your Facebook Friends Close And Your Process Server Closer: The Expansion Of Social Media Service Of Process To Cases Involving Domestic Defendants,
2014
University of San Diego
Keep Your Facebook Friends Close And Your Process Server Closer: The Expansion Of Social Media Service Of Process To Cases Involving Domestic Defendants, Alyssa L. Eisenberg
San Diego Law Review
This Comment addresses why service by social media better meets the constitutional standard for service of process than publication and advocates change at the state level, including suggesting arguments attorneys can use to persuade courts to allow them to serve defendants over social media. Part II of this Comment discusses the constitutional and statutory evolution of service of process beginning with traditional personal service, moving on to service by publication, and ending with electronic service of process. Part III explores recent cases in which courts have authorized and denied social media service for serving both parties abroad and parties in …
United States Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. Charles Williams Jr., Defendant-Appellant: Reply Brief Of Appellant,
2014
William & Mary Law School
United States Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. Charles Williams Jr., Defendant-Appellant: Reply Brief Of Appellant, Gregory Davis, Patricia E. Roberts, Brittany Sadler, Andrew L. Steinberg, Tillman J. Breckenridge, Thomas W. Ports Jr.
Appellate and Supreme Court Clinic
No abstract provided.
Spying On Americans: At What Point Does The Nsa's Collection And Searching Of Metadata Violate The Fourth Amendment?,
2014
University of Washington School of Law
Spying On Americans: At What Point Does The Nsa's Collection And Searching Of Metadata Violate The Fourth Amendment?, Elizabeth Atkins
Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts
Edward Snowden became a household name on June 5, 2013, when he leaked highly classified documents revealing that the American Government was spying on its citizens. The information exposed that the National Security Agency (NSA) collected millions of American’s metadata through forced cooperation with telephone-service providers. Metadata contains sensitive and private information about a person’s life. When collected and searched, metadata can reveal a portrait of a person’s intimate activities amounting to a violation of one’s reasonable expectation of privacy. This Article suggests changing the current standard allowing the NSA to collect and search metadata under Section 215 of the …
Cause To Believe What? The Importance Of Defining A Search's Object--Or, How The Aba Would Analyze The Nsa Metadata Surveillance Program,
2014
Vanderbilt University Law School
Cause To Believe What? The Importance Of Defining A Search's Object--Or, How The Aba Would Analyze The Nsa Metadata Surveillance Program, Christopher Slobogin
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Courts and scholars have devoted considerable attention to the definition of probable cause and reasonable suspicion. Since the demise of the mere evidence rule in the 1960s, however, they have rarely examined how these central Fourth Amendment concepts interact with the object of the search. That is unfortunate, because this interaction can have significant consequences. For instance, probable cause to believe that a search might lead to evidence of wrongdoing triggers a very different inquiry than probable cause to believe that a search will produce evidence of criminal activity. The failure to address the constraints that should be imposed on …
Symposium: Surprising Unanimity, Even More Surprising Clarity,
2014
William & Mary Law School
Symposium: Surprising Unanimity, Even More Surprising Clarity, Adam M. Gershowitz
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure Decisions In The October 2005 Term,
2014
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Criminal Procedure Decisions In The October 2005 Term, Susan N. Herman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Cloudy Forecast: Divergence In The Cloud Computing Laws Of The United States, European Union, And China,
2014
University of Georgia School of Law
A Cloudy Forecast: Divergence In The Cloud Computing Laws Of The United States, European Union, And China, Tina Cheng
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Conversational Consent Search: How “Quick Look” And Other Similar Searches Have Eroded Our Constitutional Rights,
2014
Georgia State University College of Law
The Conversational Consent Search: How “Quick Look” And Other Similar Searches Have Eroded Our Constitutional Rights, Alexander A. Mikhalevsky
Georgia State University Law Review
One area in which law enforcement agencies have stretched constitutional limits concerns the scope of a suspect’s consent to search his or her vehicle. Police forces across the country have tested the limits of consent by asking vague, conversational questions to suspects with the goal of obtaining a suspect’s consent to search, even though that individual may not want to allow the search or may not know that he or she has the right to deny consent.
Conversational phrases like “Can I take a quick look?” or “Can I take a quick look around?” have “emerg[ed] as . . . …
53rd Henry J. Miller Distinguished Lecture Series,
2014
The Supreme Court of the United States
53rd Henry J. Miller Distinguished Lecture Series, The Hon. Justice John Paul Stevens
Georgia State University Law Review
Remarks by the Honorable John Paul Stevens, Retired Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, at the 53rd Henry J. Miller Distinguished Lecture Series.
United States Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. Charles Williams Jr., Defendant-Appellant: Brief Of Appellant,
2014
William & Mary Law School
United States Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. Charles Williams Jr., Defendant-Appellant: Brief Of Appellant, Gregory Davis, Patricia E. Roberts, Brittany Sadler, Andrew L. Steinberg, Tillman J. Breckenridge, Thomas W. Ports Jr.
Appellate and Supreme Court Clinic
No abstract provided.
The Case For Rational Basis Review Of General Suspicionless Searches And Seizures,
2014
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
The Case For Rational Basis Review Of General Suspicionless Searches And Seizures, Richard C. Worf
Touro Law Review
This article examines the constitutional status of suspicionless searches and seizures of groups- an exceedingly important question in the age of terror, and a subject recently brought back to the forefront by the searches of subway passengers in New York City. It draws on process theory to argue that when a legislature has authorized a group search or seizure, courts should generally apply rational basis review.
First, other areas of constitutional doctrine exhibit deep trust in the power of groups to protect their interests in political process, and there is no reason why fourth amendment doctrine should not do the …
Supreme Court, New York County, People V. Smith,
2014
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Supreme Court, New York County, People V. Smith, Jessica Miller
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
