The Promise Of America,
2016
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
The Promise Of America, Joseph A. Greenaway Jr.
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Keeping Cases From Black Juries: An Empirical Analysis Of How Race, Income Inequality, And Regional
History Affect Tort Law,
2016
University of Maryland School of Law
Keeping Cases From Black Juries: An Empirical Analysis Of How Race, Income Inequality, And Regional History Affect Tort Law, Donald G. Gifford, Brian Jones
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Combining Constitutional Clauses,
2016
Louisiana State University Law Center
Combining Constitutional Clauses, Michael Coenen
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
Due Process And Fundamental Rights,
2016
Touro Law Center
Due Process And Fundamental Rights, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Masi Management Inc., V. Town Of Ogden,
2016
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Masi Management Inc., V. Town Of Ogden, Courtney Aronowsky
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Division, First Department, Bertoldi V. New York,
2016
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Appellate Division, First Department, Bertoldi V. New York, Sharon Ryan
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
City Court, Watertown New York, People V. Rogers,
2016
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
City Court, Watertown New York, People V. Rogers, Lisa Bartolomeo
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Monroe County, People V. Owens,
2016
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Supreme Court, Monroe County, People V. Owens, Wendy Holland
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States Court Of Appeals Second Circuit, Seabrook V. City Of New York,
2016
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
United States Court Of Appeals Second Circuit, Seabrook V. City Of New York, Wendy Holland
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Of New York, People V. David,
2016
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Court Of Appeals Of New York, People V. David, Courtney Blakeslee
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brief Of The Catholic University Of America School Of Canon Law, The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, The Queens Federation Of Churches, And The Serbian Orthodox Church In North And South America, As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioners,
2016
Notre Dame Law School
Brief Of The Catholic University Of America School Of Canon Law, The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, The Queens Federation Of Churches, And The Serbian Orthodox Church In North And South America, As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioners, Richard W. Garnett, David H. Hyams
Court Briefs
No. 15.1005
Chabad-Lubavitch of Michigan v. Dr. Dov Schuchman
On Petition for a Writ of Ceriorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan
This brief addresses the importance of the principle of church autonomy and the protections provided by the First and Fourteenth Amendments and this Court's precedents regarding religious denominations' internal mandatory dispute-resolution procedures.
Why The Right To Elective Abortion Fails Casey'S Own Interest-Balancing Methodology—And Why It Matters,
2016
Quinnipiac University School of Law
Why The Right To Elective Abortion Fails Casey'S Own Interest-Balancing Methodology—And Why It Matters, Stephen G. Gilles
Notre Dame Law Review
Casey adopted a new, interest-balancing framework for the right to elective abortion while preserving the core of that right. But by declining to address whether the right to elective abortion can be justified in interest-balancing terms, Casey opened the door to unduly stringent applications of the undue-burden standard and, no less importantly, to future extensions of the right. By ruling that the state’s interest in protecting pre-viable fetal life outweighs the woman’s interest in an elective abortion, while preserving that right on stare decisis grounds, the Court could ensure that the balance it struck in Casey—and that “was central …
No Better Instrument: The Necessity Of Notice And An Opportunity To Be Heard And The Due Process Deficiencies Of Nuisance Abatement,
2016
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
No Better Instrument: The Necessity Of Notice And An Opportunity To Be Heard And The Due Process Deficiencies Of Nuisance Abatement, Elise Bernlohr
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Erosion Of The Rule Of Law When A State Attorney General Refuses To Defend The Constitutionality Of Controversial Laws,
2016
Barry University School of Law
The Erosion Of The Rule Of Law When A State Attorney General Refuses To Defend The Constitutionality Of Controversial Laws, Rena M. Lindevaldsen
Barry Law Review
No abstract provided.
Martin Luther King, Jr. Celebration Keynote Address: The Honorable Carlton W. Reeves, United States District Court For The Southern District Of Mississippi,
2016
Roger Williams University
Martin Luther King, Jr. Celebration Keynote Address: The Honorable Carlton W. Reeves, United States District Court For The Southern District Of Mississippi, Roger Williams University School Of Law
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.
Voting Is Association,
2016
The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law
Voting Is Association, Daniel P. Tokaji
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Missed Opportunities: The Unrealized Equal Protection Framework In Maher V. Roe And Harris V. Mcrae,
2016
University of Michigan School of Law
Missed Opportunities: The Unrealized Equal Protection Framework In Maher V. Roe And Harris V. Mcrae, Amelia Bailey
Michigan Journal of Gender & Law
This Note focuses on two cases, Maher v. Roe and Harris v. McRae, and argues that they represent watershed moments in the reproductive rights movement because they positioned abortion as a fundamental right in name only. In both cases, the Supreme Court sanctioned severe funding restrictions and refused to grant poor women the right to state and federal assistance for elective and “nontherapeutic” abortions. “Non-therapeutic abortion” refers to those abortions performed or induced when the life of the mother is not endangered if the fetus is carried to term or when the pregnancy of the mother is not the …
Use Of Facial Recognition Technology For Medical Purposes: Balancing Privacy With Innovation,
2016
Barry University
Use Of Facial Recognition Technology For Medical Purposes: Balancing Privacy With Innovation, Seema Mohapatra
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Case For Lgbt Equality: Reviving The Political Process Doctrine And Repurposing The Dormant Commerce Clause,
2016
Brooklyn Law School
The Case For Lgbt Equality: Reviving The Political Process Doctrine And Repurposing The Dormant Commerce Clause, Terri R. Day, Danielle Weatherby
Brooklyn Law Review
As a reaction to the Supreme Court’s historic marriage equality decision earlier this summer, many Southern state legislators opposing the trend toward LGBT-protective laws have proposed legislation that would essentially prohibit municipalities from carving out new antidiscrimination protections for the LGBT community. Conservative Senator Bart Hester spearheaded the passing of one of these “anti” antidiscrimination laws in Arkansas, and states like Texas, West Virginia, Michigan, and Oklahoma are not far behind. These “Hester-type laws” are strikingly similar to the Colorado amendment struck down by the Romer v. Evans Court 20 years ago. Both the Colorado amendment and the new wave …
Shock Incarceration And Parole: A Process Without Process,
2016
Brooklyn Law School
Shock Incarceration And Parole: A Process Without Process, Adam Yefet
Brooklyn Law Review
The idea that an inmate could possess a liberty interest in parole is a relatively recent development in Fourteenth Amendment law. It was not until 1979, in Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex, that the Supreme Court examined Nebraska’s parole scheme and found that inmates could have a liberty interest in parole. The primary implication of Greenholtz was that parole statutes that contained certain mandatory language could confer upon inmates a liberty interest in parole. Applying the Greenholtz analysis, numerous parole schemes across the country were held to create a liberty interest and to require …
