Private Religious Schools And Disability Discrimination,
2025
Calvin University
Private Religious Schools And Disability Discrimination, Kevin Timpe
University Faculty Publications and Creative Works
In the lead-up to the passing of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), religious institutions and organizations lobbied to be exempt. Because they were successful in securing an exemption to most of the ADA’s requirements, religious private schools maintain the legal right to refuse admission to disabled students or to fail to give them various legal protections. After considering the arguments given in its favor, the paper critiques this exemption on moral grounds. It then suggests that these considerations should lead to a reexamination of the legal right such schools have to discriminate against disabled individuals, especially in those cases …
Shoot The Messenger: Why Section 230 Does Not Shield Suggestive Content Delivery,
2025
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Shoot The Messenger: Why Section 230 Does Not Shield Suggestive Content Delivery, Alexander Heinkele
Cardozo Law Review de•novo
Internet companies have frequently relied on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 to avoid liability for third-party content hosted on their platforms. However, over time, companies began to take advantage of the broad cover of Section 230 in circumstances outside the statute’s original scope. This Note advocates for a more nuanced interpretation of the statute as it applies to suggestive algorithms and offers a proposal for amending Section 230 to better reflect the modern digital landscape.
Fearless Speech Ignores History To Make A Point,
2025
Brooklyn Law School
Fearless Speech Ignores History To Make A Point, Robert Corn-Revere
Brooklyn Law Review
Professor Mary Anne Franks’ book Fearless Speech: Breaking Free from the First Amendment purports to offer a bold reimagining of free speech doctrine that “takes power, harm, and history seriously.” However, as this review essay demonstrates, Fearless Speech neither breaks free from familiar critiques of the First Amendment nor engages seriously with the historical and doctrinal record. The review illustrates how Professor Franks’ claim that “First Amendment norms have perpetuated and maintained a neo-Confederate ideology of white male supremacy” is entirely unsupported and is based on a series of strawman arguments that mischaracterize both the historical record and free speech …
Church Autonomy, Textualism, And Originalism: Scotus’’S Use Of History To Give Definition To Church Autonomy Doctrine,
2025
Marquette University Law School
Church Autonomy, Textualism, And Originalism: Scotus’’S Use Of History To Give Definition To Church Autonomy Doctrine, Carl H. Esbeck
Marquette Law Review
Church autonomy is a First Amendment doctrine altogether distinct from the more familiar causes of action brought under the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. The principle of church autonomy was first recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in the post-Civil War case Watson v. Jones, holding that civil courts must not be drawn into resolving religious questions or settling disputes over church polity. And early this century, in the unanimous decision Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. EEOC, the theory of church autonomy took on its most fully developed form as a constitutional immunity …
Table Of Contents,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Corporate Scenarios: Drawing Lessons From History,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Corporate Scenarios: Drawing Lessons From History, Madison Condon
Seattle University Law Review
As corporations are increasingly pressed to reveal information about their exposure to climate-related risks, they are often asked to undertake and disclose the outcome of “scenario analysis.” In this exercise, corporations, including financial institutions, examine how their business would fare under different pathways the future may take. One oft-used scenario, for example, is the International Energy Agency’s “Net-Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Energy Sector.” This Essay presents a history of the use of scenarios as a corporate planning tool, particularly in the oil industry, arguing that it is key for understanding our present moment and the role of …
Shareholder Expression In A Time Of Heightened Political Tension,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Shareholder Expression In A Time Of Heightened Political Tension, Aaron A. Dhir
Seattle University Law Review
In this article, I provide context for my forthcoming research project on shareholder proposals and racial equity audits. Since the murder of George Floyd in May of 2020, progressive shareholder actors have increasingly used the proposal mechanism to advance diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice-related goals. These proposals have frequently gone beyond requesting the usual corporate fare of diversity trainings, intersectionality workshops, affinity groups, etc. Instead, a more ambitious type of proposal asks corporate America to conduct racial equity audits, defined as “an independent, objective and holistic analysis of a company’s policies, practices, products, services and efforts to combat systemic racism …
Corporate Governance Speech,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Corporate Governance Speech, Sarah C. Haan
Seattle University Law Review
The State has always regulated the intra-firm communications that make corporate governance possible, most commonly by mandating disclosures of information by a corporation to its shareholders. Some such laws are labeled “securities regulation,” but securities regulation is a broad category that extends to speech by actors who are outside the corporate enterprise as well. Also, the conventional securities regulation category does not capture all such laws; other examples, including informationforcing mandates, can be found in state corporate law. This Article uses the term “corporate governance speech” to describe the communications among shareholders, directors, and officers through which corporate governance is …
Dark Accounting Matter,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Dark Accounting Matter, Colleen Honigsberg
Seattle University Law Review
Physicists calculate that approximately 85% of the matter in the universe is composed of “dark matter” that “does not absorb, reflect, or emit electromagnetic radiation and is therefore difficult to detect.” The S&P 500 currently trades at a price-to-book value of 4.2, suggesting that book value accounts for less than 20% of the S&P 500’s market value. The remaining 80% appears nowhere in these firms’ balance sheets—it is invisible to contemporary accounting techniques and constitutes “dark accounting matter.”
Some “dark accounting matter” is composed of factors commonly described as components of “ESG.” Human capital, for example, is an intangible asset …
The Employees’ Dilemma: Balancing Internal Reporting, Whistleblowing, And Insider Trading Risks,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
The Employees’ Dilemma: Balancing Internal Reporting, Whistleblowing, And Insider Trading Risks, Geeyoung Min
Seattle University Law Review
The Essay examines how recent developments in insider trading regulations and whistleblower reward programs can lead to unintended and counterproductive results of discouraging employees from using internal reporting channels within corporate compliance programs. While the presence of a robust and well-functioning corporate compliance program is a critical factor both in mitigating the level of public enforcement actions against companies and in protecting corporate managers from liability in private litigation, these programs often provide little incentive for employees to report potential misconduct internally.
Corporate compliance programs are designed to promote the upward information flow within the company, which is essential for …
How The Antidiscrimination Law Of Commercial Transactions Really Works,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
How The Antidiscrimination Law Of Commercial Transactions Really Works, Helen Norton
Seattle University Law Review
A variety of businesses now cite 303 Creative when seeking First Amendment protection for their refusal to serve certain customers based on those customers’ protected class status. How this litigation will play out remains to be seen. But future courts need not, and should not, repeat the 303 Creative Court’s misunderstanding of how the antidiscrimination law of commercial transactions actually works.
Part I of this Essay explains the Court’s longstanding understanding of the antidiscrimination law of commercial transactions, and then describes the Court’s failure to engage with this precedent in 303 Creative. Part II then identifies the 303 Creative decision’s …
Beyond The Editorial Analogy: First Amendment Protections For Platform Content Moderation After Moddy V. Netchoice,
2025
University of Minnesota Law School
Beyond The Editorial Analogy: First Amendment Protections For Platform Content Moderation After Moddy V. Netchoice, Alan Rozenshtein, Kyle T. Langvardt
Articles
This Article examines the Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in Moody v. NetChoice and its implications for social media platform regulation. In Moody, which addressed state laws requiring platforms to host certain content, the Court issued a complex set of opinions that left the scope of platforms’ First Amendment rights uncertain. On the procedural question of how such laws may be challenged, the Court provided a clear holding: it rejected facial challenges to broad content-moderation laws, instead requiring case-by-case analysis of how specific regulations affect different platform features—a shift that undermines the tech industry’s longstanding litigation strategy. But on the …
Foreword,
2025
Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Foreword, Patricia B. Barnett
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
The Right To Truth,
2025
Washington and Lee University School of Law
The Right To Truth, Maureen Edobor
Scholarly Articles
This Article argues that today’s anti-CRT statutes, book bans, and “divisive concepts” laws are not isolated culture-war skirmishes but the latest chapter in a long campaign—dating back to the Lost Cause and the United Daughters of the Confederacy—to legislate white innocence as national identity. By sanitizing slavery, suppressing discussions of systemic racism, and threatening educators with punitive ambiguity, these laws flatten historical truth and convert classrooms into zones of anticipatory obedience. The result is a state-engineered amnesia that undermines the core First and Fourteenth Amendment protections the Supreme Court has recognized for more than a century, from Meyer and Barnette …
Volume 48 Masthead,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
Voting Matters: Materiality Considerations And The Shareholder Vote,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Voting Matters: Materiality Considerations And The Shareholder Vote, Renee M. Jones
Seattle University Law Review
For the shareholder franchise to have meaning, shareholders must have access to relevant information to inform their voting decisions. The securities laws’ disclosure requirements play an essential role in informing the shareholder vote.
This Essay focuses on the question of the materiality of information in the context of shareholder voting. It addresses the question of whether ESG-related information is material, positioning the materiality inquiry within the context of shareholders’ voting decisions. It explores the definition of materiality with a focus on the “reasonable investor” concept embedded within the definition. The Essay argues that the implicit expectations of many commentators that …
Volume 48 Masthead,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
Understanding The Big Three’S Wavering Support Of Environmental And Social Shareholder Proposals,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Understanding The Big Three’S Wavering Support Of Environmental And Social Shareholder Proposals, Jeff Schwartz, Jefferson Jensen
Seattle University Law Review
Because of their substantial equity portfolios, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street (the Big 3) are central players in corporate governance. It is, therefore, critical to understand how they vote. One puzzle is that their support for shareholder proposals on environmental and social matters appears to waiver. In 2020, for instance, BlackRock supported 11.1% of environmental proposals at S&P 500 firms. In 2021, it seemingly reversed course, supporting 55.2%. It then flipped again, supporting 32.1% in 2022. Such statistics suggest that the Big 3 are constantly changing their views on these topics. This Article seeks to better understand whether this is …
Volume 48 Masthead,
2025
Seattle University School of Law
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
An Eye For An Eye Makes A Vigilant Society,
2025
Arcadia University
An Eye For An Eye Makes A Vigilant Society, Liam C. Preyer
Capstone Showcase
Vigilantism is one of the oldest practices of mankind; for as long as there have been moral and legal laws to govern us and live by, there have been individuals who have sought justice outside these systems. Vigilantism is the response to failures in the justice system, and in the United States in particular, we have seen examples from the Western Frontier to the modern-day digital landscape. This paper will explore the nature of vigilante justice through historical, psychological, media-driven, legal, and digital lenses. We will explore how cultural narratives, media influences, government actions, and psychological motivations have shaped the …
