A Supreme Court Ruling That's About Way More Than Preemption,
2013
American University Washington College of Law
A Supreme Court Ruling That's About Way More Than Preemption, Nancy Polikoff
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Valuing Art In An Estate: New Concerns,
2013
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law
Valuing Art In An Estate: New Concerns, Anne-Marie E. Rhodes
Faculty Publications & Other Works
No abstract provided.
Sharia-Compliant Wills: Principles, Recognition, And Enforcement,
2013
Fordham University School of Law
Sharia-Compliant Wills: Principles, Recognition, And Enforcement, Omar T. Mohammedi
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Re Gilmore,
2013
New York Law School
“I’M Not Quite Dead Yet!”: Rethinking Anti-Lapse Redistribution Of A Dead Beneficiary’S Gift,
2013
Florida International University College of Law
“I’M Not Quite Dead Yet!”: Rethinking Anti-Lapse Redistribution Of A Dead Beneficiary’S Gift, Eloisa Rodriguez-Dod
Faculty Publications
Anti-lapse statutes create a category of substitute takers when a beneficiary prematurely dies. They are based on the legislature’s presumption of how a testator or settlor would want his property distributed in these circumstances. However, a testator’s or settlor’s intent may effectively be frustrated by this presumed intent.
This Article critically examines the tension between an individual’s autonomy and societal goals in the context of anti-lapse statutes applicable to wills and trusts. It scrutinizes the current rules of construction regarding anti-lapse statutes and identifies their deficiencies in their application to wills and trusts. This Article analyzes and identifies the deficiencies …
Restricting Testamentary Freedom: Ex Ante Versus Ex Post Justifications,
2013
Notre Dame Law School
Restricting Testamentary Freedom: Ex Ante Versus Ex Post Justifications, Daniel B. Kelly
Journal Articles
The organizing principle of American succession law — testamentary freedom — gives decedents a nearly unrestricted right to dispose of property. After surveying the justifications for testamentary freedom, I examine the circumstances in which it may be socially beneficial for courts to alter wills, trusts, and other gratuitous transfers at death: imperfect information, negative externalities, and intergenerational equity. These justifications correspond with many existing limitations on the freedom of testation. Yet, disregarding donor intent to maximize the donees’ ex post interests, an increasingly common justification for intervention, is socially undesirable. Doing so ignores important ex ante considerations, including a donor’s …
The Not-So-Artful Dodger: The Mccourt-Selig Battle And The Powers Of The Commissioner Of Baseball,
2013
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
The Not-So-Artful Dodger: The Mccourt-Selig Battle And The Powers Of The Commissioner Of Baseball, Matthew L. Winkel
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Does “Defalcation” By A Fiduciary, Rendering A Debt Nondischargeable, Include Unknowing Breach Of The Duty Of Loyalty? (Bullock V. Bank Champaign, N.A.),
2013
New York Law School
Does “Defalcation” By A Fiduciary, Rendering A Debt Nondischargeable, Include Unknowing Breach Of The Duty Of Loyalty? (Bullock V. Bank Champaign, N.A.), Marshall E. Tracht
Other Publications
CASE AT A GLANCE
Petitioner Randy Curtis Bullock, trustee of a family trust, loaned trust funds to himself, jointly with his mother, for business purposes. These loans were all repaid. A state court entered judgment against him for breach of fiduciary duty, ordering that profits from the loaned moneys be paid to the trust. The Supreme Court must decide whether Bullock’s liability for self-dealing, without conscious misbehavior, is nondischargeable as a “defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity.
The Goldilocks Principle And Informed Consent In Joint-Spouse Representation,
2013
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
The Goldilocks Principle And Informed Consent In Joint-Spouse Representation, Madison Kaplan
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The note explores the complexities of joint legal representation of spouses, emphasizing the need for balanced and clear informed consent. It highlights the challenges posed by conflicting legal guidelines and the necessity of detailed Joint Representation Agreements (JRAs) to navigate confidentiality and communication duties effectively.
The Emergence Of Natural Gas And The Need For Cooperative Federalism To Address A Big "Fracking" Problem.,
2013
University of San Diego
The Emergence Of Natural Gas And The Need For Cooperative Federalism To Address A Big "Fracking" Problem., Joshua P. Dennis
San Diego Journal of Climate & Energy Law
This Comment explores the recent emergence of natural gas production, the hydraulic fracturing process and briefly touches on the current regulatory system that oversees its operation. I then explain why the current regulatory system is insufficient to protect individuals and the environment from hydraulic fracturing. And lastly, I argue that a form of cooperative federalism is the best approach to regulate hydraulic fracturing.
Kite: Irs Wins Qtip Battle But Loses Annuity War,
2013
Saint Louis University School of Law
Kite: Irs Wins Qtip Battle But Loses Annuity War, Kerry A. Ryan
All Faculty Scholarship
In Kite, the Tax Court held that a 10-year deferred annuity constituted adequate and full consideration for a transfer of family partnership interests, even though the transferor died before receiving any payments. The court also held that the liquidation of a qualified terminable interest property trust and subsequent sale of its assets constituted a disposition of the qualifying income interest for life, resulting in a deemed transfer of the entire trust under section 2519. Ryan discusses those holdings and two more issues that were not raised in the Tax Court proceeding but are clearly implicated by the Kite facts.
Rules Or Standards For Intestate Succession?,
2013
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Rules Or Standards For Intestate Succession?, Stewart E. Sterk
Articles
No abstract provided.
Grantor Trusts: The Who, The What, The Where, The Wherefore, And The Wherewithal,
2012
University of South Dakota School of Law
Grantor Trusts: The Who, The What, The Where, The Wherefore, And The Wherewithal, Thomas Simmons
Faculty Publications
In a “grantor trust,” the grantor is treated as the owner for income tax purposes. All income generated by the trust assets of a grantor trust is taxed to the grantor. Essentially, the trust is ignored for income tax purposes. When an individual creates a revocable living trust and funds it with his or her own assets, for example, the trust is a grantor trust for federal income tax purposes until the grantor’s death. These written materials summarize the history of the grantor trust rules, discuss the rules in context, and illustrate the rules in operation with an outline of …
Wills, Trusts, Guardianships, And Fiduciary Administration,
2012
Mercer University School of Law
Wills, Trusts, Guardianships, And Fiduciary Administration, Mary F. Radford
Mercer Law Review
This Article describes selected cases and significant legislation from the period of June 1, 2011 through May 31, 2012 that pertain to Georgia fiduciary law and estate planning.
Interpreting I.R.C. § 67(E): The Supreme Court's Attempt To Nail Investment Advisory Fees To The "Floor",
2012
University of Florida Levin College of Law
Interpreting I.R.C. § 67(E): The Supreme Court's Attempt To Nail Investment Advisory Fees To The "Floor", Lindsay Roshkind
Florida Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Case For The Retention Of The State Death Tax Credit In The Federal Transfer Tax Scheme: "Just Say No" To A Deduction,
2012
Pepperdine University
The Case For The Retention Of The State Death Tax Credit In The Federal Transfer Tax Scheme: "Just Say No" To A Deduction, John M. Janiga, Louis S. Harrison
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Crummey Trusts: An Exploitation Of The Annual Exclusion,
2012
Pepperdine University
Crummey Trusts: An Exploitation Of The Annual Exclusion, Dora Arash
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Distinction Without A Difference? An Examination Of The Legal And Ethical Difference Between Asset Protection And Fraudulent Transfers Under Virginia Law,
2012
University of Richmond
A Distinction Without A Difference? An Examination Of The Legal And Ethical Difference Between Asset Protection And Fraudulent Transfers Under Virginia Law, Elizabeth Southall
Law Student Publications
“A distinction without a difference”—a colloquial expression employed by one wishing to recognize that while a linguistic or conceptual distinction exists between any number of options, any such distinction lacks substantive practical effect. To allege that a situation presents “a distinction without a difference” is to suggest that any difference between a given set of options is a logical fallacy—purely a creature of erroneous perception. When it comes to concepts of asset protection planning and fraudulent transfer law, one must ask whether the law draws a distinction where there is no difference....This essay identifies these distinctions. Part II provides a …
Wills, Trusts, And Estates,
2012
Hunton & Williams, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia
Wills, Trusts, And Estates, J. William Gray Jr., Katherine E. Ramsey
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Right To Publicity After Death: Postmortem Personality Rights In The Wake Of Experiencehendrix V. Hendrixlicensing.Com,
2012
Seattle University School of Law
The Right To Publicity After Death: Postmortem Personality Rights In The Wake Of Experiencehendrix V. Hendrixlicensing.Com, Aubrie Hicks
Seattle University Law Review
While the states are fairly consistent in protecting the rights of living individuals, the level of protection for deceased celebrities varies among the states. Some states allow the right to extend beyond death, while others refuse to recognize a postmortem right of publicity. Even among states that do recognize a postmortem right of publicity, the right is protected to varying degrees, with some states providing explicit statutory protections and others providing only common law protections. Given the inconsistencies among the states, the continuing right to publicity after death has been the subject of much litigation over the last few years, …
