Offshore Wind: A Comparative Of The United States And Norway,
2024
Fordham Law School
Offshore Wind: A Comparative Of The United States And Norway
Fordham Environmental Law Review
No abstract provided.
Assessing The Human Right To Water And Sanitation In International Law And The Conflict In The Nile Basin,
2024
Fordham Law School
Assessing The Human Right To Water And Sanitation In International Law And The Conflict In The Nile Basin
Fordham Environmental Law Review
Ethiopia’s construction and operation of the Grand Ethiopian
Renaissance Dam (GERD) on the Blue Nile has intensified the long-
standing water conflict involving Ethiopia, Egypt, and Sudan, and
highlights the urgent need for a new legal framework for the Nile
Basin’s governance. This article traces the history of the international
human right to water and sanitation and previous attempts to govern
water use in the Nile Basin. We argue that outdated colonial-era
treaties, which Egypt and Sudan insist on using as a baseline for
negotiations, are a significant obstacle to resolving the Nile conflict
and managing the region’s water resources …
Debts And Desertion: Bankruptcy Law And The Orphan Well Crisis,
2024
Fordham Law School
Debts And Desertion: Bankruptcy Law And The Orphan Well Crisis
Fordham Environmental Law Review
The issue of orphan wells—unplugged and unproductive oil and
gas wells with no responsible operator—poses a significant
environmental and public health threat in the United States. The scale
of this crisis is alarming: there are over 120,000 documented orphan
wells and potentially millions more undocumented. These wells are
often significant sources of methane emissions and other toxins that
exacerbate climate change and endanger the health of surrounding
communities. This paper examines the orphan well crisis, exploring
how wells become orphaned and the environmental and health
impacts associated with them. Furthermore, it delves into how the
situation is likely to worsen …
Governing Private Governance,
2024
Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Governing Private Governance, Joshua Ulan Galperin
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
After the Supreme Court's opinion in Dobbs rejected an individual right to reproductive choice, many private firms chose to govern reproductive healthcare by covering employee access to abortions. As mass shootings continue to plague the country, some firms have decided to govern firearm safety by discontinuing sales of assault weapons. While the climate crisis continues to upend life on Earth, corporate leaders are engaging in private environmental governance by voluntarily reducing their own emissions, demanding reductions within their supply chains, and pressuring peers and competitors to do the same. Each of these endeavors represents a form of private governance in …
Multinational Asset Management Firms & Esg Disclosure Management,
2024
Holland & Knight LLP
Multinational Asset Management Firms & Esg Disclosure Management, Maggie Pahl, Michael Hamersky, Jason J. Czarnezki
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
In recent years, the United States, European Union, and United Kingdom have introduced “Environmental, Social, and Governance” disclosure regulations. Multinational Asset Management Firms must now navigate the evolving and varied disclosure and labeling requirements they are subjected to across multiple jurisdictions. This Article provides a brief history of ESG disclosure regulation and provides a summary of the enacted and proposed regulations and identifies the biggest points of contention between the regulations and provides suggestions for a more comprehensive standardized regulatory framework.
Displacing Climate Precarity,
2024
Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Displacing Climate Precarity, Camila Bustos, Julia Neusner
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
In this Essay, we explore these questions and present a two-part argument. In Parts II and III, we argue that because climate change is exacerbating other drivers of displacement, it is seldom possible to attribute movement to any single factor or to categorize movement conclusively as voluntary or involuntary. Therefore, expanding pathways to safety for all people on the move is the best approach to protect those displaced, directly or indirectly, by climate change and environmental disasters. In Part IV, we argue that, despite attribution and definitional challenges with regard to climate-related mobility, documenting and assessing the role of climate …
Closing Remarks: Toward A Climate Migration Solution,
2024
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
Closing Remarks: Toward A Climate Migration Solution, Austin T. Fragomen, Jr., Nancy H. Morowitz
Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law
No abstract provided.
Disclosure, Greenwashing, And The Future Of Esg Litigation,
2024
Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Disclosure, Greenwashing, And The Future Of Esg Litigation, Jason J. Czarnezki, Barbara Ballan
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) disclosure movement is expanding both voluntarily, as businesses choose to disclose this information, and mandatorily, as government agencies impose disclosure requirements. As ESG disclosure expands, so do the litigation risks. “Greenwashing” refers to presenting false or misleading environmental or sustainability (i.e., “green”) qualities of products, services, or practices. Businesses may greenwash consumers as well as investors with false and misleading ESG disclosures in advertising, securities filings, or other public statements activating greenwashing litigation from investors and consumers. This Article addresses (1) the laws and regulations that cover consumer and securities greenwashing litigation, (2) how …
Against Gap-Filling,
2024
Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law
Against Gap-Filling, Noah C. Chauvin
Cardozo Law Review de•novo
Legal scholars delight in gap-filling. They frequently claim that their works have identified a gap in the literature and to have filled (or begun filling) that gap. However, all too often, these same papers fail to explain why the gap needed to be filled at all. Indeed, despite a robust tradition of meta-scholarship, the legal literature is largely devoid of a theory of academic gap-filling. This essay fills that gap, arguing that gap-filling for the sake of gap-filling is an error for three interconnected reasons. First, gaps might exist for a good reason. Second, concern with gap-filling is often a …
Corn War: A Trade Fight Between The United States And Mexico,
2024
Dale E. Fowler School of Law, Chapman University
Corn War: A Trade Fight Between The United States And Mexico, Ernesto Hernández-López
Cardozo Law Review de•novo
An international fight grows over corn. The United States claims that México’s ban on genetically modified (GMO) corn violates the United StatesMexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). México prohibits GMO corn for human consumption. American arguments focus on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) measures, covered in Chapter 9 of the USMCA. A trade panel will review these.
This Essay first describes SPS arguments and relevant trade rules. The United States’ complaints emphasize that México’s ban is excessive, is not consistent with international standards, and mishandles risks. Second, the Essay identifies the obstacles American positions face: weak mandates and deference to México. Chapter 9 of …
Calming The Waters: The International Atomic Energy Agency As A Viable Model To Address Water Weaponization,
2024
Emory University School of Law
Calming The Waters: The International Atomic Energy Agency As A Viable Model To Address Water Weaponization, Jenna Beasley
Emory International Law Review
No abstract provided.
Public Primacy In Corporate Law,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
Public Primacy In Corporate Law, Dorothy S. Lund
Seattle University Law Review
This Article explores the malleability of agency theory by showing that it could be used to justify a “public primacy” standard for corporate law that would direct fiduciaries to promote the value of the corporation for the benefit of the public. Employing agency theory to describe the relationship between corporate management and the broader public sheds light on aspects of firm behavior, as well as the nature of state contracting with corporations. It also provides a lodestar for a possible future evolution of corporate law and governance: minimize the agency costs created by the divergence of interests between management and …
Robo-Voting: Does Delegated Proxy Voting Pose A Challenge For Shareholder Democracy?,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
Robo-Voting: Does Delegated Proxy Voting Pose A Challenge For Shareholder Democracy?, John Matsusaka, Chong Shu
Seattle University Law Review
Robo-voting is the practice by an investment fund of mechanically voting in corporate elections according to the advice of its proxy advisor— in effect fully delegating its voting decision to its advisor. We examined over 65 million votes cast during the period 2008–2021 by 14,582 mutual funds to describe and quantify the prevalence of robo-voting. Overall, 33% of mutual funds robo-voted in 2021: 22% with ISS, 4% with Glass Lewis, and six percent with the recommendations of the issuer’s management. The fraction of funds that robo-voted increased until around 2013 and then stabilized at the current level. Despite the sizable …
The Limits Of Corporate Governance,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
The Limits Of Corporate Governance, Cathy Hwang, Emily Winston
Seattle University Law Review
What is the purpose of the corporation? For decades, the answer was clear: to put shareholders’ interests first. In many cases, this theory of shareholder primacy also became synonymous with the imperative to maximize shareholder wealth. In the world where shareholder primacy was a north star, courts, scholars, and policymakers had relatively little to fight about: most debates were minor skirmishes about exactly how to maximize shareholder wealth.
Part I of this Essay discusses the shortcomings of shareholder primacy and stakeholder governance, arguing that neither of these modes of governance provides an adequate framework for incentivizing corporations to do good. …
The Pioneers, Waves, And Random Walks Of Securities Law In The Supreme Court,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
The Pioneers, Waves, And Random Walks Of Securities Law In The Supreme Court, Elizabeth Pollman
Seattle University Law Review
After the pioneers, waves, and random walks that have animated the history of securities laws in the U.S. Supreme Court, we might now be on the precipice of a new chapter. Pritchard and Thompson’s superb book, A History of Securities Law in the Supreme Court, illuminates with rich archival detail how the Court’s view of the securities laws and the SEC have changed over time and how individuals have influenced this history. The book provides an invaluable resource for understanding nearly a century’s worth of Supreme Court jurisprudence in the area of securities law and much needed context for …
Three Stories: A Comment On Pritchard & Thompson’S A History Of Securities Laws In The Supreme Court,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
Three Stories: A Comment On Pritchard & Thompson’S A History Of Securities Laws In The Supreme Court, Harwell Wells
Seattle University Law Review
Adam Pritchard and Robert Thompson’s A History of Securities Laws in the Supreme Court should stand for decades as the definitive work on the Federal securities laws’ career in the Supreme Court across the twentieth century.1 Like all good histories, it both tells a story and makes an argument. The story recounts how the Court dealt with the major securities laws, as well the agency charged with enforcing them, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the rules it promulgated, from the 1930s into the twenty-first century. But the book does not just string together a series of events, “one …
On The Value Of History: A Review Of A.C. Pritchard & Robert B. Thompson’S A History Of Securities Law In The Supreme Court,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
On The Value Of History: A Review Of A.C. Pritchard & Robert B. Thompson’S A History Of Securities Law In The Supreme Court, Joel Seligman
Seattle University Law Review
A.C. Pritchard and Bob Thompson have written a splendid history of securities law decisions in the Supreme Court. Their book is exemplary because of its detailed use of the long unpublished papers of Supreme Court justices, including those of Harry Blackmun, William O. Douglas, Felix Frankfurter and Lewis F. Powell, primary sources which included correspondence with other Justices and law clerks as well as interviews with law clerks. The use of these primary sources recounted throughout the text and 67 pages of End Notes deepens our understanding of the intentions of the Justices and sharpens our understanding of the conflicts …
Table Of Contents,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Memories Of An Affirmative Action Activist,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
Memories Of An Affirmative Action Activist, Margaret E. Montoya
Seattle University Law Review
Some twenty-five years ago, the Society of American Law Teachers (SALT) led a march supporting Affirmative Action in legal education to counter the spate of litigation and other legal prohibitions that exploded during the 1990s, seeking to limit or abolish race-based measures. The march began at the San Francisco Hilton Hotel, where the Association of American Law Schools (AALS) was having its annual meeting, and proceeded to Union Square. We, the organizers of the march, did not expect the march to become an iconic event; one that would be remembered as a harbinger of a new era of activism by …
Defeat Fascism, Transform Democracy: Mapping Academic Resources, Reframing The Fundamentals, And Organizing For Collective Actions,
2024
Seattle University School of Law
Defeat Fascism, Transform Democracy: Mapping Academic Resources, Reframing The Fundamentals, And Organizing For Collective Actions, Francisco Valdes
Seattle University Law Review
The information we gathered during 2021–2023 shows that critical faculty and other academic resources are present throughout most of U.S. legal academia. Counting only full-time faculty, our limited research identified 778 contacts in 200 schools equating to nearly four contacts on average per school. But no organized critical “core” had coalesced within legal academia or, more broadly, throughout higher education expressly dedicated to defending and advancing critical knowledge and its production up to now. And yet, as the 2021–2022 formation of the Critical (Legal) Collective (“CLC”) outlined below demonstrates, many academics sense or acknowledge the need for greater cohesion among …
