Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

Seamen, Railroad Employees, And Uber Drivers: Applying The Section 1 Exemption In The Federal Arbitration Ace To Rideshare Drivers, Conor Bradley

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA or the Act) exempts “seamen, railroad employees, [and] any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce” from arbitration. In 2019, the Supreme Court held in New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira that this provision exempted independent contractors as well as employees. This decision expanded the reach of the section 1 exemption and may affect the relationship between ridesharing companies, such as Uber, and their drivers. Previously, ridesharing companies argued that courts must enforce the arbitration clauses in their employment contracts because their workers were independent contractors and, therefore, section 1 …

Let The Earth Teach You Torah: Sustainability In Jewish Law, Itzchak E. Kornfeld

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Settlement Fever: Lawyers, Have You Updated Your Philosophical Map?, Elayne E. Greenberg

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

This column is the second in my three-part series about settlement fever. The focus of this column is on how settlement fever is incentivizing you, an ethical lawyer, to expand your legal mindset when you engage with your clients to help resolve their disputes. Have you updated your philosophical map lately?

Ethical Compass: Three Different Judicial Treatments For Settlement Fever, Elayne E. Greenberg

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

This is the first of a three-part series that examines different aspects of the settlement fever that has stricken our justice system. What can we learn from judicial decisions about how individual judges assess the settlement means that lawyers, in consultation with their clients, have chosen to resolve their case?

If You Build It, Will They Come? An Empirical Study Of The Voluntary Use Of Mediation And Its Implications, Dwight Golann

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

A generation ago, American litigants did not often go to mediation voluntarily. Advocates of the process predicted, however, that as lawyers and parties became more familiar with mediation, they would opt to use it more often. But, is this true? Virtually no data exists about how often litigants voluntarily choose to mediate legal disputes, whether use varies in different kinds of cases, and what motivates litigants' decisions whether to mediate or not. This Article presents data about each of these issues and analyzes its meaning.

Client-Centered Communication: How Effective Lawyering Requires Emotional Intelligence, Active Listening, And Client Choice, Heather Heavin, Michaela Keet

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

For the lawyer-client relationship to work effectively, lawyers need to provide clients with competent, understandable, and relevant legal advice. This proposition is so central to the lawyer's role that it is difficult to challenge. Yet, we suggest, this proposition belies the complexity of the responsibility, given the decision-making process that clients are going through (or should be going through) when deciding to litigate or to settle through negotiation or mediation. The educational literature contains much advice for lawyers on the benefits of dispute resolution processes, how to select and navigate through them, but much less on how lawyers should guide …

The Use Of Mediation To Resolve Conflicts Arising From Cultural Appropriation By Western Fashion Brands, Faith Adongo

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The Cambridge Dictionary defines cultural appropriation as "the act of taking or using things from a culture that is not your own, especially without showing that you understand or respect this culture." It is sometimes referred to as cultural misappropriation, and also defined as taking intellectual property, traditional knowledge, cultural expressions, or artifacts from a culture other than one's own, without permission. Supporters of cultural appropriation see it as the only realistic way of developing, spreading and integrating cultures, while critics see it as a means through which dominant cultures "borrow" from the cultures of minority groups.

Applying Mediation To The Complexities Of Surrogacy Agreements, Aude-Mazarine Lestienne

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In the late part of the twentieth century, assisted reproductive technologies ("ART") offered new hope to individuals who were infertile, could not carry a pregnancy, or whose attempts to form non-biological families were rejected. At the same time, advances in ART transformed and strained the traditional notions of family, as well as the legal concepts surrounding it. If utilized for the negotiation of the terms of surrogacy agreements, mediation could provide a creative alternative to time-worn legalistic approaches to solving the problems raised by these complex new family dynamics.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 22, Iss. 3

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

But Is It Good: The Need To Measure, Assess, And Report On Court-Connected Adr, Nancy A. Welsh

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

We know that very few civil matters reach disposition through trial-but what do we really know about how civil cases DO reach disposition? What number of civil cases reach disposition through settlement? What number of civil cases reach settlement through court-connected "alternative" dispute resolution (ADR)? Do we know enough about the results of court-connected ADR to be able to detect potential patterns of systemic discrimination? This Article examines what we know from federal and state court systems' public reporting and finds: 1) only a minority of federal district courts and state court systems report regarding dispositions through settlement; 2) there …

Mediation: Embedded Assumptions Of Whiteness?, Sharon Press, Ellen E. Deason

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Article began with the murder of George Floyd by an officer of the Minneapolis Police Department on May 25, 2020, after a convenience store employee reported that Floyd used a counterfeit $20 bill to purchase cigarettes. Seventeen minutes after the police arrived, Floyd was unconscious, pinned beneath them. The events were recorded by bystanders and the public was confronted with visual evidence of what has been happening to Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) especially Black men-for centuries. It was dramatic testimony that law enforcement is based on a system that is the product of systemic racism and …

Visions For The Future: Diversity And Inclusion Initiatives In Court-Annexed Adr Programs, Robyn Weinstein, Lance Bond

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

At the Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution's recent symposium, speakers were asked to dream about court systems of the future. When we dream of a court system of the future, we dream of one that is truly representative of the litigants we serve. This should not only be true of the judiciary and court staff, but also of the alternative dispute resolution programs that are embedded in many state and federal court systems.

Reimagining Adr In New York Courts, Edwina G. Mendelson, Diana Colón, Thomas V. O'Neill

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic made a swift and devastating impact in New York State. Virtually all of life's routines-working, socializing, commuting-were affected, subject to mask mandates, strictly reduced occupational capacities, and widespread working from home for those fortunate to do so. The state court system was no exception to the pandemic's reach. Constitutional guarantees and the preservation of essential legal rights necessitated that the courts always remain available to court users, but the protection of public health mandated that court processes that were traditionally conducted in-person could only remain operational by adapting those processes to new virtual formats.

Designing A State Court Small Claims Odr System: Hitting A Moving Target In New York During A Pandemic, David Allen Larson

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

When I began helping the New York State Unified Court System design a pilot online dispute resolution ("ODR") system back in October 2016, I never imagined more than four years would pass before a system was implemented. One reason our journey was so long is because our target kept moving. After completing a detailed credit card debt collection ODR platform, we had to change direction before implementation and focus instead on small claims cases. Then like the rest of the world, we suddenly had to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic. Although it took longer than anticipated, we achieved our goal …

A Case For Diversionary Restorative Justice In Cases Involving The Embezzlement Of Funds From Small Businesses, Amanda Cooper

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In 2015, John Tschol, the owner of a small advising business in Bloomington, Minnesota, thought that he had a wonderful work life. His business was successful-enough to make a modest profit-and his employees were loyal, hard workers, who had been with him for years. Then he found out that his bookkeeper, Laura Scholz, had been embezzling funds, stealing more than $317,000 over two years.

Taxing Employers For Imposing Mandatory Arbitration, Class Action Waiver, And Nondisclosure Of Dispute Provisions, Rebecca N. Morrow

SMU Law Review

Employers impose coercive dispute resolution terms on their employees more frequently, more broadly, and with greater legal success than ever before. Recent survey data indicates that mandatory employment arbitration provisions bind more than 60 million American workers—over half of the U.S. private-sector nonunion workforce. Employment class action waivers bind nearly 25 million American workers. In 2018, the Supreme Court held 5–4 that mandatory arbitration provisions and class action waivers imposed by employers on their employees do not violate the National Labor Relations Act. These terms prohibit employees from exposing employer wrongdoing in open court, bar employees with valid wage and …

The Interpretation Of International Investment Treaties: The Application Of Mfn Clauses To Matters Of Dispute Settlement In Bits, Amr Mostafa Aabed Abdo

Theses and Dissertations

The decisions of the arbitral tribunals have been under heavy attack for the inconsistent and unintended interpretations that went beyond the intent of the parties as it is expressed in the treaty provisions. One of these misinterpreted provisions is the MFN clause. Many tribunals have used this clause to allocate the adjudicatory authority between international arbitration and domestic courts. The problem of this application is a matter of treaty interpretation that is governed by the international rules of interpretation in the VCLT. These rules provide a balance approach to treaty interpretation and recognize equally the legitimate rights and interests of …

Bibliometric Analysis Of Research Trends On Role Of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms In Family Law Conflicts, Himanshi Parekh, Yogesh Dharangutti

Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal)

This paper is a bibliometric analysis of research publications in the field of dispute resolution of family matters. The paper analyses the frequency of publications in this arena and identifying the research gaps. The paper utilizes literature published on this subject available at the Scopus database from 2011 to 2020. A total of 59 documents varying from books, chapters, articles, and journals have been extracted and analyzed for the purpose of this study. This data is further analyzed and presented in the forms of tables, maps, graphs, etc using VOSviewer and IMAPBuilder software. The study shows that even though there …

Hong Kong And China: Building Bridges Between Two Systems In One Country, Harold Kang

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In 1984, Britain and China negotiated an agreement that resulted in Hong Kong's reunification with China over one hundred years after it was surrendered to Britain following the Opium War. The Sino-British Joint Declaration stipulated that although China would exercise territorial sovereignty over Hong Kong, Hong Kong would still maintain a high degree of autonomy until the year 2047. This meant that Hong Kong would have independent executive, legislative, and judicial powers while maintaining its capitalist system and way of life. However, these promisesdespite codification in the Basic Law, which is a quasi-Constitution-do not escape the inherent contradiction in "one …

Website Accessibility Lawsuits: Using Online Dispute Resolution To Provide More Efficient Outcomes Within The Second Circuit, Zachary Kriesberg

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.