Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

Feminist Legal Theory And #Metoo: Revisiting Tarana Burke’S Vision Of Empowerment Through Empathy, Penelope E. Andrews

Texas A&M Law Review

It is my purpose to ground this Article in ubuntu and the politics of radical love as applied to the goals of #MeToo and its pursuit of redress for victims of sexual harms. Part II explores the convergences and divergences of #MeToo with feminist campaigns of an earlier era. Part III questions whether a renewed quest for gender equality, largely spawned by a Twitter/social media campaign, may lead to sustainable change built on notions of empathy and restorative justice, which was the vision espoused by Carrie in her work and which influenced Tarana Burke when she founded #MeToo. Part IV …

Ethical Negotiation And Postcapitalist Politics: An Essay For Carrie, Amy J. Cohen

Texas A&M Law Review

In a 1983 article, Legal Negotiation: A Study of Strategies in Search of a Theory, Carrie Menkel-Meadow took stock of what was motivating a diverse range of scholars to want to reimagine negotiation theory. She described these negotiation scholars as shaped by the exigencies of their own political moments. Some were lawyers concerned about too much litigation of an unsatisfying quality. Many, however, were concerned more broadly about “the general level of hostility in the world,” even haunted by the possibility that nuclear weapons could destroy all of humanity. Negotiation scholars included “[e]conomists and game theorists . . . concerned …

Carrie Menkel-Meadow: Dispute Resolution In A Feminist Voice, Andrea Kupfer Schneider

Texas A&M Law Review

The presence of women in the law has changed the law’s substance, practice, and process. Carrie Menkel-Meadow, whose scholarship centers on this theme, is one such revolutionary woman.

Professor Menkel-Meadow, who I am proud to call my colleague, co-author, and friend (hereinafter referred to as Carrie), began her career in 1977 with a series of simple questions that sparked a breathtaking body of work. Carrie probed the depth of male domination in the realm of law and wondered what changes female representation might engender. In particular, she focused her inquiry on the value orientation each respective gender might bring to …

Appendix To “The Amazing Carrie Menkel-Meadow And What Wins When Passions Collide”, Lela Porter Love

Texas A&M Law Review

Appendix to “The Amazing Carrie Menkel-Meadow and What Wins When Passions Collide”

Kukin Program Newsletter – Fall 2022, Kukin Program For Conflict Resolution

Kukin Program Newsletters

The Kukin Program Newsletter – Fall 2022 celebrates leadership transitions, achievements, and initiatives at Cardozo Law School's Kukin Program for Conflict Resolution. Andrea Kupfer Schneider joins as Director, succeeding founding director Lela Love, with Robyn Weinstein taking on key roles in the Mediation Clinic. Faculty aided Ukrainian law students with skills training, and ADR Competition Honor Society members achieved international and domestic victories. The program awarded Boskey Restorative Justice Fellowships to students working on impactful community projects. Events like the Melnick Symposium explored critical topics, while William Ury received the International Advocate for Peace Award for his global conflict resolution …

Carrie Menkel-Meadow: Dispute Resolution In A Feminist Voice, Andrea K. Schneider

Articles

The presence of women in the law has changed the law’s substance, practice, and process. Carrie Menkel-Meadow, whose scholarship centers on this theme, is one such revolutionary woman.

Professor Menkel-Meadow, who I am proud to call my colleague, co-author, and friend (hereinafter referred to as Carrie), began her career in 1977 with a series of simple questions that sparked a breathtaking body of work. Carrie probed the depth of male domination in the realm of law and wondered what changes female representation might engender. In particular, she focused her inquiry on the value orientation each respective gender might bring to …

Expanding The Idea To Mitigate Disproportionality Of English Language Learners In Special Education, Hannah R. Kramer

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note addresses the disproportionate representation of English Language Learners (ELLs) in special education, arguing that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is insufficient in addressing their unique linguistic and cultural needs. It advocates for reforms to the IDEA, including enhanced pre-evaluation screening, culturally sensitive assessments, and an expanded definition of the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) to ensure ELLs receive appropriate educational support without misclassification.

The End Of Forced Arbitration Of Sexual Violence And The Uncertain Future, Heidi M. S. Sandomir

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note argues that forced arbitration clauses in employment contracts systematically deny justice to survivors of workplace sexual violence by shielding employers from accountability and limiting legal recourse. While the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (EFAA) represents a step forward by invalidating predispute arbitration agreements for sexual assault and harassment claims, it falls short of fully addressing the issue due to gaps in retroactive application, inconsistent court interpretations, and lack of alignment with Title VII. The note calls for broader legislative reforms to eliminate forced arbitration in all discrimination cases and ensure survivors' access to …

Non-Satisfaction Of Pre-Arbitration Requirements: Moving Away From Conditions Precedent Towards The Admissibility Of A Claim – Nwa V Nvf, Darius Chan, Joel Soon

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

In earlier cases, the non-satisfaction of pre-arbitration requirements has been analysed by the Singapore and English courts by reference to the issue of conditions precedent. It was assumed without argument that, if a requirement was construed as a condition precedent, the failure to satisfy that requirement would deprive the tribunal of jurisdiction. More recently, English and Hong Kong case law has focused on a different issue, asking whether the failure to meet the pre-arbitration requirement affects the tribunal’s jurisdiction or the admissibility of the claim. This case note analyses whether the Singapore courts should follow suit.

Automating Discrimination: Ai Hiring Practices And Gender Inequality, Lori Andrews, Hannah Bucher

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Amazing Carrie Menkel-Meadow And What Wins When Passions Collide, Lela Love

Articles

Carrie Menkel-Meadow (sometimes referred to as “Carrie” herein) is famous in the dispute resolution world as one of the field’s founders. Her prolific writing on dispute resolution—negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and the variants of these major processes—evidences an unrivaled passion for the subject. A renaissance thinker, her intellectual explorations also extend to other areas such as women’s rights and restorative justice for victims of egregious wrongs.

Her multiple passions sometimes create dynamic tensions. For example, what happens if mediation norms threaten a woman’s rights? Or if mediators divert the focus of a dispute resolution process to the future, neglecting a horrific …

Peer Mediation: A New Opportunity In St. Louis City Schools, Beatrice Connaghan

SLU Law Journal Online

Mediation is often used in legal disputes, but what happens when the same process is applied to children in order to deter conflicts and avoid the need for school administration intervention? In this article, Beatrice Connaghan discusses the process of training students to become peer mediators to deter conflicts in St. Louis Schools.

Collaborative Processes And Family Engagement, Kelly Browe Olson

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Non-Applications Of Good Faith, Trust, And Confidentiality In Arbitration: A Study Of The Annulment Cases In Indonesia, Anangga W. Roosdiono, Muhamad Dzadit Taqwa, Mayta Ciara Salsabila

Indonesia Law Review

Arbitration is a dispute resolution method that is chosen by the parties for, mainly, avoiding weaknesses of resolving disputes through the general court. It has three principles, that strongly connect to one another, to hold: good faith, trust, and confidentiality. These principles determine whether a dispute resolution through arbitration will be successful. However, in many - if not all - cases, many disputing parties still do not maintain these principles. This reality can be observed in annulment cases. Although the annulment mechanism renders a protection to the parties from the errors made by intention, this mechanism opens an opportunity for …

Most Favoured Nation Clause: Unleashing Its Legal Potential In Favour Of Foreign Investors In Renewable Energy Sector, Mohammad Akefi Ghaziani, Vahid Akefi Ghaziani, Moosa Akefi Ghaziani Dr.

Indonesia Law Review

International Investment Law and other international legal systems, such as trade law and environmental law have interactions and dynamic interrelationships in meeting global challenges including energy security, climate change, and the need for the renewable energy transition. They help in delivering the principles of justice in the context of changing global values and legal practices. Accordingly, they have a potential share in the global climate change mitigation agenda through innovative policies and regulations, inter alia, to facilitate and promote foreign investment and trade in the renewable energy sector. Similarly, these systems have common principles in their respective agreements. The Most-Favoured …

Brian Flores's Employment Discrimination Lawsuit Against The Nfl: A Game Changer Or Business As Usual?, Michael Conklin, Jennifer Barger-Johnson, Marty Ludlum

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

The Novelty In Terms Of Jurisdiction And Procedural System For The Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitration Awards In The United Arab Emirates, Prof. Sayed Mahmoud Ahmed, Dr. Mudhafar Jaber Al-Rawi

UAEU Law Journal

يجسد التنفيذ الاختياري والجبري غاية طلب التحكيم لكل من يحصل على حكم يحقق المراد من الدعوى التحكيمية. وفي نطاق أحكام التحكيم الأجنبية، فإن الترخيص بدون شروط أو قيود وطنية لتنفيذ أحكام التحكيم الأجنبية يؤدي إلى المساس بسيادة الدولة على إقليمها، لذا أصبح الأمر بالتنفيذ هو الأداة الرقابية القضائية التي يفرضها المشرع الوطني على إرادة الأطراف، فهي رقابة لاحقة على صدور حكم التحكيم – الوطني أو الدولي أو الأجنبي -حين يراد تنفيذه. ونظراً لتباين التشريعات الدولية والوطنية في شروط وإجراءات تنفيذ الاحكام التحكيمية الأجنبية فإن مشكلة الدراسة تكمن في معرفة أي النصوص الواجبة التطبيق لتقدير مدى توافر اختصاص وإجراءات استصدار الأمر …

International Arbitration, Sujey Herrera, Marcus Quintanilla, Martine Forneret, Emily Scherker, Jeffrey Rosenthal, James A. Egerton-Vernon, Richard Deutsch, Ranjan Agarwal, Félix Poggio, Rafael Pereyra Zorraquin, Joyce Fong, Dan Perera, Rong Gu, Helen Tang, Weina Ye, Timur Ibrahim Sen, Andrew White, Jayesh H, Dawn Yamane Hewett, Julianne Jaquith, Chelsea Pollard, Ibrahim Sattout, Adnan Gaafar, Myriam Khedair, James Boykin, Stijn Winters, Amanda Lee, Peter Ashford, Sabrina Janzik, Christina Nitsche, Gerard Meijer, Valerie Verberne, Markian Malskyy, Oksana Karel, Daryna Hrebeniuk, Keara A. Bergin, Christopher P. Denicola

The Year in Review

No abstract provided.

Litigating Terror In The Sinai After The Egyptian Spring Revolution: Should States Be Liable To Foreign Investors For Failure To Prevent Terrorist Attacks?, Robert Howse, Amin R. Yacoub

Michigan Journal of International Law

The ambiguity of the due diligence standard of the Full Protection and Security obligation in investment treaties persists to this day. A recent ICSID tribunal found a developing state liable for breaching the Full Protection and Security obligation due to its inability to protect a foreign investment against terrorist attacks in a remote deserted area. In this article, we analytically criticize the Ampal v. Egypt arbitral award against the comprehensive factual matrix behind the case. Based on our criticism of Ampal, we argue that developing states should not be liable for failing to prevent or stop terrorist attacks under the …

Review Of The Little Book Of Police Youth Dialogue: A Restorative Path Toward Justice, Robert Brenneman

The Journal of Social Encounters

No abstract provided.