Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

Foreword

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Backing The Trustees: How Erisa Supports Enforcing Arbitration Awards And Ensures Equitable Relief, Chloe R. Graham

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Bridging Theory And Practice: A Review Of Sovereign Immunity From Execution And International Arbitration By Ylli Dautaj, Taimoor R. Sultan

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Unconscionability In Consumer Arbitration: Interpreting Heckman V. Live Nation And Its Impact On Mass Arbitration, Taylor E. Crowley

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

An Arbitration Revelation? The Evolution Of Ai And Online Arbitration, Emily Bishop

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Arbitrating Energy: The Impact Of Arbitration On The Energy Transition, Somtochukwu Attamah, Lara B. Fowler

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

Even prior to recent events in the Middle East, the global energy sector has been undergoing a significant transformation as states pursue regulatory reforms aimed at addressing climate change, environmental protection, and energy system restructuring. These developments have contributed to an increase in disputes arising from energy-related investments, particularly where regulatory measures affect existing investment expectations. This paper examines the role of arbitration in the context of global energy transitions by tracking publicly available arbitration cases through 2022 and analyzing selected energy disputes linked to regulatory change. It explores how arbitration operates not only as a mechanism for resolving …

The Quiet Revival Of The Effective Vindication Of Rights Doctrine, Myriam Gilles

Fordham Law Review

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in American Express v. Italian Colors Restaurantwas widely seen as the death knell for the “effective vindication of rights” doctrine—a judicially created rule that arbitration agreements are enforceable only “so long as the prospective litigant effectively may vindicate its statutory cause of action in the arbitral forum.” By upholding a class action–banning arbitration provision that rendered arbitration economically irrational, Italian Colors appeared to extinguish any meaningful limits on the enforcement of arbitration agreements.

But reports of the doctrine’s demise were premature. This Article uncovers how, in the decade since Italian Colors, lower …

Cjcr Publishes Volume 27, Issue 2 (Symposium 2025), Michele Kallo

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (CJCR) Blog

The Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution—the country’s preeminent legal journal of arbitration, negotiation, mediation, settlement, and restorative justice—today published the web edition of Volume 27, Issue 2 (Symposium 2025). The print edition of the issue has also been released.

Accessible at Volume 27.2: Symposium 2025, this issue contains Articles by Sarah Rudolph Cole, Michael Z. Green, Jill I. Gross, and Amy J. Schmitz; Notes by Thomas Riley, Matthew Zelman, and Leora Perlstein; and a Commentary by Federica Simonelli.

The print edition of the issue has also been released. This post was originally published on the Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution …

It's The Night Of The Living Deepfakes: The Threat Of Deepfakes On The Film Industry, Neki Shero

DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Front Matter

DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Maurice Q. Robinson ’09 Honored At 16th Annual Ballsa Celebration, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo Law News Archive

Cardozo School of Law honored alumnus Maurice Q. Robinson ('09) at the 16th Annual BALLSA Celebration for his leadership, service, and commitment to mentoring students and strengthening the law school's alumni community. The event also recognized recipients of the BALLSA Scholarship and celebrated the contributions of Cardozo's affinity groups.

Mediation Training, Stephen L. Sherwin Dr, Brynn Koehler, Hayden Forthman

Justice, Law, and Public Safety Studies Department Faculty Conferences

No abstract provided.

The Kukin Program For Conflict Resolution Invites You To: The Dispute Resolution Educators Colloquium, Kukin Program For Conflict Resolution, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

2026 Event Invitations

This event brings dispute resolution educators—faculty, adjuncts, clinicians, and trainers—together for a day of community, learning, conversation, creativity, and mutual support. The program will feature demonstrations of innovative teaching methods, conversations around hot educational topics, the annual Dispute Resolution Teachers Resource Share, and more.

Lennar Communities Nevada, Llc, And Greystone Nevada, Llc V. Pamela Whalen, 142 Nev. Adv. Op. 29 (Apr. 16, 2026), Christianne White

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Courts should employ a totality of the circumstances test when determining if a party acted inconsistently with the right to arbitrate.

Juvenile Justice Probation Officers Association V. Clark County, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. 45 (Apr. 09, 2026), Anastasia Vinson

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

In Juvenile Justice Probation Officers Association v. Clark County, the Nevada Supreme Court held that a narrow arbitration clause is limited to its terms and cannot cover a statutory PREA termination outside its defined scope.

Parallel Proceedings Between International Commercial Litigation And Arbitration: Existing Tools And Comparative Perspective, Joanna Ma

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

This Article examines parallel proceedings in international commercial disputes, focusing on situations in which the same parties and substantially the same issues are simultaneously before a national court and an arbitral tribunal. It surveys the principal tools that jurisdictions have developed to address this problem, including the priority-in-time rule, the prioritization of arbitral tribunals, tolerance of parallel proceedings, anti-suit injunctions, and anti-arbitration injunctions. After evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, the Article argues that prioritizing arbitral tribunals provides the most coherent and workable framework for managing such conflicts. In particular, the model of granting full priority to arbitral …

Law, Conflict, And Hybrid Warfare: A Teaching Imperative For A Changing World, Cynthia Alkon, Andrea K. Schneider

Articles

Lawyers increasingly find themselves at the frontlines of the battlefield, just not in the traditional sense. Hybrid warfare is a conflict form that combines traditional military offensive measures with nontraditional methods, including the harnessing of legal systems to achieve strategic goals. Lawyers have always been at the frontline of typical legal risk assessment, thinking about a client’s risk of liability or regulation costs generally. Now, lawyers must stand at the ready for a lot more: lawyers must be prepared for cyber-attacks, disinformation campaigns using artificial intelligence, the use of court systems to suppress reporting or shield bad actors, and so …

The Racial Implications For Black Claimants At The Federal Arbitration Act's Centennial, Michael Z. Green

Faculty Scholarship

On February 12, 1925, when President Calvin Coolidge signed into law an Act to make arbitration agreements "valid, irrevocable, and enforceable," no person could have expected that this new statute would ever apply to claims by Black litigants. A century later, that law, now referred to as the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), has evolved to encompass disputes involving a broad array of claimants and processes where businesses enforce pre-dispute agreements to arbitrate. In examining whether Black claimants (businesses, consumers, and importantly, workers) may benefit from using arbitration, this Article investigates how the FAA, as enacted, never intended to address their …

Arbitrary Consent To Arbitration, Charity J. Fort

Washington and Lee Law Review

In the one-hundred-year period since the enactment of the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 (the Act), arbitration in the U.S. has become a battlefield embroiled in a multitude of contract law doctrines and competing arbitration jurisprudence concerning what rights can be contracted away. This battlefield has become particularly grisly with regards to the increased use of arbitration clauses in contracts with adhesive qualities between business entities and consumers. This Article seeks to confront and lay the foundations for resolving a concern raised by many arbitration scholars: scholars who argue that the use of arbitration clauses in contracts of adhesion is …