Interlocutory Review By Agreement Of The Parties: A Preliminary Analysis,
2010
Northwestern University School of Law
Interlocutory Review By Agreement Of The Parties: A Preliminary Analysis, James Pfander, Dave Pekarek-Krohn
Faculty Working Papers
Although the nineteenth century's final judgment rule no longer represents an absolute barrier to interlocutory appellate review, scholars disagree about what should take its place. Some favor a regime of discretionary interlocutory review, with power conferred on appellate courts to select issues that warrant intervention. Others reject discretionary review as a waste of appellate resources and call upon the rule makers to identify specific categories of non-final orders that always warrant review. While the Supreme Court's collateral order doctrine bears some similarity to this process of categorization, the Court may have called a halt to the judicial recognition of new …
Collateral Review Of Remand Orders: Reasserting The Supervisory Role Of The Supreme Court,
2010
Northwestern University School of Law
Collateral Review Of Remand Orders: Reasserting The Supervisory Role Of The Supreme Court, James Pfander
Faculty Working Papers
Although some might consider the appellate review of remand orders as something of a jurisdictional backwater, recent developments suggest that the rules need attention. The Supreme Court has decided no fewer than four cases in the past few years and has failed to develop a persuasive framework. Indeed, one member of the Court, Justice Breyer, has invited "experts" to solve the problem.
In this essay, I suggest that the solution lies in the Court's own hands. Rather than proposing legislative or rulemaking solutions, I call on the Court to re-invigorate its supervisory powers and conduct direct review of district court …
The New International Arbitration (Amendment) - A Broader Framework For Interim Relief Or Just A Tune-Up?,
2010
Singapore Management University
The New International Arbitration (Amendment) - A Broader Framework For Interim Relief Or Just A Tune-Up?, Mahdev Mohan, Eu-Yen Tay
2008 Asian Business & Rule of Law initiative
Singapore aspires to retain its place as a trusted arbitration hub for commercial parties all around the world. The recently proposed amendments to the International Arbitration Act seek to bring Singapore closer to meeting international standards in relation to the arbitration procedure. While the initiative should be applauded, those amendments relating to interim measures fall somewhat short of expectations of a new, broader framework of curial assistance in aid of arbitration. This article explores the uncertainties that could arise from the proposed amendments, either because of phrasing or of an omission to embrace the Model Law. It is hoped that …
Brief Of Arbitration Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, At&T Mobility Llc V. Concepcion, 131 S.Ct. 1740 (Supreme Court Of The United States 2011) (No. 09-893),
2010
UIC School of Law
Brief Of Arbitration Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, At&T Mobility Llc V. Concepcion, 131 S.Ct. 1740 (Supreme Court Of The United States 2011) (No. 09-893), Karen H. Cross
Court Documents and Proposed Legislation
No abstract provided.
Empirical Modalities: Lessons For The Future Of International Investment,
2010
Washington and Lee University School of Law
Empirical Modalities: Lessons For The Future Of International Investment, Susan D. Franck
Scholarly Articles
None available.
Whose Dictionary Controls?: Recent Challenges To The Term "Investment" In Icsid Arbirtration,
2010
American University Washington College of Law
Whose Dictionary Controls?: Recent Challenges To The Term "Investment" In Icsid Arbirtration, Joseph M. Boddicker
American University International Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Politics And International Investment Arbitration: Seeking An Explanation For Conflicting Outcomes,
2010
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Judicial Politics And International Investment Arbitration: Seeking An Explanation For Conflicting Outcomes, David Schneiderman
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
In taking on the controversial debate over the role of state attorneys general in antitrust enforcement, the article draws upon recent legal and historical scholarship on federalism to argue that globalization requires a paradigm change in concepts of U.S. federalism. While many assume that increasing international economic integration makes state participation in economic regulation with international implications inherently problematic, the article demonstrates that, to the contrary, states have an important role to play in the regulation of international business. States have a long history of challenging the federal government in a way that has promoted a robust national dialogue on …
Proportional Pragmatism: A Defense Of International Arbitration Agreements In The Face Of Asymmetrical Paternalism,
2010
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Proportional Pragmatism: A Defense Of International Arbitration Agreements In The Face Of Asymmetrical Paternalism, Rusty O'Kane
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
With foreign direct investment's increasingly important role in the global market, a more comprehensive regulatory system has emerged to guide key participants. Bilateral investment treaties have developed as an essential piece of the emerging regulatory system. Bilateral investment treaties are "[international investment] agreements between two countries for the reciprocal encouragement, promotion and protection of investments in each other's territories by companies based in either country." These treaties have drastically affected the way foreign investors interact with host countries, especially in the area of dispute resolution. A distinctive feature of many BITs is that they provide for alternative dispute resolution procedures …
Arbitrating Disputes Between Companies And Individuals: Lessons From Abroad,
2010
University of Georgia Law School
Arbitrating Disputes Between Companies And Individuals: Lessons From Abroad, Peter B. Rutledge, Anna W. Howard
Scholarly Works
Congress is considered changes to the Federal Arbitration Act and the central premise underlying these bills is the idea that the parties to these agreements (typically there is an individual on one side and a company on the other) tend to occupy unequal bargaining positions. The drafters of these bills conclude from this that the individual’s choice to opt into arbitration before a dispute has arisen cannot be considered free and voluntary, and thus, the arbitration agreement should be considered void and unenforceable.
Defenders of these bills claim that the United States, when compared to other nations, stands alone in …
Implicit Bias And The Illusion Of Mediator Neutrality,
2010
UC Hastings College of the Law
Implicit Bias And The Illusion Of Mediator Neutrality, Carol L. Izumi
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Potential Contribution Of Adr To An Integrated Curriculum: Preparing Law Students For Real World Lawyering,
2010
University of Missouri School of Law
The Potential Contribution Of Adr To An Integrated Curriculum: Preparing Law Students For Real World Lawyering, John M. Lande, Jean R. Sternlight
Faculty Publications
This Article briefly reviews the long history of critiques of legal education that highlight the failure to adequately prepare students for what they will and should do as attorneys. It takes a sober look at the hurdles reformers face when trying to make significant curricular changes and proposes a modest menu of reforms that interested faculty and law schools can largely achieve without investing substantial additional resources.This Article emphasizes the special contributions that alternative dispute resolution (ADR) can provide to legal education more generally. ADR instruction is an important corrective to a curriculum that routinely conveys the erroneous implication that …
Navigating The Murky Waters Of Untruth In Negotiation: Lessons For Ethical Lawyers,
2010
Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law
Navigating The Murky Waters Of Untruth In Negotiation: Lessons For Ethical Lawyers, Deborah Schmedemann
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Verbena Gardens had been working for months on its new product in its offices at Kost Properties' Southwest Suites when the burglary occurred, sometime between 8:00 and 10:00 at night. The case was never solved; Verbena's property was never recovered. While the burglary pushed the project back by months, the market moved on, and the promising new product was scuttled.
The Next Generation Of Online Dispute Resolution: The Significance Of Holography To Enhance And Transform Dispute Resolution,
2010
Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law
The Next Generation Of Online Dispute Resolution: The Significance Of Holography To Enhance And Transform Dispute Resolution, Susan Nauss Exon
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Many scholars have written about the use of various technologies used to enhance or transform face-to-face alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes. Whether termed online dispute resolution (ODR), cybermediation, also known as online mediation, cybercourt, electronic courthouse, virtual courtroom, virtual ADR, video conferencing, or telepresence, each of these technological advances revolves around the use of the Internet or some form of technology to facilitate long-distance, virtual communication without the necessity of physical travel or face-to-face contact. Most scholars have ignored holography, which is the next generation of technology, or perhaps we can more aptly refer to it as a current, unsung …
Mandatory Mediation: An Oxymoron? Examining The Feasibility Of Implementing A Court-Mandated Mediation Program,
2010
Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law
Mandatory Mediation: An Oxymoron? Examining The Feasibility Of Implementing A Court-Mandated Mediation Program, Dorcas Quek
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
The introduction of the "multi-door courthouse" concept at the Pound Conference is said to have ushered in a modern era of dispute resolution within the United States. This watershed event in the history of Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") spawned greater involvement by the courts in ADR. Court-annexed ADR programs were set up throughout the U.S. and legislation was enacted to encourage the use of ADR. In 1983, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was amended to exhort courts to consider the "possibility of settlement" or "the use of extrajudicial procedures to resolve the dispute" at pre-trial conferences. …
Table Of Contents - Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 11, Iss. 2,
2010
Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law
Table Of Contents - Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 11, Iss. 2
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
No abstract provided.
Negotiating Implementation Of A Peace Agreement: Lessons Learned From Five Years At The Negotiating Table,
2010
S.J. Quinney College of Law
Negotiating Implementation Of A Peace Agreement: Lessons Learned From Five Years At The Negotiating Table, Amos N. Guiora
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
For five years (1994-1999), I directly negotiated on-theground implementation of the Oslo Peace Process in the Gaza Strip. In my capacity as the Judge Advocate General's ("JAG") Corps Legal Advisor to the Israel Defense Forces ("IDF") Commander, Gaza Strip (1994-1997), I had primary responsibility for both interpretation and negotiation, first for the Gaza-Jericho Agreement and subsequently for the Interim Agreement as it applied to the Gaza Strip.
Mediation Ethics: An Exploration Of Four Seminal Texts,
2010
Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law
Mediation Ethics: An Exploration Of Four Seminal Texts, Barbara Wilson
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
The subject of mediator ethics is often conflated with discussions about standards of practice, the appropriate wording of codes of conduct, or forms of practitioner regulation. These discussions sometimes also extend to debates about practice dilemmas, such as conflicts of interest, voluntariness, confidentiality and stakeholder issues. The main purpose of this paper is instead to discuss the importance and problems of the differing ethical principles which, I argue, underlie four seminal and popular Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) books. These texts are in current circulation, although some have been republished as later editions since first appearing. They are often used-either separately …
Masthead, Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 12 (2010-11), Iss. 1,
2010
Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law
Masthead, Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 12 (2010-11), Iss. 1
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
No abstract provided.
International Advocate For Peace Award Acceptance Speech,
2010
Covington & Burling, LLP
International Advocate For Peace Award Acceptance Speech, Stuart E. Eizenstat
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
I feel very much at home here because I was here three or four year ago at a symposium at the law school-a panel with Adam Durshowitz and Erwin Cogler, who was then Administer of Justice of Canada, and others. I have also received an honorary doctorate from Yeshiva University, and I feel very much at home here. I just met Dean Dillard and Professor Love, but I have some longtime friends here: Professor Weisberg, who I will talk about in a moment, is one of the heroes of this whole episode; Eric Pan, your professor of Commercial and International …
Deconstructing Dispute Classifications: Avoiding The Shadow Of The Law In Dispute System Design In Healthcare,
2010
University of Haifa
Deconstructing Dispute Classifications: Avoiding The Shadow Of The Law In Dispute System Design In Healthcare, Orna Rabinovich-Einy
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
The paper opens with an analysis of dispute classification under ADR theory, and highlights the ways in which the "shadow of the law" has shaped the design of systems for addressing conflict. One significant byproduct of the shadow of the law has been the motivation of dispute system designers to target legal disputes at the expense of other complaints, which do not constitute a legal cause of action. This development is ironic because in the case of non-litigable disputes, alternatives constitute the only available avenues for redress. The article then proceeds to define and characterize non-litigable disputes in Part II.A. …
