Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

What If You Build It And No One Comes?: The Introduction Of Mediation To Russia, Kathryn Hendley

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Russia joined the community of countries where disputes can legally be diverted to mediation in early 2011. Russian court officials and judges were optimistic that mediation would alleviate the nagging problem of overloaded dockets; however, initial experience has shown that Russian litigants are skeptical of mediation. The reasons for this skepticism are a complex mix of institutional disincentives and a lack of familiarity with alternative dispute resolution. The relatively low costs associated with going to court in Russia, measured in terms of money, time, and relational damage, have done little to encourage litigants to opt for mediation. The absence of …

Ensuring Remedies To Cure Cramming, Amy J. Schmitz

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

On July 23, 2012, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") called wireless telephone bill cramming "a significant consumer problem," and both the FTC and Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") have been delving into the morass of concerns regarding cramming with respect to landline (or wired) telephone billing. "Cramming" occurs when a third party unaffiliated with a customer's telephone company adds charges to the telephone bills that the company sends to the customer. These charges can be for anything from horoscopes to long-distance telephone services.

Is Adjudication A Public Good? "Overcrowded Courts" And The Private Sector Alternative Of Arbitration, Stephen J. Ware

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Courts are underfunded, dockets are crowded, and litigation is slow. These observations lead many lawyers and judges to call for increased court funding. While I would like to see a significantly higher percentage of government spending go to courts, I do not believe that is likely to happen. So I suggest we think about "underfunded" courts differently.

2013 International Advocate For Peace Award Acceptance Speech, Jimmy Carter

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

On April 10, 2013, the Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution presented its annual International Advocate for Peace Award to Jimmy Carter, 39th President of the United States. What follows is a transcription of his public address at the Law School, entitled "America as Global Mediator."

Exchanging Shares To Settle A Lawsuit: Should A Confidentiality Agreement Bar Evidence Of Securities Fraud?, Christopher Tao

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Suppose that two parties enter into a mediated written settlement, but in a subsequent court proceeding, one party claims to have discovered evidence clearly establishing fraud by the opposing party during the mediation process. When a court has to determine whether or not to enforce a negotiated settlement, do mediation confidentiality rules permit the court to admit one party's evidence of the other party's fraud or misrepresentations during the mediation?

Is Adr The Solution? How Adr Gets Around The Get Controversy In Jewish Divorce, Aviva Vogelstein

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The New York State government in particular has attempted to find creative solutions to the modern problems associated with Jewish divorce issues. This Note first gives a brief historical background of the beth din and the reasons for its authority, elucidating why alternative dispute resolution (ADR) benefits the American legal system and explaining how and why the beth din serves as a preferred method of ADR in contemporary America. Using New York as a case study, this Note then proposes that, although New York civil legislative solutions and tort claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress may sometimes achieve satisfactory …

Masthead, Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 15 (2013-14)

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Law And Negotiation: Necessary Partners Or Strange Bedfellows?, Nancy L. Schultz

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Almost thirty years ago, Robert Condlin wrote an article discussing the frustrations of students in his Negotiations class. He noted that his law students saw legal argument in negotiation primarily as a source of vexation rather than resolution. In the twenty-plus years I have taught negotiations, I have heard the same thing many times. Students will prepare and research and then be disconcerted when their negotiating partners are not swayed by their brilliant legal arguments. One comment by a student in a paper discussing his team's preparation for negotiation shows the initial thought process in a domestic relations negotiation: "It …

Conflicts Between Arbitration Agreements And Arbitration Rules, Steven C. Bennett

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Arbitration is a "creature of contract." As a result, under the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") and equivalent state laws, both the obligation to arbitrate and the specific terms under which arbitration will occur are typically determined by the agreement of the parties. In many instances, parties choose to adopt the rules of an arbitration-sponsoring organization such as the American Arbitration Association ("AAA"). But parties are also free to adopt their own ad hoc procedures (sometimes based on elements of the rules of an arbitration-sponsoring organization) or to use the rules of an arbitration-sponsoring organization as a base and modify those …

Response To Condlin's Critique Of Transformative Mediation, Robert A. Baruch Bush, Joseph P. Folger

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

We welcome thoughtful critical analysis of the transformative framework because we believe such comments further substantive discussion and debate. Some prior critiques of the framework have been beneficial in helping to clearly map the ideological divide in the ADR field-a divide that separates very different approaches to conflict intervention. Cogent and honestly substantiated critiques of the transformative approach have strengthened the discourse about conflict intervention practice by building stronger arguments on all sides of the debate over the various goals and expectations for mediation.

No Longer Left To Their Own Devices: Utilizing And Facilitating Mediation To Give Students Access To Assistive Technology, Eric Slepak

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note seeks to fill that void by examining the unique role AT plays in a student's development and how mediation succeeds (and fails) in helping the student secure desired equipment and services. Part II of this Note examines the background law and facts governing the dissemination of AT devices and services and the mechanisms for resolving disputes surrounding that dissemination. Part III provides an illustrative example to demonstrate the complex legal issues that arise in the determination of technology appropriate for students with disabilities.

Part IV then examines why mediation offers a superior mode of resolution to both parents …

The Age Of (Guilt Or) Innocence: Using Adr To Reform New York's Juvenile Justice System In The Wake Of Miller V. Alabama, Morgan Molinoff

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

"Youth matters." The concept is deceptively simple. Of course youth matters. One must be a certain age to drive, to vote, to drink, to be elected president. However, the issue becomes much more complex in the context of criminal responsibility and punishment. Should children be held less accountable for their crimes because of their age? Do juveniles have a greater capacity for rehabilitation than adults? By explaining that youth matters in Graham v. Florida and holding that juveniles cannot be sentenced to life in prison without parole for non-homicide crimes, Justice Kennedy of the United States Supreme Court answered these …

Screening For Intimate Partner Violence In Mediation, Kelly Browe Olson

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Embodied Conflict Resolution: Resurrecting Roleplay-Based Curricula Through Dance, Nadja Alexander, Michelle Lebaron

All Faculty Publications

Moving on from the authors’ seminal 2009 critique of the overuse of role-plays in negotiation teaching, "Death of the Role-Play" (chapter 13 in Rethinking Negotiation Teaching), Alexander and LeBaron have taken the rapidly increasing enthusiasm for experiential learning in a new direction: multiple intelligences. Their particular interest is in a use of experiential learning that focuses on kinesthetic intelligence, employing actual physical movement, particularly dance, to unlock creativity in other mental domains, as well as to encourage authentic participation by people whose skills are not primarily verbal or mathematical. Those who may be inclined to be skeptical should note that …

Developments In Adr, Tania Sourdin, Nadja Alexander

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) processes are now widely used throughout Australia to resolve and manage disputes without the need to use traditional rights-based processes such as litigation. ADR usually refers to dispute resolution processes that are 'alternative' to traditional court proceedings. ADR is also now used as an acronym for 'assisted', 'additional', 'affirmative', or 'appropriate' dispute resolution processes within the Australian environment. ADR processes can be used across diverse areas, including commercial, legal, social, environmental and political fields. This paper identifies some key features and trends in the Australian ADR context.

When Bad Guys Are Wearing White Hats, Catherine A. Rogers

Faculty Scholarship

Allegations of ethical misconduct by lawyers have all but completely overshadowed the substantive claims in the Chevron case. While both sides have been accused of flagrant wrongdoing, the charges against plaintiffs’ counsel appear to have captured more headlines and garnered more attention. The primary reason why the focus seems lopsided is that plaintiffs’ counsel were presumed to be the ones wearing white hats in this epic drama. This essay postulates that this seeming irony is not simply an example of personal ethical lapse, but in part tied to larger reasons why ethical violations are an occupational hazard for plaintiffs’ counsel …

The Rise In Judicial Hostility To Arbitration: Revisiting Hall Street Associates, Thomas E. Carbonneau

Faculty Scholarship

When the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Hall Street Associates,LLC v. Mattel, Inc., commentators expected the Court to resolve the split among the federal circuits regarding the validity and enforceability of 'opt-in' agreements.Since the late 1990s, these agreements had become a means through which contracting parties could obtain enhanced judicial supervision of arbitral awards by providing for judicial review of the merits of arbitrator rulings. While commentators got a resolution to the split, they received a great deal more than they had been promised.

Stylistic opacity made the opinion in Hall Street somewhat inaccessible. In fact, as …

Table Of Contents - Issue 1

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Educating Law Students For The Practice: If I Had My Druthers , Solomon Oliver Jr.

Journal of Dispute Resolution

I address below those areas which I believe deserve some added attention from law schools, based on my experience with the lawyers who have appeared before me and my law clerks over more than nineteen years.

What's Law Got To Do With It?: Why We Should Mediate, Rather Than Litigate, Cases Of Wrongful Life, Shawna Benston

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In light of the legal and societal disfavor toward wrongful life suits, this Note examines the cultural, (bio)ethical, legal, and philosophical background of the wrongful life tort. While the disability rights movement and the pro-life strains of the abortion debate hope to silence proponents of wrongful life suits, the evolution of a legal right to die underscores the importance of autonomy and privacy for the individual. Philosophical exploration of prospective children-including the nonidentity problem, claim-rights and corresponding duties, and the subjunctive-threshold notion of harmhelps explain the confusion and moral conundrum that pervade the very notion of "wrongful life" and that …