2008 Arbitration Hearings Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
2008 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Annual Hearings Charts
No abstract provided.
2005 Arbitration Hearings Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
2005 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Annual Hearings Charts
No abstract provided.
2009 Arbitration Hearings Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
2009 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Annual Hearings Charts
No abstract provided.
2015 Arbitration Hearings Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
2015 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Annual Hearings Charts
No abstract provided.
2011 Arbitration Hearings Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
2011 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Annual Hearings Charts
No abstract provided.
2017 Arbitration Hearings Chart,
2018
Notre Dame Law School
2017 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Annual Hearings Charts
No abstract provided.
2010 Arbitration Hearings Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
2010 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Annual Hearings Charts
No abstract provided.
2012 Arbitration Hearings Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
2012 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Annual Hearings Charts
No abstract provided.
Keet And Heavin On Why Litigation Interest And Risk Assessment Is So Darn Important For Lawyers And Mediators – And How You Can Make Stone Soup With It,
2018
University of Missouri School of Law
Keet And Heavin On Why Litigation Interest And Risk Assessment Is So Darn Important For Lawyers And Mediators – And How You Can Make Stone Soup With It, John Lande
Faculty Blogs
This post provides links to law review articles by Michaela Keet and Heather Heavin that provide the foundation for the LIRA book.
2018 Arbitration Hearings Chart,
2018
University of Notre Dame
2018 Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds
Annual Hearings Charts
No abstract provided.
Temporary Restraining Orders To Enforce Intellectual Property Rights At Trade Shows: An Empirical Study,
2018
Brooklyn Law School
Temporary Restraining Orders To Enforce Intellectual Property Rights At Trade Shows: An Empirical Study, Marketa Trimble
Brooklyn Law Review
Infringements of intellectual property (IP) rights by exhibitors at trade shows (also called trade fairs or exhibitions), such as infringements committed through exhibitions of or offers to sell infringing products, can be extremely damaging to IP right owners because of the wide exposure that trade shows provide for infringing IP; the promotion of the infringing IP and the contacts made by infringers at trade shows can facilitate further infringements after a trade show that can be very difficult for IP right owners to prevent. IP right owners therefore seek to obtain emergency injunctive relief to stop trade show infringements immediately—if …
International Arbitration - Between Myth And Reality: The 9th John E.C. Brierly Memorial Lecture,
2018
American University Washington College of Law
International Arbitration - Between Myth And Reality: The 9th John E.C. Brierly Memorial Lecture, Susan Franck
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
The first woman to deliver the John E.C. Brierly Memorial Lecture in November 2016, Susan Franck explores common but flawed accounts of international arbitration based on anecdotes and myths while encouraging the audience to pay more attention to scientific facts. While acknowledging the challenges of living in a “post-factual” society, she argues that international arbitration, whether commercial or investment-based, is caught within a larger geo-political maelstrom which includes a backlash against globalization, the popularization of populism, and a turn toward nationalism. Rather than permitting decisions to be affected by an emotive torrent of intuitive forces that facilitate decisions based upon …
Journal Description,
2018
University of Missouri School of Law
The European Succession Regulation And The Arbitration Of Trust Disputes,
2018
University of Missouri School of Law
The European Succession Regulation And The Arbitration Of Trust Disputes, S. I. Strong
Faculty Publications
Over the last few decades, U.S. citizens have become increasingly mobile, with significant numbers of individuals living, working, and investing abroad. Estate planning has become equally international, generating ever-larger numbers of cross-border succession cases. While these sorts of developments are welcome, they require lawyers to appreciate and anticipate the various ways that the laws of different jurisdictions can interact. One of the most important recent developments in international succession law comes out of the European Union. While the European Succession Regulation may initially appear applicable only to nationals of E. U. Member States, U.S. citizens can also be affected by …
Title Page,
2018
University of Missouri School of Law
The Jury Is Out: Mandating Pre-Treatment Arbitration Clauses In Patient Intake Contracts,
2018
University of Missouri School of Law
The Jury Is Out: Mandating Pre-Treatment Arbitration Clauses In Patient Intake Contracts, Sarah Sachs
Journal of Dispute Resolution
This Comment advocates against the use of mandatory arbitration clauses in healthcare providers’ patient intake contracts and discusses the interplay between federal and state statutes that create disparities in enforceability and unenforceability of mandatory arbitration clauses in state courts. Part II discusses the history of mandatory arbitration and its development in healthcare providers’ patient intake contracts. Part III examines state statutory limitations on pre-treatment arbitration clauses. Finally, Part IV addresses how courts analyze these agreements and possible approaches to avoid mandatory arbitration arising in healthcare providers’ patient intake contracts.
Resolving Conflict On Campus: A Case Study On Free Speech And Controversial Speakers,
2018
University of Missouri School of Law
Resolving Conflict On Campus: A Case Study On Free Speech And Controversial Speakers, Benson Clayton T., J. Huff
Journal of Dispute Resolution
By their very charge, institutions of higher education are intended to serve as venues for exploring personal ideologies, promoting intellectual curiosity, and en-couraging vigorous debate about contested issues. However, when an institution and its core values come into direct conflict with viewpoints that are fundamentally inconsistent with those values, the dissonance created by the clash of perspectives can be profound. Fundamental differences in perspective on highly charged issues and topics have become recurring themes for universities in the United States. From campus speakers, to speaker protests, to demonstrations in support of free speech and a range of other inclusion and …
The First Amendment, The University And Conflict: An Introduction To The Symposium,
2018
University of Missouri School of Law
The First Amendment, The University And Conflict: An Introduction To The Symposium, Christina E. Wells
Journal of Dispute Resolution
This Symposium addresses our continuing issues with campus speech conflicts. It aims to help us recognize that speech conflicts are not abstract disputes between ideas – Justice Holmes’s famous rhetoric notwithstanding. Rather our words and ideas represent underlying conflicts between very real people and groups. The speech we use may cause, exacerbate, or resolve conflicts. Sometimes the Supreme Court’s free speech doctrine can aid our understanding and resolution of these conflicts. Other times it cannot. Regardless, simply relying on a First Amendment frame – i.e., claiming that it is one’s right to express oneself in a par-ticular way – may …
Table Of Contents,
2018
University of Missouri School of Law
Beyond The Narratives: How Free Speech In Higher Education Is Truly Restricted,
2018
University of Missouri School of Law
Beyond The Narratives: How Free Speech In Higher Education Is Truly Restricted, Azhar Majeed
Journal of Dispute Resolution
Over the past year, much of the national conversation surrounding freedom of speech on college campuses has focused on controversial speakers, including those invited by students or student groups as well as those appearing on campus without an invitation. The debate continues to rage on as to whether university communities should allow allegedly offensive speakers to come to campus and spew their hateful views; whether universities have an obligation to foot the bill for the security they deem necessary to host such an event; and whether disruptions of speaker events are indicative of decreased tolerance on the part of today’s …
