Plaintiff Anonymity During Civil Litigation Of Childhood Sexual Abuse Cases,
2012
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Plaintiff Anonymity During Civil Litigation Of Childhood Sexual Abuse Cases, Amit Shertzer
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Setting Us Up For Disaster: The Supreme Court's Decision In Terry V. Ohio,
2012
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Setting Us Up For Disaster: The Supreme Court's Decision In Terry V. Ohio, Thomas B. Mcaffee
Nevada Law Journal
The controversies spawned by the Supreme Court’s decision in Terry v. Ohio are just about as expansive as the decision’s implications for the development of Fourth Amendment doctrine. And it was recently observed that it is perhaps the most criticized Fourth Amendment decision since the modern Supreme Court belatedly incorporated the amendment, and eventually the exclusionary rule.3 Fortunately, there is neither time nor space to address and fully resolve all of these controversies, or even to determine whether the case was just wrongly decided; the somewhat narrower thesis of this Article is that the long-term impact of Terry on the …
Summary Of Whitehead V. State, 128 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 24,
2012
Nevada Law Journal
Summary Of Whitehead V. State, 128 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 24, Eric Carson
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court grants an en banc reconsideration of an appeal from an order dismissing a post-conviction petition for writ of habeas corpus.
Apprendi V. New Jersey, The Scaling Back Of The Sentencing Factor Revolution And The Resurrection Of Criminal Defendant Rights, How Far Is Too Far?,
2012
Pepperdine University
Apprendi V. New Jersey, The Scaling Back Of The Sentencing Factor Revolution And The Resurrection Of Criminal Defendant Rights, How Far Is Too Far?, Analisa Swan
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trial Objections From Beginning To End: The Handbook For Civil And Criminal Trials,
2012
Pepperdine University
Trial Objections From Beginning To End: The Handbook For Civil And Criminal Trials, Craig Lee Montz
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Municipal Liability? Not So Fast: What Connick V. Thompson Means For Future Prosecutorial Misconduct,
2012
Mercer University School of Law
Municipal Liability? Not So Fast: What Connick V. Thompson Means For Future Prosecutorial Misconduct, T. Owen Farist
Mercer Law Review
In Connick v. Thompson, the United States Supreme Court held that, under section 1983 of title 42 of the United States Code, the Orleans Parish District Attorney's actions failed to rise to the level of deliberate indifference required for municipal liability. The Court affirmed the possibility of "single-incident" municipal liability hypothesized in City of Canton v. Harris as an exception to the ordinary requirement of a pattern of similar violations necessary to prove the stringent standard of deliberate indifference to a known or obvious consequence. Despite upholding the validity of the exception, the Court found that Thompson's case did …
The Criminal Rules Enabling Act,
2012
University of New Mexico School of Law
The Criminal Rules Enabling Act, Max Mizner
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Ruiz-Gaxiola: When Criminal Defendants Say No To Drugs,
2012
Brigham Young University Law School
United States V. Ruiz-Gaxiola: When Criminal Defendants Say No To Drugs, Adam Dayton
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Empty Promises: Miranda Warnings In Noncustodial Interrogations,
2012
University of Michigan Law School
Empty Promises: Miranda Warnings In Noncustodial Interrogations, Aurora Maoz
Michigan Law Review
You have the right to remain silent; anything you say can be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney; if you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided to you at the state's expense. In 2010, the Supreme Court declined an opportunity to resolve the question of what courts should do when officers administer Miranda warnings in a situation where a suspect is not already in custody-in other words, when officers are not constitutionally required to give or honor these warnings. While most courts have found a superfluous warning to be …
Summary Of State V. Huebler, 128 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 19,
2012
Nevada Law Journal
Summary Of State V. Huebler, 128 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 19, Richard A. Andrews
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court considered an appeal from the district court’s grant of relief of an untimely petition for a writ of habeas corpus from a conviction based on a guilty plea.
Legal Representation In The Chinese Criminal Court,
2012
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Legal Representation In The Chinese Criminal Court, Yudu Li, Hong Lu
Graduate Research Symposium (2010 - 2017)
Abstract: Legal representation plays an important role in criminal sentencing decisions. China has recently stipulated a mandatory legal representation clause for all offenders facing capital charges in its Criminal Procedural Law (1996). This study uses data generated from criminal court case documents involving three serious violent crimes: murder, intentional assault, and robbery. All these crimes carry a maximum of sentence of death. The study examines whether and under what conditions legal representation has an effect on criminal sentencing decisions in China. While the overall multi-regression model did not find that having a legal representation significantly reduces the criminal sentence, a …
White-Collar Crime: Why The Sentencing Disparity Despite Uniform Guidelines?,
2012
Pepperdine University
White-Collar Crime: Why The Sentencing Disparity Despite Uniform Guidelines?, Jon J. Lambiras
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Fifth Amendment Right Against Self-Incrimination: An In-Depth Look At Mckune V. Lile,
2012
Pepperdine University
The Fifth Amendment Right Against Self-Incrimination: An In-Depth Look At Mckune V. Lile, Heidi Feldman
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tortured History: Finding Our Way Back To The Lost Origins Of The Eighth Amendment,
2012
Pepperdine University
Tortured History: Finding Our Way Back To The Lost Origins Of The Eighth Amendment, Celia Rumann
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Alabama V. Shelton: One Small Step For Man, One Very Small Step For The Sixth Amendment's Right To Counsel,
2012
Pepperdine University
Alabama V. Shelton: One Small Step For Man, One Very Small Step For The Sixth Amendment's Right To Counsel, Joshua S. Stambaugh
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ring V. Arizona: The Sixth And Eighth Amendments Collide: Out Of The Wreckage Emerges A Constitutional Safeguard For Capital Defendants,
2012
Pepperdine University
Ring V. Arizona: The Sixth And Eighth Amendments Collide: Out Of The Wreckage Emerges A Constitutional Safeguard For Capital Defendants, Jason E. Barsanti
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Summary Of Rodriguez V. Nevada, 128 Nev. Adv. Op. 14,
2012
Nevada Law Journal
Summary Of Rodriguez V. Nevada, 128 Nev. Adv. Op. 14, Rami Hernandez
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
An appeal from a district court criminal conviction, pursuant to a jury verdict, on evidentiary grounds.
Brady, Trust, And Error,
2012
Florida State University College of Law
Brady, Trust, And Error, Samuel R. Wiseman
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
Disparately Seeking Jurors: Disparate Impact And The (Mis)Use Of Batson,
2012
Brooklyn Law School
Disparately Seeking Jurors: Disparate Impact And The (Mis)Use Of Batson, Anna Roberts
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Slow Wheels Of Furman's Machinery Of Death,
2012
University of Arkansas Little Rock
The Slow Wheels Of Furman's Machinery Of Death, Brent E. Newton
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
