Criminal Procedure Commons^™

Mahkamah Agung Dan Gagasan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Yang Ideal, Eman Suparman

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Perjanjian Kerja Menurut Undang-Undang No.25 /Tahun 1997 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan, Machsoen Ali

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Penegakkan Hukum Dan Ketentuan Pidana Dalam Penghapusan Bentuk Diskriminasi Rasial, Nukila Evanty

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Peran Dan Tanggung Jawab Penjamin Emisi Efek Di Pasar Modal, M. Irsan Nasarudin

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Konsensus Untuk Mempertahankan Pembukaan Uud 1945, Mura P. Hutagalung

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Sejarah Asal Usul Desa Dan Masyarakat Hukum Adat, Rehngena Purba

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Mitos Bandung Bondowoso . Roro Jonggrang Dalam Penegakkan Hukum Di Indonesia, Suparjo Sujadi

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Implikasi Globalisasi : Dari Bureaucratic Society Menuju Civil Society, Fx. Adjie Samekto

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Komisi Pengawas Eksternal Pada Polisi, Harkristuti Harkrisnowo

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Otonomi Daerah Dalam Uu Nomor 22 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah Dan Uu Nomor 5 Tahun 1974 Tentang Pokok-Pokok Pemerintahan Di Daerah, Fatmawati Fatmawati

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Sengketa Bersenjata Non Internasional, Sulaiman Sulaiman

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Pengaturan Perluasan Yurisdiksi Pidana Di Suatu Wilayah Negara, Yasin Tasyrif

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Sejarah Undang-Undang Dalam Pembuatan Rancangan Undang-Undang, Frans Limahelu

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Public Perceptions Of The Use Of Artificial Intelligence In Voir Dire, Carson Snyder

Honors Projects

Attorneys have increasingly utilized AI tools to improve efficiency, and one area of application is in jury selection, or voir dire. Public concerns involving AI can have negative implications on how the use of AI tools in voir dire would be received. This study seeks to answer how an attorney’s use of AI in voir dire impacts the public’s perception of the process. Previous research is limited, though findings relating to privacy being a leading concern, increased perception of risk for when error outcomes are more serious, and historical abuse of peremptory challenges outline potential reasons for public disapproval of …

A Right With No Standard: The Crisis Of Adequate Counsel In Capital Cases, Luz M. Payán

Criminal Law Society Blog

“A Right With No Standard: The Crisis of Adequate Counsel in Capital Cases,” criticizes the persistent lack of uniform standards governing legal representation in capital cases and argues that these disparities undermine the criminal legal system as a whole. It highlights the various differences in state qualification standard which allow attorneys to represent a defendant in a capital case. Even further, this Article points to the lack of mitigation specialist requirements in a majority of states. To effectively safeguard a defendant’s constitutional rights, this Article urges that the American Bar Association revise its Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of …

You Can Be Innocent—Or You Can Be Free: Prosecutorial Power And Dark Pleas In Innocence Litigation, Tori Simkovic, Craig Trocino

University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review

This Article examines the phenomenon Justice Michael P. Donnelly has termed the “dark plea.” A dark plea is a post-conviction guilty plea extracted from defendants who maintain their innocence but accept freedom over exoneration. Through the lens of State of Florida v. Lawrence K. Johnson, this Article exposes how dark pleas operate at the precise moment when newly discovered evidence threatens to unravel a conviction and expose actual innocence in a nearly two decades old wrongful conviction. Johnson’s case illustrates the coercive dynamics of this type postconviction “bargaining.” After eighteen years of incarceration, compelling DNA recantation evidence, and an appellate …

Unsettling Settled Science: The Perils Of And Rationale Behind Blind Faith In Forensic Evidence, Jaclyn Marra

University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review

Science—a seemingly compelling and infallible adjudicative element—plays a pivotal role in criminal trials, serving as a cornerstone for evidence interpretation and decision-making. However, the perceived infallibility of scientific evidence often masks its inherent limitations and vulnerabilities. Forensic methods, widely regarded as objective and precise, can suffer from a plethora of inconspicuous constraints—including flawed methodologies, human error, and biases—which undermine their reliability. The American public and legal system frequently place undue trust in forensic evidence and experts, influenced by portrayals of their certainty in media and popular culture. This phenomenon has been referred to as the “Reverse CSI Effect.” This note …

Presumed Guilty By Proximity: How Geofence Warrants Undermine The Fourteenth Amendment, Radha Patel

University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review

Geofence warrants are utilized as a surveillance tool to gather location data on every user within a specific area and are being integrated into policing without a stable legal framework. This integration threatens individual rights and disproportionately impacts people and communities of color. While these warrants are often scrutinized under the Fourth Amendment, this note argues that they significantly undermine the Fourteenth Amendment by granting law enforcement excessive discretion. This unchecked discretion allows systemic bias and racial profiling to influence criminal investigations, creating the potential for wrongful convictions. The analysis in this note details the three-step execution process of geofence …

Penanggulangan Masalah Preman Ditinjau Dari Sudut Politik Kriminil, M. Hamdan

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Reasonable, Legal, Voluntary? Grants Pass Decision Sparks Need For A Revised Fourth Amendment Search Analysis In The Context Of Homelessness, Hali R. Woods

Catholic University Law Review

On June 28, 2024 the Supreme Court decided City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson.  The case addressed whether the enforcement of city ordinances regulating camping on public property against individuals including respondents, unhoused individuals residing in the city of Grants Pass, constituted cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment.  The Court upheld enforcement of the ordinances and since then approximately 150 cities across the United States have passed similar ordinances or strengthened existing similar laws.  This comment evaluates how Grants Pass is an Eighth Amendment case with Fourth Amendment consequences which sparks a need for a revised …