Criminal Law Commons^™

Accused’S Right To Document Translation..., John K. Sawyer

War Crimes Memoranda

Specifically addressing what the rights are of the accused to the translation of documents (in his or her own language and/or in the language of his or her counsel) and the concomitant obligations of the parties. Also, the issues were examined with reference to the 20 February 2009 Pre-Trial Chamber decision in Khieu Samphan’s appeal.

Appeal Based On Inadequate Representation, Ugochi Madubata

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Chapeau Elements Of Crimes Against Humanity, Crimes Against Humanity, Crimes Against Humanity And Chapeau Elements, R. Garrison Mason Jr.

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Concurrent Jurisdiction And Primacy. What Do The Concepts Of “Concurrent Jurisdiction” And “Primacy” Mean Concretely For The Stl And The Lebanese National Courts? ..., Helena Traner

War Crimes Memoranda

Concurrent Jurisdiction and Primacy. What do the concepts of “concurrent jurisdiction” and “primacy” mean concretely for the STL and the Lebanese national courts? What are the effects on the STL and Lebanese authorities of the deferral of the Hariri case

Does Terrorism Constitute A Crime Under International Law And, If So, What Is Its Definition. Specifically Addressing The Argument That A Limited Definition Of Terrorism Has Emerged In Customary International Law That Provides For International Criminal Liability For Individual Non-State Actors., Avrum Jacobson

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Customary International Law Status Of The Enumerated Crimes Of Article 5 Of The Extraordinary Chambers In The Courts Of Cambodia Law And Whether They Are Prosecutable, Andrew Bader

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Statutory Interpretation Regarding Joint Criminal Enterprise And Roots In Codes Of Superior Responsibility Doctrine. Does Article 3(1)(B) Of The Stl Statute Refer To The Joint Criminal Enterprise Doctrine (Jce) Or To Another Mode Of Liability? If This Provision Does Not Refer To Jce, What Was The Intent Of The Drafters Of The Statute Regarding The Meaning Of This Provision? What Support Is There For The Proposition That The Doctrine Of Superior Responsibility Is Rooted In National Criminal And Military Codes? Which Ones? Is It Possible To Find Concordant Law-Cases Issued Before February 14 2005 By National Courts From Different Legal Systems Which Establishes That Superior Responsibility As Set Out In Article 3 Of The Stl Statute Is Applicable To Terrorists Acts, Murder Or Other Crimes Within The Jurisdiction Of The Stl?, Jacqueline C. Greene

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Was Forced Marriage A Crime Against Humanity Under Customary International Law In 1975?, Allyson Justine Montgomery

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Under What Conditions Would The Involvement Of A Judge In The Adoption Of A Piece Of Legislation Warrant His Recusal (Or Removal) From The Bench On Grounds Of Lack Of Impartiality Or Appearance Thereof?, Brandon J. Wheeler

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Retributivism Refined - Or Run Amok?, Kenneth Simons

Faculty Scholarship

What would the criminal law look like if we took retributivist principles very seriously? In their book, Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law, the authors - Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan, with contributions by Stephen J. Morse - provide a controversial set of answers. Whether a criminal act does ordoes not result in harm should not affect the actor’s punishment. Only the last act of risk creation should suffice for liability. Conscious awareness of risk should always be necessary. And all of criminal law, each and every category of mens rea and actus reus, should be reduced …

Inter-Judge Sentencing Disparity After Booker: A First Look, Ryan W. Scott

Articles by Maurer Faculty

A central purpose of the Sentencing Reform Act was to reduce inter-judge sentencing disparity, driven not by legitimate differences between offenders and offense conduct, but by the philosophy, politics, or biases of the sentencing judge. The federal Sentencing Guidelines, despite their well-recognized deficiencies, succeeded in reducing that form of unwarranted disparity. But in a series of decisions from 2005 to 2007, the Supreme Court rendered the Guidelines advisory (Booker), set a highly deferential standard for appellate review (Gall), and explicitly authorized judges to reject the policy judgments of the Sentencing Commission (Kimbrough). Since then, the Commission has received extensive anecdotal …

Reconceiving The Fourth Amendment And The Exclusionary Rule, Craig M. Bradley

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

The Death Of Suspicion, Fabio Arcila Jr.

Scholarly Works

This article argues that neither the presumptive warrant requirement nor the presumptive suspicion requirement are correct. Though representative of the common law, they do not reflect the totality of our historic experience, which includes civil search practices. More importantly, modern developments - such as urban life and technological advancements, the rise of the regulatory state, and security concerns post-9/11 - have sufficiently changed circumstances so that these rules are not just unworkable now, they are demonstrably wrong. Worst of all, adhering to them has prevented us from formulating a more coherent Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. A new paradigm confronts us, in …

The Shadow Of State Secrets, Laura K. Donohue

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

The shadow of state secrets casts itself longer than previously acknowledged. Between 2001 and 2009 the government asserted state secrets in more than 100 cases, while in scores more litigants appealed to the doctrine in anticipation of government intervention. Contractor cases ranged from breach of contract, patent disputes, and trade secrets, to fraud and employment termination. Wrongful death, personal injury, and negligence suits kept pace, extending beyond product liability to include infrastructure and services, as well as conduct of war. In excess of fifty telecommunications suits linked to the NSA warrantless wiretapping program emerged 2006-2009, with the government acting, variously, …

Exporting U.S. Criminal Justice, Allegra M. Mcleod

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

This article explores how and why, in the Cold War’s wake, the U.S. government began to export U.S.-style criminal law and procedure models to developing and politically transitioning states. U.S. criminal law and development consultants now work in countries across the globe. This article reveals how U.S. initiatives have shaped state and non-state actors’ responses to a range of global challenges, even as this approach suffers from a deep democratic deficit. Further, this article argues that U.S. programs perpetuate U.S.-style legal institutional idolatry (which is often tied to systemic dysfunction both in the United States and abroad), and in so …

In Praise Of The Guilty Project: A Criminal Defense Lawyer's Growing Anxiety About Innocence Projects, Abbe Smith

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

There is nothing more compelling than a story about an innocent person wrongly convicted and ultimately vindicated. An ordinary citizen is caught up in the criminal justice system through circumstances beyond his or her control, spends many years in prison, and then one day, with the assistance of a dedicated lawyer, is freed.

Often, when DNA is behind a vindication, not only is the innocent person exonerated but the true perpetrator is identified. This is a significant achievement even though it can also lead apologists for the system—even police and prosecutors implicated in the wrongful conviction—to proudly declare that the …

Honest-Services Fraud: A (Vague) Threat To Millions Of Blissfully Unaware (And Non-Culpable) American Workers, Julie R. O'Sullivan

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

The author believes that statute 18 U.S.C. § 1346 is unconstitutionally vague, at least as applied to cases in which employees of private entities are prosecuted for depriving their employers of a right to their honest services (so-called “private cases”). Objections to vagueness rest on due process. “Vagueness may invalidate a criminal law for either of two independent reasons. First, it may fail to provide the kind of notice that will enable ordinary people to understand what conduct it prohibits; second, it may authorize and even encourage arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement.” The Supreme Court’s vagueness precedents do not provide much …

How Should Colleges And Universities Respond To Peer Sexual Violence On Campus? What The Current Legal Environment Tells Us, Nancy Chi Cantalupo

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

Over the last decade or so, various legal schemes such as the statutes and court or agency enforcement of Title IX and the Clery Act have increasingly recognized that certain institutional responses perpetuate a cycle of nonreporting and violence. This paper draws upon comprehensive legal research conducted on how the law now regulates school responses to campus peer sexual violence to show that schools face much greater liability from failing to protect the rights of campus peer sexual violence survivors than of any other group of students, including alleged assailants. By encouraging their institutions to develop more victim-centered responses to …

Paradigm Shifts In International Justice And The Duty To Protect; In Search Of An Action Principle, Patrick J. Glen

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

This article places the emerging “responsibility to protect” within the historical development of international human rights and criminal law, while also attempting to more fully theorize the responsibility to ensure that it can be a basis for action in the face of a state’s commission of atrocities against its citizens. The main point of departure concerns the issue of “right authority” at that point in time when a coercive intervention is justified. Rather than rely solely on the Security Council in these situations, this article contends that unilateral and multilateral action must be countenanced by a fully theorized “responsibility to …

Following Only Some Of The Money In Russia, Ethan S. Burger

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

Russia adopted the necessary legislation so that it was accepted as a member of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). It is a member of the UN Convention Against Corruption (although it refuses to enact legislation consistent with the obligations under the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention) and fought to prevent an effective mechanism to monitor compliance with the UN Convention. Russia has created state bodies to combat money laundering. Nonetheless, the Russian Federal Financial Monitoring Service appears to be highly selective in the matters it pursues and appears to lack adequate personnel and material resources.