Supreme Court Criminal Law Jurisprudence - October 2008 Term,
2010
Touro Law Center
Supreme Court Criminal Law Jurisprudence - October 2008 Term, Richard Klein
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
The Death Of Suspicion,
2010
Touro Law Center
The Death Of Suspicion, Fabio Arcila Jr.
Scholarly Works
This article argues that neither the presumptive warrant requirement nor the presumptive suspicion requirement are correct. Though representative of the common law, they do not reflect the totality of our historic experience, which includes civil search practices. More importantly, modern developments - such as urban life and technological advancements, the rise of the regulatory state, and security concerns post-9/11 - have sufficiently changed circumstances so that these rules are not just unworkable now, they are demonstrably wrong. Worst of all, adhering to them has prevented us from formulating a more coherent Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. A new paradigm confronts us, in …
Corporate War Crimes: Prosecuting Pillage Of Natural Resources,
2010
Allard School of Law at the University of British Columbia
Corporate War Crimes: Prosecuting Pillage Of Natural Resources, James G. Stewart
All Faculty Publications
Pillage means theft during war. Although the prohibition against pillage dates to antiquity, pillaging is a modern war crime that can be enforced before international and domestic criminal courts. Following World War II, several businessmen were convicted for the pillage of natural resources. And yet modern commercial actors are seldom held accountable for their role in the illegal exploitation of natural resources from modern conflict zones, even though pillage is prosecuted as a matter of course in other contexts. This book offers a doctrinal road-map of the law governing pillage as applied to the illegal exploitation of natural resources by …
Inter-Judge Sentencing Disparity After Booker: A First Look,
2010
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Inter-Judge Sentencing Disparity After Booker: A First Look, Ryan W. Scott
Articles by Maurer Faculty
A central purpose of the Sentencing Reform Act was to reduce inter-judge sentencing disparity, driven not by legitimate differences between offenders and offense conduct, but by the philosophy, politics, or biases of the sentencing judge. The federal Sentencing Guidelines, despite their well-recognized deficiencies, succeeded in reducing that form of unwarranted disparity. But in a series of decisions from 2005 to 2007, the Supreme Court rendered the Guidelines advisory (Booker), set a highly deferential standard for appellate review (Gall), and explicitly authorized judges to reject the policy judgments of the Sentencing Commission (Kimbrough). Since then, the Commission has received extensive anecdotal …
Intimate Femicide: A Study Of Sentencing Trends For Men Who Kill Their Intimate Partners,
2010
Allard School of Law at the University of British Columbia
Intimate Femicide: A Study Of Sentencing Trends For Men Who Kill Their Intimate Partners, Isabel Grant
All Faculty Publications
This article examines sentencing trends over the past 18 years for men who kill their intimate partners. Using a sample of 252 cases, the article demonstrates that periods of parole ineligibility for second degree murder rose significantly after the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Shropshire but have more recently levelled off to a range that is still higher than the pre-Shropshire era. With respect to manslaughter, changing social attitudes and the amendments to the Criminal Code making the spousal nature of the crime an aggravating factor have resulted in increasingly severe sentences for spousal manslaughters. While a large number …
Reconceiving The Fourth Amendment And The Exclusionary Rule,
2010
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Reconceiving The Fourth Amendment And The Exclusionary Rule, Craig M. Bradley
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Killing, Letting Die, And The Case For Mildly Punishing Bad Samaritanism,
2010
Louisiana State University Law Center
Killing, Letting Die, And The Case For Mildly Punishing Bad Samaritanism, Ken Levy
Georgia Law Review
For over a century now, American scholars(among others) have been debating the merits of "bad-Samaritan" laws-laws punishing people for failing to attempt "easy rescues." Unfortunately, the opponents of bad-Samaritan laws have mostly prevailed. In the United States, the "no-duty-to-rescue" rule dominates. Only four states even have bad-Samaritan laws, and these laws impose only the most minimal punishment-either sub-$500 fines or short-term imprisonment. This Article argues that this situation needs to be remedied. Every state should criminalize bad Samaritanism. For, first, criminalization is required by the supreme value that we place on protecting human life, a value that motivates laws against …
Melendez-Diaz And The Right To Confrontation,
2010
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Melendez-Diaz And The Right To Confrontation, Craig M. Bradley
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Fine-Labor: The Symbiosis Between Monetary And Work Sanctions,
2010
University of Colorado Law School
Fine-Labor: The Symbiosis Between Monetary And Work Sanctions, Martin H. Pritikin
University of Colorado Law Review
Monetary sanctions (fines and restitution) and work sanctions are theoretically superior to incarceration: they can deliver deterrence more cheaply, benefit victims tangibly, and promote offender rehabilitation. Yet incarceration remains the dominant punishment in America, even where incapacitation concerns are secondary. This is due in large part to practical drawbacks to the alternatives: monetary sanctions are difficult to enforce and do not seem punitive enough, and unions have successfully lobbied against the competitive threat of convict labor. In a hybrid "fine-labor" system, in which offenders are made to work to pay fines and restitution, the work component could remedy the flaws …
