Criminal Law Commons^™

How The United States Coast Guard Might Conduct Expedited Border Crossings On The Great Lakes In Cooperation With Canadian Authorities And Law Enforcement. Specifically Addressing How Current Agreements And Policies May Be Utilized In Order To Expedite Border Crossings On The Great Lakes And Additional Measures Which Can Be Taken To Specifically Address The Matter Through Express Agreement, Timothy R. Bierer

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Ballast Water Regulation In The Great Lakes, Erin James

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Prosecution Disclosure Obligations, Jeradon Z. Mura

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

International Standards For Forensic Digital Evidence, Amar Dzaferovic

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Is The Test For Fitness To Plead The Same During The Appeal Process As The Trial Process At The Eccc?, Khali Blankenship

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Finality Of Trial Judgment When Accused Dies Or Is Found Mentally Unfit Before Final Appellate Verdict, Katelyn R. Pierce

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Universal Definition Of Piracy & Improvements In International Coorporation And Prosecution, Brad Pyle

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

How Long Can We Suspend The Jones Act For Port Emergencies? What Impacts Does The Jones Act Have On International Voyages On The Great Lakes? What Changes To Either Canadian Or U.S. Law Are Necessary To Enhance Commerce On The Great Lakes? What Impacts Would Those Changes Have On The U.S. Domestic Fleet? What Are The Limitations On The Tug-Barge Manning Requirements?, Alpha Taylor

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

The Standard That Should Be Used By The U.S. Coast Guard In Regard To Its Provision Of Boarding Vessels Arriving To The U.S. Coasts, Silvia Garcia Ausin

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Blinding Prosecutors To Defendants' Race: A Policy Proposal To Reduce Unconscious Bias In The Criminal Justice System, Shima Baughman, Sunita Sah, Christopher T. Robertson

Utah Law Faculty Scholarship

Racial minorities are disproportionately imprisoned in the United States. This disparity is unlikely to be due solely to differences in criminal behavior. Behavioral science research has documented that prosecutors harbor unconscious racial biases. These unconscious biases play a role whenever prosecutors exercise their broad discretion, such as in choosing what crimes to charge and when negotiating plea bargains. To reduce this risk of unconscious racial bias, we propose a policy change: Prosecutors should be blinded to the race of criminal defendants wherever feasible. This could be accomplished by removing information identifying or suggesting the defendant’s race from police dossiers shared …

Introduction To The Symposium On Entrepreneurial Lawyering, Anthony J. Luppino, Ellen Suni

Faculty Works

No abstract provided.

The Complexity Of International Criminal Trials Is Necessary, 48 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 151 (2015), Stuart Ford

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

There is a widespread belief among both academics and policymakers that international criminal trials are too complex. As a result, tribunals have come under enormous pressure to reduce the complexity of their trials. However, changes to trial procedure have not meaningfully affected trial complexity. This Article explains why these changes have failed and argues that the complexity of international criminal trials is necessary for them to achieve their purposes.

Using a multiple regression model of the factors driving trial complexity at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), this Article shows that the largest drivers of complexity are …

Standards Of Legitimacy In Criminal Negotiations, Wesley Macneil Oliver, Rishi Batra

Faculty Articles

Scholarship on negotiation theory and practice is rich and well developed. Almost no work has been done, however, to translate to the criminal context the lessons learned about negotiation from extensive empirical study using the disciplines of economics, game theory, and psychology. This Article suggests that defense lawyers in criminal negotiations can employ tools frequently useful to negotiators in other arenas: neutral criteria as a standard of legitimacy. Judges sometimes exercise a type of discretion analogous to prosecutorial discretion. When they do so, they offer an independent, reasoned, and publicly available assessment of the factors that a prosecutor ought to …

On The Argument That Execution Protocol Reform Is Biomedical Research, Paul J. Litton

Faculty Publications

Regardless of whether the Supreme Court rightly upheld Oklahoma’s execution protocol in Glossip, Oklahoma officials had inadequate reason to choose midazolam as the anesthetizing agent in its procedure. Their decision is one example illustrating Seema Shah’s point that death penalty states are engaged in “poorly designed experimentation that is not based on evidence.” Shah argues that “an important factor” causing the high rate of botched executions is that lethal injection reform is a type of human subjects research that is going unregulated. Shah argues that research requirements, such as informed consent and IRB review, are necessary to render the research …

Timing Brady, Miriam H. Baer

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Death By Discovery, Delay, And Disempowerment: Legal Authority For Arbitrators To Provide A Cost-Effective And Expeditious Process, Tracey B. Frisch

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Whether warranted or not, despite statistics to the contrary, arbitration in recent years has become a punching bag for criticism that it has begun to mirror the type of scorched earth discovery practices and delays seen in litigation. Why is this? Is it because parties are not actively participating in the arbitration process and instead have allowed their outside counsels to use the litigationstyle discovery and delay tactics with which counsel feel most comfortable? Maybe. Do parties themselves want protracted discovery and a drawn out arbitration process? Some, perhaps. Has arbitration become a victim of its own success, attracting more …

Free, But Still Behind Bars: Reading The Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act To Allow Any Person Convicted Of A Crime To Raise A Claim Of Actual Innocence, 35 B.C. J. L. & Soc. Just. 1 (2015), Hugh Mundy

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

As the number of wrongfully convicted prisoners who are subsequently exonerated continues to rise, the importance of access to post-conviction relief also increases. Under the Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act, this access is restricted to petitioners who are currently imprisoned or otherwise facing a restraint on their liberty. Persons convicted of a crime who have completed their sentence are barred from pursuing post-conviction relief under the Act, regardless of the existence of exculpatory evidence that supports their innocence. Removing this procedural roadblock and interpreting the Act broadly to allow any person convicted of a crime to raise a claim of actual …

Law Enforcement And White Power: An F.B.I. Report Unraveled, 41 T. Marshall L. Rev. 103 (2015), Samuel Vincent Jones

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

Because of intensifying civil strife over the recent killings of unarmed Black men, women, and boys, many Americans are wondering, “What's wrong with our police?” Remarkably, one of the most compelling but unexplored explanations may rest with an FBI warning of October, 2006, which reported that “[W]hite supremacist infiltration of law enforcement” represented a significant national threat.

Can Criminal Law Do Without Moralism?, Review Of Crime And Punishment: A Concise Moral Critique By Hyman Gross, Youngjae Lee

Faculty Scholarship

This is a review of Hyman Gross, Crime and Punishment: A Concise Moral Critique (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).

A Cost-Benefit Analysis Of The Federal Prosecution Of Immigration Crimes, Kit Johnson

Faculty Articles

Immigration crimes are the most prosecuted federal crimes in America. This Article examines the benefits of the federal prosecution of immigration crimes (training, deterrence, and signaling/expression) and balances those benefits against the costs of such prosecutions (court- house costs, alternative prosecution, and incarceration). I conclude that deportation immediately following a conviction for an immigration crime appears to capture the key benefit of this system (signaling/expression) while alleviating its greatest expense (incarceration).