Bail Nullification,
2017
Brooklyn Law School
Preclusion And Criminal Judgment,
2017
University of Maryland School of Law
Preclusion And Criminal Judgment, Lee Kovarsky
Notre Dame Law Review
The defining question in modern habeas corpus law involves the finality
of a state conviction: What preclusive effect does (and should) a criminal
judgment have? Res judicata and collateral estoppel —the famous preclusion
rules for civil judgments—accommodate basic legal interests in fairness,
certitude, and sovereignty. Legal institutions carefully calibrate the preclusive
effect of civil judgments because judicial resources are scarce, because
the reliability and legitimacy of prior process can vary, and because courts
wield the authority of a repeat-playing sovereign that will find its own civil
judgments attacked in foreign litigation. In stark contrast to the legal sophistication
lavished on …
Beyond Law And Fact: Jury Evaluation Of Law Enforcement,
2017
Temple University Beasley School of Law
Beyond Law And Fact: Jury Evaluation Of Law Enforcement, Lauren M. Ouziel
Notre Dame Law Review
Criminal trials today are as much about the adequacy and legitimacy of the defendant’s accusers—police and prosecutors—as the alleged deeds of the accused. Yet we lack theory to conceptualize this reality, doctrine to set its parameters, and institutional mechanisms to adapt to it. The traditional framework used by courts and scholars to delineate the jury’s role—along the continuum between “fact-finding” and “law-finding”—is inadequate to the task. Jury evaluations of law enforcement are more accurately conceptualized as enforcement-finding, a process that functions both in and outside that continuum. In considering enforcement-finding’s justification and proper scope, history offers a useful analytical frame. …
Juvenile Justice Research To Policy And The Case Of Fines,
2017
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Juvenile Justice Research To Policy And The Case Of Fines, Alex R. Piquero
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Joinder, Conspiracy, And Racketeering: Charging Issues Arising In The Prosecution Of Staged-Accident Insurance Schemes,
2017
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Joinder, Conspiracy, And Racketeering: Charging Issues Arising In The Prosecution Of Staged-Accident Insurance Schemes, Michael C. Kovac
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Pursuing Gault,
2017
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Pursuing Gault, David S. Tanenhaus, Eric C. Nystrom
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Hard Bargaining In Plea Bargaining: When Do Prosecutors Cross The Line?,
2017
Texas A&M University School of Law
Hard Bargaining In Plea Bargaining: When Do Prosecutors Cross The Line?, Cynthia Alkon
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The History And Future Of Capital Punishment In The United States,
2017
University of San Diego
The History And Future Of Capital Punishment In The United States, Robert A. Stein
San Diego Law Review
It is a great pleasure to be with you today to deliver the 2016 Nathaniel Nathanson Lecture. I am delighted to join the many distinguished jurists and scholars that have delivered this Lecture in prior years. Early in his career, Professor Nathanson clerked for Justice Louis Brandeis and served the Securities and Exchange Commission in its formative days. Professor Nathanson is deservedly viewed as one of the architects of modern administrative law. His work, Administrative Discretion in the Interpretation of Statutes,was monumental in the field of administrative law. Professor Nathanson was the first scholar to identify a “principle of limited …
On The Ends And Means Of Protecting Youth In Juvenile Courts,
2017
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
On The Ends And Means Of Protecting Youth In Juvenile Courts, Franklin E. Zimring
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
My Life In Crime: An Intellectual History Of The Juvenile Court,
2017
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
My Life In Crime: An Intellectual History Of The Juvenile Court, Barry C. Feld
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Championing Children's Rights In Nevada, 2000-2015: The Thomas & Mack Juvenile Justice Clinic As Change Agent,
2017
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Championing Children's Rights In Nevada, 2000-2015: The Thomas & Mack Juvenile Justice Clinic As Change Agent, Mary C. Berkheiser
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Barry Feld: An Intellectual History Of A Juvenile Court Reformer,
2017
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Barry Feld: An Intellectual History Of A Juvenile Court Reformer, Martin Guggenheim
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Random If Not "Rare"? The Eighth Amendment Weaknesses Of Post-Miller Legislation,
2017
University of Michigan Law School
Random If Not "Rare"? The Eighth Amendment Weaknesses Of Post-Miller Legislation, Kimberly Thomas
Articles
First, this Article surveys the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to analogize life without parole for juveniles to the death penalty for adults, and discusses the Eighth Amendment law regarding the parameters around death penalty statutory schemes. Second, this Article examines the state legislative response to Miller, and scrutinizes it with the Court's Eighth Amendment death penalty law-and the states' responses to this case law-in mind. This Article highlights the failure of juvenile homicide sentencing provisions to: 1) narrow offenses that are eligible for life without parole sentences; 2) further limit, once a guilty finding is made, the categories of …
Hard Bargaining In Plea Bargaining: When Do Prosecutors Cross The Line?,
2017
Texas A&M University School of Law
Hard Bargaining In Plea Bargaining: When Do Prosecutors Cross The Line?, Cynthia Alkon
Faculty Scholarship
Well over 90 percent of all criminal cases in the United States are resolved by plea bargaining and not by trial. This means that how plea bargaining works impacts nearly every criminal defendant. However, there are few restrictions to protect defendants in the negotiating process. One serious problem is that prosecutors regularly use hard bargaining tactics such as exploding offers, threats to add enhancements, take-it-or-leave-it offers, and threats to seek the death penalty. These hard bargaining tactics contribute to the often highly coercive atmosphere of plea bargaining that can lead innocent defendants to plead guilty. Pressure to plead guilty can …
Classified Information Cases On The Ground: Altering The Attorney-Client Relationship,
2017
Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia
Classified Information Cases On The Ground: Altering The Attorney-Client Relationship, Paul G. Gill
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Child Abuse--Nonaccidental Injury (Nai) And Abusive Head Trauma (Aht)--Medical Imaging: Issues And Controversies In The Era Of Evidence-Based Medicine,
2017
Stanford Hospital & Clinics
Child Abuse--Nonaccidental Injury (Nai) And Abusive Head Trauma (Aht)--Medical Imaging: Issues And Controversies In The Era Of Evidence-Based Medicine, Patrick Barnes
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
A look at nonaccidental injury and abusive head trauma in children with a focus on Shaken Baby Syndrome.
Who Put The Quo In Quid Pro Quo?: Why Courts Should Apply Mcdonnell ’S “Official Act” Definition Narrowly,
2017
Fordham University School of Law
Who Put The Quo In Quid Pro Quo?: Why Courts Should Apply Mcdonnell ’S “Official Act” Definition Narrowly, Adam F. Minchew
Fordham Law Review
Federal prosecutors have several tools at their disposal to bring criminal charges against state and local officials for their engagement in corrupt activity. Section 666 federal funds bribery and § 1951 Hobbs Act extortion, two such statuary tools, have coexisted for the past thirty-six years, during which time § 666 has seen an increasing share of total prosecutions while the Hobbs Act’s share of prosecutions has fallen commensurately. In the summer of 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court decided McDonnell v. United States—a decision that threatens to quicken the demise of Hobbs Act extortion in favor of § 666. If …
Updating The Social Network: How Outdated And Unclear State Legislation Violates Sex Offenders’ First Amendment Rights,
2017
Fordham University School of Law
Updating The Social Network: How Outdated And Unclear State Legislation Violates Sex Offenders’ First Amendment Rights, Elizabeth Tolon
Fordham Law Review
Readily available on computers, phones, tablets, or television, social media has become a necessary platform of expression for many. But, for others, social media is an inaccessible tool whose very use has criminal repercussions. To protect innocent children, many states have enacted legislation restricting sex offenders’ access to social media. Unfortunately, this legislation is often outdated, overly restrictive, and unconstitutional under the First Amendment. North Carolina has recently attracted national attention, as its statute highlights the potential constitutional issues states face in drafting such legislation. To avoid the constitutional concerns that North Carolina faces, state legislators must draft statutes narrowly …
Unambiguous Deterrence: Ambiguity Attitudes In The Juvenile Justice System And The Case For A Right To Counsel During Intake Proceedings,
2017
Vanderbilt University Law School
Unambiguous Deterrence: Ambiguity Attitudes In The Juvenile Justice System And The Case For A Right To Counsel During Intake Proceedings, Hannah Frank
Vanderbilt Law Review
According to the traditional rational choice theory of criminal behavior, people choose to commit crimes in a rational manner.' They weigh the costs and benefits and make informed decisions to maximize their utility. Under this framework, the state can deter crime through two main avenues: increasing the probability of detection and increasing the punishment if caught, both of which increase the total cost of committing a crime. Recently, however, behavioral insights have begun to cast doubt on traditional rationality assumptions. Lab experiments and empirical studies using real-world data have shown that people exhibit bounded rationality. For example, individuals have limited …
Denial Of Harm: Sex Trafficking, Backpage, And Free Speech Absolutism,
2017
DePaul University College of Law
Denial Of Harm: Sex Trafficking, Backpage, And Free Speech Absolutism, Jody Raphael
Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence
No abstract provided.
