Courts Commons^™

California Supreme Court Survey - A Review Of Decisions: December 1994-July 1995 , April L. Anstett

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

Dealing With The Problem: Discretion Within The Court System, David Disco, Lisa Greer, Socrates Manoukian

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

California Supreme Court Survey - A Review Of Decisions: April 1994-August 1995, April L. Anstett

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

California Supreme Court Survey - A Review Of Decisions: January 1994-February 1995, April L. Anstett

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

California Supreme Court Survey - A Review Of Decisions: May 1995-August 1996, Roger Shaar

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

California Supreme Court Survey: March 1997 - August 1997, Leallen Frost, Shannon M. Mason, John W. Corrington, Mairi J. Sanford

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

California Supreme Court Survey: May 1997- August 1997, John W. Corrington, Shannon Mason, Leallen Frost, Mairi J. Sanford

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

California Supreme Court Survey: April 1996-July 1997 , Monica M. Randazzo

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

California Supreme Court Survey-A Review Of Decisions: June 1998-November 1998, Leallen Frost

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

California Supreme Court Survey-A Review Of Decisions: August 1997-June 1998, Leallen Frost

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

California Supreme Court Survey-A Review Of Decisions: July 1997-December 1997, Leallen Frost

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Unreliability Of Testimony From A Witness With Multiple Personality Disorder (Mpd): Why Courts Must Acknowledge The Connection Between Hypnosis And Mpd And Adopt A “Per Se” Rule Of Exclusion For Mpd Testimony, Mark Anthony Miller

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

Substance And Method In The Year 2000, Akhil Reed Amar

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

Law Enforcement And Criminal Law Decisions, Erwin Chemerinsky

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Supreme Court's Most Extraordinary Term - Introduction, Douglas W. Kmiec

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

2012 Maine Juvenile Justice Data Book, Becky Noréus, George Shaler Mph, Desiree Girard Mppm

Justice Policy

The 2012 Maine Juvenile Justice Data Book presents a portrait of youth involvement with the Maine juvenile justice system. The data book consists of five sections, (1) Maine Youth Population Trends, (2) Maine Juvenile Justice System Trends, (3) Maine County Trends, (4) Maine Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) Trends, and (5) Youth Recidivism Outcomes in Maine.

While Maine’s youth arrest rates are consistently among the lowest in the country, the state faces challenges in ensuring that limited resources are targeted most efficiently and effectively for programs and services aimed at rehabilitating youth who encounter the juvenile justice system. The analyses presented …

The Courts And Beyond: The Architecture Of Justice In Transition - Introduction, Trevor C. W. Farrow

Conference Papers

No abstract provided.

Setting Aside An Award Over The Mis-Application Of A Choice Of Law Clause: Quarella Spa V Scelta Marble Australia Pty Ltd [2012] Sghc 166, Darius Chan

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

In Quarella SpA v Scelta Marble Australia Pty Ltd [2012] SGHC 166, the High Court of Singapore (per Prakash J) rejected an application to set aside two related arbitration awards. The ground for setting aside was an alleged misinterpretation of a choice of law clause by the tribunal. In rejecting the application, the High Court demonstrated its unwillingness to set aside an award when the tribunal has considered and respected the choice of law clause (regardless of the interpretation the tribunal ultimately preferred). Notably, the High Court did not close the door on instances where the tribunal may have failed …

Smile For The Camera - The Long Lost Photos Of The Supreme Court At Work—And What They Reveal., Sonja R. West

Popular Media

In a day when even our cellphones can capture images unobtrusively, why were we forced to stare at pixels on our computer screens or at a static televised image of the Supreme Court’s exterior? In 2012, why is there a wall of separation between the American people and their high court?

For decades, the debate over cameras in the court has gone something like this: the press pleads for permission and the court says no; academics make policy arguments that the court ignores; and Congress threatens to force cameras into the court, but the justices don’t blink. The argument remains …

Foreword: Academic Influence On The Court, Neal K. Katyal

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

The months leading up to the Supreme Court’s blockbuster decision on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) were characterized by a prodigious amount of media coverage that purported to analyze how the legal challenge to Obamacare went mainstream. The nation’s major newspapers each had a prominent story describing how conservative academics, led by Professor Randy Barnett, had a long-term strategy to make the case appear credible. In the first weeks after the ACA’s passage, the storyline went, the lawsuit’s prospects of success were thought to be virtually nil. Professor (and former Solicitor General) Charles Fried stated that he would “eat a …