The Trouble With Amicus Facts,
2014
William & Mary Law School
The Trouble With Amicus Facts, Allison Orr Larsen
Faculty Publications
The number of amicus curiae briefs filed at the Supreme Court is at an all-time high. Most observers, and even some of the Justices, believe that the best of these briefs are filed to supplement the Court’s understanding of facts. Supreme Court decisions quite often turn on generalized facts about the way the world works (Do violent video games harm children? Is a partial birth abortion ever medically necessary?). To answer these questions, the Justices are hungry for more information than the parties and the record can provide. The consensus is that amicus briefs helpfully add factual expertise to the …
The I.C.J.'S Decision In The Lockerbie Cases,
2014
University of Adelaide
The I.C.J.'S Decision In The Lockerbie Cases, Gerald P. Mcginley
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Top 10 U.S. Supreme Court Cases From The Last Term,
2014
Dordt College
Top 10 U.S. Supreme Court Cases From The Last Term, Donald Roth
Faculty Work Comprehensive List
"This list is ranked based on my perceptions of importance, newsworthiness, and the interests of this audience. Every Supreme Court case is significant. I just think these will be the most significant for a reading of in all things to know."
Posting about significant U.S. Supreme Court cases from the last term from In All Things - an online hub committed to the claim that the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ has implications for the entire world.
http://inallthings.org/top-10-u-s-supreme-court-cases-you-should-know-about/
5 U.S. Supreme Court Cases Every Christian Should Be Aware Of,
2014
Dordt College
5 U.S. Supreme Court Cases Every Christian Should Be Aware Of, Donald Roth
Faculty Work Comprehensive List
"What United Stated Supreme Court cases should Christians be aware of?"
Posting about the five United States Supreme Court cases of which all Christians should be aware from In All Things - an online hub committed to the claim that the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ has implications for the entire world.
http://inallthings.org/supreme-court-cases-christians-should-know-about/
Human Rights - Haitian Refugees - Haitian Refugees Housed At Guantanamo Bay Naval Base Held To Have No Valid Constitutional Or International Law Claims To Challenge Forced Repatriation By The U.S. Government. Haitian Refugee Center V. Baker, 953 F.2d 1498 (11th Cir. 1992), Cert. Denied, 112 S.Ct. 1245 (1992).,
2014
University of Georgia School of Law
Human Rights - Haitian Refugees - Haitian Refugees Housed At Guantanamo Bay Naval Base Held To Have No Valid Constitutional Or International Law Claims To Challenge Forced Repatriation By The U.S. Government. Haitian Refugee Center V. Baker, 953 F.2d 1498 (11th Cir. 1992), Cert. Denied, 112 S.Ct. 1245 (1992)., Jason A. Golden
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Scholars Of The Constitutional Rights Of Children Susannah W. Pollvogt, Catherine E. Smith, And Tanya Washington As Amici Curiae In Support Of Plaintiffs-Appellants And Reversal: Robicheaux V. Caldwell,
2014
Washington and Lee University School of Law
Brief Of Scholars Of The Constitutional Rights Of Children Susannah W. Pollvogt, Catherine E. Smith, And Tanya Washington As Amici Curiae In Support Of Plaintiffs-Appellants And Reversal: Robicheaux V. Caldwell, Catherine E. Smith, Tanya Washington, Susannah W. Pollvogt
Scholarly Articles
Amici are scholars and professors of family law and the law of equal protection. Amici submit this brief to respond directly to arguments advanced by the State of Louisiana that its laws prohibiting same-sex marriage2 are justified because they advance child welfare. Specifically, the State asserts that its laws advance child welfare by promoting Louisiana’s interest in: (1) linking children with their biological parents to prevent the social stigma associated with being “illegitimate” and (2) establishing the child as a member of an intact family resulting from the marriage of the mother and alleged father. These purported justifications express and …
The Extradition Proceedings Against General Augusto Pinochet: Is Justice Being Met Under International Law?,
2014
University of Georgia School of Law
The Extradition Proceedings Against General Augusto Pinochet: Is Justice Being Met Under International Law?, Anita C. Johnson
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
To Be Or Not To Be: The Forum Non Conveniens Performance Acted Out On Anglo-American Courtroom Stages,
2014
Sunderland University
To Be Or Not To Be: The Forum Non Conveniens Performance Acted Out On Anglo-American Courtroom Stages, Alan Reed
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Mexico's Legal Revolution: An Appraisal Of Its Recent Constitutional Changes, 1988-1995,
2014
University of San Diego School of Law
Mexico's Legal Revolution: An Appraisal Of Its Recent Constitutional Changes, 1988-1995, Jorge A. Vargas
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Reflections On Regional Human Rights Law,
2014
University of Georgia School of Law
Reflections On Regional Human Rights Law, Gabriel M. Wilner
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Status Of The Universal Declaration Of Human Rights In National And International Law,
2014
Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University
The Status Of The Universal Declaration Of Human Rights In National And International Law, Hurst Hannum
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Customary International Human Rights Law In Domestic Court Decisions,
2014
University of Cincinnati College of Law
Customary International Human Rights Law In Domestic Court Decisions, Gordon A. Christenson
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The "Blank Stare Phenomenon": Proving Customary International Law In U.S. Courts,
2014
University of Georgia School of Law
The "Blank Stare Phenomenon": Proving Customary International Law In U.S. Courts, Paul L. Hoffman
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
How To Make Sense Of Supreme Court Standing Cases – A Plea For The Right Kind Of Realism,
2014
William & Mary Law School
How To Make Sense Of Supreme Court Standing Cases – A Plea For The Right Kind Of Realism, Richard H. Fallon Jr.
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Standing And The Role Of Federal Courts: Triple Error Decisions In Clapper V. Amnesty International Usa And City Of Los Angeles V. Lyons,
2014
William & Mary Law School
Standing And The Role Of Federal Courts: Triple Error Decisions In Clapper V. Amnesty International Usa And City Of Los Angeles V. Lyons, Vicki C. Jackson
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Does The Supreme Court Ignore Standing Problems To Reach The Merits? Evidence (Or Lack Thereof) From The Roberts Court,
2014
University of Alabama School of Law
Does The Supreme Court Ignore Standing Problems To Reach The Merits? Evidence (Or Lack Thereof) From The Roberts Court, Heather Elliott
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Governmental Sovereignty Actions,
2014
William & Mary Law School
Governmental Sovereignty Actions, Ann Woolhandler
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
International Extradition Of Mexican Narcotics Traffickers: Prospects And Pitfalls For The New Millennium,
2014
University of Georgia School of Law
International Extradition Of Mexican Narcotics Traffickers: Prospects And Pitfalls For The New Millennium, Rishi Hingoraney
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Germany V. United States In The International Court Of Justice: An International Battle Over The Interpretation Of Article Thirty-Six Of The Vienna Convention On Consular Relations And Provisional Measures Orders,
2014
University of Georgia School of Law
Germany V. United States In The International Court Of Justice: An International Battle Over The Interpretation Of Article Thirty-Six Of The Vienna Convention On Consular Relations And Provisional Measures Orders, Stephanie Baker
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Democracy's Struggle Against Terrorism: The Powers Of Military Commanders To Decide Upon The Demolition Of Houses, The Imposition Of Curfews, Blockades, Encirclements And The Declaration Of An Area As A Closed Military Area,
2014
University of Haifa
Democracy's Struggle Against Terrorism: The Powers Of Military Commanders To Decide Upon The Demolition Of Houses, The Imposition Of Curfews, Blockades, Encirclements And The Declaration Of An Area As A Closed Military Area, Emanuel Gross
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
