Effective Contract Drafting: Indentifying The Building Blocks Of Contracts,
2013
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Effective Contract Drafting: Indentifying The Building Blocks Of Contracts, Lori D. Johnson
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Tzedek Tzedek Tirdofi: How Female Religious Court Advocates Can Mitigate A Lack Of Judicial Review Of The American Beth Din System,
2013
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Tzedek Tzedek Tirdofi: How Female Religious Court Advocates Can Mitigate A Lack Of Judicial Review Of The American Beth Din System, Raquel J. Greenberg
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Contract As Pattern Language,
2013
University of Colorado Law School
Contract As Pattern Language, Erik F. Gerding
Publications
Christopher Alexander’s architectural theory of a "pattern language" influenced the development of object-oriented computer programming. This pattern language framework also explains the design of legal contracts. Moreover, the pattern language rubric explains how legal agreements interlock to create complex transactions and how transactions interconnect to create markets. This pattern language framework helps account for evidence, including from the global financial crisis, of failures in modern contract design.
A pattern represents an encapsulated conceptual solution to a recurring design problem. Patterns save architects and designers from having to reinvent the wheel; they can use solutions that evolved over time to address …
Vertical Boilerplate,
2013
Washington and Lee University School of Law
Vertical Boilerplate, James Gibson
Washington and Lee Law Review
Despite what we learn in law school about the “meeting of the minds,” most contracts are merely boilerplate—take-it-or-leave-it propositions. Negotiation is nonexistent; we rely on our collective market power as consumers to regulate contracts’ content. But boilerplate imposes certain information costs because it often arrives late in the transaction and is hard to understand. If those costs get too high, then the market mechanism fails. So how high are boilerplate’s information costs? A few studies have attempted to measure them, but they all use a “horizontal” approach—i.e., they sample a single stratum of boilerplate and assume that it represents the …
Party Sophistication And Value Pluralism In Contract,
2013
Touro Law Center
Party Sophistication And Value Pluralism In Contract, Meredith R. Miller
Touro Law Review
In a previous article, Contract Law, Party Sophistication and the New Formalism, 75 Missouri L. Rev. 493 (2010), I documented a trend in United States case law and scholarship that fashions a dichotomy between sophisticated and unsophisticated parties. That article set out to explain the trend as a theoretical compromise between formalism and realism in the face of a renewed formalism.
However, as I noted in the previous article, the “new formalism” may not be formalism at all because it retains normative concerns. Indeed, the shift in legal thought may be more appropriately and simply characterized as embracing pluralism. This …
Penalty Clauses As Remedies: Exploring Comparative Approaches To Enforceability,
2013
Touro Law Center
Penalty Clauses As Remedies: Exploring Comparative Approaches To Enforceability, Jack Graves
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Presumptively Better Approach To Arbitrability,
2013
University of Michigan Law School
A Presumptively Better Approach To Arbitrability, John A. E. Pottow, Jacob Brege, Tara J. Hawley
Law & Economics Working Papers
One of the most complex problems in the arbitration field is the question of who decides disputes over the scope of an arbitrator’s purported authority. Courts in Canada and the United States have taken different approaches to this fundamental question of “arbitrability” that necessarily arises when one party disputes the contractual validity of the underlying “container” contract carrying the arbitration clause. If arbitration is a creature of contract, and contract is a product of consensual agreement, then any dispute that impugns the underlying consent of the parties to the container contract implicates the arbitration agreement itself (i.e., no contract, no …
Learning Contracts Through Current Events: Lawrence Cunningham’S Contracts In The Real World: Stories Of Popular Contracts And Why They Matter,
2013
St. John's University School of Law
Learning Contracts Through Current Events: Lawrence Cunningham’S Contracts In The Real World: Stories Of Popular Contracts And Why They Matter, Miriam A. Cherry
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
In his recent book published by Cambridge University Press, Professor Lawrence Cunningham explores the nuances of contract law through current events. His decision to use the contracts of modern-day singers, actors, and entertainers to illustrate contract law principles is an inspired choice that will appeal to today’s law students. The book guides the reader down the well-trodden path of classic contract doctrines and applies those classics in modern, celebrity-laden contexts. In this regard, the book reads like an updated version of Marvin Chirelstein’s classic contracts primer— an easy-to-read and clearly written commentary. Cunningham’s version adds rollicking celebrity stories to …
From Lord Coke To Internet Privacy: The Past, Present, And Future Of The Law Of Electronic Contracting,
2013
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
From Lord Coke To Internet Privacy: The Past, Present, And Future Of The Law Of Electronic Contracting, Juliet M. Moringiello, William L. Reynolds
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Presumptively Better Approach To Arbitrability,
2013
University of Michigan Law School
A Presumptively Better Approach To Arbitrability, John A. E. Pottow, Jacob Brege, Tara J. Hawley
Articles
One of the most complex problems in the arbitration field is the question of who decides disputes over the scope of an arbitrator's purported authority. Courts in Canada and the United States have taken different approaches to this fundamental question of "arbitrability" that necessarily arises when one party disputes the contractual validity of the underlying "container" contract carrying the arbitration clause. If arbitration is a creature of contract, and contract is a product of consensual agreement, then any dispute that impugns the underlying consent of the parties to the container contract implicates the arbitration agreement itself (i.e., no contract, no …
The Right To Palimony: Why New York Should Change Its Law To Enforce Claims Between Unmarried Cohabitants,
2013
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
The Right To Palimony: Why New York Should Change Its Law To Enforce Claims Between Unmarried Cohabitants, Ashley Frankel
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The note advocates for legal reform in New York to align its palimony laws with New Jersey's approach, emphasizing the need for written and attorney-reviewed agreements to reduce ambiguity and litigation. It highlights the growing trend of unmarried cohabitation and the urgency of establishing clear legal frameworks to address the needs of such couples.
Prostitution 3.0?,
2013
University of Colorado Law School
Prostitution 3.0?, Scott R. Peppet
Publications
This Article presents an entirely novel approach to prostitution reform focused on incremental market improvement facilitated by information law and policy. Empirical evidence from the economics and sociology of sex work shows that new, Internet-enabled, indoor forms of prostitution may be healthier, less violent, and more rewarding than traditional street prostitution. This Article argues that these existing "Prostitution 2.0" innovations have not yet improved sex markets sufficiently to warrant legalization. It suggests that creating a new "Prostitution 3.0" that solves the remaining problems of disease, violence, and coercion in prostitution markets is possible, but would require removing legal barriers to …
Understanding Financial Derivatives,
2013
University of Missouri - Kansas City, School of Law
Understanding Financial Derivatives, Timothy E. Lynch
Faculty Works
Derivatives are commonly defined as some variation of the following: a financial instrument whose value is derived from the performance of a secondary source such as an underlying bond, commodity or index. But this definition is both over-inclusive and under-inclusive. Thus, not surprisingly, derivatives are largely misunderstood, including by many policy makers, regulators and legal analysts. It is important for interested parties such as policy makers to understand derivatives, because the types and uses of derivatives have exploded in the last few decades, and because these financial instruments can provide both social benefits and cause social harms. This Article presents …
A Precedent Built On Sand: Norcon V. Niagra Mohawk,
2013
Columbia Law School
A Precedent Built On Sand: Norcon V. Niagra Mohawk, Victor P. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
Under the common law, a contracting party could only demand assurance of performance if the other party was insolvent. If a party had reasonable grounds for insecurity, the UCC Section 2-609 allowed it to demand adequate assurance even if the counterparty were solvent. The Restatement (Second) adopted the same rule for non-goods. In NorCon v. Niagara Mohawk the New York court extended the adequate assurance doctrine for some non-goods contracts. Although the decision seems to imply that there is some relation between the NorCon facts and its conclusion as to the law, there is none. Relying primarily on material available …
Drafting Arbitration Agreements: A Practioner's Guide For Consumer Credit Contracts,
2013
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Drafting Arbitration Agreements: A Practioner's Guide For Consumer Credit Contracts, Nicole F. Munro, Peter L. Cockrell
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
Sex Matters: Considering Gender In Consumer Contracting,
2013
University of Colorado School of Law
Sex Matters: Considering Gender In Consumer Contracting, Amy J. Schmitz
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
We hear about the so-called "War on Women" and persisting salary gaps between men and women in the popular media, but contracts scholars and policymakers rarely discuss gender. Instead, dominant voices in the contracts field often reflect classical and economics-driven theories built on assumptions of gender neutral and economically rational actors. Furthermore, many mistakenly assume that market competition and antidiscrimination legislation address any improper biases in contracting. This Article therefore aims to shed light on gender's importance by distilling data from my own e-survey of Colorado consumers along with others' research regarding gender differences in contract outcomes, interests and behaviors. …
Larry From The Left: An Appreciation,
2013
Saint Louis University School of Law
Larry From The Left: An Appreciation, Matthew T. Bodie, Grant M. Hayden
All Faculty Scholarship
This essay approaches the scholarship of the late Professor Larry Ribstein from a progressive vantage point. It argues that Ribstein's revolutionary work upended the "nexus of contracts" theory in corporate law and provided a potential alternative to the regulatory state for those who believe in worker empowerment and anti-cronyism. Progressive corporate law scholars should look to Ribstein's scholarship not as a hurdle to overcome, but as a resource to be tapped for insights about constructing a more egalitarian and dynamic economy.
How Markets Work: The Lawyer’S Version,
2013
Duke Law School
How Markets Work: The Lawyer’S Version, Mitu Gulati, W. Mark C. Weidemaier
Faculty Scholarship
In this article, we combine two sources of data to shed light on the nature of transactional legal work. The first consists of stories about contracts that circulate widely among elite transactional lawyers. Surprisingly, the stories portray lawyers as ineffective market actors who are uninterested in designing superior contracts, who follow rather than lead industry standards, and who depend on governments and other outside actors to spur innovation and correct mistakes. We juxtapose these stories against a dataset of sovereign bond contracts produced by these same lawyers. While the stories suggest that lawyers do not compete or design innovative contracts, …
Constraints On Private Benefits Of Control: Ex Ante Control Mechanisms Versus Ex Post Transaction Review,
2013
Columbia Law School
Constraints On Private Benefits Of Control: Ex Ante Control Mechanisms Versus Ex Post Transaction Review, Ronald J. Gilson, Alan Schwartz
Faculty Scholarship
We ask how to regulate pecuniary private benefit consumption. These benefits can compensate controlling shareholders for monitoring managers and investing effort in implementing projects. Controlling shareholders may consume excessive benefits, however. We argue (a) ex post judicial review of controlled transactions dominates ex ante restrictions on the controlled structures: the latter eliminate efficiencies along with abuses of the controlled company form; (b) controlling shareholders should be permitted to contract with investors over private benefit levels. Both work with better courts. Hence, we recommend creating a European-level corporate court, whose jurisdiction parties can invoke by contract.
Freedom Of Contracts,
2013
Columbia Law School
Freedom Of Contracts, Hanoch Dagan, Michael Heller
Faculty Scholarship
“Freedom of contracts” has two components: (1) the familiar freedom to bargain for terms within a contract and (2) the long-neglected freedom to choose from among contract types. Theories built on the first freedom have reached an impasse; attention to the second points toward a long-elusive goal, a liberal and general theory of contract law. This theory is liberal because it develops an appealing conception of contractual autonomy grounded in the actual diversity of contract types. It is general because it explains how contract values – utility, community, and autonomy – properly relate to each other across contract types. Finally, …
