Deal Momentum,
2017
S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah
Deal Momentum, Cathy Hwang
Utah Law Faculty Scholarship
Why do parties use non-binding agreements? This Article explores the role of nonbinding preliminary agreements in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) deals. It provides a modern, comprehensive account of how and why sophisticated parties use these common bargaining tools, even when they have the option of using binding contracts.
In M&A deals, parties enter into non-binding preliminary agreements, such as term sheets and letters of intent. Once parties sign a non-binding agreement, they behave as though bound and almost always follow up with a formal contract with terms that closely resemble the non-binding agreement’s terms. Scholars and courts have long treated …
Conspicuous Philanthropy: Reconciling Contract And Tax Laws,
2017
Southern Illinois University School of Law
Conspicuous Philanthropy: Reconciling Contract And Tax Laws, William A. Drennan
American University Law Review
It sold for $15 million, and the IRS treated it as worthless. Avery Fisher, a titan of industry and a lover of classical music, made a generous contribution to renovate a charity's building, and in exchange the charity agreed to name the building after Fisher in perpetuity. Forty years later, the Fisher family sold the naming rights back to the charity for $15 million in cash. The IRS treats these publicity rights as worthless when charities grant them, and this generates substantial tax benefits for the donor and the donor's family. In contrast, the common law can treat these publicity …
Bsl Holdings, Llc Et Al., Order On Defendants' Motions To Dismiss And Motions For More Definite Statement,
2017
Fulton County Superior Court, Judge
Bsl Holdings, Llc Et Al., Order On Defendants' Motions To Dismiss And Motions For More Definite Statement, Elizabeth E. Long
Superior Court of Fulton County: Metro Atlanta Business Case Division Opinions
No abstract provided.
Redefining Roles And Duties Of The Transactional Lawyer: A Narrative Approach,
2017
University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law
Redefining Roles And Duties Of The Transactional Lawyer: A Narrative Approach, Lori D. Johnson
Scholarly Works
Today’s transactional lawyers perform myriad tasks for their clients, including structuring, drafting, conceptualizing, negotiating, and executing the complex, risky, and often cutting-edge transactions their clients bring to the table. On the other side of that table, often sits another team of sophisticated transactional lawyers. These opposing counsel are armed for battle over every nuance, every word, every representation, every deliverable, and every obligation their client is poised to undertake or agree to. Therefore, modern transactional lawyers must behave as advocates and explore new modes of persuasion. As a response, scholars have begun to propose that transactional lawyers employ methods of …
Electronic Signatures In Agriculture: Law, Guidelines, And Recommendations,
2017
John Deere Global Law Services Group
Electronic Signatures In Agriculture: Law, Guidelines, And Recommendations, John Hughes, Sangramsinh Shinde, John L. Brown
Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law
No abstract provided.
Why Arbitration Clauses May Make Sense In Cyber Insurance Policies,
2017
JAMS
Why Arbitration Clauses May Make Sense In Cyber Insurance Policies, Andrew Nadolna, Adrienne Publicover, Daniel Garrie
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
In this Article, we will argue that policyholders should ask for an arbitration clause in their cyber policies and negotiate over the terms. We will also argue that insurers should offer more options in this space. In this regard, modular arbitration clauses can prove useful for both sides and lead to an effective dispute resolution mechanism for dealing with what may turn out to be a flood of cyber coverage disputes.
We will start with a discussion of the principal objections policyholders often have to mandatory arbitration clauses. Then we will discuss why some of these objections may cut differently …
Taxing Greed,
2017
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School
Taxing Greed, Genevieve Tokić
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
Appeals to greed in support of various tax proposals are often seen in response to populist moods in politics. Such appeals may be used to garner political support for a policy or proposal. However, there has been little academic consideration of the role of greed (or attitudes towards greed) in the law, and in tax law in particular. This Article seeks to fill that gap by taking a close look at the concept of greed. In doing so, the Article first surveys the history of greed and its meaning, and draws on political philosophy and economic literature to provide a …
An Empirical Study Of Law Journal Copyright Practices, 16 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 207 (2017),
2017
UIC School of Law
An Empirical Study Of Law Journal Copyright Practices, 16 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 207 (2017), Brian Frye, Christopher Ryan, Franklin Runge
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
This article presents an empirical study of the copyright practices of American law journals in relation to copyright ownership and fair use, based on a 24-question survey. It concludes that many American law journals have adopted copyright policies that are inconsistent with the expectations of legal scholars and the scope of copyright protection. Specifically, many law journals have adopted copyright policies that effectively preclude open-access publishing, and unnecessarily limit the fair use of copyrighted works. In addition, it appears that some law journals may not understand their own copyright policies. This article proposes the creation of a Code of Copyright …
The Concurrent Liability In Contract And Tort Under U.S. And English Law: To What Extent Plaintiff Is Entitled To Recover For Damages Under Tort Claim?,
2017
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
The Concurrent Liability In Contract And Tort Under U.S. And English Law: To What Extent Plaintiff Is Entitled To Recover For Damages Under Tort Claim?, Phutchaya Numngern
Maurer Theses and Dissertations
Both U.S. and English courts has confronted with the concurrent situations mostly occurring in the cases where 1) the plaintiff asks for the recovery in tort claim despite the existence of contractual relationship or 2) the plaintiff asserts contract claim but the defendant contends that the issue at bar should be sound in tort rather than in contract. After studying all relevant cases and academic writings, this thesis found that both U.S. and English systems generally recognize concurrent tort claim as an elective right. The courts have attempted to provide the justified rationales either to allow the plaintiffs tort claim …
Guide To Land Contracts: Forestry Projects,
2017
Columbia Law School, Columbia Center on Sustainable Development
Guide To Land Contracts: Forestry Projects, International Senior Lawyers Project, Kaitlin Y. Cordes, Sam Szoke-Burke
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment Staff Publications
Agricultural investment contracts and forestry projects can be complex, with complicated provisions that are difficult to understand. To assist non-lawyers in better understanding agricultural investment contracts, such as those available on the Open Land Contracts repository, CCSI has developed a Guide to Land Contracts: Forestry Projects.
This Guide, prepared by International Senior Lawyers Project staff and volunteers in collaboration with the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, aims to assist the Open Land Contracts repository users in unpacking the technical provisions and language typically found in forestry contracts in order to better understand the contracts and the potential implications of …
Differing Perceptions? Market Practice And The Evolution Of Foreign Sovereign Immunity,
2017
Duke Law School
Differing Perceptions? Market Practice And The Evolution Of Foreign Sovereign Immunity, W. Mark C. Weidemaier, Mitu Gulati
Faculty Scholarship
The 20th century witnessed a transformative, “tectonic” shift in international law, from “absolute” to “restrictive” theories of sovereign immunity. As conventionally understood, however, this dramatic transformation represented only a shift in the default rule. Under absolute immunity, national courts could not hear lawsuits and enforce judgments against a foreign sovereign without its consent. Under restrictive immunity, foreign sovereigns were presumptively not immune when they engaged in commercial acts. We demonstrate that market practices undermine this conventional understanding. Using an extensive, two-century data set of contracts between foreign governments and private creditors, we show that contracting parties have long treated absolute …
Restructuring Sovereign Debt After Nml V. Argentina,
2017
Duke Law School
Restructuring Sovereign Debt After Nml V. Argentina, Lee C. Buchheit, G. Mitu Gulati
Faculty Scholarship
The decade and a half of litigation that followed Argentina’s sovereign bond default in 2001 ended with a great disturbance in the Force. A new creditor weapon had been uncloaked: The prospect of a court injunction requiring the sovereign borrower to pay those creditors that decline to participate in a debt restructuring ratably with any payments made to those creditors that do provide the country with debt relief.
For the first time holdouts succeeded in fashioning a weapon that could be used to injure their erstwhile fellow bondholders, not just the sovereign issuer. Is the availability of this new weapon …
Mandatory Arbitration In Consumer Finance And Investor Contracts,
2017
University of Michigan Law School
Mandatory Arbitration In Consumer Finance And Investor Contracts, Michael S. Barr
Book Chapters
This chapter focuses on the use of mandatory pre-dispute arbitration clauses in a subset of consumer contracts – those involving consumer finance and investor products and services. Arbitration clauses are pervasive in financial contracts – for credit cards, bank accounts, auto loans, broker-dealer services, and many others. In the wake of the recent financial crisis, Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank). Dodd-Frank authorises the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to prohibit or condition the use of arbitration clauses in consumer finance and investment contracts, …
Consumer Internet Standard Form Contracts In India: A Proposal,
2017
Cornell Law School
Consumer Internet Standard Form Contracts In India: A Proposal, Robert A. Hillman
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
India's burgeoning Internet commerce sector has made consumers susceptible to standard-form contracts. Due to the slim likelihood of consumers reading the terms, vendors may often draft heavy-handed terms in the contracts, thereby adversely impacting consumer interests. The Indian legal framework in this regard is inadequate. This article evaluates the existing suggestions on standard-form contracts and argues that none of them safeguard consumer interests sufficiently. Instead, based on the American Law Institutes' Principles of the Law of Software Contracts, the article proposes a disclosure approach that would benefit the interests of Indian consumers engaged in commerce on the Internet.
Rediscovering Liberty Of Contract: The Unnoticed Economic Right Contained In The Freedom Of Speech,
2017
University of Notre Dame Law School
Rediscovering Liberty Of Contract: The Unnoticed Economic Right Contained In The Freedom Of Speech, Steven C. Begakis
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
The liberty of contract formation is a form of speech, and thus it is a right guaranteed by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.This Article examines how the First Amendment secures the liberty of contract formation and analyzes how that liberty is supported by the U.S. Supreme Court’s commercial speech jurisprudence and by both originalist and traditionalist theories of Constitutional interpretation.
Egg Donation: Whether A Woman Has A Property Right In Her Own Egg And How Donors Should Be Taxed,
2017
Loyola Law School, Los Angeles
Egg Donation: Whether A Woman Has A Property Right In Her Own Egg And How Donors Should Be Taxed, Richard Gano
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Battle Over Corporate Bylaws,
2017
Loyola Law School, Los Angeles
The Battle Over Corporate Bylaws, Ariel Beverly
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Police Union Contracts,
2017
Loyola University Chicago School of Law
Police Union Contracts, Stephen Rushin
Faculty Publications & Other Works
This Article empirically demonstrates that police departments' internal disciplinary procedures, often established through the collective bargaining process, can serve as barriers to officer accountability.
Policymakers have long relied on a handful of external legal mechanisms like the exclusionary rule, civil litigation, and criminal prosecution to incentivize reform in American police departments. In theory, these external legal mechanisms should increase the costs borne by police departments in cases of officer misconduct, forcing rational police supervisors to enact rigorous disciplinary procedures. But these external mechanisms have failed to bring about organizational change in local police departments. This Article argues that state labor …
Illiberty Of Contract,
2017
California Western School of Law
Illiberty Of Contract, Donald J. Smythe
Faculty Scholarship
The term “liberty of contract” is usually associated with the doctrine that the due process clause of the United States Constitution prohibits or should prohibit the State from regulating contracts between private individuals. Many libertarians and free-market advocates embrace the liberty of contract doctrine because they are averse to State interference with private market transactions. But the term is ironic because a contract is only legally binding if courts will enforce it. Since courts derive their authority because they are the third branch of government, they are State actors and contractual enforcement involves the exercise of the State’s powers of …
Contracting Correctness: A Rubric For Analyzing Morality Clauses,
2017
University of Miami
Contracting Correctness: A Rubric For Analyzing Morality Clauses, Patricia SáNchez Abril, Nicholas Greene
Washington and Lee Law Review
Morality clauses give a contracting party the right to terminate if the other party behaves badly or embarrassingly. A curious product of twentieth-century Hollywood, these contract clauses have traditionally been used to control the antics of entertainers and athletes. The current politically-sensitive historical moment, combined with the internet’s ability to broadcast widely and permanently, has put everyone’s off-duty speech, conduct, and reputation under the microscope. Media reports detailing people’s digital falls from grace abound. For fear of negative association, businesses are more attuned than ever to the extracurricular acts of their agents and associates—and are increasingly binding them to morality …
