Bespoke Discovery,
2018
University of Richmond
Bespoke Discovery, Jessica Erickson
Law Faculty Publications
The U.S. legal system gives contracting parties significant freedom to customize the procedures that will govern their future disputes. With forum selection clauses, parties can decide where they will litigate future disputes. With fee-shifting provisions, they can choose who will pay for these suits. And with arbitration clauses, they can make upfront decisions to opt out of the traditional legal system altogether. Parties can also waive their right to appeal, their right to a jury trial, and their right to file a class action. Bespoke procedure, in other words, is commonplace in the United States.
Far less common, however, are …
Contractarian Theory And Unilateral Bylaw Amendments,
2018
University of Virginia Law School
Contractarian Theory And Unilateral Bylaw Amendments, Albert H. Choi, Geeyoung Min
Ira M. Millstein Center for Global Markets and Corporate Ownership
Corporate directors have been utilizing a potent mechanism in dealing with shareholder activism and shareholder litigation: the right to unilaterally amend corporate bylaws. Directors have exercised this right, for instance, to impose various requirements on who can nominate a director or call a special shareholder meeting, or to designate an exclusive forum where the shareholders can bring suit. Based on the theory that corporate charters and bylaws constitute a “contract” between the shareholders and the corporation, courts have blessed many of the bylaws that directors have unilaterally adopted. This Article examines the contractarian theory by drawing a parallel between amending …
Fiduciary Principles In Agency Law,
2018
Duke Law School
Fiduciary Principles In Agency Law, Deborah A. Demott
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Deal Structure,
2018
Brigham Young University Law School
Deal Structure, Cathy Hwang, Matthew Jennejohn
Faculty Scholarship
Modern commercial contracts—those governing mergers and acquisitions and financial derivatives, for instance—have become structurally complex and interconnected. Yet contract law largely ignores structural complexity. This Article develops a theory of “contractual structuralism” to explain the important role of structure in every aspect of contract law, from the design of a contract to courts’ interpretation and enforcement.
For generations, scholars have debated whether a court should consider only the text of a contract or also consider broader context to determine parties’ intent. More recently, scholars have shown that parties can choose between textual and contextual interpretation by drafting a contract provision …
2017 Government Contract Law Decisions Of The Federal Circuit,
2018
American University Washington College of Law
2017 Government Contract Law Decisions Of The Federal Circuit, Dennis J. Callahan, Lauren B. Kramer, Lucas T. Hanback, Stephen L. Bacon
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interpreting Contracts Without Context,
2018
University of North Carolina School of Law
Interpreting Contracts Without Context, John Coyle, W. Mark C. Weidemaier
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Shareholder Voting And The Symbolic Politics Of Corporation As Contract,
2018
Saint Louis University School of Law
Shareholder Voting And The Symbolic Politics Of Corporation As Contract, Matthew T. Bodie, Grant M. Hayden
All Faculty Scholarship
American corporations are structured in such a way that shareholders, and shareholders alone, have the right to vote in all significant corporate decisions. Over the years, this exclusive shareholder franchise has been supported by an ongoing procession of justifications. But as those arguments have fallen by the wayside, shareholder primacists have circled back and latched upon a final argument for the special voting status of shareholders, arguing that this fundamental feature of corporate governance is the product of the set of freely-bargained-for agreements among all corporate constituents. Because this set of agreements reflects the preferences of all parties to the …
International Contracts,
2018
Saint Louis University School of Law
International Contracts, William P. Johnson, Sabin Volciuc-Ionescu, Catalin-Sergiu Dinu, Katya Logunov, Adrián Lucio Furman, Adam Rose, Willem Den Hertog
All Faculty Scholarship
This article identifies some of the key developments for international contracts that occurred in 2017 in a variety of jurisdictions, with particular attention given to commercial relationships that arise in connection with product distribution. Specifically, in this article we cover developments concerning international sales law (the CISG), choice of law in Romania, franchising in Canada, termination of commercial agency in Argentina, a court decision on scope of commercial agency law in the UK, and the creation of a new commercial court in the Netherlands.
One Judge's Legacy And The New York Court Of Appeals: Mr. Justice Cardozo And The Law Of Contracts,
2018
Touro Law Center
One Judge's Legacy And The New York Court Of Appeals: Mr. Justice Cardozo And The Law Of Contracts, Meredith R. Miller
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Remedies In The Ucc: Some Critical Thoughts,
2018
Columbia Law School
Remedies In The Ucc: Some Critical Thoughts, Victor P. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
I thank the conference organizers and the law review for giving me the opportunity to vent some of my frustrations with the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). I have expressed my concerns with the Code’s overreliance on “custom and usage” elsewhere, and will not pursue that further here. Nor will I bemoan the Code’s invocation of good faith to undo the parties’ balancing of flexibility and reliance. I will confine my discussion to contract remedies. But I have to begin by noting one section I simply do not understand. Why on earth would the Code drafters in § 2–718(2)(b) have required …
The Middleman’S Damages Revisited,
2018
Columbia Law School
The Middleman’S Damages Revisited, Victor P. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
If A promises to sell to B who, in turn, promises to sell to C and either A or C breaches should B receive the gain it expected had both transactions occurred (lost profits) or the larger market/contract differential? Recent case law and commentary argues for the lost profit remedy. The argument is that there is a conflict between awarding market damages and making the nonbreacher whole. This paper argues that there is no conflict. If B were a broker, and C breached, then A would have an action against C for market damages. If B were party to the …
The Lost Volume Seller In English Law,
2018
Columbia Law School
The Lost Volume Seller In English Law, Victor P. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
If a buyer breaches a contract but the market price has remained unchanged, English courts and the treatises have treated the seller as a “lost volume seller.” The seller, it is argued, could have had two sales, not one, so it lost the profit on the second sale. This paper recognizes that the buyer has an option to terminate and that the contract prices that option. The implicit option price of the lost volume remedy results in an absurd contract, setting the option price high when it should be low and vice versa. The default rule ought to be the …
Why Autonomy Must Be Contract's Ultimate Value,
2018
Tel Aviv University
Why Autonomy Must Be Contract's Ultimate Value, Hanoch Dagan, Michael A. Heller
Faculty Scholarship
In “The Choice Theory of Contracts”, we develop a liberal theory of contract law. One core task of the book was to persuade advocates of economic analysis that they must situate their enterprise within our liberal framework. Autonomy, rightly understood, is the telos of contract.
Oren Bar-Gill pushes back strongly in “Choice Theory and the Economic Analysis of Contracts”. He offers a penetrating – perhaps devastating – critique of our approach. Bar-Gill notes the substantial convergence between choice theory and a welfarist view. If he is right, then what does choice theory add?
Our task in Part I of this …
Reckoning Contract Damages: Valuation Of The Contract As An Asset,
2018
Columbia Law School
Reckoning Contract Damages: Valuation Of The Contract As An Asset, Victor P. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
When a contract is breached the law in most jurisdictions provides some version of the aphorism that the non-breaching party should be made whole. Application of the aphorism has proven problematic, particularly for anticipatory repudiations. This paper argues for a general principle that should guide application – the contract is an asset and the problem is one of valuation of the change in value of that asset at the time of the breach. This provides a framework that will help clear up some conceptual problems in damage assessment. The focus is on direct damages, not consequential damages.
The paper begins …
Antitrust Enforcement Against Platform Mfns,
2018
American University Washington College of Law
Antitrust Enforcement Against Platform Mfns, Jonathan Baker, Fiona M. Scott Morton
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
Antitrust enforcement against anticompetitive platform most favored nations (MFN) provisions (also termed pricing parity provisions) can help protect competition in online markets. An online platform imposes a platform MFN when it requires that providers using its platform not offer their products or services at a lower price on other platforms. These contractual provisions may be employed by online platforms offering hotel and transportation bookings, consumer goods, digital goods, and handmade craft products. They have been the subject of antitrust enforcement in Europe but have drawn only limited antitrust scrutiny in the U.S. Our paper explains why MFNs employed by online …
Consequential Damages And Exclusion Clauses,
2018
Columbia Law School
Consequential Damages And Exclusion Clauses, Victor P. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
Contracts often include language excluding compensation for consequential damages. However, the boundary between consequential and direct damages is a blurry one. Courts have used concepts like foreseeability, natural result of the breach, and collateral business in their attempts to define the boundary. Those categories, I argue, are not particularly helpful. I consider three classes of cases: wrongful termination, delay, and breach of warranty. This paper argues that lost profits, when referring to the change in value of the contract after a wrongful termination would be direct damages; the hard case involves terminated dealers who had been paid indirectly for retailing …
Southern States Chemical Inc., Final Order Granting Defendants' Summary Judgment,
2017
Fulton County Superior Court
Southern States Chemical Inc., Final Order Granting Defendants' Summary Judgment, Alice D. Bonner
Superior Court of Fulton County: Metro Atlanta Business Case Division Opinions
No abstract provided.
Palm Papers,
2017
City University of New York (CUNY)
Palm Papers, Nicole Rothwell
Capstones
The Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) came into possession of a secret dataset of property owners of the Palm Islands, the elite high-end artificial islands on the coast of Dubai.
With over 250 neighborhoods on Dubai’s waterfront, a group of journalists around the world has been investigating who these individuals are that can afford the posh and pricey real estate. While most fall into the uber-rich category, some also have corrupt to criminal backgrounds leading to questions such as if the Palm Islands are truly a real-estate paradise, or instead a refuge for the corrupt.
The task for …
Sovereign Debt Restructuring And English Governing Law,
2017
Brooklyn Law School
Sovereign Debt Restructuring And English Governing Law, Steven L. Schwarcz
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
The problem of sovereign indebtedness is becoming a worldwide crisis because nations, unlike individuals and corporations, lack access to bankruptcy laws to restructure unsustainable debt. Decades of international efforts to solve this problem through contracting and attempted treaty-making have failed to provide an adequate debt-restructuring framework. A significant amount of outstanding sovereign debt is governed, however, by English law. This Article argues that the U.K. Parliament has the extraordinary power to help solve the problem of unsustainable country debt by changing English law to facilitate fair and consensual debt restructuring. This Article also proposes modifications to English law that Parliament …
United States V. Osage Wind, Llc,
2017
Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana
United States V. Osage Wind, Llc, Summer Carmack
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Osage Nation, as owner of the beneficial interest in its mineral estate, issues federally-approved leases to persons and entities who wish to conduct mineral development on its lands. After an energy-development company, Osage Wind, leased privately-owned surface lands within Tribal reservation boundaries and began to excavate minerals for purposes of constructing a wind farm, the United States brought suit on the Tribe’s behalf. In the ensuing litigation, the Osage Nation insisted that Osage Wind should have obtained a mineral lease from the Tribe before beginning its work. In its decision, the Tenth Circuit applied one of the Indian law …
