The Duty Dilemma: When The Duty To Mitigate Damages And The Duty To Preserve Evidence Collide,
2019
University of Oklahoma College of Law
The Duty Dilemma: When The Duty To Mitigate Damages And The Duty To Preserve Evidence Collide, Collen L. Steffen
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Internet Of Torts: Expanding Civil Liability Standards To Address Corporate Remote Interference,
2019
University of Richmond - School of Law
The Internet Of Torts: Expanding Civil Liability Standards To Address Corporate Remote Interference, Rebecca Crootof
Law Faculty Publications
Thanks to the proliferation of internet-connected devices that constitute the “Internet of Things” (“IoT”), companies can now remotely and automatically alter or deactivate household items. In addition to empowering industry at the expense of individuals, this remote interference can cause property damage and bodily injury when an otherwise operational car, alarm system, or implanted medical device abruptly ceases to function.
Even as the potential for harm escalates, contract and tort law work in tandem to shield IoT companies from liability. Exculpatory clauses limit civil remedies, IoT devices’ bundled object/service nature thwarts implied warranty claims, and contractual notice of remote interference …
Central Clearing Of Financial Contracts: Theory And Regulatory Implications,
2019
Duke Law School
Central Clearing Of Financial Contracts: Theory And Regulatory Implications, Steven L. Schwarcz
Faculty Scholarship
To protect economic stability, post-crisis regulation requires financial institutions to clear and settle most of their derivatives contracts through central counterparties, such as clearinghouses associated with securities exchanges. This Article asks whether regulators should expand the central clearing requirement to non-derivative financial contracts, such as loan agreements. The Article begins by theorizing how and why central clearing can reduce systemic risk. It then examines the theory’s regulatory and economic efficiency implications, first for current requirements to centrally clear derivatives contracts and thereafter for deciding whether to extend those requirements to non-derivative contracts. The inquiry has real practical importance because the …
Is There A First-Drafter Advantage In M&A?,
2019
Duke Law School
Is There A First-Drafter Advantage In M&A?, Adam B. Badawi, Elisabeth De Fontenay
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Advanced Artificial Intelligence And Contract,
2019
Touro Law Center
Advanced Artificial Intelligence And Contract, John Linarelli
Scholarly Works
The aim of this article is to inquire whether contract law can operate in a state of affairs in which artificial general intelligence (AGI) exists and has the cognitive abilities to interact with humans to exchange promises or otherwise engage in the sorts of exchanges typically governed by contract law. AGI is a long way off but its emergence may be sudden and come in the lifetimes of some people alive today. How might contract law adapt to a situation in which at least one of the contract parties could, from the standpoint of capacity to engage in promising and …
Contract Creep,
2019
Touro Law Center
Contract Creep, Tal Kastner, Ethan J. Leib
Scholarly Works
Scholars and judges think they can address the multiple purposes and values of contract law by developing different doctrinal regimes for different transaction types. They think if we develop one track of contract doctrine for sophisticated parties and another for consumers, we can build a better world of contract: protecting private ordering for sophisticated parties and protecting consumers’ needs all at once. Given the growing enthusiasm for laying down these separate tracks and developing their infrastructures, this Article brings a necessary reality check to this endeavor by highlighting for scholars and judges how doctrine in contract law functions in fact: …
Defining Law,
2019
Touro Law Center
Defining Law, Tal Kastner
Scholarly Works
Commenting on Chaim Saiman’s book, Halakhah: The Rabbinic Idea of Law, this essay views the difficulty of defining halakha as indicative of the universal challenge of defining the bounds of what constitutes “law.” Considering the dynamic of contingent norms, social context, history, and narrative that shapes the meaning of law, it focuses on a series of decisions by a federal district court judge in connection with the case of Bayless v. United States (1996) involving the sufficiency of reasonable suspicion to justify a police stop. Tracing the slippage in this case between holding and dicta, among other sources of authority …
The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly Of Online Reviews: The Trouble With Trolls And A Role For Contract Law After The Consumer Review Fairness Act,
2019
Texas A&M University School of Law
The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly Of Online Reviews: The Trouble With Trolls And A Role For Contract Law After The Consumer Review Fairness Act, Wayne R. Barnes
Georgia Law Review
The advent of the internet has brought innumerable
innovations to our lives. Among the innovations is the
meteoric rise in the volume of e-commerce conducted on
the internet. Correspondingly, consumer-posted
information about merchants, goods, and services has
also become a rich source of information for consumers
researching a purchase online. This information takes
many forms, but a major category is the narrative review
describing the purchase and experience. Such reviews
are posted on websites such as Yelp, Amazon, and
TripAdvisor, on apps, and on social media such as
Facebook and Twitter. The amount and volume of
reviews has exploded in …
Voluntary Obligation And Contract,
2019
Fordham University Law School
Voluntary Obligation And Contract, Aditi Bagchi
Faculty Scholarship
Absent mistake or misrepresentation, most scholars assume that parties who agree to contract do so voluntarily. Scholars tend further to regard that choice as an important exercise in moral agency. Hanoch Dagan and Michael Heller are right to question the quality of our choices. Where the fundamental contours of the transaction are legally determined, parties have little opportunity to exercise autonomous choice over the terms on which they deal with others. To the extent that our choices in contract do not reflect our individual moral constitutions — our values, virtues, vices, the set of reasons we reject and the set …
Online Terms As In Terrorem Devices,
2019
St. Mary's University School of Law
Online Terms As In Terrorem Devices, Colin P. Marks
Faculty Articles
Online shopping has quickly replaced the brick-and-mortar experience for a large portion of the consuming public. The online transaction itself is rote: browse items, add them to your cart, and check out. Somewhere along the way, the consumer is likely made aware of (or at least exposed to) the merchant's terms and conditions, via either a link or a pop-up box. Such terms and conditions have become so ubiquitous that most consumers would be hardpressed to find a merchant that doesn't try to impose them somewhere on their website.
Though such terms and conditions are pervasive, most consumers do not …
From The Courtroom To The Classroom: How A Litigator Became A Transactional Drafting Professor,
2019
University of Colorado Law School
From The Courtroom To The Classroom: How A Litigator Became A Transactional Drafting Professor, Amy Bauer
Publications
No abstract provided.
The New Social Contracts In International Supply Chains,
2019
American University Washington College of Law
The New Social Contracts In International Supply Chains, David Snyder
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
This Article considers, from legal, practical, moral, and policy perspectives, Model Contract Clauses (MCCs) to protect the human rights of workers in international supply chains. The product of the ABA Business Law Section Working Group to Draft Human Rights Protections in International Supply Contracts, the MCCs are an effort to provide companies with carefully researched and well-drafted clauses to incorporate human rights policies into supply contracts (purchase orders, master vendor agreements, and the like). The Article discusses the impetus, goals, and strategies of the MCCs and explains the paradigm of the corporate, operational, and political landscape for which they are …
Contracts Are Like Snowflakes,
2019
American University Washington College of Law
Contracts Are Like Snowflakes, David Spratt
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Choice Theory: A Restatement,
2019
Columbia Law School
Choice Theory: A Restatement, Michael A. Heller, Hanoch Dagan
Faculty Scholarship
This chapter restates choice theory, which advances a liberal approach to contract law. First, we refine the concept of autonomy for contract. Then we address range, limit, and floor, three principles that together justify contract law in a liberal society. The first concerns the state’s obligation to be proactive in facilitating the availability of a multiplicity of contract types. The second refers to the respect contract law owes to the autonomy of a party’s future self, that is, to the ability to re-write the story of one’s life. The final principle concerns relational justice, the baseline for any legitimate use …
Freedom, Choice, And Contracts,
2019
Tel Aviv University
Freedom, Choice, And Contracts, Hanoch Dagan, Michael A. Heller
Faculty Scholarship
In “The Choice Theory of Contracts,” we explain contractual freedom and celebrate the plurality of contract types. Here, we reply to critics by refining choice theory and showing how it fits and shapes what we term the “Contract Canon”.
I. Freedom. (1) Charles Fried challenges our account of Kantian autonomy, but his views, we show, largely converge with choice theory. (2) Nathan Oman argues for a commerce-enhancing account of autonomy. We counter that he arbitrarily slights noncommercial spheres central to human interaction. (3) Yitzhak Benbaji suggests that choice theory’s commitment to autonomy is overly perfectionist. Happily, in response to Benbaji, …
Three By Posner,
2019
Columbia Law School
Three By Posner, Victor P. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
If Richard Posner did not invent the term “efficient breach,” he at least was its most aggressive marketer. I confess that nowadays I do not find the concept particularly useful, but that does not detract from its value. It was a catalyst, forcing scholars to consider the economic function of contract remedies. Any assessment of Judge Posner’s contracts jurisprudence must acknowledge that contribution.
In this paper, I will consider three of his opinions that appear with some regularity in contracts casebooks – Northern Indiana Public Service Company v. Carbon County Coal Company, Empire Gas v. American Bakeries, and Lake River …
Divergence And Convergence At The Intersection Of Property And Contract,
2019
Columbia Law School
Divergence And Convergence At The Intersection Of Property And Contract, Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci, Carmine Guerriero
Faculty Scholarship
In this Article, we study rules that solve the conflict between the original owner and an innocent buyer of a stolen or embezzled good. These rules balance the protection of the original owner’s property and the buyer’s reliance on contractual exchange, thereby addressing a fundamental legal and economic trade-off. Our analysis is based on a unique, hand-collected dataset on the rules in force in 126 countries. Using this data, we document and explain two conflicting trends. There is a large amount of first-order divergence: both rules that apply to stolen goods and those that apply to embezzled goods vary widely …
The Private Law Critique Of International Investment Law,
2019
University of Michigan Law School
The Private Law Critique Of International Investment Law, Julian Arato
Articles
This Article argues that investment treaties subtly constrain how nations organize their internal systems of private law, including laws of property, contracts, corporations, and intellectual property. Problematically, the treaties do so on a one-size-fits-all basis, disregarding the wide variation in values reflected in these domestic legal institutions. Investor-state dispute settlement exacerbates this tension, further distorting national private law arrangements. This hidden aspect of the system produces inefficiency, unfairness, and distributional inequities that have eluded the regime's critics and apologists alike.
Aliera Healthcare, Inc., Order Entering Temporary Restraining Order,
2018
Fulton County Superior Court
Aliera Healthcare, Inc., Order Entering Temporary Restraining Order, Alice D. Bonner
Superior Court of Fulton County: Metro Atlanta Business Case Division Opinions
No abstract provided.
Curb Your Enthusiasm: The Real Implications Of Blockchain In The Legal Industry,
2018
Pepperdine University
Curb Your Enthusiasm: The Real Implications Of Blockchain In The Legal Industry, Justin Evans
The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law
No abstract provided.
