Constitutional Law Commons^™

Huppert, Reilly, And The Increasing Futility Of Relying On The First Amendment To Protect Employee Speech, John Q. Mulligan

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.

Faulty Foundations: How The False Analogy To Routine Fingerprinting Undermines The Argument For Arrestee Dna Sampling, Corey Preston

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

No abstract provided.

November 30,2010: There Is No G-O-D In America, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “There is no G-o-d in America“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

The Constitutional Right To Informational Privacy: Nasa V. Nelson, Russell T. Gorkin

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar

No abstract provided.

Minister Of Justice V. Zohar, Dorit Beinisch, Eliezer Rivlin, Edna Arbel, Esther Hayut, Salim Joubran, Miriam Naor, Elyakim Rubinstein, Edmond E. Levy, Yoram Danziger

Translated Opinions

Facts: The respondent was convicted of various crimes and sentenced to life imprisonment in 1996, after which he was given additional sentences for crimes committed while on leave from jail. In 2004, he applied to the then-President of the State, Moshe Katzav, to reduce the duration of his sentence. Although the Minister of Justice at the time (Tzipi Livni) recommended that the application be denied, the President signed a letter limiting the respondent’s sentence to 32 years. The Minister of Justice refused to countersign the document approving the reduced sentence, as did other Ministers of Justice who served after …

November 25, 2010: Happy Thanksgiving, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “Happy Thanksgiving“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

November 23, 2010: Religion, Art, Science And Philosophy Are Invitations, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “ Religion, Art, Science and Philosophy Are Invitations“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

Rethinking The Order Of Battle In Constitutional Torts: A Reply To John Jeffries, Nancy Leong

NULR Online

The Supreme Court’s decision in Pearson v. Callahan ended an eight-year experiment in the adjudication of qualified immunity claims. That experiment began with Saucier v. Katz, in which the Court held that lower courts mustdecide whether a government officer violated a plaintiff’s constitutional rights before addressing the question of whether the government officer was entitled to immunity. The Court’s rationale for requiring lower courts to first address the merits was the need to clarify constitutional law for the benefit of both government actors (who could then better conform their behavior to constitutional standards) and future plaintiffs (who could then …

November 20, 2010: The Task Of Secularism, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “The Task of Secularism“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

Is A Mentally Ill Defendant Still Considered Competent To Waive The Right To Counsel In New York After Indiana V. Edwards?, John H. Wilson

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

November 18, 2010: “Getting Honest”, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, ““Getting Honest” “ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

November 16, 2010: How Is Reality God-Like?, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “How is Reality God-Like?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

November 14, 2010: Global Warming, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “Global Warming“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

November 11, 2010: So, What About God?, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “So, What About God?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

November 7, 2010: How To Fix The Establishment Clause, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “How to Fix the Establishment Clause“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

November 5, 2010: “Let The Free Market Reign”, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, ““Let the Free Market Reign”“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

November 3, 2010: Pat Tommey A Citizens United Victory, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “Pat Tommey a Citizens United Victory“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.

No Direction Home: Constitutional Limitations On Washington's Homeless Encampment Ordinances, Jordan Talge

Washington Law Review

The Washington State Constitution protects the free exercise of religion. It also vests strong police power in local governments. When these two constitutional provisions conflict, the Washington State Supreme Court must draw the line between valid police power action and impermissible burden on free exercise. In City of Woodinville v. Northshore United Church of Christ, a municipal government crossed that line. The City of Woodinville, Washington refused to consider a church’s application to host a homeless encampment. The Court held this outright refusal to be an unjustified infringement on the church’s free exercise of religion. The Court did not, …

"The People" Of The Second Amendment: Citizenship And The Right To Bear Arms, Pratheepan Gulasekaram

Faculty Publications

The Supreme Court's recent Second Amendment decision, District of Columbia v. Heller asserts that the Constitution's right to bear arms is an individual right to armed self-defense held by law-abiding “citizens.” This Article examines the implications of this description, concluding that the Second Amendment cannot concurrently be a right of armed self-defense and restricted to citizens. The Article proceeds in three parts. First, it analyzes the term "the people" as it has been interpreted in recent Court cases. The Article concludes that constitutional text and Supreme Court jurisprudence provide no sustainable basis to believe the Second Amendment is limited …

Teens, Porn, And Video Games: Is It Time To Rethink Ginsberg?, John A. Humbach

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

This term the Supreme Court will decide whether states can constitutionally ban sales of violent videogames to minors. In reaching its decision, the Court will inevitably be faced with how to deal with Ginsberg v. New York, the case that allowed states to forbid sales of non-obscene (constitutionally "protected") pornography to persons under age 17.

The opinion in Ginsberg, if not the result, is an odd duck in First Amendment jurisprudence. It is a case that applied "rational basis" review in an area where the Supreme Court now insists on strict scrutiny. But the Court predicated its use of rational …