Constitutional Law Commons^™

Judicial Gatekeeping And The Seventh Amendment: How Daubert Infringes On The Constitutional Right To A Civil Jury Trial, Brandon L. Boxler

Richmond Public Interest Law Review

This Article begins by reviewing the history, purpose, and function of the Seventh Amendment within the American constitutional system. It then discusses the Supreme Court's analytical framework for preserving the fundamental features of the right to a civil jury trial while simultaneously permitting rational legal development of the jury system. Next, the Article provides a brief overview of the Court's Daubert jurisprudence, and argues that the creation of judicial gatekeeping has caused an institutional shift of adjudicatory authority away from juries and into the hands of judges in violation of the Seventh Amendment. The Article concludes by suggesting three legal …

Reasoning About The Irrational: The Roberts Court And The Future Of Constitutional Law, H. Jefferson Powell

Faculty Scholarship

Commentary on the future direction of the Roberts Court generally falls along lines that correlate with the commentators' political views on the desirability of the Court's recent decisions. A more informative approach is to look for opinions suggesting changes in the presuppositions with which the Justices approach constitutional decision making. In footnote 27 in his opinion for the Court in the District of Columbia v. Heller Second Amendment decision, Justice Scalia suggested a fundamental revision of the Court's assumptions about the role of judicial doctrine, and the concept of rationality, in constitutional law. Justice Scalia would eliminate the normative aspects …

The Regrettable Clause: United States V. Comstock And The Powers Of Congress, H. Jefferson Powell

Faculty Scholarship

In this Article, Powell argues that in Comstock, the Court encountered one of the oldest and most basic constitutional issues about the scope of congressional power-whether there are justiciable limits to the range of legitimate ends Congress may pursue. The Justices, without fully recognizing the fact, were taking sides in an ancient debate, and in doing so, they inadvertently reopened an issue that ought to be deemed long settled. Part II of the Article first addresses the question before the Court in Comstock, which was limited to a pure question of Article I law: is a specific provision of a …

Original Habeas Redux, Lee B. Kovarsky

Faculty Scholarship

This article explores what is perhaps the Supreme Court’s most exotic appellate power— its authority to issue (inaptly-named) “original” writs of habeas corpus. Although I have been working on Original Habeas Redux for some time, the Troy Davis case has recently thrust this topic into the national spotlight. In Davis (2009), the Supreme Court exercised, for the first time in over forty years, its power to transfer an original habeas petition to a district court for merits adjudication. Having collected and tabulated two decades of new data, I argue that Davis is not a blip in an otherwise constant state …

Advocacy, True Threats, And The First Amendment, Mark Strasser

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Brandenburg v. Ohio is thought by many to represent an extremely speech-protective doctrine. Yet, much of the protection offered by Brandenburg can easily be swallowed up by the true threat doctrine, which provides the basis for a robust exception to First Amendment protections. Both the Brandenburg protections and the true threat exception are important to maintain-the great challenge for the Court is to include both within the formulation and articulation of First Amendment jurisprudence so that sufficient protection is afforded to the implicated societal and the individual interests represented by each. Regrettably, rather than provide helpful guidelines that would establish …

Associations And Forums: Situating Cls V. Martinez, Ashutosh Bhagwat

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

This article explores certain problematic aspects of the Supreme Court's modern First Amendment doctrine through the lens of the Court's 2010 decision in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez. In Martinez the Court upheld a decision by Hastings College of the Law, a public law school, to deny official recognition to a religious student group because the group excluded students based on their religion and sexual orientation. Applying free speech doctrine, the Court found that the Hastings's decision and the policy underlying it were reasonable, viewpoint-neutral restrictions on speech in a limited public forum. While the result reached by the Martinez …

Christian Legal Society V. Martinez: Six Frames, Toni M. Massaro

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

In Christian Legal Society v. Martinez, the United States Supreme Court upheld the Hastings Law School registered student organization ("RSO") policy, which required that all student groups comply with a nondiscrimination condition on RSO status and benefits. Viewing the case as a matter of government benefits, the Court held that the Christian Legal Society ("CLS") was obliged to comply with an "all-comers" condition on access to benefits, despite the burden on CLS members' expressive associational, free speech and religious freedom to organize around religious beliefs. According to the Court, the policy was a reasonable and viewpoint neutral condition on access …

How Equality Constitutes Liberty: The Alignment Of Cls V. Martinez, Julie A. Nice

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Across the constitutional doctrines protecting individual liberty from governmental interference, judicial inquiry often focuses on the unequal infringement of liberty. Many of the most important individual rights have emerged from the synergy between equality and liberty. But the Court has not yet provided any framework for understanding the various ways that liberty and equality interrelate. Neither has any consensus developed around any scholarly attempt to understand the relationship between liberty and equality. Without any grand theory, the search for understanding this important relationship is thus left to induction, as scholars examine one case at a time to glean both specific …

Protecting Surface Land By Internalizing The Cost Of Oil And Gas Development: Wyoming's Surface Owner Accommodation Act Strikes A More Sustainable Balance, Jennifer A. Richardson

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Split estate mineral lands have been well established in the United States since 1900, but state legislatures have only recently begun to reexamine whether damages to the surface estate should be paid for by the surface owner or instead by the mineral developer. The Wyoming Surface Owner Accommodation Act ("WSOAA") is one such state law that allows surface owners to be compensated for impacts to the surface estate's value beyond the compensation provided for by federal law. However, unlike the preempted mining regulations of several other states, the WSOAA supplements federal regulations in a permissible manner because it does not …

Changes To The Culture Of Adversarialness: Endorsing Candor, Cooperation And Civility In Relationships Between Prosecutors And Defense Counsel, Lissa Griffin, Stacy Caplow

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

The newest revision of the influential ABA Standards for the Prosecution and Defense Function recognizes the changing practices and attitudes in today's criminal justice system. Placing even more responsibility on prosecutors than past versions, the proposed Standards require prosecutors to be problem-solvers and reformers who consult and cooperate with defense counsel when engaging in both routine and systemic matters. These changes signal new responsibilities for prosecutors that call for more than lip service to their role as administrators of justice. Candor, cooperation and civility are now explicit values that should pervade all dealings between prosecutors, defense lawyers and courts.

Lochner V. New York (1905) And Kennedy V. Louisiana (2008): Judicial Reliance On Adversary Argument, Douglas E. Abrams

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist called Lochner v. New York "one of the most ill-starred decisions that [the Supreme Court] ever rendered." The Justices' deliberations in the case demonstrate the courts' reliance on advocacy in the adversary system of civil and criminal justice. The stark imbalance between the state's "incredibly sketchy" brief and Joseph Lochner's sterling submission may have determined Lochner's outcome, and thus may have changed the course of constitutional history, by leading two Justices to join the majority on the central question of whether New York's maximum-hours law for bakery workers was a reasonable public health measure.

The …

Secure In Their Yards - Curtilage, Technology, And The Aggravation Of The Poverty Exception To The Fourth Amendment, Amelia L. Deidrich

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Throughout the history of American jurisprudence, curtilage-the physical space surrounding a home-has been deemed to share the heightened Fourth Amendment protections that have traditionally been applied to the home itself. However, a recent trend in United States Supreme Court decisions has carved out an exception to the heightened Fourth Amendment protection of curtilage. In cases involving an alleged Fourth Amendment search where technological advancements were used in the intrusion of a defendant's curtilage, the Court fails to apply the traditionally heightened Fourth Amendment protections to curtilage. This change threatens to aggravate the already present Poverty Exception to the Fourth Amendment …

Whose Constitution Is It Anyway - The Executives' Discretion To Defend Initiatives Amending The California Constitution, Jeremy Zeitlin

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

The decision of then Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown to refuse to appeal the United States District Court's findings in Perry v. Schwarzenegger, striking down Proposition 8 as unconsitutional, was a bare assertion of executive power. Although plainly contrary to the will of the majority of the electorate who implemented Proposition 8, the Governor and Attorney General's decision was lawful because it stemmed from the wide discretionary powers that the California Constitution and the Government Code grant to the state's executive officers. Instead, the only check to the particular manner executives wield their discretionary authority is the …

Too Big To Fail And Too Big To Pay: States, Their Public-Pension Bills, And The Constitution, Debra Brubaker Burns

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Faced with the most severe budget crises since the Great Depression, many state officials and lawmakers within the United States are desperately trying to pay their bills and balance their budgets. More than a few economists, reporters, academicians, lawyers, and politicians are arguing about legal solutions for pension liabilities that are too big to pay, including possible federal bailouts for states that are deemed "too big to fail."

States choosing to default on or repudiate any public-pension obligation would face significant legal challenges to any action that impaired those pensions. Beyond the protections of the Constitution's Contract Clause, state constitutional …

Does A Broad Free Exercise Right Require A Narrow Definition Of Religion, Donald L. Beschle

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

The Supreme Court case of Employment Division v. Smith revived an older view of the Constitution's Free Exercise Clause that protected believers only from government acts aimed at beliefs specifically, where those acts grew out of hostility to the religious belief rather than a desire to advance or protect otherwise legitimate nonreligious goals. This reversion to a previously discarded standard by the Supreme Court was much criticized, and states around the country sought to undo its effect by enacting and applying strict scrutiny standards for governmental regulation of religious belief despite there no longer being a Free Exercise exemption.

This …

Top-Down Or Bottom-Up? A Look At The Unification Of Private Law In Federal Systems, Daniel Halberstam, Mathias Reimann

Book Chapters

At its current stage, European private law is still more an aspiration than a reality. It is true that there is a substantial body of European private law on the Union level; and it is also true that there are private law principles and rules shared by many—often by most, and sometimes even by all—European legal systems. Still, in most areas, we do not at present have one body of positive private law for all of Europe, but rather a coexistence of more or less similar national laws. Thus, to the extent one considers a European private law desirable, one …

Constituent Authority, Richard Kay

Faculty Articles and Papers

The force of a constitution, like the force of all enacted law, derives, in significant part, from the circumstances of its enactment. Legal and political theory have long recognized the logical necessity of a “constituent power.” That recognition, however, tells us little about what is necessary for the successful enactment of an enduring constitution. Long term acceptance of a constitution requires a continuing regard for the process that brought it into being. There must be, that is, recognition of the “constituent authority” of the constitution-makers. This paper is a consideration of the idea of “constituent authority” drawing on a comparison …

Independent Newspapers, Inc. V. Brodie: Maryland's Precarious Balance Between Internet Defamation And The Right To Eanonymity, Bryce Donohue

Journal of Business & Technology Law

No abstract provided.

State Constitutional Design And Education Reform: Process Specification In Louisiana, Scott R. Bauries

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

As to education, the Louisiana Constitution contains the familiar general mandate for the establishment of a public school system, now ubiquitous among state constitutions. But unlike the founding documents of any of the other states, Louisiana's constitution also provides for a very specific process-based allocation of the responsibilities for determining appropriations levels in education from year to year.

It is well-known that state constitutions often treat numerous—sometimes trivial—subjects, or contain provisions that seem hyper-specific and statutory, rather than foundational and constitutional, and state constitutions have been roundly criticized (and sometimes defended) for these features. In this Article, I argue that …

State Constitutions And Individual Rights: Conceptual Convergence In School Finance Litigation, Scott R. Bauries

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

This Article begins by reviewing Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld's “fundamental conceptions” and expanding his theory to the arena of state constitutional rights, building on recent work by other scholars. From this foundation, it moves to a discussion of the sources of rights to education. The Article then examines the text of relevant state constitutional provisions, as well as the ever-changing landscape of school finance litigation, the principal vehicle through which litigants assert constitutional claims based on ostensible education rights. Next, it systematically analyzes the population of reported cases from the highest state courts to identify Hohfeldian conceptions of education rights held …