The Thirteenth Amendment And Constitutional Theory,
2011
Rutgers Camden School of Law
The Thirteenth Amendment And Constitutional Theory, Earl Maltz
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
The Thirteenth Amendment And The Meaning Of Familial Bonds,
2011
University at Albany, Department of Political Science
The Thirteenth Amendment And The Meaning Of Familial Bonds, Julie Novkov
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
States Rights, Southern Hypocrisy, And The Crisis Of The Union,
2011
Albany Law School
States Rights, Southern Hypocrisy, And The Crisis Of The Union, Paul Finkelman
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
Contract, Race, And Freedom Of Labor In The Constitutional Law Of "Involuntary Servitude",
2011
Rutgers Law School- Newark
Contract, Race, And Freedom Of Labor In The Constitutional Law Of "Involuntary Servitude", James G. Pope
Schmooze 'tickets'
The Supreme Court has yet to adopt and apply a standard for assessing labor rights claims under the involuntary servitude clause. This article suggests that one may be found in the leading decision of Pollock v. Williams (1944), which contains the Court’s most thorough discussion of the interpretive issues. Under Pollock, a claimed right should be protected if it is necessary to provide workers with the “power below” and employers the “incentive above” to prevent “a harsh overlordship or unwholesome conditions of work.” Although this is not the only conceivable standard, it does fit well with the text, history, and …
The Enduring Legacy Of The Thirteenth Amendment,
2011
Fordham University School of Law
The Enduring Legacy Of The Thirteenth Amendment, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
James Ashley And The Thirteenth Amendment,
2011
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
James Ashley And The Thirteenth Amendment, Rebecca E. Zietlow
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
A Grievance Based Interpretation Of The Thirteenth Amendment,
2011
University of Iowa College of Law
A Grievance Based Interpretation Of The Thirteenth Amendment, Lea Vandervelde
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
The Reconstruction Power,
2011
Yale Law School
Slavery And The Phenomenology Of Torture,
2011
University of Texas School of Law
Slavery And The Phenomenology Of Torture, Sanford Levinson
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Politics, Constitutional Law, And The Thirteenth Amendment,
2011
Ohio State University
Constitutional Politics, Constitutional Law, And The Thirteenth Amendment, Michael Les Benedict
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
February 26, 2011: The Power Of The President Not To Defend The Law,
2011
Duquesne University
February 26, 2011: The Power Of The President Not To Defend The Law, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “The Power of the President Not to Defend the Law“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
February 25, 2011: Is Unitarian Universalism The Answer?,
2011
Duquesne University
February 25, 2011: Is Unitarian Universalism The Answer?, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Is Unitarian Universalism the Answer?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
A Father’S Presence: Flores-Villar V. United States And Equal Protection,
2011
Duke Law
A Father’S Presence: Flores-Villar V. United States And Equal Protection, Jeffrey Hochstetler
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
No abstract provided.
February 20, 2011: What Is Behind The Republican Assault On Public Sector Unions?,
2011
Duquesne University
February 20, 2011: What Is Behind The Republican Assault On Public Sector Unions?, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “What is Behind the Republican Assault on Public Sector Unions?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
Scribble Scrabble, The Second Amendment, And Historical Guideposts: A Short Reply To Lawrence Rosenthal And Joyce Lee Malcolm,
2011
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
Scribble Scrabble, The Second Amendment, And Historical Guideposts: A Short Reply To Lawrence Rosenthal And Joyce Lee Malcolm, Patrick J. Charles
NULR Online
In a recent article Professors Lawrence Rosenthal and Joyce Lee Malcolm provided an intriguing debate over the standard of scrutiny that should be applied to restrictions on the Second Amendment in the wake of McDonald v. City of Chicago. This Article sets forth to illuminate two aspects of that debate. The first is Professor Rosenthal’s concern on the constitutionality of open-carry or conceal-carry prohibitions. He inaccurately claims that the founders left insufficient historical evidence to support such prohibitions. Thus this Article addresses those concerns through the use of “historical guideposts.” The second aspect this Article sets forth to address …
February 17, 2011: Shari’Ah And Constitutionalism,
2011
Duquesne University
February 17, 2011: Shari’Ah And Constitutionalism, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Shari’ah and Constitutionalism“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
Lacking Swiss Precision: The First-Sale Doctrine In Costco V. Omega,
2011
Duke Law
Lacking Swiss Precision: The First-Sale Doctrine In Costco V. Omega, Justin Yedor
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
No abstract provided.
February 13, 2011: Happy Darwin Day,
2011
Duquesne University
February 13, 2011: Happy Darwin Day, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “Happy Darwin Day“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
So How Did We Get Into This Mess? Observations On The Legitimacy Of Citizens United,
2011
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law
So How Did We Get Into This Mess? Observations On The Legitimacy Of Citizens United, Alexander Polikoff
NULR Online
How did the American body politic allow business corporations to threaten members of Congress by saying, credibly, “Do what we want or we’ll bury you!”?
On January 21, 2010, the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission interpreted the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment to permit corporations to spend unlimited amounts of money to support or oppose their chosen candidates. "[A] lobbyist," said the front page of the next day’s New York Times, "can now tell any elected official that [if you vote wrong,] my company, labor union or interest group will spend unlimited sums explicitly …
February 9, 2011: What Does It Mean To Ban State Courts Use Of Sharia Or Other Foreign Law?,
2011
Duquesne University
February 9, 2011: What Does It Mean To Ban State Courts Use Of Sharia Or Other Foreign Law?, Bruce Ledewitz
Hallowed Secularism
Blog post, “What Does it Mean to Ban State Courts Use of Sharia or Other Foreign Law?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.
