Constitutional Law Commons^™

Making A Mountain Out Of A Molehill - Marbury And The Construction Of The Constitutional Canon, Keith E. Whittington, Amanda Rinderle

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

This article challenges the notion that Marbury v. Madison was a critical case immediately after the Supreme Court issued its decision in 1803. The article performs an empirical analysis of the quantity and quality of citations invoking Marbury over the years to determine its importance and impact at various points in American history. Additionally, the article looks at how the case has been, and continues to be used by courts.

Perception Profiling & Prolonged Solitary Confinement Viewed Through The Lens Of The Angola 3 Case: When Prison Officials Become Judges, Judges Become Visually Challenged, And Justice Becomes Legally Blind, Angela A. Allen-Bell

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Solitary confinement is a tool used by the American prison system without a sufficient check on its application. Current practice provides that an inmate's solitary confinement is reviewed at regular intervals by Executive-branch prison administrators. They have employed it to enforce discipline and order in the prison population, but simultaneously have ridden roughshod over inmates' substantive due process rights by failing to provide a meaningful opportunity for a hearing of the facts and justifications for the continued and prolonged solitary confinement of prison inmates. Many, too many inmates have been kept in solitary confinement for extended periods-some for decades-without any …

Putting State Courts In The Constitutional Driver's Seat: State Taxpayer Standing After Cuno And Winn, Edward A. Zelinsky

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

In DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno and Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn, the U.S. Supreme Court definitively terminated the possibilities of taxpayer standing previously opened by the Warren Court in Flast v. Cohen.

under the U.S. Constitution governing state taxes and outlays. This body of constitutional law will be beyond the direct review of the U.S. Supreme Court because that Court has rejected state taxpayer standing in the federal courts.

State court judges will be more inclined than their federal counterparts to uphold state tax and expenditure policies against constitutional challenge. Consequently, these state-friendly cases under the U.S. Constitution, …

Communications Disruption And Censorship Under International Law: History Lessons, Jonathon Penney

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

With Internet censorship on the rise around the world, a variety of tools have proliferated to assist Internet users to circumvent such censorship. However, there are few studies examining the implications of censorship circumvention under international law, and its related politics. This paper aims to help fill some of that void, with an examination of case studies wherein global communications technologies have been disrupted or censored — telegram cable cutting and censorship, high frequency radio jamming, and direct broadcast satellite blocking — and how the world community responded to that disruption or censorship through international law and law making. In …

Open Connectivity, Open Data: Two Dimensions Of The Freedom To Seek, Receive And Impart Information In The New Zealand Bill Of Rights, Jonathon Penney

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

Recently, ideas about "rights" to Internet access or connectivity have received growing recognition from governments, legal institutions, and other political actors in several countries, including New Zealand Despite this emerging political and legal recognition, there are few, if any, systematic studies exploring such ideas. This paper aims to change this. First, it offers a theoretical exploration of the idea of a "right" to Internet access, including the diferent versions of such rights talk. Secondly, it examines whether there is any legal basis for such rights claims in New Zealand and ultimately argues that section 14 of the New Zealand Bill …

Charter Without Borders? The Supreme Court Of Canada, Transnational Crime And Constitutional Rights And Freedoms, Robert Currie

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

The first decades of the Supreme Court of Canada's Charter jurisprudence have coincided roughly with an increase in the extent to which Canada is affected by transnational crime and the nation's consequential participation in inter-state efforts to combat it. The court itself has remarked on its discrete "jurisprudence on matters involving Canada's international co-operation in criminal investigations and prosecutions." This article examines the Court's adoption of a different approach to Charter analysis in cases involving transnational elements and surveys where the Court has "drawn the line" in terms of Charter application. By way of analyzing jurisprudence on exclusion of evidence …

Communications Disruption And Censorship Under International Law: History Lessons, Jonathon Penney

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

With Internet censorship on the rise around the world, a variety of tools have proliferated to assist Internet users to circumvent such censorship. However, there are few studies examining the implications of censorship circumvention under international law, and its related politics. This paper aims to help fill some of that void, with an examination of case studies wherein global communications technologies have been disrupted or censored — telegram cable cutting and censorship, high frequency radio jamming, and direct broadcast satellite blocking — and how the world community responded to that disruption or censorship through international law and law making. In …

Insecure Refugees: The Narrowing Of Asylum-Seeker Rights To Freedom Of Movement And Claims Determination Post-9/11 In Canada, Constance Macintosh

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

This chapter has a modest goal: to track some legislative changes since 9/11 which impact on two rights of asylum-seekers where those changes are linked to or justified by security concerns. These are the rights of asylum-seekers to have their claim determined, and to not be detained. This article identifies how legislation restricting these key rights of asylum-seekers has largely been promoted as necessary for Canada to be able to protect its public from criminality and security threats. The article thus queries whether measures, especially those introduced under Bill C-11, The Balanced Refugee Reform Act and those proposed under Bill …

Funding Port-Related Infrastructure And Development: The Current Debate And Proposed Reform, Christopher T. Cook

Fordham Urban Law Journal

Given the lack of consensus and certainty in how funding should best be generated to meet critical infrastructure and development needs, this Note proposes an amendment to the Shipping Act to provide port authorities with the express power to impose fees for the construction, operation, and maintenance of qualifying port-related infrastructure and development initiatives. The amendment would effectively spread the costs specific to qualifying initiatives over the useful life of the project. Part I discusses the relevant provisions and judicial standards associated with the Tonnage Clause and Shipping Act. Part II addresses the efforts by both Congress and port authorities …

Interpretive Contestation And Legal Correctness, Matthew D. Adler

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Slavery In The United States: Persons Or Property?, Paul Finkelman

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

A Constitutional Dilemma For Cities Seeking To Regulate Day Labor Solicitation, Monica Smith

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

In 2011, the Ninth Circuit invalidated a Redondo Beach municipal ordinance that prohibited individuals from standing on streets or sidewalks and soliciting work, business, or contributions from passing vehicles. The court determined that the law was a facial restriction of speech that did not advance the achievement of the city's stated interest.

This note examines the unsettling gaps in the law as a result of the decision. Although undoubtedly a victory for day laborers, the court's holding potentially precludes any future statute seeking to legitimately regulate such day labor solicitation. Unless crafted with tremendous care, there is a strong likelihood …

Herding Katz: Gps Tracking And Society's Expectations Of Privacy In The 21st Century, Zachary Gray

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

For nearly forty-four years, the Supreme Court has adhered to the same test for its Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, first announced in Justice Harlan's concurrence in Katz v. United States. Despite the judiciary's steadfast use of the test since its enunciation, the decisions since Katz have been anything but consistent.

Most recently, this nation's federal courts were confronted with questions about the legitimacy of using GPS tracking devices. In its attempt to resolve the issue, the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Jones strayed from applying Katz and instead relied on the common-law trespass doctrine.

In an attempt to determine …

Tea Party Constitutionalism: Does The Astroturf Have Roots In The History Of The Constitution, Ryan D. Murphy

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

In 2009, the Tea Party was born-a movement that in just over a year captured a United States senate seat and more than 700 state legislature seats. The movement is a controversial force in American politics, with some arguing that the group merely challenges the moderate tendencies of the Republican Party, while others say it is merely a set of individuals acting at the whims of billionaire backers.

This note argues that the background of the Tea Party is not an originalist movement, as is often claimed, but is instead rooted in Jacksonian populism. Specifically, in assessing the movement's views …

The Sky Is Still Not Falling, Richard D. Friedman

Articles

Cases since Crawford have mainly fallen into two categories. One involves accusations of crime, made by the apparent victim shortly after the incident. In Michigan v. Bryant, a majority of the Court adopted an unfortunately constricted view of the word "testimonial" in this context. That decision was a consequence of the Court having failed to adopt a robust view of when an accused forfeits the confrontation right. How the Court will deal with this situation-one mistake made in an attempt to compensate for another-is a perplexing and important question. This Essay, though, concentrates on the other principal category of post-Crawford …

How The Gun-Free School Zones Act Saved The Individual Mandate, Richard A. Primus

Articles

For all the drama surrounding the Commerce Clause challenge to the in-dividual mandate provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”), the doctrinal question presented is simple. Under existing doctrine, the provision is as valid as can be. To be sure, the Supreme Court could alter existing doctrine, and many interesting things could be written about the dynamics that sometimes prompt judges to strike out in new directions under the pressures of cases like this one. But it is not my intention to pursue that possibility here. My own suspicion, for what it is worth, is that the …

On Overreaching, Or Why Rick Perry May Save The Voting Rights Act But Destroy Affirmative Action, Ellen D. Katz

Articles

The State of Texas is presently staking out two positions that are not typically pursued by a single litigant. On the one hand, Texas is seeking the invalidation of the Voting Rights Act, and, on the other, the State is now defending the validity of the expansive race-based affirmative action policy it uses at its flagship university. This Essay presses the claim that Texas has increased the chance it will lose in bothTexas v. Holder andFisher v. University of Texas because it has opted to stake out markedly extreme positions in each. I argue that Texas would be more likely …

John Hart Ely: An Influential Constitutional Scholar—Protecting "Flag Desecration" Under The First Amendment, Mohammed Saif-Alden Wattad

Barry Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Constitutional Imaginary: Just Stories About We The People, Gerald Torres, Lani Guinier

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Convicting Lennie: Mental Retardation, Wrongful Convictions, And The Right To A Fair Trial, John H. Blume, Sheri Lynn Johnson, Susan E. Millor

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

"Lennie" refers to Lennie Small, the intellectually disabled character in John Steinbeck's famous novella Of Mice and Men, which tells the story of two Depression-era wandering farmhands, George and Lennie, who dream of getting their own stake and living "off the fat of the land." Their dream dies hard when Lennie accidently kills the young, beautiful, and flirtatious wife of a ranch owner's son and then tries to cover it up because he realizes that he has "done a bad thing." George, in turn, kills Lennie to prevent him from being lynched or tried for murder.

Lennie was doomed …